D6. Final Noise Existing Conditions Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "D6. Final Noise Existing Conditions Report"

Transcription

1 D6. Final Noise Existing Conditions Report

2 Clean Harbors Canada Inc. Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Noise Existing Conditions Report Prepared by: Conestoga-Rovers & Associates MAY 2014 REF. NO (3) 651 Colby Drive, Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2

3 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Executive Summary This Noise Existing Conditions Report was prepared to identify and describe the existing noise conditions associated with the Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Study Area in accordance with the Air Quality, Odour and Noise Work Plan. As per the approved Terms of Reference, the Study Area includes the existing site as well as potentially affected surrounding areas. The Study Area for the noise discipline was defined by the area extending 1 kilometre from the existing Clean Harbors Canada Inc. property boundary and the proposed south expansion alternative. The noise impact beyond 1 kilometre is environmentally insignificant. The noise existing baseline conditions were determined using the framework provided in the approved Terms of Reference. The noise existing conditions were evaluated using predictive modeling and the predominant off-site environmental noise sources were identified. Vehicular road traffic was determined to be the predominant background noise in the Study Area. Field observations were used to confirm the on and off-site baseline conditions as well as the locations of the residential dwellings subject of analysis. The traffic volumes and corresponding traffic-generated sound levels demonstrate that a portion of the Study Area can be classified as Class 2 Urban for those residences located along Petrolia Line and Brigden Road (adjacent to Plank Road). The Study Area can be classified as Class 3 Rural for those residences located along Telfer Road and Rokeby Line due to the absence of significant road traffic volumes. Vibration was observed to be environmentally insignificant. The facility s existing noise levels meet the Ministry of the Environment noise limits at all residential receptors with the exception of one residential property. Noise control measures are necessary to achieve the minimum MOE noise limits at the residence identified as point-of-reception 1. This residence is located immediately west of the Clean Harbors facility main gate on the opposite side of Telfer Road. There are 15 existing one-storey (1.5 m above grade) and two-storey (4.5 m above grade) residential dwellings within the Study Area of interest. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

4 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion Study Area Methodology Available Secondary Source Information Collection and Review Process Undertaken Review of Available Information Site Visit & Field Investigations Road Traffic Modelling Noise Modelling of the Existing Site Conditions Review of Noise Work Plan Existing Noise Conditions Historic Noise Complaints Review of Zoning Site Visit and Field Investigation MOE Technical Guidelines and Standards Road Traffic Data and Modelling Road Traffic Volumes Model Input Parameters Traffic Volumes Road Conditions Road Traffic Modelling Results Noise Model of the Existing Facility Conditions Field Investigations Predominant Noise Sources Modelled Noise Contours Off-site Noise Impact at Existing Receivers Summary References Glossary of Terms D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

5 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA List of Figures Figure 2.1: Noise Study Area 3 Figure 3.1: St. Clair Township By-law Comprehensive Zoning Noise Study Area 5 Figure 4.1: Road Traffic Noise Contours Daytime 15 Figure 4.2: Road Traffic Noise Contours - Nightime 16 Figure 4.3A: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Worst-Case Conditions) 19 Figure 4.3B: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Typical Conditions) 20 Figure 4.4A: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Worst-Case Conditions) 21 Figure 4.4B: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Typical Conditions) 22 Figure 4.5A: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Worst-Case Conditions) 23 Figure 4.5B: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Typical Conditions) 24 Figure 4.6A: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Worst-Case Conditions) 25 Figure 4.6B: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Typical Conditions) 26 Figure 5.1: Cumulative Noise Impact Noise Contours - Daytime 29 Appendices Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix B Air Quality, Odour and Noise Work Plan Appendix C Additional Reviewed Information Appendix D Summary Noise Tables 1 to 4 and C.1 Appendix E Facility Acoustic Assessment Report D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

6 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 1.0 Introduction This report identifies and describes the existing noise conditions associated with the proposed expansion of the Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Study Area (see Section 2.0) in accordance with the approved Terms of Reference (ToR) (Appendix A) and the Air Quality, Odour and Noise Work Plan (Appendix B). The ToR included a preliminary description of the existing environmental conditions in the Study Area with the commitment that the description would be expanded upon in the Environmental Assessment (EA). In accordance with the ToR, investigative studies of the following environmental components were carried out for the purposes of generating a more detailed description and understanding of the existing environment for use in the assessment and evaluation of the two alternative landfill expansion options during the EA: Atmospheric Environment Geology and Hydrogeology Surface Water Natural Environment Agriculture Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Technical Socio-economic Upon completion, each report will be made available during the EA to St. Clair Township and appropriate review agencies, First Nations and Métis organizations, and the public for their information via the project website and upon request and will become either a reference or supporting document to the submitted EA Report. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 1 -

7 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 2.0 Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion Study Area The existing approved landfill operation, including all historical fill areas, has a footprint of 56 hectares out of the entire 121 hectare licensed property (see Figure 2.1). As documented in the ToR, two landfill expansion options for the existing Lambton Landfill have been identified: A vertical expansion of the existing landfill site Expansion of the site to the south of the existing landfill (i.e., shallow entombment off site) As per the ToR, the study areas include the existing Lambton Landfill Facility as well as potentially affected surrounding areas. (See Figure 2.1). The Study Area for the noise discipline was defined by the area extending 1 kilometre (km) from the existing Clean Harbors Canada Inc. (Clean Harbors) property boundary and the proposed south expansion alternative. The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Noise Screening Process Questionnaire requires that industries with significant noise sources or equipment with significant noise emissions evaluate the off-site environmental noise impact within 1 km from the site; the noise impact beyond 1 km is expected to be environmentally insignificant. Five roadways are located within the Study Area including: 1. Petrolia Line is a two-lane roadway with significant 24-hour road traffic 2. Plank Road (Country Road 20) is a two-lane arterial road to Sarnia with significant 24-hour road traffic north of Petrolia Line 3. Brigden Road is a two-lane road providing access to Country Road 20 with significant 24-hour road traffic 4. Rokeby Line is a two-lane rural road with local traffic only 5. Telfer Road is a two-lane rural road primarily used by Clean Harbors The rationale for the Study Area for the noise discipline is that the off-site environmental noise impact from the existing Clean Harbors Lambton facility (Facility) or the development of either of the two proposed landfill expansion alternatives will be defined by the sound power generated by the equipment on-site and the proximity and line-of-sight exposure to the off-site receiver locations. In the absence of other developments and built structures, such as businesses or institutions, the residential dwellings within the Study Area represent the receiver locations subject of the assessment. The net change to the noise impact predicted at these residences based on the design of the two landfill expansion alternatives will be directly compared to the Noise Existing Conditions Report. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 2 -

8 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 2.1: Noise Study Area D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 3 -

9 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 3.0 Methodology The Noise Existing Conditions Report was developed based on the evaluation criteria, indicators and data sources included in the approved ToR (refer to Appendix A), which were developed in consultation with government agencies and other stakeholders, and is based on the activities described in the Air Quality, Odour and Noise Work Plan (March, 2011) (refer to Appendix B). In addition, input and comments were solicited from St. Clair Township and First Nations with respect to the Air Quality, Odour and Noise Work Plan. Comments that resulted in revisions to the work plan have been integrated in the description of the existing noise conditions. 3.1 Available Secondary Source Information Collection and Review Available secondary sources of information were collected and reviewed by the Noise Study Team to determine the noise existing conditions within the Study Area. The following sources of information were collected and reviewed: Review of Historic Noise Complaints Review of current zoning plans, definitions and land use designations MOE technical guidelines and standards Road traffic volumes Site visit, field observations and updated noise measurements 3.2 Process Undertaken Information was compiled and interpreted from the secondary source information. The following section outlines the process followed to determine the existing noise conditions Review of Available Information Historic noise complaints, zoning information and road traffic data were collected and reviewed by the project team. The zoning information is summarized in Figure 3.1 and road traffic data is provided in Appendix C. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 4 -

10 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 3.1: D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx St. Clair Township By-law Comprehensive Zoning Noise Study Area -5-

11 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Site Visit & Field Investigations A site visit was necessary to conduct sound level measurements both on and off-site. Field observations were used to confirm the baseline or ambient background noise conditions, the locations and character of the off-site sensitive and/or historic buildings and structures subject of the analysis, and to determine the predominant on-site environmental noise sources Road Traffic Modelling Road traffic volumes for the roads of interest were obtained from the Township of St. Clair and the County of Lambton and input into an industry standard acoustic model. The road traffic noise model was used to approximate the existing baseline or background noise conditions within the Study Area Noise Modelling of the Existing Site Conditions The existing noise conditions at the Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Facility were evaluated using both direct measurements and predictive modelling. For the purposes of the Noise Existing Conditions Report, the Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Facility on-site noise sources were measured during worst-case operations and the source parameters were documented including: Type (point or area) Geometry (location, height above grade) Acoustic character (steady state, impulse, tonal) The existing noise sources at the Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Facility were input into an industry standard acoustic model that included all significant on-site structures (buildings, equipment, storage tanks and silos). The off-site environmental noise from the existing site conditions was predicted based on the measured sound pressure levels and reference distances and representative noise specifications for standard mobile equipment such as trucks and bulldozers. Computer Aided Noise Abatement Acoustical Modeling Software (CADNA A), version 4.3, calculates sound level emissions based on the ISO standard "Acoustics Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors Part 2: General Method of Calculation". The CADNA model is the industry standard for environmental noise modeling in Ontario. The Ministry s Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation (ORNAMENT) software is the approved road traffic model that is currently used in the province of Ontario to evaluate noise generated from road traffic. However, the model does not graphically generate contours and cannot be used to evaluate large areas and multiple road corridors simultaneously. ORNAMENT modeling predictions are also limited to noise predictions less than 500 metres from the source and a minimum traffic volume of 40 vehicles per hour is required to evaluate an individual roadway. Due to these limitations, CADNA was selected for the purposes of this study as the preferred modeling software for analysis of road traffic generated background noise existing conditions. In D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 6 -

12 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA addition, the CADNA modeling software is better suited to handle multiple noise sources and can generate contour plots with imported base maps. CRA completed a sensitivity analysis comparing ORNAMENT to CADNA results and concluded that the results obtained using CADNA are more conservative (lower) even when the impact from multiple road segments is modelled. In addition, CADNA can better calculate sound propagation based on surface reflection and ground absorption qualities, changes due to posted speed limits and road geometry. To illustrate this, CRA completed an ORNAMENT model for select receptors that are within 500 m of the major roads within the Study Area. Only roads with traffic volumes over 40 vehicles per hour were modelled due to this minimum traffic volume limitation of the ORNAMENT model. The following table summarizes the CADNA and ORNAMENT model results to illustrate the noise impact comparison: Receptor ORNAMENT Impact CADNA Impact (dba) (dba) POR POR For both receptors, only the impacts from Petrolia Line were estimated. All other roads are located beyond ORNAMENT s 500 m maximum distance limitation and could not be modelled. In addition, traffic along the smaller connecting roads is below ORNAMENT s 40 vehicles per hour limitation and as such their impacts could not be modelled. However, CRA created an illustrative model where the road segments of interest (Petrolia Line, Plank Road and Rokeby Line) were within the 500 m ORNAMENT limit and the traffic volumes were also above the 40 vehicles per hour limit. This hypothetical scenario was created to support the sensitivity analysis and the results are not representative of the ambient conditions but provided for information purposes only. The following model inputs were used: Petrolia Line o Total hourly traffic volume 150 vehicles/hour o Traffic breakdown percentage (auto/medium/heavy) 55/35/10 o Speed Limit 80 km/h o Distance from receptor 300 m Plank Road o Total hourly traffic volume 200 vehicles/hour o Traffic breakdown percentage (auto/medium/heavy) 55/35/10 o Speed Limit 80 km/h o Distance from receptor 250 m Rokeby Line o Total hourly traffic volume 100 vehicles/hour o Traffic breakdown percentage (auto/medium/heavy) 55/35/10 o Speed Limit 80 km/h o Distance from receptor 250 m D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 7 -

