Recommendations For Oak Grove Bike Project Field Trial
|
|
- Scarlett Atkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Purpose: It is not easy to make decisions that require trade-offs between competing interests, what the Menlo Park City Council now faces, as it considers a field trial to evaluate the Oak Grove- Crane-University Bike Project ( OCUBP ). Such decisions are particularly challenging when a minority of residents might benefit at the expense of a larger group, in this case bicyclists at the expense of motorists who drive and park on affected streets and residents who live there. That said, residents always expect their city leaders to demonstrate care, wisdom and fiscal responsibility and to acquire the information needed to make the best possible decisions, generate maximum community support, minimize misunderstandings and avoid potential backlash. Since the upcoming field trial is a critical step in the evaluation of this bike project, I have wish to share some perspectives and recommendations about the field trial and concerns about the trial metrics proposal posted on the City website on Thursday March 23, My overall conclusion: the proposed trial metrics will NOT produce the information the Council needs to assess the value and impact of either the trial or actual project. I welcome the opportunity to discuss these ideas BEFORE a final trial plan is approved and intend to actively survey residents before, during and after the actual trial our entire community can benefit from valuable feedback. (I note that the trial plan now includes a community survey towards the end of the trial - but based on prior history have little confidence in the city s ability to effectively collect resident feedback re: city bike projects) My Current Outlook 1. This bike trial (and project) will likely have little impact on bicyclists who want to cross El Camino as it is not a significant improvement over the options that already exist, especially the nearby combination of Valparaiso, Glenwood and Laurel bike lanes. The fact that neither Santa Cruz nor Middle Avenues directly connect to the new bike lanes on Oak Grove will remain a big deterrent. New bike lanes on University will improve the comfort of riding bikes there and perhaps increase the number of riders to downtown. Motorists will generally dislike the changes due to less convenient parking options and new traffic delays, especially on Santa Cruz and possibly near Station These problems although not likely large will remain a constant source of irritation. The field trial as currently conceived will fail to demonstrate the likely positive and negative impacts of a permanent installation as the scope and methodology as reflected in the proposed trial metrics are too narrowly defined. After spending over $ on this trial, the community (including the Council) will generally view the results as either inconclusive or disappointing. Having already invested this significant amount it will be pressured to either continue the trial or complete a permanent installation. (The total price tag is currently unknown) in hopes that bike usage will eventually increase. Meanwhile, valuable city staff resources will have been diverted from more important projects, both a waste and demoralizing. When the Council approves the final trial plan, it owns this project regardless of whether individual members strongly support it, or not. Unfortunately, they appear to have become willing passengers on a train heading for a mishap with only the bike commission at the controls. Why does this happen? Dana Hendrickson March 26,
2 Central Concern Recommendations For Oak Grove Bike Project Field Trial Based on the field trial metrics in the latest staff report dated March 28, 2017, the trial will likely NOT produce results that will demonstrate that this project will improve access to key destinations in the City, including schools, the downtown, (as well as) connecting residential neighborhoods, where improved access means greater bike safety, utilization (convenience) and comfort. More specifically, trial results will NOT show that the project will 1. Provide greater safety and convenience than the existing bike lanes on Valparaiso, Glenwood, Laurel, and Ravenswood (east of Laurel). 2. Provide benefits that significantly outweigh the negative impacts (harm) that other street users will experience. 3. Provide greater safety and convenience than a promising alternative that would install 2- way bike lanes on the south side of Menlo Avenue and a totally separate bike path parallel to Ravenswood from El Camino to Laurel. Basis For Concern 1. It is impossible to test the effectiveness of a bike trial when the project itself does not have clear, specific and measurable objectives, goals, metrics and thresholds for expected benefits and potential negative impacts. What does the Council want the results to be? How will it know? Neither questions has been satisfactorily answered. 2. I do not understand how the Menlo Park can conduct an effective field trial for this project when the Council does not know how bicyclists currently use Oak Grove AND other east-west streets to cross El Camino. Predicting and measuring the trial (and project) impact is impossible without this information. How many bike trips occur today? What are the most popular bike destinations and where do bicyclists now prefer to cross El Camino? How many of these are students? Once again like in the El Camino Corridor Study - the council is evaluating a major bike network improvement on a piecemeal basis, an approach inconsistent with contemporary bike network design philosophies, principles and methodologies. Why? This approach is not defensible (See Appendix A Current El Camino Crossing Patterns). 3. The current field trial metrics are inadequate in both scope and methodology as they do not adequately measure safety, convenience and comfort. SAFETY concerns motorists and bicyclists, as no driver wants to experience any type of accident that harms a bike rider. Since actual collisions represent only a small fraction of vehicle-bike conflicts and accidents this data, is not a reliable measure of safety. Why hasn t the City asked Alta to evaluate potential safety problems at the redesigned Santa Cruz-Crane intersections and at the three adjacent busy intersections (Garwood Way, Merrill, and Alma) near Station 1300 and the train station? Are new traffic controls or signals planned? California is considering legislation that would make it legal for bicyclists to NOT obey stop signs. What impact will this have on bike safety at these two locations? Also, sharrows provide no safety on busy streets where must share lanes much faster vehicles and there are few places where bicyclists could move aside to allow motorists to safely pass. (See Appendix B Bike Safety) Dana Hendrickson March 26,
