UEG Women s Technical Committee Reports Bern 2016 UNION EUROPÉENNE DE GYMNASTIQUE EUROPÄISCHE TURNUNION EUROPEAN UNION OF GYMNASTICS.

Transcription

1 UNION EUROPÉENNE DE GYMNASTIQUE EUROPÄISCHE TURNUNION EUROPEAN UNION OF GYMNASTICS 31 st European Women s Artistic Gymnastics Championships Bern (SUI), 1 th 5 th June 2016 Technical Report Women s Technical Comittee Yvette Brasier Satu Murtonen Anca Mihailescu Grigoras Hana Liskarova Christine Frauenknecht Orna Shai Sabrina Klaesberg President Technical Delegate Responsible for the Judges Supervisor on Vault Supervisor Uneven Bars Supervisor Balance Beam Supervisor Floor Exercise Page 1

2 Bern 2016: a nice competition, organised with a lot of mastery! The option of doing the draw after the nominative registrations was a good initiative. For the two categories, only one team has withdrawn before the competition and the individuals have stayed stable, which has allowed a very smooth running of the qualifications. As always, we have been able to appreciate the professionalism of the technicians from Spieth as well as of the Swiss Timing team. Their cooperation is precious for us. Thank you to everybody. Our thanks also to: - The UEG staff, always present, ready to reply to our solicitations, and who also do an enormous work of preparation before the competition. - The UEG officials for their support. We had the help of Karsten Struck (GER) for our presentations during the judges course and used his skills in the preparation of the documents for this course. Thank you to Karsten for all the accomplished work, for his availability and his help, we deeply hope that this cooperation will continue. The documents used for the judges course will be put on the UEG website so that all the judges can use this training tool. The entire competitions were run under very good conditions, with an attentive and knowledgeable public. A big thank you too all the numerous helpers for their competence and goodwill. The sun wasn t with us but it was considerably counterbalanced by the warmth of the welcome which we enjoyed during the entire week. To all our gymnasts on the road to Rio: all my best wishes of success. The following report, made by the WTC includes also a comparative analysis of the D and E scores as well as some composition requirements for the cycle Page 2

3 CC GENERAL REPORT Yvette Brasier Satu Muronen Anca Grigoras Page 3

4 Participation I. GENERAL 37 NF have participated in the 31 st European Championships in Women s Artistic Gymnastics, Juniors and Seniors. 32 NF have participated in the Junior competitions, i.e. 24 teams and total of 125 gymnasts 36 NF have participated in the Senior competitions, i.e. 25 teams and total of 131 gymnasts Gymnasts Juniors Seniors Total Bern Sofia Brussels Birmingham Teams Juniors Seniors Bern Sofia Brussels Birmingham Page 4

5 Registrations Juniors Junior registrations Federations Teams Individuals Definitive Nominative 32-AUT,SWE 24 8 In competition Seniors Senior registrations Federations Teams Individuals Definitive Nominative 36-MON,SRB In competition IRL NF took part either in junior or senior competition; 32 NF in the junior competitions and 36 in senior competitions 19 NF participated with junior and senior teams (16 of them were also present in 2014 with senior and junior teams). Participating Federations Team Senior Team Junior Individuals Senior BEL, BLR, CZE, ESP, FIN, FRA, GBR, GER, GRE, HUN, ISL, X X ITA, NOR, ROU, RUS, SLO, SUI, TUR, UKR Individuals Junior POL, POR, ISR, LAT X X AUT, AZE X BUL, CRO, DEN, GEO, NED X X CYP, IRL, SVK X X AND, LTU, SWE X SRB X Competition Programme: CI, CII and CIII for the Juniors CI, CIV and CIII for the Seniors Format: for the Juniors CI for the Seniors CI for the Seniors CIV Juniors Competition I (team ranking) Bern: RUS, GBR, ROU, ITA, FRA, SUI, GER, BEL Sofia: RUS, GBR, ROU, GER, ITA, BEL, FRA, SUI Brussels: RUS, ITA, ROU, GBR, GER NED, FRA, UKR Birmingham: RUS, ROU, ITA, FRA, GBR, NED, SUI, GER Page 5

