June 23, 2017 File No: Mr. Gordon Moseley Specialist Environmental Health Officer Interior Health Authority Ave Vernon, BC V1B 2T1

Transcription

1 June 23, 2017 File No: Mr. Gordon Moseley Specialist Environmental Health Officer Interior Health Authority Ave Vernon, BC V1B 2T1 Dear Mr. Moseley, Re: 2016 Water System Annual Report Enclosed for your records is a copy of The City of Armstrong s Annual Water Report for If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, Kerry Fox Water/ Wastewater Technician KF/lg Enclosure (1)

2 Water System 2016 Annual Report Date Prepared: June 23, 2017

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) 2016 Water System Summary... 1 Backflow Prevention Program... 5 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results a) Water Sampling Sites b) Annual Water Consumption Graphs c) Drinking Water Report d) Raw Water Report e) Trihalomethane Report f) Schedule A g) Water Quality h) Total Flow i) UV System Performance Report APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 3 Emergency Response/Deviation Plan Certificates

4 2016 Water System Summary Page 1

5 2016 Water System Summary System Description: The following annual report is for the City of Armstrong s drinking water system. The water supply for the City is primarily a surface source with 92.97% (1,002,562 m3) taken from Fortune Creek in The water is released from the North and South Silver Star lakes to Fortune Creek then diverted to the water treatment plant where it is treated with ultra violet (UV) lights and chlorinated and then diverted to reservoirs 1, 2 and then to reservoir 3 which are located at the end of Reservoir Road in the Township of Spallumcheen. From the three reservoirs the treated water flows by gravity into the City. The remaining 7.03% (75,810 m3) of the water supply came from two deep wells located within the City (the Fire Hall Well and Pleasant Valley (PV) Well). The surface water is of very good quality with the only treatment being UV and chlorination. The Fire hall and PV Well also has disinfection capabilities using a 12% Hypo Chlorite solution. The system has continuous chlorine residual and turbidity monitoring through a SCADA system at the water treatment plant and the distribution line leaving the reservoirs. Comments on Source, Treatment and Distribution Events: 2016 was an excellent year as far as water quality goes after freshet was over. High turbidity occurred on April 22, 2016 at 6.58 NTU s and UVT s of 54.8% for that day causing the plant to shut down. System Classification / Operator Training: The City of Armstrong had their drinking water system reclassified by the EOCP late 2015; it is now a level two water treatment system (WT2). At present, we have: 4 employees certified at water treatment level one (WT1) 1 of the above employees is scheduled to attend water treatment level two (WT2) training in the fall of The above noted employees are also certified in water distribution, as noted below: 3 employees certified at water distribution level one (WD1) 1 employee certified at water distribution level two (WD2) Bacteriological Summary: In 2016 a total of 91 samples were analysed by Caro; 11 raw water samples, 75 Drinking water samples, 4 Trihalomethane (THM) samples and 1 Schedule A surface source. Page 2

6 6 drinking water samples were taken per month from a combination of the 8 sample locations, 2 samples are taken from the start of the water system, 2 from the middle of the water system and 4 from the end of the system. Sampling occurred at 2 separate times during the month, with 1 sample from each of the location to ensure continuous and current monitoring of our system. The results are posted under Appendix 1 Monitoring Results Drinking Water. Chemical Summary: Schedule A analysis is done every year on the surface source and every three (3) years on our ground water sources, we also tested for THM s four (4) times this year with no unusual results noted. Average turbidity for the year was below 0.3 and during freshet the high was 6.58 for a short period of time. (See Appendix 1 Monitoring Results Water Quality Report ). Source Sampling: The City of Armstrong took 11 raw water samples this year from the surface source. No unexpected results noted. Chlorine Residual: The City has continual chlorine residual monitoring at our water treatment plant for reservoir dosing residual and at the distribution of the reservoir through a SCADA system. As well we manually check 8 sites per month while doing sampling. In 2016 our distribution residuals had a high of 1.9 ppm (April 12) to a low of 0.0 ppm (April 24) (when on ground water). We did not have any issues with maintaining chlorine residuals in our system when on surface water Water System Works Completed or Ongoing: This includes planned line replacements, upgrading, as well as water breaks and repairs. In either case the City follows industry standards for the disinfection of new water lines or repairs made to existing lines before opening them to the rest of the water system. The following list includes work done in 2016: Water: Unidirectional flushing program in progress; New 8 water main completed on Okanagan Street to the intersection of Highland Park Drive and Highland Park Crescent There were Water Main Breaks at o 3800 Pleasant Valley Road o 3075 Fraser Road o 3345 Rosedale Avenue o 2635 Catherine Crescent o 3505 Jackson Avenue Page 3

7 Wells: Well Head Protection Plan in place as of 2008; General Maintenance Dams & Storage Reservoirs: 2017 Plans: Comments: Vegetation maintenance; year Dam Safety Review. Upgrade to Patterson Avenue & Willowdale Drive Master Water Plan completion; Vegetation maintenance (ongoing), at Dams & reservoirs; Work to be done on the outlet pipe from the North Silver Star Lake; and Complete the 10-year Dam Safety Review. The water quality was excellent in The spring freshet was a little longer than normal for the City of Armstrong this year. The City of Armstrong went to ground water from April 22 to May 16. The water treatment plant ran well in its eighth year with just the regular maintenance. Page 4