13 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA The results from the noise model are summarized in the table below: ORNAMENT CADNA (dba) (dba) As shown, the road traffic noise impacts estimated by the CADNA software are consistently more conservative. Therefore the use of the CADNA model with the TNM module is considered to be representative of the typical ambient conditions within the Study Area. The road traffic data and modelling methodology is explained in Section Review of Noise Work Plan Comments were solicited from St. Clair Township, First Nations, and the Ministry of the Environment on the Noise Existing Conditions Work Plan. A copy of the Work Plan is included in Appendix B. Comments that resulted in revisions to the Noise Existing Conditions Work Plan have been integrated in this report and are outlined in Table To review all comments received on the various Work Plans and associated Clean Harbors responses, please refer to the Clean Harbors Work Plan Comment Response Summary Report. Note that this Report will also be documented in the Environmental Assessment Record of Consultation. Table Work Plan Revisions Based on Comments Received Reviewer Comments Clean Harbors Response Existing Conditions Report Reference St. Clair Township It appears that very little will be done as part of the existing noise conditions evaluation. Some measurements may be undertaken to fill in the gaps in the information already on hand or contained within previously prepared Acoustic Assessment Reports (AAR). As noted in PRT Comment #1, the information that is already on hand and what the gaps are must be clearly outlined. The current TDU AAR reflects the existing conditions and measurements are not necessary to update the AAR detailing the stationary noise sources. Updated sound level measurements were conducted in October See Section 4.6. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 8 -

14 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 4.0 Existing Noise Conditions 4.1 Historic Noise Complaints Clean Harbors has not received any noise complaints for the existing operations. Additionally, members of the surrounding community were surveyed on a number of issues, including concerns related to noise. When asked if there are any concerns related to dust, odour or noise from the facility, a greater number of respondents stated that they have these types of concerns than the number of people that have filed complaints about the existing site. These responses are summarized in Table 4.1 below. Table 4.1 Summary of Residents and Business Survey Responses Regarding Concerns about the Clean Harbors Lambton Facility Type of Concern Yes No Total Number of Responses Dust from the Air Odour Noise When asked to explain these concerns in more detail, residents gave a range of answers including health concerns, general unpleasant nuisance effects and concerns from the noise of Clean Harbors operations and from truck traffic. This suggests that while fewer respondents stated that they have filed complaints about the site, a greater number of respondents do have concerns about the existing facility, when specifically asked. This is particularly the case with respect to odour. This information is also available in more detail in the Socio-Economic Existing Conditions Report. 4.2 Review of Zoning The Clean Harbors Facility is located on Industrial zoned land (M4-1) and is surrounded by land that is zoned for Agricultural use (A1) and Environmental Protection Woodlot (EP-WD) zones. The Study Area is rural in character and surrounded by agricultural fields. There are no existing industries within the Study Area other than the existing Clean Harbors Facility that contribute to the background noise levels. 4.3 Site Visit and Field Investigation Site visits and field investigations were conducted on October 4, 2012, and October 27, The purpose of the field investigations were to: 1) identify the predominant background ambient noise source(s) 2) confirm the character of existing buildings and off-site receiver locations subject of the noise impact assessment 3) classify the acoustic character of the Study Area D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx - 9 -

15 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 4) conduct updated sound level measurements for, and to identify, the predominant on-site environmental noise source(s) Road traffic noise was the predominant source of ambient noise in the Study Area based on a review of the available secondary information and observations during the site visits and field observations. Road traffic noise impacting the receptors within the identified Study Area is generated by vehicles travelling along the following corridors: Petrolia Line Plank Road Brigden Road Telfer Road Rokeby Line The background noise generated from vehicles travelling these five roads of interest was evaluated. There are both one and two-storey residential dwellings of varied construction (siding, brick) located along these roads. Aside from outbuildings servicing farm equipment and related storage, there are no other significant developments or businesses located within the Study Area. The acoustical character of the Study Area was evidently a mixed rural and suburban environment. The background noise or ambient sound is dominated by road traffic or natural sounds depending on proximity to the adjacent road corridors and the extent of their use as defined by the 24-hour traffic volume. A detailed description of the Study Area is provided in the following Section 4.5. The noise measurements and the predominant on-site environmental noise sources are discussed in Section MOE Technical Guidelines and Standards The acoustic character of the Study Area will be defined in accordance with the MOE guidelines NPC Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning, October As stated in the guidelines: A "Class 1 Area" means an area with an acoustical environment typical of a major population centre, where the background noise is dominated by the urban hum. "Class 2 Area" means an area with an acoustical environment that has qualities representative of both Class 1 and Class 3 Areas, and in which a low ambient sound level, normally occurring only between 23:00 and 07:00 hours in Class 1 Areas, will typically be realized as early as 19:00 hours. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

16 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Other characteristics which may indicate the presence of a Class 2 Area include: Absence of urban hum between 19:00 and 23:00 hours Evening background sound level defined by natural environment and infrequent human activity No clearly audible sound from stationary sources other than from those under impact assessment "Class 3 Area" means a rural area with an acoustical environment that is dominated by natural sounds having little or no road traffic, such as the following: A small community with less than 1000 population Agricultural area A rural recreational area such as a cottage or a resort area A wilderness area The urban sound level limits are 5 dba greater in comparison to the rural limits to account for the elevated background sound level or the urban hum due to road traffic or adjacent industrial/commercial activities. 4.5 Road Traffic Data and Modelling Road Traffic Volumes The most current road traffic volumes were provided by the following authorities: Township of St. Clair The County of Lambton The road traffic data provided by the Township of St. Clair included actual daily counts for the following roads within the Study Area: Rokeby Line (2009) Plank Road (south of Petrolia Line) (2009/2011) Brigden Road (2002) The road traffic data that was provided by the County of Lambton was inclusive of the existing site truck traffic and included an hourly breakdown, as well as traffic distribution, for the following roads within the Study Area: Petrolia Line (2011) Plank Road (north of Petrolia Line) (2011) The traffic volume data discussed above was the only available data for the Study Area. Telfer Road traffic was not available. The Noise Study Team has observed that the road is used primarily for access to the Clean Harbors site. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

17 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) values are the only reported data for less travelled roads, which presents a problem when estimating daytime and nighttime background noise levels as the values do not provide a distribution for the two time periods. Detailed information was provided for the two major roads Petrolia Line and Plank Road (north of Petrolia Line). This information included a detailed traffic breakdown for each hour of the day as well as traffic distribution, which provides information on the types of vehicles. The AADT provided for each road was: Petrolia Line (west of Plank Road) 2,340 Plank Road (north of Petrolia) 4,029 Rokeby Line 214 Plank Road (between Petrolia and Waterworks) 425 Brigden Road 1,998 To estimate the daytime and nighttime road traffic volumes for the less travelled roads, the 24-hour traffic pattern for the two major roads was used. The 24-hour traffic pattern was determined by calculating the average hourly traffic volumes for the daytime and nighttime periods along Petrolia and Plank Road as well as calculating the average breakdown of automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks for each time period. The pattern was then converted to a percentage, which allowed for the direct conversion of the AADT values to estimate the average hourly volumes for those roads where 24-hour detailed traffic data was not available. This was considered to be the most representative approach to evaluate the typical traffic noise exposure for the Study Area. The following hourly traffic composition (rounded to the nearest full number) was estimated: Petrolia Line: o Hourly Daytime Automobile Percentage of traffic 53% o Hourly Daytime Medium Truck Percentage of traffic 38% o Hourly Daytime Heavy Truck Percentage of traffic 10% o Hourly Nighttime Automobile Percentage of traffic 47% o Hourly Nighttime Medium Truck Percentage of traffic 47% o Hourly Nighttime Heavy Truck Percentage of traffic 6% Plank Road o Hourly Daytime Automobile Percentage of traffic 67% o Hourly Daytime Medium Truck Percentage of traffic 30% o Hourly Daytime Heavy Truck Percentage of traffic 3% o Hourly Nighttime Automobile Percentage of traffic 62% o Hourly Nighttime Medium Truck Percentage of traffic 35% o Hourly Nighttime Heavy Truck Percentage of traffic 3% Again, the percentages were then applied to the calculated average daytime and nighttime volumes for the smaller, connecting roads. The resulting numbers allowed CRA to estimate the road traffic noise impacts on an hourly basis for a direct comparison to Facility-generated noise impacts. Traffic distribution plays a vital role in estimating the background noise levels due to traffic. Larger vehicles, such as buses and tractor trailers are noisier than passenger vehicles due to the use of larger engines, reduced aerodynamics associated with frontal surface area, and tire noise associated with larger tires with deeper treads and a heavier load. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

18 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA CRA reviewed the itrans Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment, dated September 2009 (itrans Report), however, did not use the presented traffic data to evaluate the ambient noise due to road traffic within the Study Area. The itrans Report focused on evaluating only the peak hourly traffic volumes during the daytime and evening, which if used will result in higher ambient noise and not representative of typical traffic noise exposure for the Study Area. In addition, as outlined above, CRA obtained more up-to-date traffic data from the local traffic authorities and did not apply a growth factor to be conservative. CRA did use the on-site truck traffic counts from the itrans Report to model a typical truck traffic conditions model for comparison to the worst-case existing conditions, which is discussed in Section 4.6. The existing noise conditions within the Study Area were quantified using the industry standard CADNA software and the road traffic data provided by the regulatory authorities. The US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model (TNM) calculation standard was used in CADNA to quantify the noise levels. Vehicular road traffic generates noise that consists of mechanical noise from the engine and brakes, friction noise created from wheel contacting the road surface, and aerodynamic wind noise. Traffic volume, speed, road composition, gradient and surface type will affect the overall traffic noise that can be generated. Proximity and line-of-sight to the road corridor are most consequential for quantifying the off-site noise exposure conditions. The model calculates the predicted equivalent sound level (Leq) respective of the defined daytime (7 am to 11 pm) and nighttime (11 pm to 7 am) periods Model Input Parameters Site-specific conditions were input, including the width of each road segment, the road surface composition type, the basic site topography, the ground surface type, road traffic volumes and composition, and the posted speed limits. Satellite imagery was obtained and input to the model. The files included major topographic features such as roads, intersections, and lots, which were necessary to establish basic site geometry for modeling purposes. The following critical road traffic noise modeling parameters were identified for the Study Area: 1. Traffic Volumes 2. Road Conditions 3. Vehicle Distribution Traffic Volumes Hourly traffic patterns for the two main roads were used to estimate the daytime and nighttime traffic volumes for less travelled roads, for which only AADT values were provided. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