3 Does Alta really believe sharrows significantly improve safety at these locations? Also, note that vehicles regularly use six busy entrances and exits to public parking lots on these sections of Crane. How will the city determine that the claim of greater convenience is valid when alternative routes bike trip counts are not taken at all places where bicyclists currently cross El Camino, especially Valparaiso, Glenwood, and Ravenswood. Note: the Council has wisely decided not to add any type of bike facility to Santa Cruz between University and Crane but this will greatly limit the appeal of Oak Grove for bicyclists who use Santa Cruz, including Hillview students. (See Appendix C - Project Destination Attractors) While bike lanes would improve rider comfort on University and Oak Grove, the sharrows on Crane will not due to faster vehicles, busy driveways and street parking. If this project is expected to improve bike safety, comfort and convenience more students should ride bikes to Hillview Middle and Menlo-Atherton High Schools yet the trial metrics due not include actual bike counts at each school. What about the other destinations labeled as attractors in the trial proposal? How will increased bike usage to these places be measured? 4. How does the Council intend to measure and evaluate the negative impact this project will have on motorists, i.e., lost parking and increased traffic delays? Motorists will encounter two new stop signs on Santa Cruz in each direction and will be delayed even if no bicyclists are present. Additional motorist delays will occur near Station 1300 with the introduction of the Garwood Way extension and Station 1300 users. 5. What specific policy and criteria does the Council intend to use to decide whether the benefits of this project outweigh its harm and costs. For example, how will the Council decide the future of this project if the trial demonstrates modest benefits for bicyclists and modest harm for others who depend on the effected streets? A wasted investment but simply hope things will get better in the future? 6. The impact that the construction of Station 1300 will have on Oak Grove and trial schedules, results, and bike-motorist safety has not been adequately explained. Bike Commission assurances are insufficient. What does city staff believe? Why conduct a trial before this project is completed and actual traffic volumes and patterns are known? 7. The City appears ready to invest about $3000,000 to complete a field trial without a reliable estimate for the total cost of this project including probable modifications. Why not develop an estimate that includes contingencies for additional traffic controls, especially near Station 1300?. a. Feasibility study: $38,000 (spent) b. Field trial plan & implementation (estimate): $263,000 c. Needed to complete project: unknown Dana Hendrickson March 26,
4 Additional Concerns About City Bike Project Planning 1. On both the El Camino Real Corridor Study and this project the Council used bike network consultants to perform technical feasibility studies and project designs but not comprehensive need and impact analysis, areas where they excel and Menlo Park lacks expertise. And consequently, potential projects are not intelligently prioritized and individual projects (and trial plans) lack the specific objectives, implementation strategies, goals, metrics and well-defined thresholds for benefits and costs the Council needs to confidently evaluate field trial results. AND the Council continues to struggle to make good decisions because they along with the entire community lack essential information and left unprepared to deal with a barrage of anecdotes and emotional appeals from individuals who also lack the appropriate expertise. 2. The Council has failed to adequately evaluate the most promising opportunity to improve east-west bike access across El Camino in the next 5 to 7 years, an innovative combination of bike lanes on Menlo Avenue and a bike path near Ravenswood that would be safer and more convenient than the planned project. This east-west bike corridor is recommended in the General Plan, Specific Plan and existing Comprehensive Bike Development Plan and an innovative off-street bike path would bypass the problematic section of Ravenswood between El Camino and Laurel. However, the Council has refused to fund a study of the merits and feasibility of this alternative project and instead offered untested objections, e.g., this intersection is too dangerous, Ravenswood has too much vehicle traffic, and new bike facilities should not be undertaken before the uncertainties surrounding future high speed rail and associated track crossing designs are eliminated. I believe a professional consultant could produce a safe bike solution, and fortunately, any bike corridor built now would offer tremendous value and be easily modified to accommodate future changes to Ravenswood. It appears the Council is locked into evaluating a single project and immune to considering promising alternatives. This would not be viewed as a responsible approach in business and non-profits. 3. The small bike commission CLEARLY exercise more influence over the Council s bike network development decision-making than can be justified given its activist bent, frequent displays of anti-motorist attitudes, unrealistically high expectations about the proper role biking should play in our city s transportation plans and investments, and clear lack of bike network design knowledge. During 2016 Bike Commissions senior members express the following views: The bike lanes on Valparaiso are unsafe and should not to be considered legitimate elements in the Menlo Park community bike network The bike lanes on Middlefield are unsafe and should not to be considered legitimate elements in the Menlo Park community bike network The bike lanes on Alma are unsafe and should not to be considered legitimate elements in the Menlo Park community bike network The proposed bike access to Middle Plaza should be shifted from Middle Avenue to Cambridge Elimination of a future Menlo-Ravenswood bike corridor Dana Hendrickson March 26,
