Why is a SUMP framework useful for effective cycling advocacy?

Transcription

1 1 Why is a SUMP framework useful for effective cycling advocacy? Jörg Thiemann-Linden Difu, Berlin Velo-City Vienna, 11 th June 2013 s Urban Affairs n Institute of Germa

2 About 1 2 How to identify stakeholders to strengthen cycling advocay within the SUMP framework Example SUMP & Cycling Strategy integration Berlin, StEP Verkehr & Radverkehrsstrategie 3 New areas of action on cycling policy, how to learn more Urban Affairs German Institute of

3 3 Three stages of dealing with cycling during the last decades in Germany 1. No matter, just a toy orjust sport >> ignored it. 2. Part of the problem of unsafety >> regulated it (separated in to cycle paths) 3. Part of the solution in a public interest >> encourage it (in order to achieve goals) Germa n Institute of Urban Affairs

4 4 Cycling is much more than just mobility. Don t ask what you can do for cycling, but what cycling can do for you. (ECF) Urban Affairs How to start stakeholder involvement: n Institute of Germa

5 5 Dear Regional Tourism Manager: more guests staying / enjoying / spending? s

6 6 Dear Parents, Teachers, more children s autonomy, less mama taxi? s

7 7 Dear Public Health Association : time left for physical activity in the gym? s

8 Dear Employer: employees arriving fit to work? 8

9 9 Dear Job Center: poor accessibility of job without own car? s

10 10 Dear Shopkeeper: local buying power shifting to mall outside? s

11 11 Dear Urban Developper: to create liveable places for face-to-face contacts? s

12 12 Dear Housing Administration: organize a quality environment, less car use? s

13 13 Dear Energy Saving Agency: daily zero CO2 transport in mental map? s

14 Dear Public Transport Authority: heavy work load in bus + tram during peak hour? 14 s

15 15 1st steps: Discover district from cyclist s perspective establish a strong team, having a good time together s

16 16 1st steps: Asking the usersfor their specific needs learning from their daily mobility expertise s

17 17 1st steps: A local coalition of stakeholders in favour of their own city district, village, town starting bicycle accessibility marketing! s

18 st steps: Starting cycling policy: visible signs of acceptance: cyclists welcome Not necessarily costly action: Signposting g of calm routes (and one-way-streets opened both ways for cyclists) Bicycle parkings atshops Visibility at intersections

19 Berlin Urban Transportation Development Plan 2011 ( StEP Verkehr - example SUMP in Germany) 19 s titut für s ches Ins Deuts Urbanist ik

20 20 Modal Split to Shopping Locations nearby location Periphery shopping centre City centre Public Transport Walking Cycling Car use Home Urban Affairs other location Germa n Institute of

21 Modal split of Berlin s inhabitants Walking % Walking 2008: 28% Car 1998: 38% Car 2008: 32% PT stable 27% Cycling 1998: 10% Cycling 2008: 13% German Institute of Urban Affairs

22 22 More modal shift a key policy goal modal share in 2025 StEP Verkehr objectives walking 28% Motorized private transport 25% Ecomobility 75% cycling 18% public transport 29% n Institute of Urban Affairs 22 Germa

23 23 Objectives Building on the Mission Statement t t in the first StEP Verkehr with new innovations Interface to other policy/structural fields own policy making role Ideals and Vision i and integrating necessities Instruments and supporting understanding and communication Ambitious but realistic 23 Germa n Institute of Urban Affairs

24 24 Objectives Lessons learnt from first StEP Verkehr Long-term overall goals Energy Climate protection Services of general interest Guidelines es of neighbouring policy fields Urban development Environment Business and industry Framework conditions Population Spatial structure Funding Imp pact on tr room fo ransporta or manoe ation and uvre Analyses and Forecasts Mission Statement (integrated) Objectives (12 quality goals, 4 target fields) Strategy (6 (old) or 7 (new) sub-strategies) Measures (5 different categories) Impact tassessment Long-term infrastructural options n Institute of Urban Affairs 24 Germa

25 25 Mission i Statement t t Objectives Strategies t Measures s

26 26... for example: matter of CO 2 reduction (and cycling policy) 26 s

27 27 Targets 2025 in Berlin s Cycling Strategy (adopted 2013) Modal share: from 18% to 20% of all trips; modal shift from car use. Longer bicycle trips: average trip length from 3,7 km to 4,6 km Interlinks with Public Transport: combined trips from 3% to 5% of all cycle trips Traffic safety: reduction of killed cyclists by 40%, injured by 30% Adequate funding: - reshape of street space an efficient measure - need for 5 / inhab. annually for implementation, (according to analyses in NRVP 2020, nat. strategy) - expectation to achieve this volume in infrastructure budget step-by-step until 2017 Urban Affairs >> attend lecture from Burkhard Horn (Berlin Senate Dep.) on Friday 10:15 Overrun by Success: What Strategies t Do We Need dto Deal with Large Amounts of Cyclists in Our Cities? n Institute of Germa