8 Backflow Prevention Program Page 5

9 Backflow Prevention Program The City of Armstrong has had an active backflow program in place since All commercial and industrial buildings that require a service connection to supply water from the City s water system must have a backflow prevention assembly installed at their expense as per bylaw Armstrong backflow devices are comprised as follows: 191 total backflow devices; 160 devices tested and passed 24 devices are classified as minor and the City does not require testing. 6 devices were not tested in 2016, but were tested early in devices not tested in 2016 as the building is vacant, the backflow test was not required. The backflow test will be required once a new business is in the location. The type, size and location of the backflow assembly are specified by the City. Applicants for building permits, where a commercial or industrial business is being constructed, pay a deposit before the building permit is issued to ensure the installation of a backflow assembly. The City of Armstrong flags any new business license application received for the public works department s review. The Public Works Manager will sign off on the business licence after a passed current backflow assembly test and a current backflow survey has been performed. Certification: The City of Armstrong presently has one employee that has backflow prevention certification; I have included a copy of their certificate. The City of Armstrong also has one employee who is certified as a Cross Connection Control Inspector, that certification has been included as well. Armstrong employees only test devices at Armstrong facilities. Devices on private property are the responsibility of the property owners, the City is to be provided with annual test reports completed by certified testers. Backflow testing assembly: The City of Armstrong presently uses a Midwest model 830 this testing assembly is sent away annually as required for calibration. A copy of the latest calibration results has been included with the report. Backflow assembly requirements: The types of backflow assemblies required will depend upon the degree of hazard to our water system that is present in a business operation, as per CSA Standards. Model: Minor risk DuC (dual check) Moderate risk DCVA (double check valve assembly) Severe risk RPBA (reduced pressure backflow assembly) & Air Gap Page 6

10 lnterior lnstruments * rjjv sfon of CûRIX 1115 St. Paul Street lglowna, BC ViY2C6 T F INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REPORT - BENCH CUSTOMER: City of Armstronq Element No. INSTRUMENT DATA Loop No. Manufact. Midwest lnput Ranqe 0-15 PSt Model No. 830 Output Ranse 0-15 PSt SerialNo lnst. Accuracv 2.0 o/o of full scale styte Differential Pressure Gauqe Allow. Tolerance 0.3 PSt INPUT CALIBRATION Ma OUTPUT Units: PSID As Req'd As Found lo Error As Left lo Error Test I Test Test Test CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT USED INPUT Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Ranqe I Endress & Hauser PMD55-7FP6/O H PSI 2 3 OUTPUT Manufacturer Model No. SerialNo. Ranqe REMARKS 1 2 As found, as left. Flushed gauge. Calibrated By: Gordon Jensen Date Comoleted March 3,2016 Page 7

11 BCWWA BC WATER &WAsTE AsSOCIATION Safeguarding public health and the environment through the sharing ofskills, knowledge, education and experience, and providing a voice forthe water and waste commun ty. October L8,20L6 Rick Bronson PO Box 40 Armstrong, BC VOE 1BO CITY OF ililí 2 r t*;* ARMSTRONG Dear Rick, RE: Backflow Assembly Tester Recertification Exam Exam Date: Location: Results: Certificate #: October L3,2Ot6 MTS lnc. Written -84%;Pass Practical - Pass 562t We are pleased to inform you that you have passed both the written and practical components of the Backflow Assem bly Tester Recertification Exam ination. Congratulations! Please find your new wallet card below which indicates your recertification date and your annual membership expiry date. ln order to maintaín 'active' tester status, you must pay annual membership/certification dues and pass a recertification exam every 5 years. Your membership is free for the first year after becoming certified and is also free for the year after you pass the recertification exam. For further information about BCWWA backflow assembly tester certification, please visit Sincerely, Jeremy Braacx Cross Connection Control Manager cross CONNECTION CONTROL BACKFLOW ASSEM BLY TESTER o BCWWA d\ 8T WÀroR &WÁITEßMßrcü Rick Bronson is certified by thë BC \ / ter & Wastê Associaiion CEFTTIFICATE # RFCFRiIFICAfICN DAÏE FXPIRY DAÎE 5627 October!3,202L October t3,2ol7 Page 8

12 This card is issued under a Voluntary certifiçat on Program of the BC Water & Waste Associat on. Certification should be renewed on an annual basis. For information on certiflcation renewal, contact the BCWWA at or at: West Pender Street, Vancouver BC V6E 2N7 Tel: Fax: TF: t Renewal for certlfication may be contingent upon proof of competency or may be revoked for improper testing or improper reporting of test results. Page 9