6 Competition II (24 best gymnasts of CI max. 2 per federation) 15 NF (RUS, SUI, ITA, GBR, FRA, BEL, ROU, GER, NED, HUN, GEO, DEN, CZE, UKR, ESP) in CII, representing 47 % of the federations that have participated in CI. 9 NF were represented with 2 gymnasts, 6 NF with 1 gymnast. In 2014: 10 NF * 2 gymnasts and 4 NF * 1 gymnast. Competition III (8 best gymnasts, max 2 per federation) Vault: 8 gymnasts - 6 federations Bars: 8 gymnasts - 5 federations Beam: 8 gymnasts - 6 federations Floor: 8 gymnasts - 6 federations Seniors Competition IV: (8 best teams of CI) Here they are in the final ranking after CIV: Bern: RUS, GBR, FRA, SUI, ITA, ROU, GER, HUN Sofia: ROU, GBR, RUS, GER, ITA, ESP, BEL, SUI Brussels: ROU, RUS, ITA, GBR, FRA, BEL, ESP, GER Birmingham: RUS, GBR, ROU, FRA, ITA, SUI, NED, UKR Competition III (8 best gymnasts, max 2 per federation) Vault: 8 gymnasts - 7 federations Bars: 8 gymnasts - 6 federations Beam: 8 gymnasts - 6 federations Floor: 8 gymnasts - 7 federations Summary of the federations represented in CII and CIII: NF Junior Junior Vault CIII Senior Vault CIII Junior Bars CIII Senior Bars CIII Junior Beam CIII Page 6 Senior Beam CIII Junior Floor CIII Senior Floor CIII Total 2016 Total 2014 CII RUS GBR FRA ROU ITA SUI GER BEL HUN NED SLO CZE DEN GEO ESP POL UKR SWE AZE Total 2012

7 IRL BLR GRE ISR CRO TOTAL For all competitions, Juniors and Seniors, Bern 2016: Distribution of the medals CIV Senior and CIII Junior & Senior Team Junior and CII Junior NF Junior Gold Senior Gold Junior Silver Senior Silver Junior Bronze Senior Bronze Gold Silver Bronze Total 2016 Total 2014 Total 2012 Total 2010 RUS GBR ROU SUI ITA FRA GER AZE NED UKR TOTAL Page 7

8 Comments In 2010 the gold medals were shared only between three (3) federations. The distribution has been fairer in the following years as in 2012 six (6) federations, in 2014 and 2016 five (5) federations returned home with at least one gold medal. The dominant countries are nearly the same every year, but in 2016 the biggest winner was FRA who in 2012 and 2014 went home without medals, but in 2016 took 3 medals. General Organisation The competition venue PostFinance-Arena and the training halls in Bernexpo were located along the tramline from the different hotels and any transportation were not needed. The competition schedules were held under excellent conditions. The competition CI Juniors and Seniors were organized in 4 subdivisions. The competition schedules were respected. The award ceremonies were held according to the protocol. The access and accreditations controls were carried out by the security service. Page 8

9 The LOC worked hard whole week, but they were very friendly, helpful and smiling team. It was very nice to work with them Thank You! II. JUDGING REPORT 36 National federations with judge 70 judges 1 National federation without judge (AND) category I 11 category II 36 category III 20 category IV 3 Judges categories representation cat. I - 15% cat. II - 53% cat. III - 25% cat. IV - 7% Page 9

10 D-Panel D1-judges were drawn by the UEG/WTC in Bratislava on among those with FIG Brevet category I. They belonged to BEL, ESP, FRA, GBR D2-judges were drawn by the UEG/WTC after the definitive registration ( ), in Bern on among those with FIG Brevet category I, II and III. In Juniors they belonged to DEN, FIN, GER, NED In Seniors they belonged to AUT, BUL, ITA, NOR Reference judges (RJ) RJ were drawn by the UEG/WTC after the definitive registration ( ), in Bern on RJ remained at the same apparatus throughout the entire competition in Juniors and in Seniors, except for C-III in case of non-neutrality caused by the participation of gymnasts representing their own NF. DRAW JUNIORS 32 NF Competition I and II The draw was done horizontally. PRINCIPLES D, R and E Judges in the same panel represented different NF Out for the first draw: - NF having already designated positions as D2 or RJ (reference) - NF without competitors in Juniors Judges with category 4 were drawn only for Assistant positions Draw for the E-panel: 20 NF for 20 places Draw for the 2 positions of Reserve judge from the NF which had D2 position Draw for the 7 positions of Assitant: rest of 2 NF with D2 position + 3 NF with category 4 judges + 2 NF without competitors in Junior competition Competition III The draw was done horizontally. PRINCIPLES D, RJ and E Judges in the same panel represented different NF NF with competitors and first reserve in C-III all finals, were withdrawn One RJ with competitors in all finals was replaced by a neutral judge E-panel: 20 NF for 20 places Draw: priority for the NF with competitors in 1, 2 or 3 finals, to insure a neutral place Draw: the rest of the NF (all neutral) Draw for the 2 positions of Reserve judge from the NF which had D2 position Draw for the 7 positions of Assitant: rest of 2 NF with D2 position + 3 NF with category judges from NF which already have a position but are neutral, to complete all Page 10

