Program Review. Computer Business Applications. Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Program Review. Computer Business Applications. Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness"

Cornelius Gallagher
5 years ago
Views:

1 Program Review Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness

2 Program Review NOTES AND DEFINITIONS... 3 SUMMARY DASHBOARD... 4 STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS... 6 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY ETHNICITY... 6 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER... 7 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY AGE GROUP... 8 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STATUS... 9 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY DISABILITY STATUS...10 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY VETERAN STATUS...11 UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION BY FOSTER YOUTH STATUS...12 ENROLLMENT AND FILL RATE RETENTION AND SUCCESS OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY TERM...15 OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY ACADEMIC YEAR...17 RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY SESSION TYPE...18 RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY ETHNICITY...20 RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY GENDER...23 RETENTION AND SUCCESS OF SPECIAL POPULATION GROUPS...25 FULL TIME AND PART TIME FACULTY DISTRIBUTION CERTIFICATES AND DEGREES AWARDED... 28

3 Notes and Definitions The following data tables and charts have been provided to each department at Golden West College in order to assist them in completing a comprehensive review of each of their programs. Program Review is the primary mechanism by which Golden West College identifies the objectives and resources needed to fulfill our educational mission. It is also an opportunity for each department to document its plans for improving student success and sharing that information with the college community. Each department is asked to review all of its programs (instructional and non instructional) on the same three year cycle. It is important for all departments to participate in the Program Review process, since programs that do not complete a review are not eligible to receive additional funding for one time requests, classified positions, faculty positions, or facilities requests. Enrollment refers to the count of students enrolled in courses in the specified discipline each term or academic year. If a student enrolls in multiple courses in a discipline, they will be counted more than once. o Note: In some cases, enrollment counts differ slightly across the tables included in this report. These minor discrepancies occur, because different data sets are needed for different parts of the report. These unique data sets often contain some small discrepancies. However, the larger trends over the multi year period being reviewed are consistent across the data sets used. Unduplicated headcount refers to the unduplicated count of students enrolled in courses in a given discipline in the specified semester or academic year. It differs from the enrollment count, since students will only be counted once in the unduplicated headcount, even if they enroll in multiple courses in a given discipline. o Note: The unduplicated headcounts included in this report are unduplicated for each academic year by discipline. Counts across disciplines or for the entire college are duplicated. refers to the percentage of students who enrolled in a course in a specified discipline who did not withdraw and received a valid grade. refers to the percentage of students who enrolled in a course in a specified discipline and received a passing or satisfactory grade (defined as grades of A, B, C, P, IA, IB, IC, or IPP). o Note: and success rates are calculated using the duplicated enrollment count of students, since many students enroll in more than one course in a discipline in a given semester.

4 Total Enrolled % of Total Enrolled PROGRAM REVIEW SUMMARY DASHBOARD Gaps in Rates by Student Ethnicity, Academic Year Rate Avg. Rate Rate Gap (Compared to Avg.) ful Completions Lost Am. Indian/Alaska Native % Asian % 56.0% 43.4% 12.6% -- Black or African American % 14.5% 43.4% -28.8% 16 Hispanic % 32.1% 43.4% -11.2% 16 Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander % Two or More % 40.9% 43.4% -2.4% 1 Unknown % White % 46.9% 43.4% 3.5% -- Total 602 Note: For those disciplines that have labs, enrollment data do not include dependent lab sections. In cases where the total enrollment for a particular ethnic group is 10 or less, data have been excluded from the analysis in order to protect individuals' privacy. Column1 Enrollment Total Enrollment Enrollment/Section Average Fill Rate Overall and Three-Year Trend Rates by Student Ethnicity Am. Indian/Alaska Native -- Asian Black or African American Hispanic/Latino Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander -- White Two or More Races -- Unknown -- Rates by Gender Female Male Column1 Enrollment Total Enrollment Enrollment/Section Average Fill Rate Overall and Three-Year Trend Rates by Student Ethnicity Am. Indian/Alaska Native -- Asian Black or African American Hispanic/Latino Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander -- White Two or More Races -- Unknown -- Rates by Gender Female Male Three-Year Trend Summary FALL Awards Certificates Awarded Degrees Awarded SPRING Three-Year Trend Page 4 of 28