13 () o BCWWA BC WATER &WASTE ASSOCIATION CITY OF JUN ARMSTRONG cross CONNECTION CONTROT INSPECTOR o BCWWA SCWAnR&WñMhnoil \ Chad Pounder ls certified by the BC Watêr & Wãste Associatìon,_) CERTIFìCATE # CONTACT HOURS DUE DATE ANNUAL EXPIRY DATE L April, April, 2017 Page 10

14 This card is issued under a Voluntary Certification Program of the BC Water & Waste Associat on. Certification should be renewed on an annual bas s, For information on cert f cation renewal, contact the BCWWA at or at: West Pender Street Vancouver BC VOE 2N7 Tel: 60 t Fax: 60G TF: t Renewal tor.qertifiëtion may he q 1 gent upon.p oof of competency or may be revoked for improper testing or improper reporting of test results. Page 11

15 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results a) Water Sampling Sites Page 12

16 Water Sampling Sites Site # Site Location Address Distribution Point 1 City Hall 3570 Bridge Street, - Lunch Room Sink Armstrong 2 City Shop 2950 Patterson Avenue - Lunch Room Sink Armstrong 3 Water Treatment Plant End of Reservoir Road, - Raw Water Analizer Spallumcheen 4 1st Customer End of Reservoir Road, - Taken from tap in chlorine Spallumcheen room at Reservoir 5 Pleasant Valley Well Across from PVSS, - Meter Pit Sample Tap Armstrong 6 Round Prarie Meter Pit 3965 Wood Avenue, - Sample Tap Armstrong 7 Highland Park Meter Pit Corner Highland Park - Sample Tap Crescent & Young Road 8 Meighan Creek 2259 Hunter Avenue, -Sample Tap Armstrong Middle Middle Start First End End End End Page 13

17 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results b) Annual Water Consumption Graphs Page 14

18 Annual Water Consumption cubic meters (m3) CITY OF ARMSTRONG All water usage Printed Jan 17, 2017 Page 1 of 1 Page 15

19 Monthly Total Water Consumption 200, , ,000 80, ,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec cubic meters (m3) CITY OF ARMSTRONG All water usage Printed Jan 17, 2017 Page 1 of 1 Page 16

20 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results c) Drinking Water Reports Page 17

21 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Jan Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CARO Analytical Services Page 18 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

22 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Jan Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Jan :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CFU/100 ml Jan Jan CARO Analytical Services Page 19 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

23 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Feb Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :20 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CARO Analytical Services Page 20 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

24 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Feb Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb Sample ID: Public Works Shop Site #2 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Feb :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CFU/100 ml Feb Feb CARO Analytical Services Page 21 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

25 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Mar Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Mar :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Mar Mar CFU/100 ml Mar Mar Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Mar :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Mar Mar CFU/100 ml Mar Mar Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Mar :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Mar Mar CFU/100 ml Mar Mar CARO Analytical Services Page 22 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

26 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Apr Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Apr :40 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Apr Apr CFU/100 ml Apr Apr Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Apr :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Apr Apr CFU/100 ml Apr Apr Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: Apr :20 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml Apr Apr CFU/100 ml Apr Apr CARO Analytical Services Page 23 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

27 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :50 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :35 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml CARO Analytical Services Page 24 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

28 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml Sample ID: Public Works Shop Site #2 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml CFU/100 ml CARO Analytical Services Page 25 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

29 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 26 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

30 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 27 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

31 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 28 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

32 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :20 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 29 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

33 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Public Works Shop Site #2 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 30 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

34 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :50 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :25 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 31 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

35 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 32 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

36 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 33 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

37 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 34 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

38 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 35 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

39 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 36 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

40 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 37 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

41 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 38 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

42 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 39 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

43 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: P.V. Sample Site #4 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :45 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Highland Park Sample Site #6 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 40 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

44 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Drinking Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: Reservoir Sample Site #3 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Round Prairie Sample Site #5 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample ID: Meigan Creek Sample Site #7 ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 Coliforms, Total < 1 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 41 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

45 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results d) Raw Water Reports Page 42

46 Page 43 Page 3 of 3

47 Page 44 Page 3 of 3

48 Page 45 Page 3 of 3

49 Page 46 Page 3 of 3

50 Page 47 Page 3 of 3

51 Page 48 Page 3 of 3

52 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Raw Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: WTP - Raw Water ( ) [Water] Sampled: :15 General Parameters ph ph units N/A HT2 Coliforms, Total 53 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A Background Colonies > 200 N/A 200 CFU/100 ml N/A Coliforms, Fecal < 1 N/A 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample / Analysis Qualifiers: HT2 The 15 minute recommended holding time (from sampling to analysis) has been exceeded - field analysis is recommended. CARO Analytical Services Page 49 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

53 Page 50 Page 3 of 3

54 Page 51 Page 3 of 3

55 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Raw Water WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: WTP - Raw Water ( ) [Water] Sampled: :30 General Parameters ph ph units N/A HT2 Coliforms, Total 13 MAC = None 1 CFU/100 ml N/A Coliforms, Fecal < 1 N/A 1 CFU/100 ml N/A CFU/100 ml N/A Sample / Analysis Qualifiers: HT2 The 15 minute recommended holding time (from sampling to analysis) has been exceeded - field analysis is recommended. CARO Analytical Services Page 52 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