11 DRAW SENIORS 35 NF Competition I The draw was done horizontally. PRINCIPLES D, R and E Judges in the same panel represented different NF Out for the first draw: - NF having already designated positions as D2 or RJ (reference) - NF without competitors in Seniors Judges with category 4 were drawn only for Assistant positions Draw for the E-panel: 22 NF for 20 places in E-panel + 2 Reserve judges Draw for the 7 positions of Assitant: 3 NF with D2 position + 3 NF with category 4 judges + 1 NF without competitors in Senior competition Competition IV Same as C-I, except the priority given to the 2 Reserve judges Competition III The draw was done horizontally. PRINCIPLES D, RJ and E Judges in the same panel represented different NF NF with competitors and first reserve in C-III all finals, were withdrawn One RJ with competitors in the same apparatus was switched with one RJ from another apparatus E-panel: 20 NF for 20 places Draw: priority for the NF with competitors in 1, 2 or 3 finals, to insure a neutral place Draw: the rest of the NF (all neutral) Draw for the 2 positions of Reserve judge from the NF which had D2 position Draw for the 7 positions of Assitant: rest of 2 NF with D2 position + 3 NF with category judges from NF which already have a position but are neutral, to complete all Judges Instruction WTC prepared another new, interesting instruction, after an interactive concept, with the help of Karsten Struck (judge GER), presented to the WTC by our colleague Sabrina Klaesberg. He prepared the platform called Magic Wall in powerpoint and the WTC provided the material to be inserted. They were divided by teams, having to answer to questions concerning the code of points, analysis and scores of exercises at every apparatus, all of that leading to win or lose precious points. At the end there was also a ranking. The judges received very well the new way of instruction. Page 11

12 G UEG-WTC - EC Bern - JI UEG-WTC - EC Bern - JI Page 12

13 New elements The following elements were submitted: APPARATUS ELEMET DESCRIPTION GYMNAST NAT DV SYMBOL CATEGORY UNEVEN BARS 1 Stalder fwd in L-grip with 1 ⅟2 (540⁰) to handstand MERKOVA, Adela CZE E junior BALANCE BEAM 1 Mount: flank with 1/2 (180⁰) turn finishing in cross sit position BOTNARU, Alisia ROU A junior 2 Scissors leap over the beam with 1/2 (180⁰) turn to cross sit position MERKOVA, Vendula CZE A junior 3 2/1 turn with free leg held upward in 180 split position throughout turn RUMBUTIS, Julia GEO E senior 4 Gainer flic flac with leg change ZUBOVA, Varvara RUS C junior 5 Mount: Jump on the beam with 1/1 turn (360⁰) to straddle position TORRES, Marcela SWE A senior 6 Change leg leap to ring position with the front leg bent at min. 90⁰ MILLOUSI, Vasiliki GRE D senior 7 Dismount: gainer salto stretched with 2/1 turn (720⁰) JURKOWSKA- KOWALSKA, Katarzyna POL G senior 8 1 ⅟2 turn (540⁰) in side position URVIKKO, Annika FIN C senior FLOOR 1 Split leap with 2/1 turn (720⁰) Fragapane Claudia GBR E senior 2 3/1 turn (1080⁰) on one leg with heel of free leg fwd at horizontal throughout turn Titarsolej Mara NED E senior General comments The work of the judges was good and the ranking of the gymnasts was correct. After the first view of the the evaluation, based on the program elaborated by Mr. Les Fairbrother, the judging in seniors was better than the one in juniors, so we have to take care in future with more preparation for the young and/or unexperienced judges. Page 13

14 CC APPARATUS REPORT Hana Liskarova Christine Frauenknecht Orna Shai Sabrina Klaesberg Vault Uneven Bars Balance Beam Floor Exercise Page 14