28 Consultation ti of Berlin s new Cycling Strategy t 28

29 Fine grained cycling issues in the SUMP (Munich) s

30 Bremen: early public consultation on Your know-how, your ideas draft with us the new SUMP! Here it goes wrong, here well : 4,241 inputs 9,567 comments 66,971 pro voting 39,084 con voting s Urban Affairs n Institute of Germa

31 Bremen: early public consultation on s

32 32 32 Monitoring: Bicycle Balance by test rides (fietsersbond, NL) Utrecht compared to Groningen

33 33 33 Bicycle Balance byregular users satisfaction survey (City of Copenhagen) s

34 34 Indicator severely injured / killed children in LTP 1 and LTP2 period s

35 35 Transparency of public expenditures Grenoble, PDU (SUMP) & Cycling strategy s

36 Some first big non infrastructure projects Funding from NRVP and international emission trading at ca. 1 Mio. / a 100 companies advice in Mobility Management ( effizient mobil ) Cycling Capital Munich campaign Zero CO2 by active mobility ( Kopf an, Motor aus : Turn brain on; engine off ) Tendering of bike sharing in Hamburg Many other middle size NRVP projects German Institute of Urban Affairs

37 37 Keeping the potential by sound infrastructure Quick and easy travel on bike lanes, cheaper than build cycle paths Adequate space at intersections Safe self-explanatory design Enforcement, no car parking on it Designed after new guidelines ( ERA 2010 )

38 38 Peaceful together in the square ( Shared Space ) Metz (FR), Duisburg (DE), London (UK), Baar (CH) s

39 39 39 Cycling for quick access from home to the commuter railway and regional bus Walking 1 km =Bicycle 2,5 km =Pedelec 4 km

40 40 40 Bike Sharing (capacity restraints, lacking quality in PT?) personal bike at home public city bike s Urban Affairs PT bicycle for last mile to work rental network for leisure n Institute of Germa

41 41 In future ahighproportion of electric bicycles? s titut für s ches Ins Deuts Urbanist ik 41

42 Pedelecs for car based in-commuters into cycling based inner-cities (like in the city of Münster) 42 car 0 p.t. Argus/Difu 2010; Abbildungsquelle: Hartmut Topp, Städtische Mobilität ohne Emissionen eine Vision?, 8./ S Pedelec- Szenario Germa n Institute of Urban Affairs Long term mobility scenarios for Münster 2050 (all kilometers driven within city boundaries)

43 43 Cycling Expertise files on (40 files for download, newsletter in English) s 43

44 44

45 45 Thank you for your attention. Questions? Your own experiences on a quality plan and process? Jörg Thiemann-Linden thiemann-linden@difu.de Difu Zimmerstrasse 13-15, Berlin Germa n Institute of Urban Affairs

46

47 47

48 48 Quelle: State-of-the-Art Report zu SUMP in Europa (August 2011 in ELTISplus) s

49 49 Diversity of cycling cultures in Europe but the users needs are the same s

50 50 Our vision: Cycling is fun in Europe 50 s

51 51 StEP Verkehr - Consultative ti Planning Process Service Providers Round Table Project Group Administration Service Providers Scientific Advisory Board Service Providers Service Providers Round Table: Administration (Project Group) Scientific Advisory Board Parliamentary Fractions Districts (Building Departments) Transport Providers Alliances (environment, Agenda 21, bicycle, car ) Associations (Industry, Trade, Unions, etc.) Special Interests (urban development, children, parents, etc.) + External Moderator 51 Germa n Institute of Urban Affairs

52 52 Source: German National Cycling Plan

53 Car free events Europe wide public awareness and health promotion 53 Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik

54 54 Adopted by German Federal Government in late 2012: New National Cycling Plan 2020 Cycling modal share to rise from 10% to 15% of all trips in Germany in year 2020 Bicycle parking capacity, multimodality Pedelecs, cycle highwaysh Focus also on rural mobility But an overall mobility strategy on the national level still lacking 450 suggestions on nat. cycling strategy from cycling experts during cycling policy conference in 2011 German Institute of Urban Affairs