56 Page 53 Page 3 of 3

57 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results e) Trihalomethane (THM) Reports Page 54

58 Page 3 of 3 Page 55

59 Page 3 of 3 Page 56

60 Page 57 Page 3 of 3

61 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTED TO PROJECT Armstrong, City of Trihalomethanes WORK ORDER REPORTED Analyte Result / Recovery Standard / Guideline MRL / Limits Units Prepared Analyzed Notes Sample ID: THM-PW SHOP (Brown/Soft Cap) ( ) [Water] Sampled: :00 Calculated Parameters Total Trihalomethanes MAC = mg/l N/A N/A Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Bromodichloromethane N/A mg/l N/A Bromoform < N/A mg/l N/A Chloroform N/A mg/l N/A Dibromochloromethane < N/A mg/l N/A Surrogate: Toluene-d % N/A Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene % N/A CARO Analytical Services Page 58 3 of 3 Rev Page 3 of 3

62 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results f) Schedule A Water Testing Results Page 59

63 Page 3 of 4 Page 60

64 Page 61 Page 4 of 4

65 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results g) Water Quality (SCADA Automatic Report) Page 62

66 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: January, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Turbidity Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU NTU January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January Feb-16 Total Minimum Average Page Maximum

67 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: February, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribut Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February March 1 March 2 03-Mar-16 Total Minimum Average Page 64 Maximum

68 ion Turbidity Average NTU Page 65

69 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: March, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Turbidity Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU NTU March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March Apr-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 66

70 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: March, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distributio Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March Apr-16 Total Minimum Average Page 67 Maximum

71 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 68

72 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: April, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April May 1 02-May-16 Total Minimum Average Page 69 Maximum

73 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 70

74 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: May, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May Jun-16 Total Minimum Average Page 71 Maximum

75 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 72

76 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: June, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June July 1 02-Jul-16 Total Minimum Average Page 73 Maximum

77 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 74

78 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: July, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Turbidity Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU NTU July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July Aug-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 75

79 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: August, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August Sep-16 Total Minimum Average Page 76 Maximum

80 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 77

81 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: September, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Turbidity Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU NTU September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September October 1 02-Oct-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 78

82 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: October, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October Nov-16 Total Minimum Average Page 79 Maximum

83 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 80

84 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: November, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November December 1 02-Dec-16 Total Minimum Average Page 81 Maximum

85 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 82

86 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: December, 2016 Water Quality Report Supply Water Water Post Injection Residual Chlorine Distribution Residual Chlorine Date UVT Turbidity Temperature Temperature Distribution Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum percent NTU NTU PPM PPM PPM Degrees C PPM PPM PPM Degrees C NTU December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December Jan-17 Total Minimum Average Page 83 Maximum

87 n Turbidity Average NTU Page 84

88 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results h) Total Flow (SCADA Automatic Report) Page 85

89 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: January, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January Feb-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 86

90 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: February, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February March 1 March 2 03-Mar-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 87

91 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: March, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March Apr-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 88

92 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: April, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April May 1 02-May-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 89

93 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: May, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May Jun-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 90

94 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: June, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June July 1 02-Jul-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 91

95 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: July, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July Aug-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 92

96 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: August, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August Sep-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 93

97 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: September, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September October 1 02-Oct-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 94

98 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: October, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October Nov-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 95

99 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: November, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November December 1 02-Dec-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 96

100 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: December, 2016 Total Flow to Reservoirs and to Distribution Report Flow through UV Reactors UV Header Pressure Distribution Res 1 Level Res 3 Level Date UV 1 Total UV 2 Total UV 3 Total UV 4 Total Total Flow Minimum Maximum Average Total Flow Minimum Minimum Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters Cubic meters PSI PSI PSI Cubic meters % % December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December Jan-17 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 97

101 APPENDIX 1 Monitoring Results i) UV System Performance Report (SCADA Automatic Report) Page 98

102 Armstrong - Fortune Creek UV System Performance Report Raw Water Date UVT Month: January, 2016 UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January January Feb-16 Total Minimum Average Page 99 Maximum

103 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: February, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February February 29 March 2 03-Mar-16 Total Minimum Average Maximum Page 100

104 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: March, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March Apr-16 Total Minimum Average Page 101 Maximum

105 Armstrong - Fortune Creek UV System Performance Report Month: April, 2016 Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April April May 1 02-May-16 Total Minimum Average Page 102 Maximum

106 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: May, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May May Jun-16 Total Minimum Average Page 103 Maximum

107 Armstrong - Fortune Creek UV System Performance Report Month: June, 2016 Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June July 1 02-Jul-16 Total Minimum Average Page 104 Maximum

108 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: July, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July July Aug-16 Total Minimum Average Page 105 Maximum

109 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: August, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August August Sep-16 Total Minimum Average Page 106 Maximum

110 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: September, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September September October 1 02-Oct-16 Total Minimum Average Page 107 Maximum

111 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: October, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October Nov-16 Total Minimum Average Page 108 Maximum

