Eventing Risk Management Programme Statistics ( )

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Eventing Risk Management Programme Statistics ( )"

Derrick Webb
5 years ago
Views:

1 q Eventing Risk Management Programme ( ) 1 1

CONTENTS COMPETITIONS Statistics 2005-2015 01 STARTERS Statistics 2005

2 CONTENTS COMPETITIONS Statistics STARTERS Statistics FALLS Statistics INJURY Statistics

3 COMPETITIONS COMPETITIONS 3

4 COMPETITIONS Competitions per Competition Level Year Total number 1* 2* 3* 4* number % number % number % number % % % % 5 1.4% % % % 6 1.5% % % % 5 1.2% % % % 7 1.6% % % % 6 1.4% % % % 7 1.5% % % % 6 1.1% % % % 6 1.1% % % % 6 1.1% % % % 7 1.1% % % % 6 0.9% 4

5 COMPETITIONS Competitions per Competition Format Year Total number CICs number % number % CCIs % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5

6 COMPETITIONS Key Facts Total number of competitions keeps growing with a 85% increase from 2005 to As from 2011 the total number of competitions include multiple sections. The distribution between the competition formats has remained relatively stable. In 2015, 67% of competitions were CICs versus 33% CCIs as opposed to 66% for CICs and 34% for CCIs in Pony competitions are not included. 6

7 STARTERS 7

8 STARTERS Starters per Competition Level Year Total starters 1* 2* 3* 4* starters % Starters % starters % starters % ,542 6, % 4, % 1, % % ,660 6, % 4, % 2, % % ,661 6, % 4, % 2, % % ,268 7, % 4, % 2, % % ,206 6, % 4, % 2, % % ,698 7, % 5, % 2, % % ,312 7, % 5, % 2, % % ,456 7, % 5, % 2, % % ,808 8, % 5, % 2, % % ,210 9, % 6, % 2, % % ,351 9, % 6, % 3, % % Number of competitions processed for 2015 is 668 out of 684 (2.33% unprocessed for lack of information received). All the following figures (starters, falls, injuries, etc.) relate to that dataset. 8

9 STARTERS Average Starters per Competition Level All 1* 2* 3* 4* Year Starters Compet. levels starters starters starters starters Starters , , , , , , , , , , ,

10 STARTERS Starters per Competition Format Year Total starters CICs Starters % Starters % CCIs ,542 7,779 62% 4,763 38% ,660 7,807 57% 5,853 43% ,661 7,761 57% 5,900 43% ,268 8,445 59% 5,823 41% ,206 8,556 60% 5,650 40% ,698 9,664 62% 6,034 38% ,312 10,308 63% 6,004 37% ,456 10,121 65% 5,335 35% ,808 11,790 66% 6,018 34% ,210 12,634 66% 6,576 34% ,351 14,010 69% 6,341 31% 10

11 STARTERS Average Starters per Competition Format Year CICs Starters Compet. Average Starters Compet. Average CCIs , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

12 STARTERS Key Facts Total number of starters keeps growing with a 62% increase from 2005 to The average number of starters per competition is 30. As from 2011 the total number of competitions include multiple sections. Distribution of starters per star level remains basically unchanged with an average of 47.5% for one star, 34.2% for two star, 16.6% for three star and 1.7% for four star. The starters at one star level represent nearly 50% of the total number of starters in FEI competitions and together with the two star level make up 80% of the total number of starters. Within the overall increased number of starters the distribution between format shows a stable trend with approximately 69% CICs and 31% CCIs. 12

13 FALLS 13

14 FALLS Total falls per competition level and percentage of total falls on starters Year Total 1* 2* 3* 4* starters falls % Falls % Falls % falls % falls % , % % % % % , % % % % % , % % % % % , % % % % % Average % 4.39% 6.50% 8.54% 13.77% 1 every x starters Target % 3.90% 5.78% 7.72% 12.43% Alert level 10.80% 7.79% 11.56% 15.44% 24.86% , % % % % % , % % % % % , % % % % % , % % % % % , % % % % % Average % 4.48% 5.52% 6.90% 11.83% 1 every x starters Target % 3.90% 5.78% 7.72% 12.43%% Alert level 10.80% 7.79% 11.56% 15.44% 24.86% ,210 1, % % % % % ,351 1, % % % % % 14

