EXH-1 DESIGN CLINTON AVENUE EXTENSION MASTER ROADWAY PLAN MIRADA STREET "C" SPINE ROAD BOYS VILLAGE DRIVE MCCABE ROAD LEGEND

Transcription

1 PP FO: M O LINON VNU XNION ' W 0' -7' W WLN (O & WFWM) WLN (WFWM) OUNOU YNLL O 80- reckenridge Pkwy. ampa, Florida 0 Office: 8-- Fax: M Y PLN 7' W IL Y (Y OH) XH- LGN FUU POP O LIGNMN FUU ULY O WINING LIGNMN POJ NO: IGN Y: FIL: MP XHII OG WN Y: PIGG :\MI\M PLN\WOKING FIL\UN WING\P\XHII\MP XHII.WG-MP-PLN 0/0/ 9:8 M NN IK ngineering usiness ertificate of uthorization No. 878 Landscape rchitecture ertificate of uthorization No. L0000 ivil ngineering Planning & GI ransportation ngineering cological ervices Landscape rchitecture GPHI L: = 00' NNON NH VLOPMN OMPNY, LL IGN 000 IPION OY VILLG IV 00 HI OPYIGH 0, HI IGN, LL. LL IGH V. NO OUMNION (INLUING U NO LIMI O WING O XHII) MY OPI, POU, O IIU UNL PIFI WIN PMIION H N OIN FOM HI IGN, LL. IN VN. ONN I HY GN PIFILLY O GOVNMNL GNI O POU HI OUMNION IN OMPLIN WIH F.. HP 9. O IGN M Y PLN 0 MI IPION ULY PIN O PHL PON F OUNY O 77 07//0 INIIL UMIL V. L I M LV. MI OUNY O 77 (ULY )

2 PP FO: LINON VNU XNION M Y PHING XHII LGN YNLL O PH PH PH PH PH PH PH 7 PH 8 POJ NO: FIL: 80- reckenridge Pkwy. ampa, Florida 0 Office: 8-- Fax: XH- FUU POP O LIGNMN FUU ULY O WINING LIGNMN IGN Y: MP PHING OG WN Y: PIGG :\MI\M PLN\WOKING FIL\UN WING\P\XHII\MP PHING.WG-MP-PHING 0/0/ 9:8 M NN IK ngineering usiness ertificate of uthorization No. 878 Landscape rchitecture ertificate of uthorization No. L0000 ivil ngineering Planning & GI ransportation ngineering cological ervices Landscape rchitecture GPHI L: = 00' NNON NH VLOPMN OMPNY, LL M O HI IPION IGN 000 OPYIGH 0, HI IGN, LL. LL IGH V. NO OUMNION (INLUING U NO LIMI O WING O XHII) MY OPI, POU, O IIU UNL PIFI WIN PMIION H N OIN FOM HI IGN, LL. IN VN. ONN I HY GN PIFILLY O GOVNMNL GNI O POU HI OUMNION IN OMPLIN WIH F.. HP 9. OY VILLG 00 M Y PHING O IGN IPION F 0 MI 07//0 VIW UMIL. V L I M PIN O ULY PHL PON OUNY O 77 OUNY O 77 (ULY )