19 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA The traffic volumes input determine the potential sound energy generated by each road corridor Road Conditions Road conditions are necessary to accurately model the noise propagation from the vehicles travelling along the defined corridors. The following information was input: 1. Width of Road establishes source geometry and that the sound propagation begins over a reflective pavement surface. 2. Surface Type reflective or porous ground was established for both the road and non-road surfaces, respectively. 3. Speed Limit the posted speed limit was input for each roadway. The posted speed limit of each road plays a vital role in determining the noise dispersion due to the effects of the engine, tire noise and aerodynamic noise generated at different speeds. The Township of St. Clair provided average recorded speeds which were higher than the posted speed limits. The posted speed limits throughout the Study Area were used for the CADNA model results as the average recorded speed may differ between different sampling periods Road Traffic Modelling Results The CADNA modelling software was used to predict the road traffic generated ambient sound levels within the Study Area. The sound level contours provide a visual representation of the traffic generated noise and how it propagates with greater distance from the road corridor. As expected, major roads, such as Brigden Road, Petrolia Line and Plank Road experience greater 24-hour road traffic volumes and are the predominant contributors to the background noise levels within the Study Area. The nighttime noise levels are lower than the daytime levels due to the significantly lower traffic volumes. Figures 4.1 and 4.2 present the road traffic sound level contours within the Study Area for the daytime and nighttime periods, respectively. Daytime noise impacts at the off-site residences varied from 29 dba to 52 dba and from 24 dba to 48 dba during the nighttime, depending on their proximity to the modelled roads. The noise modelling results were verified through field observations conducted on October 4, The traffic generated sound levels demonstrate that a portion of the Study Area can be classified as Class 2 Urban for those residences located along Petrolia Line and Brigden Road (adjacent to Plank Road). The Study Area can be classified as Class 3 Rural for those residences located along Telfer Road and Rokeby Line due to the absence of significant road traffic volumes. This classification was previously agreed to by the MOE in 2010, including the analysis of independent consultants, and was further confirmed during the preparation of this report. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

20 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.1: Road Traffic Noise Contours Daytime D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

21 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.2: Road Traffic Noise Contours - Nightime D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

22 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 4.6 Noise Model of the Existing Facility Conditions Field Investigations The off-site environmental noise impact from the Facility was previously documented in a December 2009 Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR) that was submitted and approved by the MOE in support of a Certificate of Approval (Air) Application, now termed an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA). Updated sound level measurements were obtained for the environmental noise sources during the field investigations that were conducted on October 4th, and 12th, All noise measurements were conducted in accordance with good acoustic engineering methods and in consideration of the MOE equipment and procedural requirements as defined in NPC-103 Procedures Predominant Noise Sources The model included all environmental or outdoor noise sources that were identified at the Facility. The significant environmental noise sources are summarized in Table 1 in Appendix D. The predominant off-site environmental noise sources are summarized as follows: Incineration and Disposal Facility 1) Incinerator Stack 2) Landfill Disposal Regulation (LDR) Stack 3) Incinerator Primary Combustion Air Blower and Fan Assembly Landfill Operations 4) Main On-site Truck Route The environmental noise sources generate continuous steady state mechanical noise. There are no ground-borne vibration sources at the Facility. As stated in the approved ToR, there are no anticipated effects to warrant noise model analysis of the off-site haul route, which will be unchanged from the existing conditions to the proposed alternatives. A traffic impact study was completed as part of the approved ToR. The study concluded that the existing study area road network and intersections have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the projected growth in background traffic along with the truck traffic associated with the continued operation of the landfill operations at the Lambton Facility. The projected traffic volumes and access arrangements will not vary between the two alternative landfill expansion alternatives under consideration and thus traffic would not be used as a criterion in the comparative evaluation of alternatives. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

23 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Modelled Noise Contours The environmental noise model in support of the Facility s AAR was based on the principal of the predictable worst-case, meaning the model evaluates the on-site activities that generate the maximum noise level in terms of the 1-hour equivalent sound level (1-hour Leq). The Facility will not be operating continuously under a worst-case scenario. Therefore, CRA developed a second typical noise model based on the on-site truck traffic data as provided in the itrans 2009 Report. The difference between the two scenarios is the number of trucks entering, leaving and driving within the Facility boundary. The results of the worst-case and typical scenarios represent the existing conditions noise exposure range. As per the itrans Report, the peak AM truck traffic is 2 trucks entering the site and 1 truck leaving the site. To model this typical scenario, CRA assumed that the only trucks entering and leaving the site are landfill trucks. All other truck routes, such as incinerator and fly ash routes were not included in the model because the traffic on-site did not permit their inclusion. The noise model included attenuation affects due to geometric divergence, atmospheric attenuation, barriers/berms, ground absorption and directivity, as applicable for all significant noise sources. The on-site buildings were input as intervening and reflective structures at the appropriate height. Ground contours were also input to the model. The existing unattenuated steady state noise levels for the worst-case and typical scenarios are presented as contours, which propagate and decay with increased distance from the source and are presented on Figure 4.3A to Figure 4.4B for the day and night, respectively. The modelled noise exposure range based on the two scenarios is 0.7 db at POR1, which is the receptor most impacted by truck traffic due to line-of-sight noise exposure. The reason for the small difference is that the unattenuated stationary noise sources are the compliance drivers and as such, a reduction in the truck traffic has little environmental effect. The attenuated steady state noise levels (post 2020 Phase 3 abatement completion) are presented for both the worst-case and typical scenarios on Figures 4.5A to Figure 4.6B for the daytime and nighttime, respectively. The modelled noise exposure range for the attenuated steady state noise levels is 4.7 db for POR1, which is the receptor most heavily impacted by truck traffic. Once attenuated, the off-site stationary noise source impacts are lower and therefore, truck traffic has a higher impact at this receiver only. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

24 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.3A: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Worst-Case Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

25 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.3B: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Typical Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

26 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.4A: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Worst-Case Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

27 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.4B: Unattenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Typical Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

28 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.5A: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Worst-Case Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

29 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.5B: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Daytime (Typical Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

30 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.6A: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Worst-Case Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

31 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 4.6B: Attenuated Facility Only Noise Contours Nighttime (Typical Conditions) D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

32 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Off-site Noise Impact at Existing Receivers There are 14 existing one-storey (1.5 m above grade) and two-storey (4.5 m above grade) residential dwellings within the Study Area of interest. The December 2009 AAR documented the off-site impact at four of the immediately adjacent and most exposed sensitive point(s)-of-reception(pors). A "POR" is any point on the premises of a person where sound, originating from other than those premises, is received. The POR may be located on permanent or seasonal residences, hotels/motels, nursing/retirement homes, rental residences, hospitals, campgrounds, parks, schools, or places of worship. The off-site environmental noise impacts from all the steady state sources and impulse noise sources are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively, in Appendix D. The off-site noise impacts are summarized against the applicable MOE criteria in Table 4 (Appendix D). The attenuated off-site impacts confirm that the receptors located beyond the Study Area will experience insignificant environmental impacts to justify the 1 km Study Area radius. The Facility attenuated noise impacts were compared against the higher of the minimum exclusionary MOE noise limits or site-specific sound level limits established in accordance with NPC-300. The Landfill operations are compared against the daytime limit of 55 dba with operations limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. under the Noise Guidelines for Landfill Sites (N-1). The Facility s noise levels meet the MOE NPC-300 noise limits at all receptors pending the completion of the 2020 Phase 3 Noise Abatement Plan (NAP). The updated AAR and NAP are subject of MOE review and approval. Implementing the noise control measures is intended to achieve the minimum MOE noise limits at POR1. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

33 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 5.0 Summary The traffic volumes and corresponding traffic-generated sound levels demonstrate that a portion of the Study Area can be classified as Class 2 Urban for those residences located along Petrolia Line and Brigden Road (adjacent to Plank Road). The Study Area can be classified as Class 3 Rural for those residences located along Telfer Road and Rokeby Line due to the absence of significant road traffic volumes. There are 14 existing one-storey (1.5 m above grade) and two-storey (4.5 m above grade) residential dwellings within the Study Area of interest. The facility s existing noise levels meet the MOE noise limits at all residential receptors with the exception of one residential property. Noise control measures are necessary to achieve the minimum MOE noise limits at the residence identified as POR1. The noise existing conditions for the Study Area are summarized as follows: Steady state noise from the existing Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Facility Impulse noise generated from the baghouse controls Road traffic noise from Petrolia Line, Bridgden Road, Plank Road, Rokeby Line The existing noise conditions including the steady state noise contribution from the Facility and background road traffic noise are presented on Figure 5.1 below. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

34 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Figure 5.1: Cumulative Noise Impact Noise Contours - Daytime D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

35 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 6.0 References Ministry of Environment (MOE), 1989: Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation (ORNAMENT), Technical Document MOE, 2013: NPC-300, Stationary and Transportation Services Approval and Planning, October 2013 ISO, 1996: , Acoustics Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors Part 2: General Method of Calculation D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

36 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA 7.0 Glossary of Terms Glossary of Terms Existing Conditions Environment Environmental Assessment (EA) The existing conditions that are the physical, chemical, biological, social, economic, and cultural setting in which the proposed project is to be located and where local impacts (both positive and negative) might be expected to occur. The Environmental Assessment Act defines environment broadly to include: i) air, land or water ii) plant or animal life, including human life iii) social, economic, and cultural conditions influencing the life of humans or a community iv) any building, structure, machine or other device or thing made by humans v) any solid, liquid, gas, odour, heat, sound, vibration, or radiation resulting directly or indirectly from the human activities vi) any part or combination of the foregoing and the interrelationships between any two or more of them, in or of Ontario A generic term for a study that assesses the potential environmental effects (positive or negative) of a proposal. Key components of an environmental assessment include consultation with government agencies and the public; consideration and evaluation of alternatives; and the management of potential environmental effects. Conducting an environmental assessment promotes good environmental planning before decisions are made about proceeding with a proposal. For the purposes of this Terms of Reference, an Environmental Assessment refers to the process and related documentation, including the submission of a Terms of Reference and Environmental Assessment Report for approval by the Minister of the Environment, in accordance with the requirements of Part II of the EA Act. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

37 Noise Existing Conditions Report Clean Harbors Lambton Landfill Expansion EA Glossary of Terms Terms of Reference (ToR) The first step in an application for approval to proceed with a project or undertaking under the Environmental Assessment Act is the submission of a Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Environmental Assessment (EA). Public and agency consultation is required on the preparation and submission of the ToR to the Ministry of the Environment. Approval is required by the Minister of the Environment. If approved, the ToR provides a framework / work plan for the EA. D06 - Noise Existing Conditions Report.Docx