15 FALLS Falls per competition format and percentage of falls on starters Year Total CICs CCIs starters falls % starters Falls % starters falls % , % 7, % 4, % , % 7, % 5, % , % 7, % 5, % , % 8, % 5, % , % 8, % 5, % , % 9, % 6, % , % 10, % 6, % , % 10, % 5, % , % 11, % 6, % ,210 1, % 12, % 6, % ,351 1, % 14, % 6, % period 173,172 9, % 108,875 5, % 64,297 4, % 1 every x starters

16 FALLS Falls at fences and on the flat and percentage of total falls Year Total falls At fences On the flat falls % Falls % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % , % % ,140 1, % % period 9,696 9, % % 16

17 FALLS Falls per type and percentage of falls on starters Year Total Unseated riders Horse falls starters falls % Falls % falls % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % ,210 1, % % % ,351 1, % % % period 173,172 9, , % 2, % 1 every x starters

18 FALLS Horse falls per type and percentage of type of falls on starters Year Total horse falls Non rotational Rotational starters falls % Value % value % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % period 173,172 2, % 2, % % 1 every x starters

19 FALLS Key Facts For 2015, the overall percentage of falls (5.60%) has slightly increased compared to 2014 (5.59%), it is slightly higher than the average of 5.37%. The number of falls on the flat has increased for 2015, passing from 10,07 % in 2014 to 12.19% in The average over the period is of 6.98%. The average for the period is of 3.92 unseated riders for every 100 starters (1 unseated rider every 25 starters) and 1.68 horse falls for every 100 starters (1 horse fall every 60 starters). The distribution of falls per competition format shows an established trend with a higher percentage of falls in CCIs with an average for the period of 4.93% for CICs and 6.74% for CCIs. Figures for 2015 show a slight increase of the percentage of unseated riders. However horse falls have decreased from 1.64% in 2014 to 1.41 % in The percentage of horse falls is below the average of the period. The percentage of rotational horse falls (higher risk of injuries for horse and rider) has decreased from 0.45 horse fall every 100 starters (1 rotational horse fall every 224 starters) in 2005 to 0.19 rotational horse fall every 100 starters (1 rotational horse fall every 536 starters) in

20 INJURY 20

21 INJURY Falls per type of injury and percentage of injuries on starters Year Total starters No injury Slight injury Serious and fatal injuries falls % falls % falls % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % ,351 1, % % % period 173,172 8, % % % 1 every x starters every x fences 621 7,593 15,651 21

22 INJURY Distribution of riders seriously/fatally injured per type of fall and percentage on falls Unseated riders Non rotational horse falls Rotational horse falls Year Total starters Falls Seriously injured Falls Seriously injured Falls Seriously injured riders % riders % riders % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % , % % % period 173,172 6, % 2, % % 1 every x falls

23 INJURY Key Facts The numbers and statistics in this section need to be assessed with due care as the reporting on injuries has not always been consistent. The reporting of the type of injury sustained was originally left to the fence judge that could only base his judgment on a first impression which could often be misleading. An improved follow up procedure on injuries has been implemented as of 2010 in order to have more reliable information on the exact injuries sustained by the riders and horses. Therefore, figures from 2010 to 2015 should be considered more reliable, particularly if not compared with the other years. The distribution of falls per competition format shows an established trend with a higher percentage of falls in CCIs with an average for the period of 4.93% for CICs and 6.74% for CCIs. Nevertheless the average values for the period indicate 4.99% falls with no injury every 100 starters (1 fall with no injury every 20 starters), 0.41 % falls with slight injury every 100 starters (1 fall with slight injury every 245 starters), 0.19 falls with serious injury every 100 starters (1 fall with serious injury every 520 starters) and a fatal falls every 100 starters (1 fatal fall every 17,317 starters) 23

24 INJURY Key Facts Figures for 2015 show a slight increase of the percentage of unseated riders. However horse falls have decreased compared with The percentage of horse falls is below the average of the period. Relating the risk of an injury to the number of fences jumped the average of the period shows a risk of a serious injury every 16,121 fences jumped. The relative risk factors for the different types of falls show clearly that the risk of having a serious injury changes dramatically from the unseated rider for whom, as an average of the period, the risk of having a serious injury is once every 55 falls to the rotational horse falls where the average risk of a serious injury is once every 5 falls. 24

25 25

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook ANNUAL STATISTICS SUMMARY 2015 3941 CCC_Road Safety HBook.indd 1 19/08/2016 14:59 Contents Introduction 2 Key points 3 Summary table 4 Overall trends 4