112 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: November, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November November December 1 02-Dec-16 Total Minimum Average Page 109 Maximum

113 Armstrong - Fortune Creek Month: December, 2016 UV System Performance Report Raw Water UV 1 UV 2 UV 3 UV 4 Date UVT Dose Dose Dose Dose Min Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg % % mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 mj/cm^2 December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December December Jan-17 Total Minimum Average Page 110 Maximum

114 APPENDIX 2 Emergency Response / Deviation Plan Page 111

115 Deviation Response Plan Background: The surface water supply from Fortune Creek has the potential to contain pathogenic or disease causing microorganisms. As it is not practical or technically feasible to monitor for all pathogens (protozoa, bacteria, enteric viruses) in drinking water, microbiological guidelines are used to indicate the presence of organisms and effective treatment. To ensure that the water is potable (safe) a disinfection system using chlorine has been implemented. The amount of chlorine that is added to the water is adequate to achieve the desired disinfection but not excessive as undesirable taste and odor will result. The water is sampled at various points throughout the water distribution system on a specified frequency and sent to a certified laboratory for analysis. Water Quality and Disinfection: Chlorine readily combines with organic compounds. In order to achieve disinfection, enough chlorine must be added to result in a free chlorine residual concentration of adequate strength. Good quality water requires a much lower dose of chlorine than poor quality. The resulting concentration and the contact time is crucial to achieving adequate disinfection. Chlorine, when combined with organics, creates undesirable disinfection by products (THM s). For this reason, when the Fortune Creek source becomes undesirable, as indicated by a turbidity of greater than 3.5 ntu, its use is discontinued and the alternate groundwater sources are used. Groundwater sources do not require disinfection. Water Quality and Turbidity: The City of Armstrong monitors for cloudiness or turbidity continually through a SCADA system. Cloudy water is created when fine particles like sediment or organic matter end up in our reservoirs usually due to heavy rain or during spring freshet. As turbidity increases our ability to adequately disinfect becomes more difficult. When the turbidity is less than 3.5 ntu, operation will continue as normal. Once the ntu reaches between 3.5 and up to 5.0 the use of surface water will be discontinued in favor of groundwater. In the event groundwater cannot keep up or cannot be used (problems with the wells) Interior Health would be notified and a water quality advisory will be issued on the City s web site. If the turbidity continues to rise and reaches 5 ntu, and groundwater cannot be used Interior health would be notified and a boil water notice would be issued. Testing Frequency: The Drinking Water Protection Act, S.C.B. 2001, requires that where the population serviced is less than 5,000 a minimum of 4 samples per month be taken. Page 112

116 In Addition: The Operating Permit issued by Interior Health contains a condition that a drinking water sampling program be implemented. This program includes raw water, THM s, aesthetic constituents and 6 microbiological samples per month from various locations within the City of Armstrong. Testing Locations: The location of samples is random between a total of 6 sites as shown on the site location (Water Sampling Sites). Monitoring of Effective Treatment: All drinking water supplies should be analyzed routinely for coliform bacteria. The presence of excess total coliforms indicates that the disinfection is inadequate, but an immediate health hazard is unlikely. The presence of any Escherichia coliform (E. coli) indicates that an immediate health hazard does exist. There should be a free chlorine residual at all points of the distribution system. This is defined as a minimum residual of 0.2 mg/l total at the end point. In order to achieve this, experience has shown that the free chlorine residual at the point where the water leaves the reservoir should be above 0.5 mg/l. This is the point that a continuous on line chlorine analyzer has been installed and a S.C.A.D.A. system used to record and alarm the chlorine residual. In order to achieve a 0.5 mg/l free chlorine leaving the reservoir, it is necessary to dose the raw water at about 0.9 mg/l under normal operating conditions and higher if the water quality is not excellent. In spite of maintaining adequate free chlorine residual, the routine microbiological sampling may detect the presence of coliforms. If unacceptable conditions exist, action must be taken to protect the health of the water customers. It should be noted that total coliform only without the presence of faecal coliform indicates a soil or vegetation source and faecal coliform results from a faecal matter source from a warm-blooded animal. Faecal coliform will also result in total coliform but not the opposite. The following conditions are considered to be in compliance with providing safe water for consumers and no action is deemed necessary: 1. No sample should contain more than 10 total coliform organisms per 100 ml, none of which should be E. coli; 2. No consecutive sample from the same site should show the presence of coliform organisms; 3. Not more than one sample from a set of samples taken from the community on any given day should show the presence of coliform organisms. (Less than 1.1 mpn is the same as zero no action needed.) 4. No raw water sample should contain more than 20 E. coli. IF ANY OF THE ABOVE CRITERIA ARE EXCEEDED, CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY REFER TO DEVIATION RESPONSE BELOW. Page 113