38 APPENDIX A APPROVED TERMS OF REFERENCE EVALUATION CRITERIA, INDICATORS AND DATA SOURCES (3)

39 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Atmospheric Environment Air Emissions Waste disposal facilities can emit contaminants that degrade air quality. Construction and operation activities at a waste disposal facility can also lead to increased levels of particulates (dust) in the air. Noise Odour Construction and operation activities at a waste disposal facility can result in increased noise levels associated with the waste disposal facility. Operation activities at a waste disposal facility can result in odours from the site. Geology and Hydrogeology Groundwater Contaminants associated with a waste disposal Quality facility have the potential to mobilize and move by the processes of diffusion and advection through the subsurface and impact off-site groundwater quality. Predicted off-site point of impingement concentrations ( g/m 3 ) of indicator compounds Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses/farms, institutions) Predicted site-related noise levels (dba) Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses/farms, institutions) Predicted off-site odour concentrations ( g/m 3 and odour units) Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses/farms, institutions) Predicted effect of contaminant movement on groundwater quality on-site and off-site. Environment Canada Sarnia Airport meteorological data MOE meteorological data Site ambient air monitoring, stack testing and continuous emissions monitoring data Receptors confirmed on recent mapping Sarnia Lambton Environmental Association meteorological data and background air quality data Waste materials and leachate characterization and sampling data Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) reports Landfill design and operation data Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Site noise monitoring data; Review site noise complaint history Receptors confirmed on recent mapping Acoustic Assessment and Acoustic Audit reports Landfill design and operation data Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Environment Canada Sarnia Airport meteorological data MOE meteorological data Sarnia Lambton Environmental Association meteorological data and background air quality data Site odour related data Site odour complaint history Waste materials and leachate characterization and sampling data Receptors confirmed on recent mapping Odour assessment reports Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Physical Setting: Extensive existing documentation on site geology and hydrogeology available for site and surroundings. Information summarized in a report prepared in support of Cell 18 EA. Supplement above with field investigation (geophysical survey, plus one deep and one shallow well) to characterize conditions in area south of existing landfill (i.e., general footprint of area for entombed landfill). Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A1 -

40 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Contaminant Transport Processes: Extensive analysis of transport processes completed in , which is documented in a report prepared in support of Cell 18 EA. Lambton Facility property has been the focus of research on contaminant transport processes in clay environments conducted by the University of Waterloo. Information available in published articles and thesis. Supplement above with updated computer modeling (POLLUTE). Contaminant Characteristics: Extensive analysis of waste and leachate in landfill cells completed in , which is documented in a report prepared in support of Cell 18 EA. Active program underway to examine quality of leachate derived from solidification processes. Leachate sampling and analysis also underway. Natural Water Quality: Existing monitoring programs at the site have resulted in an extensive database on the quality of the groundwater in the two principal waterbearing units, namely the active aquitard and the interface aquifer. Additional data are available on groundwater in contact with the clay aquitard and the deeper bedrock formations. Regional information on groundwater quality is available in published articles and thesis. Lambton Groundwater Management Study Supplement above with field investigation to south of Facility. Supplement with survey of well water users within 1 km in conjunction with Agriculture discipline. Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Groundwater Quantity The construction of a landfill has the potential to alter the hydraulic gradient in the subsurface in the vicinity of the landfill, which in turn can affect the volume of groundwater that moves laterally through shallow subsurface and to depth to the regional aquifer. Predicted effect of landfill development on groundwater quantity on-site and off-site Physical Setting: Extensive existing documentation on site geology and hydrogeology available for site and surroundings. Information summarized in a report prepared in support of Cell 18 EA. Supplement above with field investigation (geophysical survey, plus one deep and one shallow well) to characterize conditions in area south of existing landfill (i.e., general footprint of area for entombed landfill). Landfill Design: Establish and define design features for two options (vertical and entombed) and associated engineering to be employed to alter infiltration and groundwater flow. Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A2 -

41 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Hydraulic Gradients: Existing monitoring programs at the site have resulted in an extensive database on water levels in the two principal water-bearing units, namely the active aquitard and the interface aquifer. Additional data are available on water levels in landfill cells. Supplement above with field investigation to south of Facility. Leachate Density: Density of leachate in various landfill cells was determined in , and is documented in a report prepared in support of Cell 18 EA. Program underway to examine quality of leachate derived from solidification processes. Leachate sampling and analysis also underway. Water Balance: Using HELP model and simple flow calculations develop water balance for alternative landfill designs. Establish potential groundwater flux at site boundaries in each the two primary water-bearing units. Surface Water Surface Water Quality Surface Water Quantity Contaminants associated with a waste disposal facility have the potential to seep or runoff and impact off-site surface water. Site development will have the potential to increase peak flows to the receiving drainage system. Assessment of on-site and off-site surface water quality including any predicted impact from upward diffusion of chemicals from the waste. Predicted water flows for existing and proposed site conditions Site surface water and drainage studies Topographic mapping On-going site monitoring reports MOE Published water quality information Surface water quality assessment Ministry of Natural Resources and local Conservation Authority databases Input from Geology & Hydrogeology and Natural Environment technical disciplines Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Site surface water and drainage studies Topographic mapping On-going site monitoring reports Ministry of Natural Resources and local Conservation Authority databases Input from Geology & Hydrogeology and Natural Environment technical disciplines Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A3 -

42 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Natural Environment Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems Agriculture Agriculture Resources Waste disposal facility construction and operation may remove or disturb the functioning of land-based habitats. Waste disposal facility construction and operation may remove or disturb the function of aquatic ecosystems. Waste facility can displace high quality agriculture land and create emissions that may impact on agricultural operations. Predicted impact on vegetation communities due to landfill footprint, construction and operations on-site Predicted impact on wildlife habitats due to landfill footprint, construction and operations on-site Predicted impact on amphibian habitats and communities due footprint, construction and operations on-site Presence of known or identified Species at Risk and their habitats and the predicted impact of the proposed footprint, construction and operation on-site Predicted impact on aquatic habitat due to landfill footprint, construction and operations on-site Predicted impact on fisheries due to construction and operations on-site Presence of known or identified Species at Risk and their habitats and the predicted impact of the proposed footprint, construction and operation on-site. Displacement of high quality agricultural lands Agriculture operational impacts Particulate (dust) emissions from landfill Nuisances caused by weeds due to exposed site area and berms Existing terrestrial ecosystem investigations, reports and data, including identified published reports Agency databases including Ministry of Natural Resources (Natural Heritage Information Centre, Local District, Natural Resource Inventory Value System), St. Clair Region Conservation Authority, Conservation Ontario, Lambton County Field inventory data (Ecological Land Classification, floristic/tree inventories, wildlife surveys) Input from Geology & Hydrogeology and Surface Water technical disciplines Topographic mapping and stereo pair air photos Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Existing aquatic ecosystem investigations, reports and data, including identified published reports Agency databases including Ministry of Natural Resources (Natural Heritage Information Centre, Local District, Natural Resource Inventory Value System), Local Conservation Authority, Conservation Ontario Aquatic Species at Risk, Lambton County Field inventory data (aquatic sampling) Input from other Geology & Hydrogeology and Surface Water technical disciplines Topographical mapping and stereo pair air photos Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Soil capability mapping and Canada Land Inventory ratings supplemented by soil survey Regional and local statistics, mapping, reports and publications Provincial Policy Statement Confirmation of agricultural operations (windshield survey and survey of farm owners/managers within 1 km of the landfill site) Atmospheric environment technical studies Input from Natural Environment technical discipline including description of existing terrestrial communities and botanical inventory plus predictive evaluation of future botanical conditions/community succession. Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A4 -

43 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Archaeological Resources Above Ground Cultural Heritage Resources Technical Facility characteristics Archaeological resources are non-renewables that can be disturbed or destroyed by the construction and operation of a waste disposal facility. Cultural heritage resources are non-renewable sites and places that can be disturbed or destroyed by the construction and operation of a waste disposal facility. The characteristics of the proposed conceptual expansion options may potentially affect site activities and operational and maintenance requirements. Presence of known archaeological resources. Potential effects on archaeological potential. Presence of built heritage resources or cultural heritage landscapes. Presence of designated (Ontario Heritage Act), commemorated (National Historic Site or historical plaque) inventoried (listed on a municipal heritage register), and identified built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes in the site vicinity. Potential effects on above ground cultural heritage resources. Effects can include direct and indirect impacts. Direct impacts can include displacement through removal, while indirect impacts can include disturbance through the introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements not in keeping with the surrounding setting. Complexity of site infrastructure changes Complexity of engineered components, including their demonstrated or predicted effectiveness, longevity, maintenance and/or replacement requirements Operational flexibility Interaction and integration with existing site infrastructure Site record forms for registered sites housed at the MCL; Published and unpublished documentary sources; Determination of archaeological potential per MCL guidelines Field survey of study area and immediate vicinity to confirm areas of archaeological potential; Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Archival documents contained within the local and provincial repositories; Historic mapping; Contact local municipality and heritage/historical society stakeholders; Site analysis and survey of cultural heritage resources located within the study area and in the immediate vicinity; Applicable municipal heritage inventory/register; Relevant background studies that have surveyed cultural heritage resources. Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Existing facility characteristics and operations Performance review of landfill expansion alternatives Predictive analyses of engineered components Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A5 -

44 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Appendix A. Approved Terms of Reference Evaluation Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources Criteria Rationale Indicators Data Sources Socio- Economic Economic The continued use of the waste management facility can provide economic benefits to the local community in the form of increased employment opportunities in local firms supplying goods or services directly or as secondary suppliers. Opportunities to provide goods or services Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Social The continued use of the waste management facility may affect the host municipality. Petroleum resources and/or infrastructure may be present in the area of the proposed waste disposal facility. Aggregate resources may be present in the area of the proposed waste disposal facility. Waste disposal facility construction and operation may cause disruption to use and enjoyment of residences. The contours of the waste disposal facility may have an effect on the visual landscape. Change in municipal tax base resulting from change in land use. The relative number and levels of jobs at the facility, in the community and among suppliers that are created/sustained during construction and operations. The relative dollar values of construction and operations of the project in terms of contribution to the local economy. Displacement of business activities. Effects on Municipal revenues (e.g., fees, service charges) and expenditures (e.g., costs associated with providing services to the site and other responsibilities such as participating in monitoring activities) Existing off-site businesses and numbers of employees within 500, 1000 and 1500 metres of the landfill site boundary Presence of known or identified Petroleum Resources or related abandoned infrastructure/wells and the predicted impact of the proposed footprint, construction and operation on-site. Presence of known or identified Aggregate Resources and the predicted impact or impairment of their use due to the proposed footprint, construction and operation on-site. Existing off-site residents within 500 m of the landfill boundary Existing off-site residents within 1,000 m of the landfill boundary Existing off-site residents within 1,500 m of the landfill boundary Predicted changes in landscapes and views Municipal tax roll and assessment MPAC property value assessment data Clean Harbors Township of St. Clair and Lambton County Engineering and/or Agriculture technical disciplines Survey in conjunction with Agriculture discipline including information on type of business, number of persons potentially impacted and key characteristics (family status, age, farm versus non-farm residential, etc.) Ontario Oil, Gas and Salt Resources Land Information Ontario County of Lambton Official Plan Aggregate Resources Inventory Mapping (ARIM), Ontario Geological Survey Geophysical survey and borehole logs from Geology & Hydrogeology technical discipline field investigation Number of residents confirmed through survey in conjunction with Agriculture discipline Landfill expansion alternatives concepts Proposed facility characteristics Appendix A - TOR Evaluation Criteria, Indicators And Data Sources.Docx -A6 -