5 My Recommendations 1. Policy. The city needs a clear policy for determining whether a bike project is a good one. There are several potential field trial outcomes. (a) The benefits are significant; harm exceeds an unacceptable threshold (b) The benefits are significant; harm is acceptable (c) The benefits are insignificant; harm is unacceptable (d) The benefits are NOT significant; harm is NOT significant The trial does not support a new bike project if either (c) or (d) occurs. So the trial policy should establish the framework for deciding how to make the trade-off when both benefits and harm are significant, (a). 2. Specific Objectives: The primary challenge is to define project specific objectives and goals. These will shape the scope of the trial, the methodology used to collect and analyze data, and the intepretation of results. Achieve the following specific objectives: (Candidates) a. The project generates a significant increase in the total number of daily bike trips that cross El Camino. b. Oak Grove bike lanes experience significant and significantly more daily bike traffic. c. University bike lanes experience significant and significantly more daily bike traffic. d. The bike project does not create safety problems for bicyclists and motorists. e. The bike project does NOT generate an unacceptable motorist delays or inconvenient parking The trial plan should clearly establish specific metrics AND criteria (goals and thresholds) for measuring benefits and harm and determining whether they are considered significant. Dana Hendrickson March 26,
6 3. Scope: This project is expected to improve the perceived safety, convenience and comfort of crossing El Camino just north of downtown Santa Cruz. Since there are other popular crossings, the trial should measure The increase in bike usage on Oak Grove The total increase of bike usage at all popular crossings, at Oak Grove, Valparaiso, Santa Cruz, Ravenswood-Menlo, Robles-Ravenswood and Middle-Ravenswood AND changes in crossing patterns Changes in bike usage on University between Middle and Live Oak AND bike usage patterns between University and nearby Fremont The increase bicyclists that ride on Santa Cruz between University and Crane The trial should also measure the impact of Lost street parking on all street users Different scenarios for restricted parking on University and Oak Grove Different intersection configurations at Santa Cruz Crane on bicyclists and vehicle traffic => delays and safety, e.g., yield versus stop signs? 4. Safety Collision data is an inadequate measure Alta should advise the Council on the safety of its intersection designs (Santa Cruz- Crane, near Station 1300) and use of sharrows on Crane The trial should monitor these places with cameras. 5. Data collection Conducted before, during and at the end of the trial Include quantitative data and qualitative feedback Should capture street usage patterns during different times of the day and year Minimize sampling errors. Be credible and defensible 6. Usage Data collection locations See Appendix E My Recommendations. Motorist Delays Travel delays on Santa Cruz between University and Crane as each vehicle in a line must stop at new signs even when bicyclists are not present. Travel delays on Oak Grove between El Camino and Crane as each vehicle in a line must wait for more bikes to cross Oak Grove at Crane Dana Hendrickson March 26,
7 Lost Parking Impact Monitor streets and nearby parking plazas Survey nearby businesses Survey nearby residents APPENDICES - Appendix A - Current El Camino Bike Crossing Patterns Page 8 Appendix B Bike Safety Concerns on Crane And Santa Cruz Page 11 Appendix C Current Field Trial Objectives Page 14 Appendix D Field Trial Data Collection Plan Page 16 Appendix E Usage Data Collection - My Recommendations Page 17 Dana Hendrickson March 26,
8 Appendix A - Current El Camino Bike Crossing Patterns Project supporters claim that bike access will be improved to about twenty destinations on either side of El Camino Real (See Appendix A). In order to evaluate the potential impact of this project it is first necessary to understand how bicyclists currently cross this highway. Bike lanes now cross El Camino only at the north end (Valparaiso-Glenwood) so many bicyclists have found more convenient places to traverse this highway. 1. Valparaiso-Glenwood. This popular route has bike lanes that extend from the Alameda to Laurel, which extends north-south from Encinal to Willow. Laurel has bike lanes. 2. Oak Grove. Some bicyclists cross El Camino here but not clear how often. 3. Menlo-Ravenswood. Many bicyclists cross the El Camino intersection in both directions; others travel only in the eastbound direction where there is a narrow bike lane along Ravenswood between El Camino and Alma. Note: Cyclists travel between Santa Cruz and Menlo using either University or a combination of its west side sidewalk and Fremont Park. 4. Ravenswood-Merrill-Santa Cruz-Doyle-Menlo. Westbound bicyclists who are comfortable riding on Ravenswood and Menlo frequently use this short detour to avoid the complex El Camino intersection where bike lanes disappear in the right turn lane. 5. Robles-Parking Lots. Bicyclists often avoid the Menlo-Ravenswood intersection by crossing El Camino at Roble and passing through the parking lots to the sidewalk near the tracks. Reverse travel is also common. 6. Middle-Ravenswood. A small number of bicyclists traveling eastbound direction on Middle cross El Camino, ride north a short distance on El Camino, and then turn right into the driveway next to Big 5. They likely cross at Roble on return trips. The Valparaiso-Glenwood route generally appeals to bicyclists with trip origins and destinations north of Santa Cruz and Ravenswood. The Menlo-Ravenswood route generally appeals to bicyclists with trip origins either on or south of Santa Cruz and south of Oak Grove. The Robles-Ravenswood and Middle-Ravenswood route generally appeals to bicyclists who usually ride through the intersection of Middle and University. The City does NOT know how many bike trips occur at each of these El Camino crossings. Dana Hendrickson March 26,