15 APPARATUS REPORT VAULT 1. Supervisor/D-planel Competition Seniors Hana LISKAROVA (UEG) Supervisor Marianne DROINGT ASSADI (FRA) D 1 Johanna GRATT (AUT) D 2 2. Participants on Vault Gymnasts 89 Gymnasts making 2 vaults 31 Total vaults performed 120 Federation Number of vaults from each group Group no # % 0,0 25,0 22,5 47,5 5,0 Page 15

16 4. Number of vaults from each group GROUP 2 Handspring fwd on... # 2.10 Tucked Salto DV # 2.11 Tucked Salto fwd with ½ turn off DV # 2.12 Tucked Salto fwd with 1/1 turn off DV # 2.20 Picked Salto DV # 2.21 Picked Salto fwd with ½ turn off DV # 2.31 Stretched Salto fwd with ½ turn off DV # 2.32 Stretched Salto fwd with 1/1 turn off DV # 2.33 Stretched Salto fwd with 1 ½ turn off DV GROUP 3 Tsukahara... # 3.10 Tucked Salto DV # 3.20 Picked Salto DV # 3.30 Stretched Salto DV # 3.32 Stretched Salto with 1/1 turn off DV Page 16

17 Page 17

18 GROUP 4 Round off, flic-flac on... # 4.10 Tucked salto bwd off DV # 4.20 Piked salto bwd off DV # 4.30 Stretched salto bwd off DV # 4.32 Stretched salto bwd with 1/1 turn off DV # 4.33 Stretched salto bwd with 1 ½ turn off DV # 4.34 Stretched salto bwd with 2/1 turn off DV GROUP 5 Round off, flic-flac with ½ turn on... # 5.10 Tucked salto fwd DV # 5.20 Piked salto fwd DV # 5.31 Stretched salto fwd with ½ turn off DV Page 18

19 5. Line deductions Line 0.1 p. 0.3 p. # The number of gymnasts who performed different no of vault: Highest Lowest Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: STEINGRUBER, Giulia SUI 1 D-Score: STEINGRUBER, Giulia SUI 1 E-Score: STEINGRUBER, Giulia SUI 1 Lowest Notes Ranking Final Score: D-Score: and 79 E-Score: E-Score E-Score # of gymnasts % or more 24 20,22 % ,04 % ,99 % ,37 % or less 6 3,37 % Page 19

20 9. Average of scores Average C I Q for C III Finale-score p p. D-score 4.94 p p. E-score p p. 10. Comments The D-panel worked very well. Competition went smooth and fast Judging was OK. One gymnast used the colour wrists on vault, the deduction 0,30 p. was applied. the reference scores were used 5 times on vault Page 20

21 Appendix Comparison European Championships Moscow 2013 Sofia 2014 Montpellier 2015 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Montpellier Bern # % # % # % ,0 % 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % ,9 % 0 0,0 % 1 0,8 % ,6 % 49 44,5 % 47 39,2 % ,8 % 60 54,5 % 71 59,2 % 6.0 or more 2 1,8 % 1 0,9 % 1 0,8 % Total Vault ,0 % ,0 % ,0 % Page 21

22 2. Comparison of the Vault groups in percent 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

23 1. Supervisor/D-planel Competition Juniors Hana LISKAROVA (UEG) Supervisor Marianne DROINGT ASSADI (FRA) D 1 Agnete Louise MADSEN BJERRENGAARD (DEN)D 2 2. Participants on Vault Gymnasts 106 Gymnasts making 2 vaults 29 Total vaults performed 135 Federation Number of vaults from each group Group no # % 0,0 24,2 26,5 49,3 5,0-23 -

24 4. Number of vaults from each group GROUP 2 Handspring fwd on... # 2.10 Tucked Salto DV # 2.11 Tucked Salto fwd with ½ turn off DV # 2.20 Picked Salto DV # 2.21 Picked Salto fwd with ½ turn off DV GROUP 3 Tsukahara... # 3.10 Tucked Salto DV # 3.12 Tucked Salto with 1/1 turn off DV # 3.20 Picked Salto DV # 3.30 Stretched Salto DV # 3.32 Stretched Salto with 1/1 turn off DV

25 GROUP 4 Round off, flic-flac on... # 4.12 Tucked salto bwd off DV # 4.20 Piked salto bwd off DV # 4.30 Stretched salto bwd off DV # 4.32 Stretched salto bwd with 1/1 turn off DV # 4.33 Stretched salto bwd with 1 ½ turn off DV # 4.34 Stretched salto bwd with 2/1 turn off DV Line deductions Line 0.1 p. 0.3 p. # The number of gymnasts who performed different no of vault:

26 7. Highest Lowest Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: GOLGOTA, Denisa ROU 1 D-Score: GOLGOTA, Denisa ROU 1 MAGGIO, Martina ITA 2 CIMPIAN, Olivia ROU 3 E-Score: GOLGOTA Denisa ROU 1 Lowest Notes Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score E-Score # of gymnasts % or more 15 11,11 % ,70 % ,56 % ,41 % or less 3 2,22 % 9. Average of scores Average C I Q for C III Finale-score 13,180 p p. D-score p p. E-score p p

27 10. Comments There were 3 gymnasts received 0 scores for different reasons : - started vaulting on red line (GBR), this was a mistake of the gymnast; - landed not feet first (BEL); - run with touching board but not vaulting (RUS). D-panel worked very good. E-panel judged Ok, eventhough there were quite small differences between very good and poor vaults. There were 4 reference scores counted

28 Appendix Comparison European Championships Sofia 2014 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Bern # % # % ,67 0 0, ,00 0 0, , , , , or more 0 0,00 0 0,00 Total Exercise , ,

29 2. Comparison of the Vault groups in percent 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

30 APPARATUS REPORT - UNEVEN BARS 1. Supervisor/D-panel Competition I - Seniors Christine FRAUENKNECHT (UEG)Supervisor Pauline SMITH (GBR) D 1 Anne Torill NORDLI (NOR) D 2 2. Participants on Uneven Bars Gymnasts 87 Federations D-Score D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D- D- # Score Score # * * * * * 5 * Most used D-Score in C

31 4. Missing composition requirements and performed dismounts Missing composition requirements 1. Flight element from HB to LB 7 2. Flight element on the same bar Different grips Non flight element with min. 360 turn 9 5. Dismount No A B 11 Performed dismounts No Dismount 0 A-Dismount 7 B-Dismount 4 C-Dismount 26 D-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements E-Element F-Element 43 1 DV E DV F

32 6. Connection Value (CV) CV # CV (0.30 or more) more than 1 gymnast or special connection # D + D + D = D + D + D = D + D + E = D + D + D = E + D + D + E = E + D + D = E + E + D = D + F + D = E + D + D = CV (0.20) # CV (0.20) # E + D 3 D + E 1 D + D 1 D + C 1 D + D 1 D + D 2 E + D 1 F + D 1 E + D 1 E + D 1 D + E 1 D + E

33 CV 0.10 p. (more than 2) CV (0.10) # CV (0.10) # D + D 10 D + D 3 D + D 5 D + D 3 D + D 4 D + D 4 D + D 9 Routines with # Most used D-Elements (more than 4) Element # Element # Element # Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # D 44 C Falls Routines with... 1 fall 2 falls 3 falls 4 falls #

34 9. Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: MUSTAFINA, Aliya RUS 1 D-Score: HARROLD, Ruby GBR 11 E-Score: MUSTAFINA, Aliya RUS 1 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % , , , , , , , , , ,30 Total Scores 17 19,54 From a total 87 exercises 17 exercises (19,54 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher

35 Total E-Scores E-Score # % ,45 % ,09 % ,84 % ,44 % ,09 % ,45 % ,30 % ,60 % ,75 % Total Scores , New elements - none Comments We would like to thank the D-panel, who did a very good job. The E-Judges did a good job. The reference score went in five times. Gymnast performed 4 elements, then fall, used the springboard to jump back up to HB and continue exercise - no deduction applied. 3 x raising bars request. Some very high level skills and connections. Interesting construction of some routines

36 Appendix Comparison European Championships Moscow 2013 Sofia 2014 Montpellier 2015 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Montpellier Bern # % # % # % 1.9 or less 2 2,3 % 3 3,5 % 1 1,2 % ,7 % 2 2,4 % 5 5,8 % ,8 % 12 14,1 % 11 12,8 % ,7 % 25 29,4 % 18 20,9 % ,0 % 37 43,5 % 40 46,5 % 6.0 or more 11 12,5 % 6 7,1 % 11 12,8 % Total Exercise ,0 % ,0 % ,0 %

37 2. Comparison of the missing composition requirements 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