45 APPENDIX B AIR QUALITY, ODOUR AND NOISE WORK PLAN (3)

46 DETAILED WORK PLAN TO CONDUCT AIR QUALITY, ODOUR, AND NOISE STUDIES LANDFILL EXPANSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CLEAN HARBORS CANADA, INC. HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILL SITE ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP, LAMBTON COUNTY DISCLAIMER: SOME FORMATTING CHANGES MAY HAVE OCCURRED WHEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WAS PRINTED TO PDF; HOWEVER, THE ORIGINAL CONTENT REMAINS UNCHANGED. Prepared by: Conestoga-Rovers & Associates 651 Colby Drive Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2V 1C2 MARCH 2011 REF. NO (7) Office: (519) Fax: (519) web: Worldwide Engineering, Environmental, Construction, and IT Services

47 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW ESTABLISH EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS FIELDWORK SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS CONDUCT COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE ALTERNATIVES AIR QUALITY STUDY NOISE STUDY PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT...8 Page (7) CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

48 1.0 INTRODUCTION Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) has been retained by Clean Harbors to conduct the Air Quality (Air Emissions, Odour and Noise) studies required as part of the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed expansion of the hazardous waste landfill at the Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Facility (Facility) located in St. Clair Township, Lambton County, Ontario. CRA is intimately familiar with the Facility's air and noise emissions. During the past three years, CRA has successfully completed the following air and noise projects for the Facility: Prepared an Application for Certificate of Approval (C of A) (Air) for the laboratory operation Prepared an Application for C of A (Air) for the proposed SPL waste processing unit Prepared an Application for C of A (Air) for the proposed Thermal Desorber Unit (TDU) Updated the site-wide Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modeling (ESDM) Report, including all air emissions sources at the Facility Prepared a site-wide air dispersion model using the USEPA AERMOD Dispersion model, including fugitive sources Completed a stack testing program for a baghouse emission control system for the pretreatment operation Updated the site s Fugitive Dust Best Management Practices Plan (FDBMPP) Prepared a Compliance Verification Plan (CVP) for the TDU Prepared a Site-wide Additional Noise Assessment and Acoustic Audit Report The following is a detailed work plan for the Air Quality Studies (7) 1 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

49 2.0 OVERVIEW The primary air and noise emission sources at the Facility include: An active landfill area on the north side of the Facility containing working cells A liquid industrial waste incinerator near the centre of the Facility A pretreatment facility near the centre of the Facility A laboratory building near the west side of the Facility A thermal desorber unit (TDU) and associated sources Several fugitive emission sources at various locations There are two designs for the proposed landfill expansion currently under consideration. This proposal is based on the assumption that two "Alternative Methods" (Alternatives) identified in the Terms of Reference (ToR) will be evaluated in the EA: Alternative Method 1 - Vertical Expansion Alternative Method 2 - Shallow Entombment (Southern Expansion) The air quality and noise studies will evaluate both alternatives and will include evaluations of compliance with applicable air quality and noise regulations. The air quality component will evaluate all of the air contaminants emitted from the Facility, including odour. The MOE requires site-wide assessments for the air and noise impacts. Therefore, the air and noise sources associated with activities other than the landfill operations will also be included in the studies. Other sources will include, for example, the incinerator, the TDU, the pretreatment operations and the laboratory. The ToR requires an assessment of cumulative effects for air emissions from other offsite sources. This will be assessed using background air quality data. The ToR contemplates description of existing environmental conditions (including existing/baseline air and noise quality). CRA will build on existing air and noise studies and reports completed for the Facility in the past few years. The air quality and noise studies will require the identification of potential effects by the proposed expansion on those existing environmental (i.e. air and noise) conditions. An evaluation of the potential environmental effects (after mitigation) with regard to air quality, odour and noise impacts will be provided for each of the expansion options and (7) 2 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

50 a technical memo comparing the two options from an air quality, odour, and noise perspective will be provided. 2.1 ESTABLISH EXISTING CONDITIONS The detailed work plan for Establishing Existing Conditions is discussed below: DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS CRA's air quality and noise experts will collect and analyze the necessary background information as per Appendix B of the ToR, including, but not limited to: Environment Canada Sarnia Airport meteorological data MOE meteorological data Sarnia Lambton Environmental Association meteorological data and background air quality Waste materials and leachate characterization and sampling data Noise and odour complaint history Site-specific monitoring data FIELDWORK CRA will conduct some additional fieldwork to fill any gaps in the available air, noise, and odour data. The contemplated fieldwork includes: Noise Data Collection Fieldwork - The noise measurements will evaluate the noise impact and compliance with NPC-232 noise limits by conducting short-term and direct audit sound level measurements. Measurements will be conducted when the Facility is operating under normal conditions. The selected measurement period will be respective of the predictable worst-case when the difference between the Facility noise emissions and background noise conditions are at a maximum, which may require that the audit measurements are conducted during the late nighttime period when human and commercial generated noise is minimized. Odour Fieldwork The odour data collection will involve the use of a Nasal Ranger Field Olfactometer to measure and quantify odor strength in the ambient air (7) 3 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

51 Measurement of odour units will be conducted for the primary fugitive emission sources, including the landfill working face, leachate ponds, and TDU process. Air Fieldwork CRA field staff will collect total hydrocarbon (THC) data using a photoionization detector (PID) to assess the potential fugitive emissions of organic compounds from the landfill working face, leachate ponds and TDU process. Chemicalspecific sampling is not included in this air quality data collection SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS To summarize the existing conditions for air, noise, and odour at the site, CRA will provide the 2010 Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report and Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR), prepared in support of an Application for C of A (Air) for the Thermal Desorber Unit (TDU) in addition to the 2010 Annual Report, and supplemental technical memorandums describing the results of the field work outlined above. 2.2 CONDUCT COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE ALTERNATIVES This section provides a description of the detailed work plan involved in the detailed air quality and noise studies that will be required for the evaluation of the two alternatives during the EA AIR QUALITY STUDY The Air Quality Study includes the following three main components: Air emissions estimates for the two options Air dispersion modeling for the two options Reporting, including the estimated air quality and odour impacts from the expansion options at off-site, sensitive receptors (7) 4 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

52 Air Emission Estimates CRA will calculate the air emissions from the two landfill design options. The existing air emissions from other sources at the Facility will also be included. The existing ESDM report will be used for the existing air emissions sources. The potential air emissions from the Facility that will be assessed include: particulate matter (TSP, PM10, PM2.5); combustion by-products including CO, NOx, and SOx; volatile organic compounds (VOCs); polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAHs); carbonyl compounds; dioxins/furans; metals; and odour. Odour will be addressed by modelling odour unit emissions. The Facility's complaint response procedure records include useful qualitative information about the potential for odour impacts from the existing operations. A quantitative odour assessment in terms of odour units (OU) will be conducted based on the field sampling data. The Facility's fugitive dust management plan (FDMP) will be updated to address fugitive dust from the new landfill configuration, once the preferred alternative is identified and has EA approval. Fugitive particulate and odour emissions will continue to be addressed by an effective fugitive dust and odour management program and are not expected to be an issue. There will be one round of Facility-wide emissions estimates for each landfill expansion option. Air Dispersion Modelling The estimated emissions from the Facility will be used as input in an approved air dispersion model to predict off-site concentrations of potential air contaminants. These off-site concentration predictions will be used to compare against the Ontario Regulation 419 air quality standards. CRA will use the USEPA AERMOD dispersion model. AERMOD is an advanced steady-state plume model that has the ability to incorporate building cavity downwash, actual source parameters, emission rates, terrain, and historical meteorological information to predict ground level concentrations (GLCs) at specified locations. Short-term (1-hour average) and long-term (24-hour and annual averages) concentration predictions will be calculated for comparison with the Regulation 419 air quality criteria as applicable (7) 5 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

53 It has been assumed that there will be one round of dispersion modeling for each landfill expansion option. ESDM Reports Updated ESDM Reports will be prepared for both options and will include: A description of the site and the proposed expansion options An assessment of existing background air quality based on existing data Air emissions estimates (including odour) for the landfill expansion options Air emissions estimates (including odour) for the other sources (e.g., TDU) at the Facility Dispersion modelling results, including contour plots Identification of nearby sensitive receptors Assessment of off-site air quality impacts, including odour impacts Conclusions ESDM Reports will be prepared in accordance with the following MOE guidance documents: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report (March 2009) Air Dispersion Modelling Guideline for Ontario (March 2009) NOISE STUDY The objective of the Noise Study will be to document and assess the potential noise impact of the Facility's noise sources at the nearest sensitive points-of-reception for the two landfill expansion options. The study will demonstrate that the sound emissions comply with the MOE's applicable sound level limits for the off-site receptors. The Noise Study includes the following three main components: Noise source emission estimates including reference sound level specifications Noise modeling to predict noise levels at off-site sensitive receptors (7) 6 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

54 Reporting, including background sound levels and the estimated noise impacts at the nearest sensitive receptors Noise Emission Estimates The Noise Study will utilize the Facility's AAR. It will include a description of the noise sources, a description of assessment methods, the details of source and background sound level measurements, an assessment of line-of-sight exposure of nearby sensitive point(s)-of-reception to the primary noise sources, and an assessment of compliance with applicable noise criteria. Noise Modelling The Cadna A acoustic software model will be used to predict the off-site noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors. Cadna is an accepted software by the MOE and it utilizes the standard ISO 9613 calculation procedures for environmental noise impacts. Noise source specifications, building parameters and digital terrain data will be used as inputs to the model. Noise contour plots will be produced and predictions at specific sensitive receptors will be made. One-hour equivalent sound levels (1-hour Leq) will be made for different time periods to compare with applicable noise criteria. The time periods are daytime (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), evening (7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) and nighttime (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). To assess compliance of noise source emissions, the noise levels estimated at sensitive points of reception will be compared with MOE applicable sound level criteria. The MOE sound level limits will be used for the determination of compliance. Based on CRA's review of the Facility, the NPC-205 Class 2 criteria should be applicable. If noise abatement is required to meet the MOE's noise criteria, CRA will identify the significant noise source(s) that require mitigation and the required noise attenuation in decibels (dba). AAR An AAR will be prepared for each alternative and will include: A description of the site and the proposed expansion options An assessment of existing background and on-site noise levels (e.g., TDU) (7) 7 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

55 Identification of nearby sensitive receptors Assessment of off-site noise impacts based on the landfill expansion options Conclusions The AAR will be prepared in accordance with the following MOE guidance documentation: "Appendix A Supporting Information for an Acoustic Assessment Report or Vibration Assessment Report Required by a Basic Comprehensive C of A", April 2004" NPC-233, "Information to be Submitted for Approval of Stationary Sources of Sound, October 1995" NPC-103, "Procedures, August 1978" PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CRA will prepare a technical memorandum, summarizing the air quality and noise studies and ranking the alternatives CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT Using the background air quality data, CRA will conduct a cumulative effects assessment for any contaminants present in significant amounts that are emitted from the facility. The cumulative effects of the facility emissions and background concentrations will be compared against MOE criteria. A technical memorandum will be prepared to discuss the conclusions of the cumulative effects assessment (7) 8 CONESTOGA-ROVERS &ASSOCIATES