9 Appendix A (continued) - Current El Camino Bike Crossings Map Bicyclists who use Middle and Santa Cruz usually cross El Camino at Menlo or Roble. In the latter case they bypass the Ravenswood intersection by traversing the parking lots behind the office buildings at 800 and 1000 El Camino.
10 Appendix A Project Bike Lanes and Bike Routes (Red Lines) Map Overlay Will Oak Grove bike lanes appeal to bicyclists who ride either on Middle given the long detour, or on Santa Cruz given the lack of safe and comfortable access direct connection? Dana Hendrickson March 26,
11 Appendix B Safety Concerns on Crane Street Bikes and vehicles will share single lanes on Crane between Menlo and Santa Cruz and between Santa Cruz and Oak Grove. The vehicle lanes are narrow and there are few places bicyclists can safely allow vehicles to pass Opening doors on parked cars can injure bicyclists Many bicyclists are uncomfortable riding in the center of a lane when traveling more slowly than following vehicles even though encouraged by sharrows (note: recreational bike speeds average 10 mph or less) There are many busy parking lot entrances/exits on Crane with reduced visibility due to street parking on both sides. o Four between Santa Cruz and Oak Grove o Seven between Santa Cruz and Menlo Dana Hendrickson March 26,
12 Appendix B Safety Concerns at Re-Designed Santa Cruz - Crane Intersections The complex configuration of two offset sections of Crane joined by a keep clear zone and bounded by two new stops signs on Santa Cruz in each direction will likely confuse and challenge bicyclists and motorists. Both Santa Cruz and Crane experience heavy vehicle and pedestrian traffic. This commercial area has many street-side distractions. Note: California is now considering a law change that would permit bicyclists to NOT always stop at stop signs. Dana Hendrickson March 26,
13 Appendix B Safety Concerns at Oak Grove-Garwood Way- Merrill Alma Intersections Station 1300 will add vehicle, bike and pedestrian traffic to Oak Grove, Alma and Garwood Way (now Derry Lane), and more bicyclists and pedestrians will cross paths with more vehicle traffic at each intersection. A field trial conducted before Station 1300 is operational cannot gauge its impact. Dana Hendrickson March 26,
14 Appendix C Current Field Trial Objectives The City Council needs to identify the specific measurable objectives this project so the field trial includes appropriate metrics and data collection strategies. So far, only vague reasons have been offered in support of this bike project.. Improving east-west bike connectivity (Specific Plan). Improving bike access to 20 specific destinations claimed as attractors in the field trial proposal (December 2016). Improving the availability (convenience) of safe routes to schools. Providing bicyclists a greater share of city streets. Dana Hendrickson March 26,
15 Recommendations For Oak Grove Bike Project Field Trial Appendix C Current Field Trial Objectives (Draft-February 2017) continued Many of the identified attractor destinations are located on Valparaiso and Santa Cruz but neither is connected to the project bike facilities. Double red lines => New bike lanes on Oak Grove and University ( Blue lines => Bike route signage and street markings on Live Oak and Crane Dana Hendrickson March 26,
16 Appendix D Field Trial Data Collection Plan Dana Hendrickson March 26, 2017
17 Appendix E Usage Data Collection - My Recommendations Menlo Park has no data on how bicyclists use city streets and in particular how they cross El Camino. Investing in new bike lanes should not be done in a piecemeal fashion. Each opportunity should be judged by how it contributes to the overall value of the entire bike network. Bike Usage I recommend that the City count the number of bikes at in Menlo-Atherton High School and Hillview Middle bike storage areas and bike trips at the following locations: 1. On Oak Crane use the different approaches to the Oak Grove bike lanes 2. On Oak El Camino use Oak Grove to cross El Camino 3. On Oak Alma use Oak Grove to access Alma 4. On Oak Laurel use Oak Grove to access Laurel bike lanes 5. On Oak Grove a@ Middlefield use Oak Grove to access Middlefield 6. On Santa Cruz between University and Crane use downtown Santa Cruz to connect to Oak Grove bike lanes 7. On Santa Cruz between Crane and El Camino use Santa Cruz to access downtown destinations 8. ON Santa - use to cross El Camino and bypass Ravenswood intersection 9. On Menlo at El cross El Camino at the Ravenswood intersection 10. On Menlo at use Menlo to Access downtown 11. On Crane at Menlo 12. On University between Middle and Live Oak use new University bike lanes 13. On Live Oak at University use live Oak to bypass Menlo-University intersection 14. On Fremont between Middle and Santa Cruz use Fremont to bypass University 15. On El Camino use Robles to cross El Camino and business parking lots in order to bypass the section of Ravenswood between El Camino and Alma 16. On El Camino use Middle to cross El Camino and business parking lots in order to bypass the section of Ravenswood between El Camino and Alma Dana Hendrickson March 26,
Subject: Bike Project Field Trial Must Validate Bike Safety Claims
April 12, 2017 To: Menlo Park City Council Subject: Bike Project Field Trial Must Validate Bike Safety Claims A few weeks ago, a collision between my road bike and a white pick-up truck on Woodside Road
More informationAGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works
AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Staff Report Number: 16-214-CC Regular Business: Approve the Oak Grove University Crane Bike Improvement Concept Plan, authorize
More informationItem No. 14 Town of Atherton
Item No. 14 Town of Atherton CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSENT AGENDA TO: THROUGH: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER MICHAEL KASHIWAGI, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MARTY
More informationREVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY
ITEM Town of Atherton TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ROBERT OVADIA, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 2019 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG
More informationTRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Review Citywide Recommendations, Updated List and Scoring Methodology December 6, 2018
NOTE: Due to lengthy Committee discussion and allotted meeting time, slides 12-35 were not presented at the meeting, but are provided here for reference. TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Review Citywide Recommendations,
More informationCaltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns
Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns Revised: May 10, 2016 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is planning various
More informationBicycle Facilities Planning
Bicycle Facilities Planning Overview Types of Cyclists Purpose for Riding Types of Facilities Bike Lanes Bicycle Boulevards Cycle Tracks Intersections Signals Signing and Marking Discussion Types of Bicyclists
More informationMinor Amendments to the Street and Traffic By-law 2849 and Skateboards in Protected Bike Lanes
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: October 31, 2017 Contact: Lon LaClaire Contact No.: 604.873.7336 RTS No.: 12241 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: November 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee
More informationImproving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection Date: August 17, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Public Works and Infrastructure Committee
More informationAppendix A: Crosswalk Policy
Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy Introduction This citywide Crosswalk Policy is aimed at improving pedestrian safety and enhancing pedestrian mobility by providing a framework
More informationEL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT
EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Would upgrade the current 522 Rapid Bus to BRT status by making changes to El Camino Real and The Alameda that make transit FAST, FREQUENT AND RELIABLE and make
More informationAGENDA ITEM H-1 Public Works
AGENDA ITEM H-1 Public Works STAFF REPRT City Council Meeting Date: 11/13/2018 Staff Report Number: 18-208-CC Regular Business: Adopt Resolution No. 6470 to approve the permanent installation of bicycle
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationDraft Traffic Calming Policy Paper
Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper What is Traffic Calming The term traffic calming is defined differently throughout the United States. The Institute of Transportation Engineers, an international educational
More informationLincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial
Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial Data Collection Report June 1, 2015 Department of Transportation Table of Contents I. Introduction...... 3 II. Data Collection Methodology & Results...... 5 A. Traffic Volume
More informationByron Avenue. Public Meeting. Thursday June 16, Traffic Calming Design Sherbourne Road to Island Park Drive
Byron Avenue Traffic Calming Design Sherbourne Road to Island Park Drive Public Meeting Thursday June 16, 2016 Our Lady of Fatima Parish 153 Woodroffe Avenue 6 9pm 1 Project Summary Area Projects Background
More information5 Circulation & Parking
5 Circulation & Parking Downtown Parking & Circulation Strategy. Downtown Wayne has a somewhat disconnected system of local public streets to connect downtown with the residential neighborhoods, and primary
More informationEUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK
EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1200 CANAL STREET EXTENSION SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13210 DRAFT REPORT DATE: November 13,
More informationBicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona
Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona Analysis from January 1, 1991 to June 30, 2002 Richard C. Moeur, PE Traffic Design Manager, Northern Region Michelle N. Bina
More informationVILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
INTRODUCTION There is increasing interest across the country in developing new strategies to reduce the speed and amount of traffic in residential neighborhoods. Measurement of speeds, traffic volumes,
More informationCITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING
CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING I. Introduction: The City of Coconut Creek recognizes that the conditions of residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability;
More informationSouthside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division
Southside Road Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division January 2007 Southside Road - Traffic Report Page 1 of 9 BACKGROUND: th At the
More informationGlebe Neighbourhood Cycling Plan
Glebe Neighbourhood Cycling Plan Summary of Public Comments received after June 5 th Public Information Session Comment STUDY NETWORK CS9, CS8, E, E0 CS4, E CS4 CS8 E Suggestions for alternate cycling
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: April 1, 219 To: Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From:
More informationUpper Market Street Bike Lane Project
Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project 17th Street to Octavia Boulevard 6 30 2010 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Agenda San Francisco & Sustainable Transportation Project Goals Outreach & Coordination Project
More informationTonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.