PROGRAM REVIEW SUMMARY DASHBOARD 2015-16 Enrollment, Sections, and Fill Rate Certificates and Degrees Awarded Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Ethnicity 2009-2010 2010-2011

5 PROGRAM REVIEW SUMMARY DASHBOARD Enrollment, Sections, and Fill Rate Certificates and Degrees Awarded Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Ethnicity N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Am. Indian/Alaska Native 3 0.4% 7 0.9% 3 0.5% 2 0.4% % % Asian % % % % % % Black or African American % % % % % % Hispanic/Latino % % % % % % Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander 8 1.0% 4 0.5% 5 0.8% 1 0.2% 3 0.7% 2 0.5% Two or More Races % % % % % % Unknown % % % % 8 1.8% 6 1.5% White % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Note: Data are unduplicated for each academic year by discipline. Data across multiple disciplines or for the entire college are duplicated. Page 5 of 28

PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY ETHNICITY Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Ethnicity Unduplicated

Indian/Alaska Native 3 0.4% 7 0.9% 3 0.5% 2 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 286 36.1% 239 30.7% 241 36.3% 205 41.2% 161 35.6% 130 31.

6% 99 24.1% Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander 8 1.0% 4 0.5% 5 0.8% 1 0.2% 3 0.7% 2 0.5% Two or More Races 25 3.2% 27 3.5% 27 4.1% 15 3.0% 15 3.3% 16 3.

6 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY ETHNICITY Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Ethnicity Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Ethnicity N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Am. Indian/Alaska Native 3 0.4% 7 0.9% 3 0.5% 2 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Asian % % % % % % Black or African American % % % % % % Hispanic/Latino % % % % % % Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander 8 1.0% 4 0.5% 5 0.8% 1 0.2% 3 0.7% 2 0.5% Two or More Races % % % % % % Unknown % % % % 8 1.8% 6 1.5% White % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Page 6 of 28

PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY GENDER Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Gender Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Gender N % of Total N % of

7 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY GENDER Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Gender Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Gender N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Female % % % % % % Male % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Note: Observations without a gender indicated were excluded from the analysis. Page 7 of 28

8 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY AGE GROUP Distribution of Student Headcount by y Age g Group p 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 9.2% 8.5% 8.0% 11.0% 9.3% 9.0% 11.1% 11.1% 9.7% 8.3% 14.3% 9.4% 6.3% 5.4% 6.0% 7.6% 5.8% 6.9% 8.7% 6.3% 9.2% 8.0% 9.2% 8.0% 15.3% 16.6% 12.7% 18.8% 18.7% 14.1% 50 or older 40 to to to to to or less 30.0% 34.0% 35.1% 38.4% 36.7% 39.2% 35.5% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 16.2% 13.5% 15.1% 11.7% 12.9% 9.1% Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Age Group N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total 19 or less % % % % % % 20 to % % % % % % 25 to % % % % % % 30 to % % % % % % 35 to % % % % % % 40 to % % % % % % 50 or older % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Page 8 of 28

PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STATUS Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged Status Unduplicated Headcount

9 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STATUS Computer Business Application Distribution of Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged Status Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Economically Disadvantaged Status N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Not Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Page 9 of 28

PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY DISABILITY STATUS Distribution of Student Headcount by Disability Status Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Disability Status N % of Total N %

10 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY DISABILITY STATUS Distribution of Student Headcount by Disability Status Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Student Disability Status N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total No Disability % % % % % % Disability % % % % % % Total % % % % % % Page 10 of 28

11 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY VETERAN STATUS Distribution of Student Headcount by Veteran Status % 99.0% % 98.6% % 98.1% % 96.8% Veteran Not Veteran % 98.2% % 99.5% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Veteran Status N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Not Veteran % % % % % % Veteran 4 0.5% % % 9 1.9% 6 1.4% 4 1.0% Total % % % % % % Page 11 of 28

12 PROGRAM REVIEW UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY FOSTER YOUTH STATUS Distribution of Student Headcount by Foster Youth Status % 96.3% % 96.0% % 99.4% Foster Youth % 99.2% Not Foster Youth % 99.7% % 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Unduplicated Headcount and Distribution by Foster Youth Status N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total N % of Total Not Foster Youth % % % % % % Foster Youth 0.0% 2 0.3% 5 0.8% 3 0.6% % % Total % % % % % % Page 12 of 28