56 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVIEWED (3)

57 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 1 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 EB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.8% 46.7% 43.1% 2.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.1% 0.4% 1.2% 2.0% 0.1% 0.0% 1.4% AM Peak 06:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 09:00 07:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 06:00 Vol PM Peak 13:00 15:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 16:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 0.8% 46.7% 43.1% 2.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.1% 0.4% 1.2% 2.0% 0.1% 0.0% 1.4%

58 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 2 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 WB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 1.0% 57.4% 31.0% 1.5% 0.3% 1.6% 0.0% 0.6% 1.8% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% AM Peak 10:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 Vol PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 15:00 12:00 16:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 1.0% 57.4% 31.0% 1.5% 0.3% 1.6% 0.0% 0.6% 1.8% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5%

59 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 3 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 EB, WB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.9% 52.0% 37.1% 1.8% 0.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.5% 1.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 06:00 Vol PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 12:00 15:00 12:00 16:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 0.9% 52.0% 37.1% 1.8% 0.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.5% 1.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4%

60 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 1 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 EB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ * * 01: * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : * * Total Percent 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 3.7% 16.7% 45.5% 28.2% 4.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 06:00 11:00 06:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 Vol PM Peak 18:00 16:00 20:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 Vol Total Percent 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 3.7% 16.7% 45.5% 28.2% 4.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 86 KPH 50th Percentile : 96 KPH 85th Percentile : 107 KPH 95th Percentile : 112 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 664 Percent in Pace : 56.1% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 908 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 76.8% Mean Speed(Average) : 97 KPH

61 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 2 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 WB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ * * 01: * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: * * 05: : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 1.8% 10.3% 26.8% 44.9% 14.2% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 07:00 05:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 06:00 08:00 Vol PM Peak 15:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 18:00 16:00 Vol Total Percent 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 1.8% 10.3% 26.8% 44.9% 14.2% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 80 KPH 50th Percentile : 92 KPH 85th Percentile : 102 KPH 95th Percentile : 108 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 630 Percent in Pace : 54.5% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 692 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 59.8% Mean Speed(Average) : 92 KPH

62 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 3 Site Code: Station ID: MC-15 CR 04 (Petrolia Line) W of CR 30 EB, WB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ * * 01: * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.2% 7.0% 21.7% 45.2% 21.3% 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 07:00 06:00 09:00 11:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 Vol PM Peak 15:00 18:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 15:00 18:00 16:00 Vol Total Percent 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.2% 7.0% 21.7% 45.2% 21.3% 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 83 KPH 50th Percentile : 94 KPH 85th Percentile : 104 KPH 95th Percentile : 110 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 1274 Percent in Pace : 54.4% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 1600 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 68.4% Mean Speed(Average) : 95 KPH

63 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 1 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 NB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.0% 58.2% 38.1% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% AM Peak 11:00 09:00 05:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 Vol PM Peak 16:00 16:00 14:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 16:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 0.0% 58.2% 38.1% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6%

64 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 2 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 SB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.4% 74.0% 22.7% 0.5% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 06:00 04:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 04:00 07:00 Vol PM Peak 18:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 13:00 13:00 12:00 16:00 17:00 15:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 0.4% 74.0% 22.7% 0.5% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5%

65 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 3 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 NB, SB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 09/20/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.2% 66.9% 29.7% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 Vol PM Peak 18:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 Vol Grand Total Percent 0.2% 66.9% 29.7% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5%

66 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 1 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 NB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ : * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: * * 05: : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 1.7% 10.1% 33.5% 39.2% 12.8% 1.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 01:00 08:00 Vol PM Peak 15:00 17:00 14:00 21:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 Vol Total Percent 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 1.7% 10.1% 33.5% 39.2% 12.8% 1.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 80 KPH 50th Percentile : 91 KPH 85th Percentile : 101 KPH 95th Percentile : 108 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 964 Percent in Pace : 53.0% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 999 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 54.9% Mean Speed(Average) : 91 KPH

67 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 2 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 SB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ * * 01: * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: * * 05: : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 2.7% 15.3% 47.3% 30.0% 3.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol PM Peak 17:00 17:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 Vol Total Percent 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 2.7% 15.3% 47.3% 30.0% 3.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 77 KPH 50th Percentile : 87 KPH 85th Percentile : 97 KPH 95th Percentile : 102 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 1290 Percent in Pace : 58.3% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 851 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 38.5% Mean Speed(Average) : 88 KPH

68 Accu-Traffic Inc. 38 Grenville St., # 3606 Toronto, ON M4Y 1A5 Tel: Fax: solutions@accu-traffic.ca URL: Page 3 Site Code: Station ID: MC-19 CR 20 (Plank Rd) NW of CR 4 NB, SB Latitude: 0' Undefined Start th 95th Time Total Percent Percent 09/20/ : * * 02: * * 03: * * 04: * * 05: : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Total Percent 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 2.2% 13.0% 41.1% 34.2% 7.9% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol PM Peak 15:00 17:00 15:00 18:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 Vol Total Percent 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 2.2% 13.0% 41.1% 34.2% 7.9% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 78 KPH 50th Percentile : 88 KPH 85th Percentile : 99 KPH 95th Percentile : 105 KPH Statistics 15 KPH Pace Speed : KPH Number in Pace : 2218 Percent in Pace : 55.1% Number of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 1851 Percent of Vehicles > 90 KPH : 45.9% Mean Speed(Average) : 89 KPH

69 APPENDIX D SUMMARY NOISE TABLE 1 TO 4 AND C (3)

70 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 1 NOISE SOURCE SUMMARY CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Cadna A Sound Power Source Sound Noise Control ID Source Description Source Type Level (1) Location (2) Characteristics (3) Measures (4) (dba) S1 Incinerator Stack Point O S S S2 ID Fan Point O S U S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower Point O S S/E S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower Point 96.9 O S U S5 LDR Baghouse Stack Point 97.7 O S S S6 LDR Baghouse Fan Point O S U S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL Point 99.0 O S,T U S8 Radiator Fan 1 Point 99.0 O S U S9 Radiator Fan 2 Point 99.0 O S U S10 Main ID Fan Point 92.6 O S U S11 Combustion Air Fan Point O S U S22 Conveyor Motor Point O S U S23 Sludge Pump Truck Point O S U STRIDL1 Idling Landfill Entrance 1 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL2 Idling Landfill Entrance 2 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL3 Idling Landfill Entrance 3 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL4 Idling Landfill Entrance 4 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL5 Idling Landfill Entrance 5 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL6 Idling Landfill Entrance 6 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL7 Idling Landfill Entrance 7 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL8 Idling Landfill Entrance 8 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL9 Idling Landfill Entrance 9 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL10 Idling Landfill Entrance 10 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL1 Idling Entrance 1 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL2 Idling Entrance 2 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL3 Idling Entrance 3 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL4 Idling Entrance 4 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL5 Idling Entrance 5 Point 88.9 O S U SD1 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill Point O S U SD2 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill Point O S U!00!STR1 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1 Moving Point - Line O S U!00!STR2 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 2 Moving Point - Line O S U!00!STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance Moving Point - Line O S U!01!STR4 On-Site Truck Route - Landfill Moving Point - Line O S U!00!STR6 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste Moving Point - Line O S U!00!STR7 On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR Moving Point - Line O S U!01!STR8 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste to Landfill Moving Point - Line O S U!00!STR9 On-Site Truck Route - Thermal Desorber Moving Point - Line O S U S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL Vertical-Area 93.3 O S,T U S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL Vertical-Area 93.3 O S,T U S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL Vertical-Area 93.3 O S,T U S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL Vertical-Area 93.3 O S,T U S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL Vertical-Area O S,T U S14A Compressor 1 Intake A Vertical-Area 98.2 O S U S14B Compressor 1 Intake B Vertical-Area 98.2 O S U S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door Vertical-Area O S U S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door Vertical-Area O S U S17A Compressor 2 Intake A Vertical-Area 92.3 O S U S17B Compressor 2 Intake B Vertical-Area 92.3 O S U S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust Vertical-Area 97.9 O S U S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD Vertical-Area 96.5 O S U S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD2 Vertical-Area 91.5 O S U S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL Vertical-Area O S,T U Impulse Noise Sources is1 Baghouse Unit 1 - Pneumatic Cylinder Impulse O I U is2 Baghouse Unit 2 - Pneumatic Cylinder Impulse O I U is3 Baghouse Unit 3 - Pneumatic Cylinder Impulse O I U is4 Baghouse Unit 4 - Pneumatic Cylinder Impulse O I U Notes: (1) Sound Power Level (PWL) in dba calculated from sound pressure level and reference distance and includes + 5 dba tonal penalty if applicable. Resulting PWL based on dimensions of vertical area source or travel path and equipment movements for moving point line/area sources. (2) Source Location: O - located/installed outside of building I - located/installed inside of building (3) Sound Characteristics: S - Steady Q - Quasi Steady Impulsive I - Impulsive B - Buzzing T - Tonal C - Cyclic TW - Time Weighted (4) Noise Control Measures: S - silencer, acoustic louvre, muffler A - acoustic lining, plenum B - barrier, berm, screening L - lagging E - acoustic enclosure O - other U - uncontrolled AC - administrative control CRA (24)