117 Deviation Response: There are three types of public notification recommended by the Drinking Water Officer. These are: Water Quality Advisory; Boil Water Notice; and, Do Not Use Water Notice. Water Quality Advisory: A Water Quality Advisory will be issued as a precautionary measure when a health risk assessment determines that the risk to drinking water users is low. Boil Water Notice: A Boil Water Notice will be issued when a health risk assessment determines that an identified threat is a risk to drinking water and alternate source is not available. Do Not Use Water Notice: A Do Not Use Water Notice would be used in those situations where there is an immediate threat or a possible unknown threat to water quality has occurred due to: Terrorist acts, Vandalism, or Acts of nature. The Do Not Use Water Notice must be used in those situations where boiling water will not remove or reduce the risk or threat to the water quality. The implications for action of each form of public notification are as follows: Water Quality Advisory: Requires immediate follow-up action Requires identification of cause and response Requires immediate follow-up response by operator and/or EHO/PHI May require re-testing of drinking water May require operating, maintenance and monitoring records Requires emergency response plan implementation and review Boil Water Notice: Provides more time to evaluate course of action once issued Requires immediate inspection by operators Requires follow-up inspections by PHI/DWO or PHE Requires identification of cause and responses Requires additional testing of drinking water Requires activation of emergency response plans May require emergency response plan review Page 114

118 Do Not Use Water: Requires identification of an immediate or unknown potential threat, such as: Terrorist acts Natural disasters Extreme conservation requirements Sewage contamination Vandalism Chemical threat or contamination May require emergency response plan implementation and review Public notification must be given when a monitored parameter in relation to the drinking water exceeds an established standard or there is, was or may be a threat to the drinking water. The public notification must be made in a manner approved by the drinking water officer. The public notification should state why the notice is given and what actions should be taken. Responsibility of the Sample Taker: Clearly label all sample bottles; Adhere to appropriate sampling techniques to avoid contamination; Ship to lab in a timely manner maximum time is 24 hours from sample to receipt; Store appropriately if shipping is to be delayed Responsibility of the Testing Laboratory: Sample analysis in an approved manner; Report any E. coli immediately to owner and Health. Issuing a Boil Water Notice (BWN): It may become necessary to issue a boil advisory due to known or suspected micro biological contamination. If there is any doubt, then an advisory is issued. Recent research indicates that holding water at a rolling boil for one minute will inactivate all waterborne pathogenic micro-organisms. Management, Staff and Elected Officials will be advised first, City residents will be advised by radio broadcast on two local stations, information posted on the City s website, and advertising in two local newspapers. High risk or high volume users will be advised by telephone, fax or . The Water Districts will be advised by a single telephone call to a contact person at each Water District and they will be responsible for contacting all their patrons. There exist a number of users outside the boundary of the City, and they will be contacted by telephone. Newspaper and radio ads would run until BWN is rescinded. A boil notice will be rescinded after two consecutive sets of samples have returned to acceptable levels and the Health Department concurs. Page 115

119 The following list of responses is intended to guide the decision making: A. Resample immediately and expedite the testing and reporting a minimum of 3 samples will be taken; B. Check chlorine residual at reservoir manually check to confirm calibration of on line analyzer; C. Check chlorine residual in the distribution system; D. Increase disinfectant dosage; E. Advise immediate supervisor, if absent advise the City Administrator or designate; F. Advise and conduct a risk evaluation with Interior Health Drinking Water Officer; G. Issue water quality advisory; H. Switch to alternate water source (ground water); I. Issue boil water notice; J. Issue Do Not Use Water notice; K. Flush water mains; L. Expanded sampling program consisting of 3 samples every Second day; M. Check with medical and health professionals regarding increased reports of gastrointestinal illnesses; N. Conduct a watershed / source investigation. Page 116

120 Deviation Problem: PROBLEM RESPONSE One sample contains less than 10 total coliform organisms per 100 ml One sample reported from the lab to have background colonies or overgrown One sample contains more than 10 total coliform organisms per 100 ml Consecutive sample from the same site shows the presence of coliform Organisms even if less than 10 per 100 ml More than one sample from a set of samples taken on a given day show the presence of coliform organisms in any amount One sample contains more than 1 E. coli organisms per 100 ml Resample confirms the presence of total coliform organisms Resample confirms the presence of faecal coliform organisms or E. coli Chlorination system failure resulting in non-disinfected water entering the distribution system Industrial or backflow contamination is suspected or very poor water quality exists with no detectable chlorine residual There is a credible threat to the water supply, either natural or man made Turbidity range between NTU Turbidity exceeds 5 NTU Raw water sample exceeds 20 E. coli Raw water sample exceeds 200 E. coli A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E F A B C D E F A B C D E F A B C D E F L E F H K L M E F I L H K M E F I K L B C D E F K Possibly G I J E F L M and possibly I E H F E H F A B C D E F G N possibly H A B C D E F I H Page 117