13 PROGRAM REVIEW ENROLLMENT AND FILL RATE Average Fill Rates for Each Semester by Academic Year Page 13 of 28

14 PROGRAM REVIEW ENROLLMENT AND FILL RATE Key Enrollment Data for Each Semester by Academic Year FALL Enrollment/ Avg. Fill Enrollment Max. Seats Total Sections Section Rate % % % % % % SPRING Enrollment/ Avg. Fill Enrollment Max. Seats Total Sections Section Rate % % % % % % SUMMER Enrollment/ Avg. Fill Enrollment Max. Seats Total Sections Section Rate % FTES/FTEF by Academic Year GWC Total Computer Business Applications Page 14 of 28

15 PROGRAM REVIEW OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS Overall & Rates (Fall) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Overall & Rates (Spring) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Overall & Rates (Summer) 100.0% 95.0% 90.0% 85.0% Notes is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course who did not withdraw and received a valid grade. is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course and received a passing or satisfactory grade (defined as grades of A,B,C,P,IA,IB,IC, or IPP) Data are unduplicated by semester for each department. Data for multiple semesters or departments are not unduplicated. Key Data The overall retention and success rates for Fall Computer Business Applications courses decreased between Fall 2012 and Fall The retention rate decreased from 77.5% to 74.2%, and the success rate went from 52.7% to 37.6%. The overall retention rate in Spring courses increased between Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, while the success rate decreased. The retention rate rose from 77.6% to 82.8%, while the success rate decreased from 55.5% to 49.3%. has not offered Summer courses since the academic year. 80.0% 75.0% Page 15 of 28

16 PROGRAM REVIEW OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS FALL Enrollment % 50.1% % 54.4% % 62.1% % 52.7% % 42.8% % 37.6% SPRING Enrollment % 53.0% % 57.6% % 54.9% % 55.5% % 51.6% % 49.3% SUMMER Enrollment % 86.5% Page 16 of 28

17 PROGRAM REVIEW OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS Overall and Rates by Academic Year 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Enrollment, Rates and Rates by Academic Year Enrollment , % 52.6% , % 55.9% % 58.5% % 54.1% % 47.0% % 43.4% Page 17 of 28

18 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS BY SESSION TYPE Notes is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course who did not withdraw and received a valid grade. is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course and received a passing or satisfactory grade (defined as grades of A,B,C,P,IA,IB,IC, or IPP) Other for Session Type includes Honors, Saturday, Self Paced, Teach3, Independent/Directed Study, and Parachute classes. Data are unduplicated by semester for each department. Data for multiple semesters or departments are not unduplicated. Key Data rates by session type for Fall courses have varied widely and fluctuated in recent years. The success rate of Other types of courses has generally been higher than that of all other session types. Between Fall 2012 and Fall 2014, the success rates of Other and hybrid courses increased, while those of daytime and online courses decreased. rates by session type for Spring courses have likewise varied widely and fluctuated in recent years. The success rate of Other types of courses has generally been higher than that of all other session types. Between Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, the success rate of Other courses was unchanged and that of online courses increased. However, the success rates of daytime and hybrid courses decreased. has not offered Summer courses since the Summer 2009 semester. Page 18 of 28

19 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS BY SESSION TYPE FALL Enrollment Day Evening Hybrid Online Other Total % 72.5% 71.0% 100.0% 73.3% % 94.9% 85.5% 80.4% 100.0% 83.6% % 85.7% 81.4% 100.0% 85.2% % 68.9% 70.3% 81.8% 77.5% % 78.6% 79.5% 73.7% 79.7% % 71.4% 100.0% 74.2% % 58.0% 47.4% 100.0% 50.1% % 79.5% 52.6% 54.1% 100.0% 54.4% % 85.7% 62.5% 100.0% 62.1% % 24.6% 43.9% 81.8% 52.7% % 39.8% 39.4% 21.1% 42.8% % 35.3% 100.0% 37.6% SPRING SUMMER Enrollment Day Evening Hybrid Online Other Total % 97.3% % 86.5% Enrollment Day Evening Hybrid Online Other Total % 87.5% 92.1% 75.8% 79.8% % 90.9% 85.5% 75.7% 83.3% 81.4% % 81.2% 85.4% 84.7% % 77.8% 68.2% 100.0% 77.6% % 81.3% 78.5% 100.0% 80.8% % 66.7% 84.2% 100.0% 82.8% % 50.0% 50.8% 51.6% 53.0% % 87.3% 55.4% 52.5% 66.7% 57.6% % 26.7% 60.5% 54.9% % 53.1% 45.5% 100.0% 55.5% % 50.0% 45.5% 100.0% 51.6% % 33.3% 50.6% 100.0% 49.3% Note: "Other" for Session Type includes Honors, Saturday, Self Paced, Teach3, Independent/Directed Study, and Parachute classes. Page 19 of 28