Strathcona Neighbourhood Renewal Draft Concept Design Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas. What is Neighbourhood Renewal? Creating a design with you for your neighbourhood.
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
More informationResidential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia
Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide Town of Ashland, Virginia August 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION... 1 B. GOALS... 1 C. CRITERIA... 1 D. IDENTIFYING NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONCERNS...
More informationSummary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009
Summary: Several recent studies have assessed potential development and redevelopment opportunities in the Mercer Crossing area of Trenton, Ewing, and Lawrence. This Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street
More informationEXHIBIT R1. Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation
Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation The traffic study conducted for the Talaria project analyzed the amount of project traffic expected to use local, residential streets immediately north of the project
More informationProject Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015
Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative
More information8. Collisions INTRODUCTION
8. Collisions INTRODUCTION While traffic collisions can affect anyone, they have a disproportionate impact on bicyclists, who along with pedestrians are the most vulnerable users of the transportation
More informationChapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.
Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities. 5.1 Description of Complete Streets. Cities throughout the world, and specifically the United States, are coming to embrace a new transportation and
More information25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07
25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07 Submitted by: The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Dan Provence May 22, 2009 EXECUTIVE
More informationBike Lanes at Intersections with Right Turn-Only Lanes
Bike Lanes at Intersections with Right Turn-Only Lanes Position Statement January 2, 2011 Summary: Throughout the state, DelDOT has identified a system of bicycle routes, as illustrated in Figure 1 on
More informationTelegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses
Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses Presentation Overview What are complete streets? What problem are we trying
More informationPlanning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide
Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide Presentation by: RJ Eldridge Peter Lagerwey August 22, 2012 WEBINAR 2: PLANNING GUIDANCE IN THE 2012 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE Today s Webinar Significant Updates
More information1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s
1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s Q. Will the proposed roundabout at Flume/2nd/1 st Streets affect access to businesses nearby?... 2 Q. What if the project isn t received well by the community after construction?...
More informationSANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008
SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 To assist VTA and Member Agencies in the planning, development and programming of bicycle improvements in Santa Clara County. Vision Statement To establish,
More informationMASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN DRAFT PLAN OPEN HOUSE May 2, 2018 AGENDA 1. Community Engagement 2. Vision and Goals 3. General Structure of Plan 4. Recommendations Overview 5.
More informationPOLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING
POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This policy provides a procedure for the consideration, evaluation and implementation of requests for traffic calming measures. II. DEFINITIONS
More informationBikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN
Bikeway action plan Summary The was held on March 5, 2007 at the Rochester Mayo Civic Center. The workshop was hosted by Rochester-Olmsted County Planning Department in collaboration with the League of
More informationCITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
RMA-2015-ATM-038 CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY DATE: April 22, 2015 SUBJECT Approval of Roadway Modifications Recommended through an Area Traffic Management Study
More informationCITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor
More informationWelcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015
Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Vision Zero The City and County of San Francisco adopted Vision Zero San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network as a policy in 2014, committing an
More informationBellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series
Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series Meeting 2 Franz Loewenherz Andreas Piller Kyle Potuzak Chris Long October 26, 2017 Today s Agenda: 1) Meeting Purpose 2) 9/28 Meeting Recap 3) Candidate
More informationCity of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines I. Purpose: The City of Elizabeth City is committed to ensure the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. One
More informationOperational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies
Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,
More informationRoute 29 Corridor Assessment Update. Development of Possible Solutions
Route 29 Corridor Assessment Update Development of Possible Solutions Public Workshop #3 October 27, 2016 Purpose of Developing Possible Solutions Recap of where we ve been and timeline for moving forward
More informationContents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines
Contents Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Introduction... 1 Stop Spacing... 2 Rural... 2 Low Density Suburban... 2 General Urban... 2 Urban Core... 2 Operational Safety... 3 Stop Placement... 4 Nearside
More informationJ Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation
J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T15125400) Before and After Traffic Evaluation Prepared by Transportation Division June 2014 Executive Summary On February 12, 2013, the City of Sacramento
More informationPennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study
MEMORANDUM Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study Prepared for: APRIL 2016 Prepared By TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Background... 2 Previous Concept... 2 Existing Conditions... 4 New Alternatives...
More informationHarbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED and Bicycle Lane Upgrades Date: April 22, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Public Works and Infrastructure Committee General Manager, Transportation Services 19 and
More informationPublic Information Centre
WELCOME Public Information Centre Father Tobin Road Lougheed Middle School - Library Wednesday November 7, 2012 7:00 p.m.to 9:00 p.m. Please sign in Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Guide Background The City
More informationCycling and risk. Cycle facilities and risk management
Cycling and risk Cycle facilities and risk management Failure to recognize possibilities is the most dangerous and common mistake one can make. Mae Jemison, astronaut 6/11/2010 York Regional Council Cycling
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More informationALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY
ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland
More informationDraft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan
Summary of North Industrial and Hudson Bay Industrial Recommended Improvements Table 1. Summary of s Item Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Millar Ave north of 51st St Super 8 Motel back lane 400 Block
More informationPEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN
ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN CITY OF SANTA MONICA PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Setting the Stage
More informationFranklin Parking Analysis
Franklin Parking Analysis Report Prepared for: The Town of Franklin, North Carolina Report prepared by: 525 N. Main Street Waynesville, NC 28786 Town of Franklin Parking Study J.M. Teague Engineering 1
More informationBorough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines
Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines Adopted by Borough Council on 1 INTRODUCTION Speeding Traffic is a major concern in the Borough of Danville because of its detrimental impacts
More informationReference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis
To James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Date January 19, 2017 Copies Reference number 243381/VP From Michael Iswalt and Vanessa Peers File reference 4-05 Subject Lafayette Downtown Congestion
More informationGeneral Design Factors
Chapter 3: 3-1.0 Introduction General Design Factors Mn/DOT s goals include encouraging and accommodating safe bicycling. From a design perspective, these goals are achieved by first having an understanding
More informationSummary of Feedback Received during Speak Up Broward s 22 Speakers Bureau Engagements from December 10, 2013 through April 2, 2014
Summary of Feedback Received during Speak Up Broward s 22 Speakers Bureau Engagements from December 10, 2013 through April 2, 2014 Broward County Transit (BCT): Concerns for the safety of children particularly
More informationCycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections
Design Best Practices Sections It is along street segments where the separation and protection methods of cycle tracks offer more comfort than conventional bicycle lanes, and are more attractive to a wide
More informationAccess Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians
Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5L - Access Management 5L-3 Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians This section addresses access location, spacing, turn lane and median needs, including
More informationCITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY VERSION: 1.0 April 10, 2012 Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorists Sharing Street Spaces CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 POLICY GOAL... 3 POLICY OBJECTIVES... 3 GUIDING
More informationA plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown
A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown February 2011 A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 7 Date: 02-15-2018 Bicycle Master Plan Public Hearing Draft Work Session #1 David Anspacher,
More informationComments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Comments 1. Under any Alternatives, MCDOT should provide better at-grade pedestrian crossing of Georgia Avenue and Forest Glen Road, including improved crosswalks with wider medians and adequate signal
More informationImprove the livability of our streets by
Pedestrian and Traffic Calming Policy March 2018 2 of 6 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy The City of Aspen continually strives to protect multimodal function while maintaining a high standard of safety.
More informationBay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project
Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project Dale Mabry Highway to Bayshore Boulevard February 08, 2018 Photo Source: Tampa Bay Times Alessandra Da Pra Meeting Format Introduction Resurfacing Information
More informationPhysical Implications of Complete Streets Policies
Presentation Overview Physical Implications of Complete Norm Cox, ASLA, LLA Landscape Architect Ann Arbor, Michigan, 10:45 to Noon What Are Complete Streets? What Matters to Bicyclists and Pedestrians
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision
Vision Walking and bicycling in Salt Lake City will be safe, convenient, comfortable, and viable transportation options that connect people to places, foster recreational and economic development opportunities,
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client
More informationCity of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force
City of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force (PSATF) Community Wide Meeting Wednesday, July 8th 6:30 to 8:30 PM Multi purpose Room, Downtown Library www.a2gov.org/pedsafety The Greenway Collaborative,
More informationMission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting
Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting La Scuola Internazionale di San Francisco, November 18, 2014 Frequently Asked Questions 1. When would construction have to start before the SFMTA loses TIGER funds?