121 APPENDIX 3 Certificates Page 118

122 o lnterior Health Health Protection Perm t To Operate Drlnking Water System ,000 Gonnection Facility Number: Name of Facility: City of Armstrong Water System 'Address: Box 40 Armstrong, BC Owner: City Of Armstrong Conditions: TIte parveyor shall: Provide a certified operator to operate the system Operate according to your Water Quality Sampling Program Provide continuous on-line turbidity monitoring of the raw water for each surface source Provide continuous on-line monitoring of the water disinfection process Perform Giardia Performance Monitoring calculations as prescribed bythe Public Health Engineer Operate according to your Gross-Connection Control Program Provide a Well Protection Plan for each well source Review and update the Emergency Response Plan annually Provide long-term plans for source, treatment, and Report monitoring results monthly and provide an stribution system improvements nual mmary Aoril 1.2OO4 Effective Date ic Health lns ç This permit is nontronsferable and must be disþlayed in o conspicuous þlace 807ó25 June 04 Page 119

123 ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Facil ity Glassification THIS IS TO GERTIFY THAT City of Armstrong Water Distri bution Sysfem has been classified by the Environmental Operators Certiflcation Program in accordance with the guidelines established in co-operation with the Association of Boards of Certification (A.B.C') as Glass ll Dated at Burnaby, B.C.on December 6,2003 Secretary - Certflca[on Board Certificate No Certificalion Board 1l rd - MEMBER OF ASSOCIATION OF BOARDS OF CERÎFICATION AFFTLIATE of B.c. wnrer ruó wrsre AssoclATloN A Society lncorporated under lhe Socíety Act' S-B.C' Page 120

124 ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Certificate of Qual ification This is to certiff hat: KerryW. Fox By Examination Hae Qualilled As A Water Distribution System Operator ard certifi E that he/sho hæ rnd ûre estaübhod qjdlffæümg üé h E the abili9 to efficienüy ryerate and mainùain a speciled npxtnum s ze d typc dmlcr deeþnated as follows: - Cerüfic tion Boad Oc'tober 8, 2004 No:4852 M nbaof A octsüon d Codlicaüon Afi,ltb of B.C. Uirsbr üd Wlsb Alsod8üql Thß ocrdficqb he[ be in full foroe and cltcst ü,ñs! lcønpslicd by al annual r newal r ãl A sodery lncorponated undor tlre godcty Ad, S.B.C. 3-?3724 Page 121

125 ENVIRONIIENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Certificate of Qualification This is to certiff that: KerryW. Fox By Examination Has Qualified As A Water Distribution System Operator and certifies that he/she has met the esþþlishêd qualifications and has thê ability to eficienüy operate and maintain a specified maximum slze And type of water distribution system dasignated asfoúows: : su'o#' :Eevel I Certlñcation Bo&d October 8, 2004 No:4852 Boad rb - Member ol Associalion of Boards of Cefificâlion Afil ate of B.C. Wat rand Waote Assoc at on This cettificaþ shall be ln full force end ëfiect when accompanial by an annual renewal seal A Society lncorporabd under lhe Socieþ Act S.B.C. $28724 l Page 122

126 ENVI O CERTIFITATIOII PROGRAì/I Ccrüffcffi,of Glualffisqt{on Weüor Thlo is to certify,that Blai te D. Sfe*varú S oxarn'nnatïon,has qu,alffbd a,s a Lswl I 'Wßßt O pêrttor Þqted aûbwrnsþy, EC on bn*any &4,2ü12 Certf'lrtriofi'lrlþ, 78ß6 SûoútÞry " bdd " Cerllfioatim åoefd Mt mibor of hp ågsgolftlen,st'bpérdb of Gl'l''tlfrw1lsn Thle asrinoûb rdud ñdlë thôçoêp aûrbtù.þd: ôãllnd's.heli bc ln lì ll fotor y!ñçn-slrd,u,f$r'.r ohbõnt'lê.neühl seêl A codeßy lrrsofþotnlpd r tþdotürrc goübty Ad, S.B.Q" 5,2&724 Page 123

127 ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Ceftificate of Qualification This is to certify that: Rick A. Bronson By Examination Has Qualified As A Water Distribution System Operator and certifies that he/she has met lhe established qualifications and has the ability to efficiently operate and maintaln a specifled maximum slze and type of water distribution system designated as follows: t-a;,$.:,1ji Level I October 8, 2004 No: Member of A,s.sgciat on of Boards of Ceni0catlon Affillate of B.C. Water and Waste Association Th s c rtïcate shall b in full force and elect when accompanied by an annual renewal seat A Society lncorporated underthe Soc tyact, S.B.C Page 124

128 Page 125

129 ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Faci I ity Class ification This is to certify that city of Armstrong water Treatment ptant has been crassiried "*i5iìl;í:lîi,i'il"off:xïi,ffifël::å,ii8:ïì,gîffî:t* with the guiderines I Dated Secretary - Certification Board Class ll Facility at Burnaby, BC on December 10, 2O1S Facility No President - Certification Board ffi* -- - This certificate must hold the EOCp embossed seal. Member of the Association of Boards of Cert fication A society incorporated under the Socieg Act, S.B.C. S Page 126

130 å / CERTIFICATE o aualrflcatlon EOCP This is to certify that: KeffgS0 ) By examination has qualified as a Water Treatment Plant Operator Level I øt Certification No August 24,2016 At Burnaby, BC CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS A society incorporated under the Society Act, S.B.C CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Page 127