20 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS AND RETENTION BY ETHNICITY Rates by Student Ethnicity (Fall) 100.0% Notes 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% Am. Indian/Alaska Native is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course who did not withdraw and received a valid grade. 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course and received a passing or satisfactory grade (defined as grades of A,B,C,P,IA,IB,IC, or IPP) Enrollment, retention and success data are duplicated, since many students enroll in more than one course in a semester. Rates by Student Ethnicity (Spring) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Rates by Student Ethnicity (Summer) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Am. Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White Am. Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White In cases where the total enrollment in a semester is 10 or less, data have been excluded from the analysis in order to protect individuals' privacy. Key Data rates for Fall Computer Business Applications courses have varied widely by student ethnic groups. Asian students have had the highest success rates over the last three years. However, the success rates for all student groups decreased between Fall 2012 and Fall rates for Spring Computer Business Applications courses have likewise varied widely by student ethnic groups. Asian students have generally had the highest success rates over the last six years. The success rates for all student groups decreased between Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, with the exception of Asian students. has not offered Summer courses since the academic year. 0.0% Page 20 of 28

21 FALL Enrollment PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS AND RETENTION BY ETHNICITY Am. Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White Total % 37.5% 77.6% 61.5% 73.9% 73.3% % 94.3% 79.5% 87.0% 83.7% 83.6% % 76.9% 82.4% 62.5% 90.4% 85.2% % 68.8% 90.2% 68.6% 77.5% % 82.4% 72.7% 82.9% 79.7% % 71.1% 70.1% 69.2% 75.8% 74.2% % 0.0% 50.7% 30.8% 50.2% 50.1% % 48.6% 50.0% 56.5% 52.9% 54.4% % 23.1% 50.0% 18.8% 70.4% 62.1% % 43.8% 52.9% 48.0% 52.7% % 11.8% 39.4% 43.9% 42.8% % 10.5% 27.3% 38.5% 41.8% 37.6% SPRING Enrollment Am. Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White Total % 80.0% 77.4% 82.4% 80.6% 79.8% % 76.9% 78.8% 68.8% 83.8% 81.4% % 76.9% 78.5% 89.5% 82.1% 84.7% % 69.2% 73.0% 80.6% 77.6% % 66.7% 81.0% 81.8% 78.0% 80.8% % 70.6% 78.3% 85.7% 82.8% % 48.0% 52.4% 35.3% 53.4% 53.0% % 42.3% 54.5% 43.8% 63.9% 57.6% % 23.1% 39.2% 47.4% 57.3% 54.9% % 30.8% 55.6% 53.8% 55.5% % 16.7% 54.0% 27.3% 51.2% 51.6% % 23.5% 38.3% 52.4% 49.3% Page 21 of 28

22 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS AND RETENTION BY ETHNICITY SUMMER Enrollment Am. Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic Nat. Hawaiian / Pac. Islander Two or More White Total % 97.3% % 86.5% Note: In cases where the enrollment for a student racial or ethnic group is 10 or fewer students, data have been suppressed to protect individuals privacy. Data for these students are still included in the total column, along with data for students whose race or ethnicity is unknown. The subtotals for each student racial or ethnic group therefore may not add up to the total column. Page 22 of 28