3 000 0 ad o GPHI L: = 000' e at t 000 oys Village rive PHL PON pine oad IGN 80- reckenridge Pkwy. ampa, Florida 0 Office: 8-- Fax: Mcabe oad LINON VNU XNION LGN PO OUNY P. OF PULI WOK M Y ION I M MI L (urley treet). V ounty oad 77 FUU POP O LIGNMN 00'-0 - '-0 MULI-U PH VL LN VL LN '-0 '-0 '-0 MULI-U PH LNP '-0 8'-0 IWLK IPION LNP '-0 '-0 '-0 FUU ULY O WINING LIGNMN IWLK '-0 '-0 '-0 '-0 0'-0 UILIY MN '-0 8'-0 '-0-9'-0 8'-0 '-0-9'-0 0'-0 UFF 0'-0 UILIY MN 0'-0-7'-0 0'-0 UFF PP FO: F WLN urley treet ounty oad 77 0' -7' W (,,,,F) M Y ION ' W ( ) :\MI\M PLN\WOKING FIL\UN WING\P\XHII\MP ION.WG-MP-ION 0/0/ 9:8 M NN IK ngineering usiness ertificate of uthorization No. 878 Landscape rchitecture ertificate of uthorization No. L0000 IGN ivil ngineering Planning & GI ransportation ngineering cological ervices Landscape rchitecture HI yndall oad YPIL ION - YP OLLO O (,,, & F) 0'- 7' - W/ MULI U PH IGN P mph. 70'-0 IL ZON: NG FOM '-0 O '-0; ONINING MNING PH OF ', 8', O ' 0'-0-8'-0 LNP '-0 '-0 '-0 VL LN VL LN '-0 '-0 '-0 '-0 VL LN MIN. MIN WIH '-0 VL LN 0'-0-8'-0 LNP '-0 - '-0 IL ZON: NG FOM '-0 O '-0; ONINING MNING PH OF ', 8', O ' 0'-0 UILIY MN '-0 '-0 '-0 '-0 '-0 '-0 7'-0 IWLK LNP '-0 '-0 0'-0 0'-0 0'-0 VL LN 0'-0 VL LN 7'-0 LNP UILIY MN '-0 '-0 - '-0 '-0 7'-0 0'-0 UILIY MN.O.W. '-0 UFF.O.W. 0'-0 UILIY MN 0'-0 UFF '-0 0'-0 '-0 POJ NO: '-0 FIL: IWLK MULI-U PH IWLK MP ION IGN Y: OG WN Y: PIGG FLOI POFIONL NGIN YPIL ION - LOL ION YPIL ION - MI OULV 0' - NO ON- PKING ' - NO ON- PKING IGN P mph. IGN P mph. L =0'-0 L =0'-0 : GIION NO. XH- OPYIGH 0, HI IGN, LL. LL IGH V. NO OUMNION (INLUING U NO LIMI O WING O XHII) MY OPI, POU, O IIU UNL PIFI WIN PMIION H N OIN FOM HI IGN, LL. IN VN. ONN I HY GN PIFILLY O GOVNMNL GNI O POU HI OUMNION IN OMPLIN WIH F.. HP 9. 8'-0 IPION 07// INIIL UMIL L =0'-0

4 MI M Y PLN LNIV N L ION 90..., N s indicated on the lternative tandards pplication Form, the pplicant/eveloper of Mirada proposes three () lternative tandards to Land evelopment ode (L) ection 90. wo of the requested lternative tandards are from ection (pavement width) and one is from 90.7., applicability of icycle Facilities. ach is described and justified separately below. LNIV N QU FOM FO YP Y he proposed Master oadway Plan for Mirada has five () ype (minor collector) roadways. Pursuant to Pasco ounty Land evelopment ode ection 90..., a ype roadway without onstreet parking is required to provide travel lanes at a total of feet in width (i.e., lanes at feet each). For all ype streets in Mirada, the applicant requests the use of -foot wide lanes for a total of feet of travel lane pavement for a difference of feet. s part of this lternative tandard, the applicant proposes to increase the bicycle lane widths from feet on each side of the roadway to feet to allow the opportunity for low speed vehicles (LVs) such as golf carts to use the streets, thus making the bicycle lanes into multi-modal lanes. emonstrate ompliance with the Following: Please answer the following criteria for approval as per ection If more than one alternative standard is requested, please address each request. Item or shall be met and all of,, and shall be met.. he alternative standard meets or exceeds the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. he applicant believes, and we concur, that the alternative standard at least meets, if not exceeds, the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. ecently, we have seen a trend in the area toward narrowing street lanes from feet to feet or even 0 feet in some cases to limit the feeling of spaciousness afforded by -foot lanes that can result in encouraging drivers to speed. We have seen this on roadways with design speeds as high as miles per hour. he proposed design/posted speed of these ype roadways is mph. We believe foot lanes will potentially encourage motorists to proceed at safer speeds. In addition, the applicant is proposing to add feet to each of the bicycle lanes on these roadways to create multi-modal lanes that can accommodate low speed vehicles (LVs). he additional lane width and resulting accommodation of LVs should play an important role in reducing automobile trips within the Mirada development. hus, the applicant feels that the alternative standard exceeds the intent of the L.. No feasible engineering or construction solutions can be applied to satisfy the regulation. Not applicable.. he alternative standard does not adversely affect compliance with other ode provisions, development order(s), or permit(s). he requested lternative tandard does not adversely affect compliance with any other ode provision,