131 ENVIRONi'ENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFIGATION PROGRAM Gertificate of Qual ification This is to certify that Blaine D. Stewart by examination has qualified as a Water Treatment Plant Operator Level I Dated at Burnaby, BC on April 8, 2016 Certification No.7886 Secretary - Certification Boad President - Certificåtlon Board e - Member of the Association of Boards of Certificâtion This ceéiflcate must hold the EOCP embossed seal and shall bc in full force when añlxed wtth a curenl enewal seal A society incorporated under the Society Ad, S.B.C. S Page 128

132 ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATORS GERTIFICATION PROGRAM Gertificate of Qual ification This is to certify that Rick Bronson by examination has qualified as a Water Treatment Plant Operator Level I Dated at Burnaby, BC on March 18, 2016 Certification No Secretary - Certification Boa d President - Gertification Board e - Member of the Association of Boards of Certification This cedificate must hold the EOCP embossed seal and shall be in full force rtten affixed with a qufient renewal seal A society incorporated under the Society Act, S.B.C. S Page 129

133 ENVIRONTUIENTAL OPERATORS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Gertificate of Qualification This is to certify that Chad L. Pounder by examination has qualified as a Water Treatment Plant Operator Level I Dated at Burnaby, BC on April22,2016 Gertification No Seoetary - Certlfrcation Board President - Certification Board rt 3 - Membcr of the Assooiatlon of Boards of Certification Thb certlficate must hold the EOCP ernbossed seal and shell b n full force when afflxed wlth a cunetìt renewal seal A society hcoporated underthe Socieg Act, S.B.C. S Ë+-:r.-.tæ#É..,-: Page 130

134 e - Environmentol Operotors Certificotion Progrom Henning Drive, Burnoby, BC V5C ón5 Ph tqx: Toll Free I -8óó-552 EOCP eocp@eocp.co Ceftif #:4848 Status: C-2O16 Mr. R. Bronson PO Box 40,3570 Bridge Street Armstrong, BC VOE 180 March L6,20L6 CITY ÜF ARMSTRC}NG We are pleased to enclose your annual renewal seal(s) and membership card valid for the year ending December 3L, Please affix the seals to your certificate(s) and keeþ the membership card with you. You also have met your CEU requirements forthe renewal period. You can forward any additional certificates or transcripts for the 2OL6-2OI7 renewal period to the EOCP office by to eocr:@eocp.ca Operators are, and always wíll be, ourgreatest asset. Please knowthat you are an important member of our tearn, and your abilities and contributions are an important part of our continued success. Please feel free to contact the EOCP Office at any time on matters relating to the Program. Yours truly, Chris Brown Secretary Th s is to certify that RIck Bronson Certification # 4B4B s a member in good âs stand ng and ent fled to all benefits and pr vileges of the Program dur ng the year Oec mber_ "nding Secretary Environmentol Operotors Certificotion progrom A Socrely lncorporoled under the Socieh/ Act, S-QO28724 Pnnted on teq,cleç1 pqps t Page 131

135 e Environmentol operotors Certificqtion Progrom Henning Drive, Burnoby, BC V5C ón5 Ph: F ox: Toll Free'l -Bóó-552-EOCP eocp@eocp.co Certif #:4852 Status: C-2016 Mr. K. Fox PO Box 40, 3570 Bridge Street Armstrong, BC VOE 180 CNTY OF March t6,2ot6 ARh/ISTRCNJG We are pleased to enclose your annual renewal seal(s) and membership card valid for the year ending December 31.,2016. Please affix the seals to your certificate(s) and keeþ the membership card with you. You also have met your CEU requirements for The 2OI4-2OI5 renewal period. You can forward any additional certificates or transcripts for the 20I6-20L7 renewal period to the EOCP office by' to gqggpeeçp.cq. Operators are, and always will be, our greatest àsset. Please know that you are an important member of our team, and your abilities and contributions are an important part of our continued success. Please feel free to contact the EOCP Office at any time on matters relating to the Program. Yours truly, Chris Brown Secretary A Society lncorporoted under lhe Pnnted on recyci This is to cert fy that Kerry Fox Certification # 4852 s a member in good stand ng and ent tled to all benel ts and - pr'riùé"" Ût" Èrogram during tne year ending December'31-16 "r &s Secretary Environmentol Operotors Certif icotion Progrom Page 132

136 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION ISSUED TO KERRYFOX IN RECOGNITION OF COMPLETION OF "Dam Inspection & Maintenance, SPONSORED BY THE BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER AND WASTE ASSOCIATION October 16,2007 Kamloops, BC 0.6 CEU'S WILL BE AWARDED FOR THIS COI]RSE BCWWA Page 133

137 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLËTION ISSUED TO RICKBRONSOI{ IN RECOGNITION OF COMPLETION OF ttl)am Inspection & Maintenance" SPONSORED BY THE BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER AND WASTE ASSOCIATION October 16,2007 Kamloops, BC 0.6 CEU'S WILL BE AWARDED FOR THIS COI]RSE JACK BCWWA EN Page 134