Cambridgeshire Constabulary USE OF FORCE SUMMARY 3 rd Quarter (October December 2018) Oct Nov Dec Total 1245

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Cambridgeshire Constabulary USE OF FORCE SUMMARY 3 rd Quarter (October December 2018) Oct Nov Dec Total 1245"

Noel Stanley Perry
5 years ago
Views:

Cambridgeshire Constabulary USE OF FORCE SUMMARY 3 rd Quarter 2018-19 (October

1 Cambridgeshire Constabulary USE OF FORCE SUMMARY 3 rd Quarter (October December 2018) Cambridgeshire Constabulary No. Oct Nov Dec Total 1245

2 Frequency of Use of Force by Type - Cambridgeshire Constabulary No. % of all records Tactical Communications % Handcuff % UDT % Limb Restraint % PAVA Incapacitant 90 7% Spit Protection 31 2% TASER 49 4% Baton 11 1% Conventional Firearm (inc AEP Baton Launcher) 3 0% Shield (Short, Medium, Long) 4 0% Police Dog 0 0% Improvised %..IN ALL RECORDS % Effectiveness of Use of Force by Type, Techniques used - Cambridgeshire Constabulary No. Effective % of all records Tactical Communications % Handcuff % UDT % Limb Restraint % PAVA Incapacitant % Spit Protection % TASER (1st cartridge, other than Drawn only) % Baton (other than Drawn only) % Conventional Firearm (other than Drawn only, inc AEP Baton Launcher) % Shield (Short, Medium, Long) % Police Dog 0 0 NA Improvised %..IN ALL RECORDS 1245

3 Injury to the Subject as a result of the Use of Force - Minor % Severe 5 5% Fatal / Likely to prove 0 0% All Injury % INJURY TO SUBJECT, % OF ALL RECORDS % SACMILL Referral required 0 MINOR INJURY: Requiring no more than simple first aid, such as a bruise or graze SEVERE INJURY: Requiring medical attention, such as a deep cut, laceration, fracture, damage to internal organ, impairment of any bodily function SACMILL Referral Severe or Fatal injury resulting from TASER or AEP Baton Launcher. These events are referred to the Home Office, for external scrutiny. Use of Force and the Mental Health of the Subject - Use of Force in Mental Health facility 14 1% Mental Health of Subject as 'Impact Factor' in decision to use force Subject was believed to have a Mental Health Disability (not Impact Factor) % %

4 Age range of the Subject of the Use of Force - Aged 10 or under 1 0% White / White British 1 100% % Asian / Asian British 7 9% Black / Black British 5 6% Don't know 2 2% Mixed 8 10% Other ethnic origin 2 2% Unknown 1 1% White / White British 57 70% % Asian / Asian British 38 5% Black / Black British 56 8% Chinese 1 0% Don't know 7 1% Mixed 13 2% Other ethnic origin 53 7% Unknown 1 0% White / White British % % Asian / Asian British 9 3% Black / Black British 13 4% Don't know 2 1% Mixed 2 1% Other ethnic origin 23 8% Unknown 3 1% White / White British % % Asian / Asian British 5 5% Black / Black British 6 6% Don't know 2 2% Mixed 1 1% Other ethnic origin 7 7% White / White British 76 78% 65 and over 6 0% Black / Black British 1 17% White / White British 5 83% Not known / recorded 19 2% Black / Black British 1 5% Don't know 3 16% Other ethnic origin 3 16% Unknown 4 21% White / White British 8 42%

5 Subject perceived ethnicity Asian / Asian British 59 5% Black / Black British 82 7% Chinese 1 0% Don't know 16 1% Mixed 24 2% Other ethnic origin 88 7% White / White British % Not known / recorded 9 1% Gender of the Subject of the Use of Force and the Gender of recording officers - Female Subject % Male Subject % Subject gender not known / recorded 10 1% Officer Gender not known / recorded 1 0% Female Reporting Officer % Male Reporting Officer % Use of Force - Risk / Welfare of the Recording Officer - Officer experienced Body Fluid Transfer 9 1% Officer was Spat upon by the Subject 31 2% Officer was Injured during Use of Force event 89 7% Officer was Intentionally injured by the Subject 51 4% Officer Threatened with Weapon by the Subject 26 2% Officer was Single-crewed / on own at time of first Use of Force Officer had Less than 6 months service at time of record of Use of Force 62 5% %

6 Percentage of all Injury to Recording Officer resulting from their Use of Force - Handcuff 2 4% UDT 27 56% Limb Restraint 5 10% PAVA Incapacitant 1 2% Spit Protection 1 2% TASER 0 0% Baton 0 0% Conventional Firearm (inc AEP Baton Launcher) 0 0% Shield (Short, Medium, Long) 0 0% Police Dog 0 0% Improvised 12 25% Injury to Officer from their Use of Force as % of all records 4% Use of Force by Primary Place of Work of Recording Officer - Cambridge City % East Cambridgeshire 37 3% Fenland 81 7% Huntingdonshire % Other Location 16 1% Parkside Custody 21 2% Peterborough % South Cambridgeshire 12 1% Thorpe Wood Custody 58 5%

7 Use of Force by Primary Location of Use of Force event - Cambridge City % East Cambridgeshire 43 3% Fenland 74 6% Huntingdonshire % Parkside Custody 41 3% Peterborough % South Cambridgeshire 29 2% Thorpe Wood Custody 112 9% Unknown 2 0% Bedfordshire Police area (including Luton Airport) 12 1% Hertfordshire Constabulary area 3 0% Other Force Area 10 1% Use of Force by Duty Type of Recording Officer - Authorised Firearms Officer (AFO) - JPS 33 3% Custody 90 7% Detective duties 6 0% Other Duty Type % Plain Clothes Patrol / Response 38 3% Police Support Unit (PSU) 5 0% Roads Policing - JPS 23 2% Uniform Patrol / Response - Foot and Vehicle % Unknown 5 0% Joint Protective Services (JPS) Sub Total 56 4%

Use of Force Monitoring Form

Use of Force Monitoring Form A record is to be completed as soon as is practicable. A record is to be completed when an officer / member of police staff uses force on any person. If an officer / member