23 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS AND RETENTION BY GENDER Notes is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course who did not withdraw and received a valid grade. is the percentage of students who enrolled in a course and received a passing or satisfactory grade (defined as grades of A,B,C,P,IA,IB,IC, or IPP) Enrollment, retention and success data are duplicated, since many students enroll in more than one course in a semester. In cases where the total enrollment in a semester is 10 or less, data have been excluded from the analysis in order to protect individuals' privacy. Key Data rates have consistently been higher for female students than male students in Fall Computer Business Applications courses. However, the success rates of both males and females decreased between Fall 2012 and Fall The success rate of female students decreaed from 55.8% to 42.7%, while that of males went from 47.8% to 28.0%. rates have consistently been higher for female students than male students in Spring Computer Business Applications courses, with the exception of the Spring 2015 term. The success rate of female students decreased between Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, while that of males increased. The success rate of female students went from 60.7% to 48.7% during this period, while that of males increased from 47.1% to 50.9%. Summer Computer Business Applications has not offered Summer courses since the academic year. Page 23 of 28

24 PROGRAM REVIEW SUCCESS AND RETENTION BY GENDER FALL Enrollment Female Male Total % 71.9% 73.3% % 81.1% 83.6% % 82.6% 85.2% % 77.2% 77.5% % 76.6% 79.7% % 64.5% 74.2% % 44.7% 50.1% % 47.9% 54.4% % 58.4% 62.1% % 47.8% 52.7% % 30.9% 42.8% % 28.0% 37.6% SUMMER Enrollment Female Male Total % 100.0% 97.3% % 93.3% 86.5% SPRING Enrollment Female Male Total % 76.5% 79.8% % 80.5% 81.4% % 79.7% 84.7% % 73.1% 77.6% % 79.1% 80.8% % 80.2% 82.8% % 51.6% 53.0% % 53.7% 57.6% % 47.8% 54.9% % 47.1% 55.5% % 44.3% 51.6% % 50.9% 49.3% Note: Students whose gender is not known are included in the total enrollment count but not in the subtotals for males and females, so male and female enrollment does not equal the total in some cases. Page 24 of 28

25 PROGRAM REVIEW OVERALL RETENTION AND SUCCESS BY SPECIAL POPULATION GROUPS Overall Rates for Special Populations by Academic Year N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate Economically Disadvantaged Status Not Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Veterans Not Veteran 1, % 1, % % % % % Veteran % % % 8 8 Disability Status No Disability 1, % 1, % % % % % Disability % % % % % % Foster Youth Not Foster Youth 1, % 1, % % % % % Foster Youth % % Total 1, % 1, % % % % % Overall Rates for Special Populations by Academic Year N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate N Rate Economically Disadvantaged Status Not Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Economically Disadvantaged % % % % % % Veterans Not Veteran 1, % 1, % % % % % Veteran % % % 8 8 Disability Status No Disability 1, % 1, % % % % % Disability % % % % % % Foster Youth Not Foster Youth 1, % 1, % % % % % Foster Youth % % Total 1, % 1, % % % % % Note: In cases where the total enrollment in a semester is 10 or less, retention and success data have been excluded from the analysis in order to protect individuals' privacy. Page 25 of 28

26 PROGRAM REVIEW COURSES TAUGHT BY FACULTY TYPE Distribution of Courses Taught by Full Time and Part Time Faculty Page 26 of 28

27 PROGRAM REVIEW COURSES TAUGHT BY FACULTY TYPE FALL SPRING Courses Taught by Full Time and Part Time Faculty Full Time (%) Part Time (%) FT Courses PT Courses % 44% % 40% % 50% % 21% % 13% % 29% 10 4 Total 64% 36% Full Time (%) Part Time (%) FT Courses PT Courses % 48% % 43% % 50% % 22% % 27% % 30% 14 6 Total 62% 38% SUMMER Full Time (%) Part Time (%) FT Courses PT Courses % 0% Total 100% 0% 1 Page 27 of 28

28 PROGRAM REVIEW CERTIFICATES AND DEGREES AWARDED Certificates and Degrees Awarded by Academic Year Certificates & Degrees Awarded Associate Degrees Certificates Total Page 28 of 28

American River College Student Equity Disproportionate Impact Analyses Fall 2015

American River College Student Equity Disproportionate Impact Analyses Fall 2015 Disproportionate Impact Analyses Fall 2015 This document introduces the set of data ARC s Research Office compiled in Fall 2015. The data reported here were sourced from the California Community College