Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

Transcription

1 Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

2 WHY DEVELOP THIS STUDY? Ogden City is planning for better connectivity and access to jobs and housing. Working with area partners, including Utah Transit Authority (UTA), the City wants to better understand ways to achieve desired development along Ogden s future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor. The Ogden Onboard Study will build on local planning efforts and identify a community-supported vision with actions that take advantage of the unique opportunities facing the Corridor. Based on local market, land use and transportation conditions, the Study will identify strategies for future transit-oriented development focusing on housing, access to essential services, active transportation and regional connectivity.

3

4 PROJECT SCHEDULE Fall 2017 Tour and Project Foundation Winter/Spring 2018 Public Launch and Baseline Analysis Summer/Fall 2018 Baseline TOD Vision Analysis and Recommendations Fall/Winter 2018 Implementing TOD Ongoing community participation, Advisory Committees, and stakeholder engagement

5 CORRIDOR VISION WORKSHOP PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW The workshop was the first in a series of public events to hear from community members about their interests, concerns and ideas for strong neighborhoods and strong connection along Ogden s future BRT Corridor. The meeting engaged participants to think critically about ideas for the future of the Corridor though informational exhibits, a presentation and precedent images. Following the presentation, the event focused on hearing from interested community members through a hands-on small group activity, allowing participants to develop their own ideas and vision. It was an inclusive and family-friendly event with activities for kids and Spanish language translation. Outcomes of this event will be used to help identify opportunities and strategies for potential transit-oriented development along the Corridor.

6 GETTING STARTED City staff and members of the planning team greeted attendees at the entrance. Participants signed-in and received an agenda and comment sheet. Prior to the presentation, participants placed sticky-dots and notes on large maps to show locations they re familiar with, and to show opportunities and challenges they encounter along the corridor. Members of the planning team, City and UTA staff were available to provide more detail on past and ongoing plans and to answer questions.

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 What s Ogden s BRT Corridor Now?

15

16 2.8 million State population growth: ,597 Weber County pop. increase ( ) 70,045 Weber County employment change ( ) Source: University of Utah Policy Institute, 7/17

17 -23% Decrease in vehicle miles traveled (16-34 y/o, ) +24% Increase in bike trips (16-34 y/o, ) +40% Increase in transit miles traveled (16-34 y/o, ) 62%* Prefer to live in a mixed-use neighborhood (18-29 y/o) Source: National Household Travel Survey, *National Association of Realtors (2011)

18 What is Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)? High quality, branded service Connects to local service Fewer stations to speed travel Dedicated ROW Increased frequency Signal priority Automated ticket/boarding Las Vegas, Nevada (MAX)

19

20 What is Transit- Oriented Development (TOD)? Centered on transit People and activities Mix of uses within easy walking distance Good connections to transportation Walkable and welcoming Grant Ave., Ogden

21 How does transit lead to more development? Transit: Contributes to a community identity and helps the area be grant ready Focuses development that would occur anyway to spur more impactful change Makes denser development more desirable

22 What s Next?

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30 Small Group Reports Following the presentation, participants used note pads and a full-size map to discuss their ideas for the Corridor in several small groups. Each group had a facilitator from the planning team that asked a set of questions and took notes. The activity included two sets of questions: Preferences for station elements listed on note pads; and opportunities, challenges and priorities described using note pads and the map.

31 1. Station Elements 1A. What types of land uses, amenities and destinations would you like to see near or around a station? 1B. What would get you to walk or bike to a future bus rapid transit station?

32 1. Station Elements

33 1. Station Elements

34 1. Station Elements

35 1. Station Elements

36 1A. What types of land uses, amenities and destinations would you like to see near or around a station? Key Observations Places for dining and access to food (markets, cafes, etc.) A range of general services that attract people Green spaces and street trees Pedestrian and bicyclist amenities Wide and connected sidewalks and bike routes Connections to nearby trails and outdoor recreation Improved wayfinding Art and design that reflects surrounding neighborhoods

37 1B. What would get you to walk or bike to a future bus rapid transit station? Key Observations Greater density and a mixture of uses Redevelopment of underused buildings Lower cost (or free) transit service Predictable service and real-time information Integrating bicycles with buses Improved safety, especially lighting Making transit more convenient than driving

38 2. Opportunities and Challenges 2A. Where are some areas of concern? 2B. Where should we focus improvements to get to future stations? What station area should we prioritize?

39 2. Opportunities and Challenges

40 2. Opportunities and Challenges

41 2. Opportunities and Challenges

42 2. Opportunities and Challenges

43 2. Opportunities and Challenges

44 2A. Where are some areas of concern? Key Observations Potential bus conflicts with crowded events (eg. Lindquist Field, Dee Events) Lack of pedestrian crossings, especially along Harrison Cost and lack of demand to redevelop along Harrison Restrictive parking requirements Cost and need for dedicated route through WSU Traffic speed and pedestrian safety along 25 th and Harrison Existing traffic congestion and speed Impacts of building a new route for existing residents and businesses Lack of destinations along Harrison

45 2B. Where should we focus improvements to get to future stations? What station area should we prioritize? Key Observations Better trail connections to outdoor recreation (to east) Reuse of underdeveloped or underperforming commercial areas Potential redevelopment at Monroe and 25 th, and Rite-Aid site Focusing improvements to increase market values Prioritizing improvements in areas with high ridership Prioritizing existing activity centers (eg. Transit HUB, WSU, Library) Reusing surface parking, or creating structured parking Improved and safer conditions for pedestrians and cyclists along Harrison, especially lighting, sidewalks and crossings

46

47 Next Steps The workshop was helpful in identifying topics to address during the study process and will be used to build a common vision for Ogden s BRT Corridor. Beginning with this workshop there will be multiple opportunities to get involved with this study. The project website, is the best place to learn more and to sign-up for updates and upcoming events. The Opportunities Mapping Survey (bit.ly/ogdenonboard) is also available on the website and is a great way to provide your ideas, especially if you weren t able to attend the workshop. A special thanks to all those who attended the workshop!

48 Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018