5 development order, or permit.. he alternative standard is not in conflict with other mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law. he requested lternative tandard does not conflict with any mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law.. he alternative standard is consistent with the applicable provisions of the omprehensive Plan. he requested alternative standard conflicts with no goals, objectives, or policies of the Pasco ounty omprehensive Plan. LNIV N QU FOM FO YP Y he proposed Master oadway Plan for Mirada has one () ype (major collector) roadway, to be called Mirada oulevard. Pursuant to Pasco ounty Land evelopment ode ection 90..., a ype roadway without on-street parking is required to provide travel lanes at a total of 8 feet in width (i.e., lanes at feet each). For Mirada oulevard, the applicant requests the use of -foot wide lanes for a total of feet of travel lane pavement for a difference of feet. emonstrate ompliance with the Following: Please answer the following criteria for approval as per ection If more than one alternative standard is requested, please address each request. Item or shall be met and all of,, and shall be met.. he alternative standard meets or exceeds the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. he applicant believes, and we concur, that the alternative standard meets the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. ecently, as indicated above, we have seen a trend in the area toward narrowing street lanes from feet to feet or even 0 feet in some cases to limit the feeling of spaciousness afforded by -foot lanes that can result in encouraging drivers to speed. We have seen this on roadways with design speeds as high as miles per hour, including the ounty s approved ypical ection for linton venue as adopted in its oute tudy. linton venue is a proposed -lane divided roadway with a mph design speed. he proposed design/posted speed of Mirada oulevard is mph. We believe -foot lanes will potentially encourage motorists to proceed at safer speeds.. No feasible engineering or construction solutions can be applied to satisfy the regulation. Not applicable.. he alternative standard does not adversely affect compliance with other ode provisions, development order(s), or permit(s). he requested lternative tandard does not adversely affect compliance with any other ode provision, development order, or permit.

6 . he alternative standard is not in conflict with other mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law. he requested lternative tandard does not conflict with any mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law.. he alternative standard is consistent with the applicable provisions of the omprehensive Plan. he requested alternative standard conflicts with no goals, objectives, or policies of the Pasco ounty omprehensive Plan. LNIV N QU FOM FO YP Y he proposed Master oadway Plan for Mirada has one () ype (major collector) roadway, to be called Mirada oulevard. Pursuant to Pasco ounty Land evelopment ode ection 90.7., a ype roadway is required to have bike lanes. For Mirada oulevard, the applicant/developer is proposing the use of a multi-modal path of -feet in width in lieu of bicycle lanes, and also proposes to upsize the required -foot sidewalk on the opposite side of the street from the multi-modal path to feet in width. emonstrate ompliance with the Following: Please answer the following criteria for approval as per ection If more than one alternative standard is requested, please address each request. Item or shall be met and all of,, and shall be met.. he alternative standard meets or exceeds the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. he applicant believes, and we concur, that the alternative standard meets the intent and purpose of the ode requirement at issue. he applicant believes, and we concur, that adequate provision and accommodation for a robust variety of mobility modes, including pedestrian traffic, bicycles, in-line skates, golf carts, and low speed vehicles (LVs) can be made on a -foot wide multi-modal path provided in proximity to a collector roadway. uccess in moving people through a community via a variety of mobility modes on such a trail system has been demonstrated at he Villages, which has trails of varying widths, including feet, and Peachtree ity, Georgia, which has the longest system of golf cart trails in this country, and in which all trails are only 0 feet in width and are shared with bicycles and pedestrians. he developer proposes to upsize the -foot sidewalks on the opposite side of Mirada oulevard from the -foot trail system to feet in width. 7. No feasible engineering or construction solutions can be applied to satisfy the regulation. Not applicable. 8. he alternative standard does not adversely affect compliance with other ode provisions, development order(s), or permit(s). he requested lternative tandard does not adversely affect compliance with any other ode provision,

7 development order, or permit. 9. he alternative standard is not in conflict with other mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law. he requested lternative tandard does not conflict with any mandatory substantive requirements of local, tate, or Federal law. 0. he alternative standard is consistent with the applicable provisions of the omprehensive Plan. he requested alternative standard conflicts with no goals, objectives, or policies of the Pasco ounty omprehensive Plan.