71 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2A POINT-OF-RECEPTION NOISE IMPACT - UNATTENUATED EXISTING FACILITY-WIDE SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Cadna A Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. ID Source Description Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) Incineration and Disposal Facility S1 Incinerator Stack dba 51.3 dba dba 41.4 dba dba 39.6 dba dba 37.7 dba dba 42.8 dba S2 ID Fan dba 20.7 dba dba 12.6 dba dba 11.2 dba dba 12.7 dba dba 17.5 dba S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower dba 48.3 dba dba 26.6 dba dba 25.0 dba dba 21.1 dba dba 38.1 dba S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower dba 26.7 dba dba 15.7 dba dba 13.7 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 17.1 dba S5 LDR Baghouse Stack dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S6 LDR Baghouse Fan dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL dba 5.7 dba dba -0.8 dba dba -2.3 dba dba 5.7 dba dba -2.3 dba S8 Radiator Fan dba 26.1 dba dba 17.6 dba dba 15.9 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 17.5 dba S9 Radiator Fan dba 25.4 dba dba 17.4 dba dba 16.0 dba dba 14.5 dba dba 18.2 dba S10 Main ID Fan dba 21.0 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 11.7 dba dba 8.4 dba dba 11.1 dba S11 Combustion Air Fan dba 25.9 dba dba 26.8 dba dba 24.2 dba dba 13.4 dba dba 15.9 dba S22 Conveyor Motor dba 20.3 dba dba 25.4 dba dba 22.8 dba dba 19.4 dba dba 10.8 dba S23 Sludge Pump Truck dba 26.9 dba dba 24.9 dba dba 22.3 dba dba 19.1 dba dba 18.0 dba STRIDL1 Idling Entrance dba 20.1 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.5 dba dba 0.7 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL2 Idling Entrance dba 22.4 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 3.8 dba dba 0.9 dba dba 10.4 dba STRIDL3 Idling Entrance dba 21.6 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 1.1 dba dba 9.5 dba STRIDL4 Idling Entrance dba 21.3 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 2.4 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL5 Idling Entrance dba 21.0 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 1.5 dba dba 9.2 dba STR1 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1 NA 36.9 dba 29.9 dba NA 24.6 dba 17.6 dba NA 22.3 dba 15.4 dba NA 19.5 dba 12.5 dba NA 24.5 dba 17.5 dba STR2 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 2 NA 36.8 dba 29.8 dba NA 23.6 dba 16.6 dba NA 21.9 dba 14.9 dba NA 19.4 dba 12.4 dba NA 25.9 dba 18.9 dba STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance NA 27.0 dba 27.0 dba NA 11.4 dba 11.4 dba NA 9.9 dba 9.9 dba NA 7.1 dba 7.1 dba NA 15.8 dba 15.8 dba STR6 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste NA 31.8 dba dba NA 18.8 dba dba NA 16.6 dba dba NA 13.9 dba dba NA 18.6 dba dba STR7 On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR NA 39.4 dba dba NA 26.5 dba dba NA 24.5 dba dba NA 21.9 dba dba NA 27.7 dba dba STR9 On-Site Truck Route - Thermal Desorber NA 33.5 dba dba NA 19.0 dba dba NA 17.1 dba dba NA 14.4 dba dba NA 20.2 dba dba S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL dba 11.5 dba dba 14.1 dba dba 11.6 dba dba 8.5 dba dba 5.4 dba S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL dba 16.2 dba dba 15.6 dba dba 13.1 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 9.6 dba S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL dba 17.9 dba dba 8.8 dba dba 6.9 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 9.2 dba S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 12.4 dba dba 9.1 dba dba 7.1 dba dba 4.8 dba dba 4.0 dba S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL dba 30.4 dba dba 11.8 dba dba 10.5 dba dba 8.2 dba dba 21.6 dba S14A Compressor 1 Intake A dba 20.1 dba dba 1.8 dba dba 0.3 dba dba -2.7 dba dba 10.2 dba S14B Compressor 1 Intake B dba 22.4 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba 12.5 dba S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door dba 9.9 dba dba 1.3 dba dba -0.3 dba dba -3.2 dba dba 3.0 dba S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door dba 12.2 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 4.5 dba S17A Compressor 2 Intake A dba 19.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba -2.5 dba dba -8.8 dba dba 10.9 dba S17B Compressor 2 Intake B dba 20.5 dba dba 0.9 dba dba -0.7 dba dba -7.7 dba dba 11.4 dba S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust dba 24.4 dba dba 13.6 dba dba 8.3 dba dba 5.9 dba dba 15.8 dba S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 26.0 dba dba 2.0 dba dba 0.1 dba dba -6.2 dba dba 16.2 dba S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 7.8 dba dba 6.3 dba dba 4.6 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 4.7 dba S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 15.6 dba dba 21.8 dba dba 19.3 dba dba 15.8 dba dba 8.6 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 54.5 dba 53.2 dba 43.4 dba 42.0 dba 41.5 dba 40.2 dba 39.2 dba 38.1 dba 46.1 dba 44.2 dba Landfill Operations STRIDL1 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL2 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL3 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL4 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL5 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL6 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL7 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL8 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL9 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL10 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STR4 On-Site Truck Route - Landfill NA 29.8 dba 0.0 dba NA 34.1 dba 0.0 dba NA 30.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.6 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.8 dba 0.0 dba STR8 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste to Landfill NA 37.0 dba 0.0 dba NA 26.7 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 20.2 dba 0.0 dba NA 29.7 dba 0.0 dba SD1 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba SD2 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 46.5 dba NA 40.2 dba NA 37.2 dba NA 32.9 dba NA 36.7 dba NA Notes: (1) Sound Level at the Receptor was calculated using Cadna A Acoustical Modelling Software. - Indicates Noise Source Subject of Abatement. - Indicates Worst-Case Sound Level CRA (24)

72 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2B POINT-OF-RECEPTION NOISE IMPACT - PHASE I ATTENUATED SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Cadna A Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. ID Source Description Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) Incineration and Disposal Facility S1 Incinerator Stack dba 51.3 dba dba 41.4 dba dba 39.6 dba dba 37.7 dba dba 42.8 dba S2 ID Fan dba 20.7 dba dba 12.6 dba dba 11.2 dba dba 12.7 dba dba 17.5 dba S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower dba 48.3 dba dba 26.6 dba dba 25.0 dba dba 21.1 dba dba 38.1 dba S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower dba 26.7 dba dba 15.7 dba dba 13.7 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 17.1 dba S5 LDR Baghouse Stack dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S6 LDR Baghouse Fan dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL dba 5.7 dba dba -0.8 dba dba -2.3 dba dba 5.7 dba dba -2.3 dba S8 Radiator Fan dba 26.1 dba dba 17.6 dba dba 15.9 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 17.5 dba S9 Radiator Fan dba 25.4 dba dba 17.4 dba dba 16.0 dba dba 14.5 dba dba 18.2 dba S10 Main ID Fan dba 21.0 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 11.7 dba dba 8.4 dba dba 11.1 dba S11 Combustion Air Fan dba 25.9 dba dba 26.8 dba dba 24.2 dba dba 13.4 dba dba 15.9 dba S22 Conveyor Motor dba 20.3 dba dba 25.4 dba dba 22.8 dba dba 19.4 dba dba 10.8 dba S23 Sludge Pump Truck dba 26.9 dba dba 24.9 dba dba 22.3 dba dba 19.1 dba dba 18.0 dba STRIDL1 Idling Entrance dba 20.1 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.5 dba dba 0.7 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL2 Idling Entrance dba 22.4 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 3.8 dba dba 0.9 dba dba 10.4 dba STRIDL3 Idling Entrance dba 21.6 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 1.1 dba dba 9.5 dba STRIDL4 Idling Entrance dba 21.3 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 2.4 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL5 Idling Entrance dba 21.0 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 1.5 dba dba 9.2 dba STR1 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1 NA 36.9 dba 29.9 dba NA 24.6 dba 17.6 dba NA 22.3 dba 15.4 dba NA 19.5 dba 12.5 dba NA 24.5 dba 17.5 dba STR2 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 2 NA 36.8 dba 29.8 dba NA 23.6 dba 16.6 dba NA 21.9 dba 14.9 dba NA 19.4 dba 12.4 dba NA 25.9 dba 18.9 dba STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance NA 27.0 dba 27.0 dba NA 11.4 dba 11.4 dba NA 9.9 dba 9.9 dba NA 7.1 dba 7.1 dba NA 15.8 dba 15.8 dba STR6 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste NA 31.8 dba dba NA 18.8 dba dba NA 16.6 dba dba NA 13.9 dba dba NA 18.6 dba dba STR7 On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR NA 39.4 dba dba NA 26.5 dba dba NA 24.5 dba dba NA 21.9 dba dba NA 27.7 dba dba STR9 On-Site Truck Route - Thermal Desorber NA 33.5 dba dba NA 19.0 dba dba NA 17.1 dba dba NA 14.4 dba dba NA 20.2 dba dba S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL dba 11.5 dba dba 14.1 dba dba 11.6 dba dba 8.5 dba dba 5.4 dba S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL dba 16.2 dba dba 15.6 dba dba 13.1 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 9.6 dba S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL dba 17.9 dba dba 8.8 dba dba 6.9 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 9.2 dba S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 12.4 dba dba 9.1 dba dba 7.1 dba dba 4.8 dba dba 4.0 dba S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL dba 30.4 dba dba 11.8 dba dba 10.5 dba dba 8.2 dba dba 21.6 dba S14A Compressor 1 Intake A dba 20.1 dba dba 1.8 dba dba 0.3 dba dba -2.7 dba dba 10.2 dba S14B Compressor 1 Intake B dba 22.4 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba 12.5 dba S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door dba 9.9 dba dba 1.3 dba dba -0.3 dba dba -3.2 dba dba 3.0 dba S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door dba 12.2 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 4.5 dba S17A Compressor 2 Intake A dba 19.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba -2.5 dba dba -8.8 dba dba 10.9 dba S17B Compressor 2 Intake B dba 20.5 dba dba 0.9 dba dba -0.7 dba dba -7.7 dba dba 11.4 dba S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust dba 24.4 dba dba 13.6 dba dba 8.3 dba dba 5.9 dba dba 15.8 dba S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 26.0 dba dba 2.0 dba dba 0.1 dba dba -6.2 dba dba 16.2 dba S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 7.8 dba dba 6.3 dba dba 4.6 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 4.7 dba S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 15.6 dba dba 21.8 dba dba 19.3 dba dba 15.8 dba dba 8.6 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 53.6 dba 53.2 dba 42.3 dba 42.0 dba 40.5 dba 40.2 dba 38.3 dba 38.1 dba 44.5 dba 44.2 dba Landfill Operations STRIDL1 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL2 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL3 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL4 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL5 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL6 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL7 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL8 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL9 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL10 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STR4 On-Site Truck Route - Landfill NA 29.8 dba 0.0 dba NA 34.1 dba 0.0 dba NA 30.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.6 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.8 dba 0.0 dba STR8 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste to Landfill NA 37.0 dba 0.0 dba NA 26.7 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 20.2 dba 0.0 dba NA 29.7 dba 0.0 dba SD1 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba SD2 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 46.5 dba NA 40.2 dba NA 37.2 dba NA 32.9 dba NA 36.7 dba NA Notes: (1) Sound Level at the Receptor was calculated using Cadna A Acoustical Modelling Software. - Indicates Noise Source Subject of Abatement. CRA (24)