38 1. Supervisor/D-panel Competition I - Juniors Christine FRAUENKNECHT (UEG)Supervisor Pauline SMITH (GBR) D 1 Maike SALEWSKI-KRISCHOK (GER) D 2 2. Participants on Uneven Bars Gymnasts 106 Federations D-Score D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # * * Most used D-Score in C

39 4. Missing composition requirements and performed dismounts Missing composition requirements 1. Flight element from HB to LB Flight element on the same bar Different grips Non flight element with min. 360 turn Dismount No A 1 Performed dismounts No Dismount 0 A-Dismount 1 B-Dismount 13 C-Dismount 61 D-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements E-Element

40 6. Connection Value (CV) CV # 27 5 CV (0.30 or more) # D + D + D = D + D + D = D + D + D = D + D + D = CV (0.20) # D + D 1 D + C 1 E + D 1 CV (0.10) # CV (0.10) # D + D 7 D + D 1 D + D 1 D + D 1 D + D 2 D + D 1 D + D 2 D + D 1 D + D 3 D + D 1 D + D 2 D + D 1 D + D 3 D + D 1 Routines with #

41 7. Most used D-Elements Element # Element # Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # D 59 C Falls Routines with... 1 fall 2 falls 3 falls # Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: ILIANKOVA, Anastasija RUS 1 D-Score: ILIANKOVA, Anastasija RUS 1 PEREBINOSOVA, Uliana RUS 2 E-Score: CHARPY, Lorette FRA 3 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score:

42 10. E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % , , , , , , , , , ,94 Total Scores 19 17,92 From a total 106 exercises 19 exercises (17,92 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher. Total E-Scores E-Score # % ,94 % ,98 % ,58 % ,81 % ,87 % ,60 % ,55 % ,72 % ,94 % Total Scores ,00%

43 11. New elements - none Comments We would like to thank the D-panel, who did a very good job. We had some problems with the E-score with judges without experience. The reference score went in five times. Wide range of level. Some routines with D-score around 5.0 with a very good execution. Best routines were very good and high level. Some routines were very low level and some with very poor execution

44 Appendix Comparison European Championships Sofia 2014 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Bern # % # % 1.9 or less 9 7,9 % 6 5,7 % ,3 % 16 15,1 % ,3 % 12 11,3 % ,8 % 33 31,1 % ,2 % 37 34,9 % 6.0 or more 4 3,5 % 2 1,9 % Total Exercise ,0 % ,0 %

45 5. Comparison of the missing composition requirements (CR) 6. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

46 APPARATUS REPORT - BALANCE BEAM 1. Supervisor/D-panel Competition Seniors Orna SHAI (UEG) Supervisor Marleen VAN DOOREN (BEL) D 1 Carmen Maria Basla (ITA) D 2 2. Participants on Beam Gymnasts 88 Federations D-Score D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score * Most used D-Score in C

47 4. Missing composition requirements and performed dismounts Missing composition requirements 1. Dance connection 6 2. Turn (Group 3) 2 3. Acro series 8 4. Acro fwd/swd and bwd 0 5. Dismount No A B 4 Performed dismounts No Dismount 0 A-Dismount 0 B-Dismount 4 C-Dismount 36 D-Dismount 20 E-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements E-Element F-Element G-Element DV E DV F DV G

48 6. Elements - Devaluation - No DV (most performed) Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # E 2 D 11 D 0 C 7 D 6 C 15 D 3 C 4 D 2 B 2 C 6 A 12 C 17 A 3 D 57 E 4 D Mounts Mounts no DV A B C D E #

49 8. Connection Value (CV) CV total in one exercise CV # acro flight element; ex. dmt 0.1 p. 0.2 p. C/D + D C + C B + E C/D + D B + D B + F Acrobatic series bonus 0.1 p. B + B + C 12 Dance/Mixed Salto + Dance Turns 0.1 p. 0.1 p. 0.2 p. 0.1 p. 0.1 p. C + C C + D D + D D + A A + C Falls Falls # Gymnasts with one fall 31 Gymnasts with more than 1 fall 5 Routines with fall 36 Routines without fall

50 10. Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: MUSTAFINA, Alina RUS TUTKHALAN, Sede RUS 11 E-Score: MUSTAFINA, Alina RUS 1 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % , , , , , , , , , ,27 Total Scores 19 21,59 From a total 88 exercises 19 exercises (21,59 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher

51 Total E-Scores E-Score # % , , , , , , , , ,41 Total Scores , Comments D panel work very good

52 Appendix Comparison European Championships Moscow 2013 Sofia 2014 Montpellier 2015 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Montpellier Bern # % # % # % 2.9 or less 1 1,2 3 3,4 1 1, ,4 5 5,6 1 1, , , , , , ,7 6.0 or more 4 4,7 4 4, ,4 Total Exercise , , ,0-52 -

53 2. Comparison of the missing composition requirements 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

54 1. Supervisor/D-panel Competition Juniors Orna SHAI (UEG) Supervisor Marleen VAN DOOREN (BEL) D 1 Jonna Salonen (FIN) D 2 2. Participants on Beam Gymnasts 106 Federations D-Score D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # * * Most used D-Score in C

55 4. Missing composition requirements and performed dismounts Missing composition requirements 1. Dance connection 6 2. Turn (Group 3) 1 3. Acro series 9 4. Acro fwd/swd and bwd 2 5. Dismount No A 0 Performed dismounts No Dismount 0 A-Dismount 0 B-Dismount 19 C-Dismount 43 D-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements E-Element F-Element

56 6. Elements - Devaluation - No DV (most performed) Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # E 4 D 7 0 D 1 C 9 0 D 9 C 11 2 D 1 C 2 0 D 0 B 3 0 C 8 A 6 0 C 14 A 4 1 E 3 D Mounts Mounts no DV A B C D #

57 8. Connection Value (CV) CV total in one exercise CV # acro flight element; ex. dmt 0.1 p. 0.2 p. C/D + D C + C B + E C/D + D B + D B + F Acrobatic series bonus 0.1 p. B + B + C 14 Dance/Mixed Salto + Dance Turns 0.1 p. 0.2 p. 0.1 p. 0.1 p. C + C D + D D + A A + C Falls Falls # Gymnasts with one fall 39 Gymnasts with more than 1 fall 16 Routines with fall 54 Routines without fall

58 10. Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: ILIANKOVA, Anastasiia RUS 1 D-Score: CRISAN, Ioana ROU BORZYKH, Polina GEO 7 E-Score: EREMINA, Elena RUS 2 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % , , , , , , , , , ,66 Total Scores 22 22,64 From a total 106 exercises 22 exercises (20,76 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher

59 Total E-Scores E-Score # % , , , , , , , , ,77 Total Scores , Comments The computer for D panel has to be in the same order as in the sheets. Each CR separately (now 5 CR and DMT). The Element is there need for 45 first leg for requirement? D panel work very good

60 Appendix Comparison European Championships EC Sofia 2014 EC Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Bern # % # % 1.9 or less 9 8,0 0 0, ,6 0 0, ,6 6 5, , , , ,8 6.0 or more 4 3,6 2 1,9 Total Exercise , ,0-60 -

61 2. Comparison of the missing Composition requirements 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

62 APPARATUS REPORT FLOOR EXERCISE 1. Supervisor D-panel Competition I - Seniors Sabrina KLAESBERG (UEG) Supervisor Maria Jose San MARTIN (ESP) D 1 Tzvetana DOBREVA (BUL) D 2 2. Participants on Floor Gymnasts 88 Federations D-Score D- D- D- D- D- D- # # # # # # Score Score Score Score Score Score 6, ,8 1 6, ,7 2 6, * * Most used D-Score in C

63 4. Missing Composition requirements and performed Dismounts Missing Composition requirements 1. Dance passage 0 2. Salto fwd/swd and bwd 0 3. Salto with LA turn (min. 360 ) 0 4. Salto with double BA 3 5. Dismount No A B 0 Performed dismounts No Dismount 0 A-Dismount 0 B-Dismonut 0 C-Dismount 24 D-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements E-Element F-Element H-Element DV E DV F DV H

64 6. Connection Value (CV) CV total in one exercise CV # Number of Connection Value (CV) Acro indirect Acro direct B/C + D 0.1 p. 0.2 p. 0.1 p. 0.2 p. A + A +D C + E D + D A + A + E A + D C + C A + E C + D Mixed Turns D salto + B dance 0.1 p. 0.1 p. E salto + A dance D + B B + B Falls Falls # Gymnasts with one fall 4 Exercices with falls 4% Gymnasts with more than 1 fall 0 Total falls 4 Gymnastis without fall 84 Exercise without falls 95%

65 8. Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: FRAGAPANE, Claudia GBR 1 D-Score: FRAGAPANE, Claudia GBR 1 E-Score: STEINGRUBER, Giulia SUI 2 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % Total Scores 0 0,00 0 0,00 2 2,27 1 1,14 4 4,55 0 0,00 4 4,55 1 1,14 4 4, , ,41 From a total 88 exercises 25 exercises (28,41 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher

66 Total E-Scores E-Score # % Total Scores 7 7, , ,00 7 7,95 8 9,09 3 3,41 1 1,14 0 0,00 0 0, , Neutral deductions Line deductions (total in one routine) Deductions # New elements Element description Gymnast NAT DV Symbol 1 Split leap with 2/1 turn (720 ) FRAGAPANE, Claudia GBR E 2 3/1 turn (1080 ) on one leg with heel of free leg fwd at horizontal throughout turn TITARSOLEJ, Mara NED E

67 12. Comments The D-panel Maria Jose San Martin and Tzvetana Dobreva did an excellent job, they worked quick and kept their line throughout the whole competition. No inquiry was received on floor during competition I. The reference score went in three times. Element devaluated Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # C 31 B 15 0 C 8 B

68 Appendix Comparison European Championships Moscow 2013 Sofia 2014 Montpellier 2015 Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Montpellier Bern # % # % # % 1.9 or less 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % ,0 % 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % ,4 % 3 3,8 % 3 3,4% ,8 % 38 48,1 % 34 38,6% ,1 % 34 43,0 % 47 53,4% 6.0 or more 5 5,7 % 4 5,1 % 4 4,5% Total Exercise ,0 % ,0 % ,0 %

69 2. Comparison of the missing Composition requirements 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent

70 1. Supervisor D-panel Competition I - Juniors Sabrina KLAESBERG (UEG) Supervisor Maria Jose SAN MARTIN (ESP) D 1 Aukje DE JONG (NED) D 2 2. Participants on Floor Gymnasts 106 Federations D-Score D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # D-Score # , , * Most used D-Score in C

71 4. Missing Composition requirements and performed Dismounts Missing Composition requirements 1. Dance passage 0 2. Salto fwd/swd and bwd 0 3. Salto with LA turn (min. 360 ) 0 4. Salto with double BA 3 5. Dismount No and A 1 Performed dismounts No Dismount 1 A-Dismount 0 B-Dismonut 1 C-Dismount 75 D-Dismount or more Number of E - G Elements -Element -Element 28 1 DV DV

72 6. Connection Value (CV) CV total in one exercise CV # Number of Connection Value (CV) Acro indirect Acro direct 0.1 p. 0.2 p. 0.1 p. 0.2 p. B/C + D A + A +D C + E D + D A + A + E A + D C + C A + E C + D Mixed Turns 0.1 p. 0.1 p. D salto + B dance E salto + A dance D + B B + B Falls Falls # Gymnasts with one fall 9 Gymnasts with more than 1 fall 0 Total falls 9 Gymnasts without fall

73 8. Highest Lowest Scores Highest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: EREMINA, Elena RUS 1 D-Score: EREMINA, Elena RUS 1 KINSELLA, Alice GBR 4 CRISAN, Ioana ROU 9 E-Score: EREMINA, Elena RUS 1 Lowest Gymnast Federation Ranking Final Score: D-Score: E-Score: E-Score Number of exercise with 8.00 p. or more E-Score # % , , , , , , , , , ,66 Total Scores 24 22,64 From a total 106 exercises 24 exercises (22,64 %) have achieved an E-Score of 8.00 p. or higher

74 Total E-Scores E-Score # % , , , , , , , , ,00 Total Scores , Neutral deductions Line deductions (total in one routine) Deductions # New elements - none

75 12. Comments The D-panel Maria Jose San Martin and Aukje de Jong did an excellent job, they worked quick and kept their line throughout the whole competition. No inquiry was received on floor during competition I. At on exercise the deduction for overtime had to be applied. The reference score went in four times. In this junior competition it was obvious that the floor routines improved a lot from artistry point of view. Element devaluated Element DV # Devaluation to # No DV # C 52 B 22 0 C 22 B

76 Appendix Comparison European Championships EC Sofia 2014 EC Bern Comparison of the D-Score in percent Sofia Bern # % # % 1.9 or less 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % ,0 % 0 0,0 % ,0 % 2 1,9 % ,3 % 61 57,5 % ,7 % 43 40,6 % 6.0 or more 0 0,0 % 0 0,0 % Total Exercise ,0 % ,0 %

77 2. Comparison of the missing Composition requirements 3. Comparison of the total E-score in percent