More informationWinnipeg Walk Bike Projects Downtown Tire Talk - Summary
Winnipeg Walk Bike Projects Downtown Tire Talk - Summary Downtown Projected Bike Lane System Connecting The Forks to the Exchange District (Fort Street, Garry Street & The Forks to Assiniboine Connection)
More informationBicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013
Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013 2005 Master Plan GOAL: Provide for safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian circulation throughout the City. Develop a city
More informationTRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO
TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO Draft January 2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 The Traffic Forum Process... 5 Neighborhood Traffic Issues... 7 Neighborhood Recommendations
More informationThe Wiggle Route in Context
The Wiggle Route in Context In a city of hills, the Wiggle is an important route because it winds its way along the flattest streets from Market to the Panhandle, bringing residents to local parks and
More informationTuesday, September 25 th Mount Holly Municipal Complex 400 East Central Avenue 5:30pm to 7:30pm. Activity Stations o Where do you Live?
Meeting Information Overview The public workshop for the Mount Holly Comprehensive Bicycle Plan occurred on September 25, 2018. The drop-in workshop allowed attendees to participate in a series of interactive
More informationLee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses
Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses Introduction At the Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House held Thursday, June 7, 2007
More informationCity of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary
City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary Prepared by: February 28, 2011 Why Plan? Encouraging healthy, active lifestyles through pathway and sidewalk connectivity has been a focus
More informationOverview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment
Overview A study of the 23 rd Street corridor was undertaken to document the existing conditions, analyze traffic operations, and recommend remedies for deficient situations Although 23 rd Street is frequently
More informationAppendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan
Appendix A Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines 75 Overview: Adequate signing and marking are essential on shared-use paths, especially to alert bicyclists to potential conflicts and to convey regulatory
More informationCITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT
CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: FROM: City Council Ryan Smoot, City Manager Item No. SCH 12 PREPARED BY: Mark A. McAvoy, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer MEETING DATE: August 1, 2017 SUBJECT:
More informationCHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation
CHAPTER 3 Transportation and Circulation 3.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This chapter evaluates traffic circulation, transit, parking, pedestrian, bicycle, and rail operational conditions in the Project
More informationMagnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6
More informationBroad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines
Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines Building from the strategies introduced in the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan and community input received thus far, City Transportation Staff have identified
More informationBUDGET FOR RESEDA BOULEVARD, STREET RECONSTRUCTION / VISION ZERO PROGRAM, REPORT BACK, COUNCIL FILE
FORM GEN. 160 (Rev. 11-02) CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: To: Honorable City Council From: Gary Lee Moore, City Engineer Bureau of Engineering 7%mt /Electronically signed by
More informationOverview. Updated pictures of the intersection are shown in Exhibits 1 thru 4, and the aerial photo provided by Google Maps is shown in Exhibit 5.
Overview The (here in after referred to as the Village ) is submitting the follow up interim RLRC Safety Report for the intersection of Lincoln Highway (US 30) at Orchard Drive. Additional reports, as
More information9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner
Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner 1 What is MMLOS? Is this a nice place to walk? Is this a nice place to bike? Is transit convenient? Bottom line - Are there options
More informationABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan
ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan The Greater Tenderloin Community Study Milestones October Community based organizations (Tenderloin Housing Clinic and
More information102 Avenue Corridor Review
February 26, 2015 102 Avenue Corridor Review Transportation Association of Canada Road Safety Engineering Award Submission for the City of Edmonton Introduction Transportation Association of Canada Road
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Background... ES-1 Pedestrian Network... ES-2 Bikeway Network... ES-2 Collision History... ES-2 Public Input... ES-4 Conclusions and Recommendations... ES-4 1. Introduction and Setting
More informationSUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing
REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager October 1, 2018 SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing RECOMMENDATION
More informationEvaluation and Changes to Pedestrian Priority Phase Signal (Scramble Crossing) at Bay Street and Bloor Street
PW2.2 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Evaluation and Changes to Pedestrian Priority Phase Signal (Scramble Crossing) at Bay Street and Bloor Street Date: February 12, 2015 To: From: Public Works and Infrastructure
More informationProject Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement
PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Goal and Description The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement d St Van Ness Ave Project is to improve safety and comfort for all who Franklin St Hyde St Octavia St Gough St
More informationTown of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy
Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy Adopted January 6, 2014 Town of Mooresville Development Services Department TOWN OF MOORESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
More information