73 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2C POINT-OF-RECEPTION NOISE IMPACT - PHASE II ATTENUATED SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Cadna A Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. ID Source Description Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) Incineration and Disposal Facility S1 Incinerator Stack dba 51.3 dba dba 41.4 dba dba 39.6 dba dba 37.7 dba dba 42.8 dba S2 ID Fan dba 20.7 dba dba 12.6 dba dba 11.2 dba dba 12.7 dba dba 17.5 dba S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower dba 24.4 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 1.3 dba dba 14.3 dba S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower dba 26.7 dba dba 15.7 dba dba 13.7 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 17.1 dba S5 LDR Baghouse Stack dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S6 LDR Baghouse Fan dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL dba 5.7 dba dba -0.8 dba dba -2.3 dba dba 5.7 dba dba -2.3 dba S8 Radiator Fan dba 26.1 dba dba 17.6 dba dba 15.9 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 17.5 dba S9 Radiator Fan dba 25.4 dba dba 17.4 dba dba 16.0 dba dba 14.5 dba dba 18.2 dba S10 Main ID Fan dba 21.0 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 11.7 dba dba 8.4 dba dba 11.1 dba S11 Combustion Air Fan dba 25.9 dba dba 26.8 dba dba 24.2 dba dba 13.4 dba dba 15.9 dba S22 Conveyor Motor dba 20.3 dba dba 25.4 dba dba 22.8 dba dba 19.4 dba dba 10.8 dba S23 Sludge Pump Truck dba 26.9 dba dba 24.9 dba dba 22.3 dba dba 19.1 dba dba 18.0 dba STRIDL1 Idling Entrance dba 20.1 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.5 dba dba 0.7 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL2 Idling Entrance dba 22.4 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 3.8 dba dba 0.9 dba dba 10.4 dba STRIDL3 Idling Entrance dba 21.6 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 1.1 dba dba 9.5 dba STRIDL4 Idling Entrance dba 21.3 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 2.4 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL5 Idling Entrance dba 21.0 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 1.5 dba dba 9.2 dba STR1 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1 NA 36.9 dba 29.9 dba NA 24.6 dba 17.6 dba NA 22.3 dba 15.4 dba NA 19.5 dba 12.5 dba NA 24.5 dba 17.5 dba STR2 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 2 NA 36.8 dba 29.8 dba NA 23.6 dba 16.6 dba NA 21.9 dba 14.9 dba NA 19.4 dba 12.4 dba NA 25.9 dba 18.9 dba STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance NA 27.0 dba 27.0 dba NA 11.4 dba 11.4 dba NA 9.9 dba 9.9 dba NA 7.1 dba 7.1 dba NA 15.8 dba 15.8 dba STR6 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste NA 31.8 dba dba NA 18.8 dba dba NA 16.6 dba dba NA 13.9 dba dba NA 18.6 dba dba STR7 On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR NA 39.4 dba dba NA 26.5 dba dba NA 24.5 dba dba NA 21.9 dba dba NA 27.7 dba dba STR9 On-Site Truck Route - Thermal Desorber NA 33.5 dba dba NA 19.0 dba dba NA 17.1 dba dba NA 14.4 dba dba NA 20.2 dba dba S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL dba 11.5 dba dba 14.1 dba dba 11.6 dba dba 8.5 dba dba 5.4 dba S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL dba 16.2 dba dba 15.6 dba dba 13.1 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 9.6 dba S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL dba 17.9 dba dba 8.8 dba dba 6.9 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 9.2 dba S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 12.4 dba dba 9.1 dba dba 7.1 dba dba 4.8 dba dba 4.0 dba S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL dba 30.4 dba dba 11.8 dba dba 10.5 dba dba 8.2 dba dba 21.6 dba S14A Compressor 1 Intake A dba 20.1 dba dba 1.8 dba dba 0.3 dba dba -2.7 dba dba 10.2 dba S14B Compressor 1 Intake B dba 22.4 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba 12.5 dba S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door dba 9.9 dba dba 1.3 dba dba -0.3 dba dba -3.2 dba dba 3.0 dba S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door dba 12.2 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 4.5 dba S17A Compressor 2 Intake A dba 19.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba -2.5 dba dba -8.8 dba dba 10.9 dba S17B Compressor 2 Intake B dba 20.5 dba dba 0.9 dba dba -0.7 dba dba -7.7 dba dba 11.4 dba S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust dba 24.4 dba dba 13.6 dba dba 8.3 dba dba 5.9 dba dba 15.8 dba S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 26.0 dba dba 2.0 dba dba 0.1 dba dba -6.2 dba dba 16.2 dba S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 7.8 dba dba 6.3 dba dba 4.6 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 4.7 dba S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 15.6 dba dba 21.8 dba dba 19.3 dba dba 15.8 dba dba 8.6 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 52.1 dba 51.6 dba 42.2 dba 41.9 dba 40.3 dba 40.1 dba 38.2 dba 38.0 dba 43.3 dba 43.0 dba Landfill Operations STRIDL1 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL2 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL3 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL4 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL5 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL6 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL7 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL8 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL9 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL10 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STR4 On-Site Truck Route - Landfill NA 29.8 dba 0.0 dba NA 34.1 dba 0.0 dba NA 30.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.6 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.8 dba 0.0 dba STR8 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste to Landfill NA 37.0 dba 0.0 dba NA 26.7 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 20.2 dba 0.0 dba NA 29.7 dba 0.0 dba SD1 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba SD2 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 46.5 dba NA 40.2 dba NA 37.2 dba NA 32.9 dba NA 36.7 dba NA Notes: (1) Sound Level at the Receptor was calculated using Cadna A Acoustical Modelling Software. - Indicates Noise Source Subject of Abatement. CRA (24)

74 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2D POINT-OF-RECEPTION NOISE IMPACT - PHASE III ATTENUATED SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Cadna A Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. Distance to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. 7 p.m. - 7 a.m. ID Source Description Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) Receptor Sound Level (1) Sound Level (1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) Incineration and Disposal Facility S1 Incinerator Stack dba 30.6 dba dba 23.4 dba dba 21.9 dba dba 20.3 dba dba 23.1 dba S2 ID Fan dba 20.7 dba dba 12.6 dba dba 11.2 dba dba 12.7 dba dba 17.5 dba S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower dba 24.4 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 1.3 dba dba 14.3 dba S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower dba 26.7 dba dba 15.7 dba dba 13.7 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 17.1 dba S5 LDR Baghouse Stack dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S6 LDR Baghouse Fan dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL dba 5.7 dba dba -0.8 dba dba -2.3 dba dba 5.7 dba dba -2.3 dba S8 Radiator Fan dba 26.1 dba dba 17.6 dba dba 15.9 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 17.5 dba S9 Radiator Fan dba 25.4 dba dba 17.4 dba dba 16.0 dba dba 14.5 dba dba 18.2 dba S10 Main ID Fan dba 21.0 dba dba 14.3 dba dba 11.7 dba dba 8.4 dba dba 11.1 dba S11 Combustion Air Fan dba 25.9 dba dba 26.8 dba dba 24.2 dba dba 13.4 dba dba 15.9 dba S22 Conveyor Motor dba 20.3 dba dba 25.4 dba dba 22.8 dba dba 19.4 dba dba 10.8 dba S23 Sludge Pump Truck dba 26.9 dba dba 24.9 dba dba 22.3 dba dba 19.1 dba dba 18.0 dba STRIDL1 Idling Entrance dba 20.1 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.5 dba dba 0.7 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL2 Idling Entrance dba 22.4 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 3.8 dba dba 0.9 dba dba 10.4 dba STRIDL3 Idling Entrance dba 21.6 dba dba 5.7 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 1.1 dba dba 9.5 dba STRIDL4 Idling Entrance dba 21.3 dba dba 5.0 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 2.4 dba dba 9.3 dba STRIDL5 Idling Entrance dba 21.0 dba dba 6.4 dba dba 4.4 dba dba 1.5 dba dba 9.2 dba STR1 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1 NA 36.9 dba 29.9 dba NA 24.6 dba 17.6 dba NA 22.3 dba 15.4 dba NA 19.5 dba 12.5 dba NA 24.5 dba 17.5 dba STR2 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 2 NA 36.8 dba 29.8 dba NA 23.6 dba 16.6 dba NA 21.9 dba 14.9 dba NA 19.4 dba 12.4 dba NA 25.9 dba 18.9 dba STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance NA 27.0 dba 27.0 dba NA 11.4 dba 11.4 dba NA 9.9 dba 9.9 dba NA 7.1 dba 7.1 dba NA 15.8 dba 15.8 dba STR6 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste NA 31.8 dba dba NA 18.8 dba dba NA 16.6 dba dba NA 13.9 dba dba NA 18.6 dba dba STR7 On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR NA 39.4 dba dba NA 26.5 dba dba NA 24.5 dba dba NA 21.9 dba dba NA 27.7 dba dba STR9 On-Site Truck Route - Thermal Desorber NA 33.5 dba dba NA 19.0 dba dba NA 17.1 dba dba NA 14.4 dba dba NA 20.2 dba dba S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL dba 11.5 dba dba 14.1 dba dba 11.6 dba dba 8.5 dba dba 5.4 dba S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL dba 16.2 dba dba 15.6 dba dba 13.1 dba dba 8.6 dba dba 9.6 dba S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL dba 17.9 dba dba 8.8 dba dba 6.9 dba dba 4.0 dba dba 9.2 dba S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 12.4 dba dba 9.1 dba dba 7.1 dba dba 4.8 dba dba 4.0 dba S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL dba 30.4 dba dba 11.8 dba dba 10.5 dba dba 8.2 dba dba 21.6 dba S14A Compressor 1 Intake A dba 20.1 dba dba 1.8 dba dba 0.3 dba dba -2.7 dba dba 10.2 dba S14B Compressor 1 Intake B dba 22.4 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba 12.5 dba S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door dba 9.9 dba dba 1.3 dba dba -0.3 dba dba -3.2 dba dba 3.0 dba S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door dba 12.2 dba dba 3.7 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 4.5 dba S17A Compressor 2 Intake A dba 19.4 dba dba -0.9 dba dba -2.5 dba dba -8.8 dba dba 10.9 dba S17B Compressor 2 Intake B dba 20.5 dba dba 0.9 dba dba -0.7 dba dba -7.7 dba dba 11.4 dba S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust dba 24.4 dba dba 13.6 dba dba 8.3 dba dba 5.9 dba dba 15.8 dba S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 26.0 dba dba 2.0 dba dba 0.1 dba dba -6.2 dba dba 16.2 dba S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD dba 7.8 dba dba 6.3 dba dba 4.6 dba dba 2.1 dba dba 4.7 dba S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL dba 15.6 dba dba 21.8 dba dba 19.3 dba dba 15.8 dba dba 8.6 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 44.8 dba 39.8 dba 34.9 dba 33.0 dba 32.7 dba 30.6 dba 29.6 dba 27.1 dba 34.2 dba 30.5 dba Landfill Operations STRIDL1 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL2 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL3 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL4 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL5 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL6 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL7 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL8 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL9 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STRIDL10 Idling Landfill Entrance dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba STR4 On-Site Truck Route - Landfill NA 29.8 dba 0.0 dba NA 34.1 dba 0.0 dba NA 30.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.6 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.8 dba 0.0 dba STR8 On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste to Landfill NA 37.0 dba 0.0 dba NA 26.7 dba 0.0 dba NA 24.5 dba 0.0 dba NA 20.2 dba 0.0 dba NA 29.7 dba 0.0 dba SD1 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba SD2 On-site Bulldozer - Landfill dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba dba 0.0 dba Total Facility Sound Level (1-hour Leq): 46.5 dba NA 40.2 dba NA 37.2 dba NA 32.9 dba NA 36.7 dba NA Notes: (1) Sound Level at the Receptor was calculated using Cadna A Acoustical Modelling Software. - Indicates Noise Source Subject of Abatement. CRA (24)

75 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 3 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - STEADY STATE SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Point-of- Sound Level at Verified by Compliance with Reception Point-of-Reception Point-of-Reception Acoustic Performance Performance ID Description Predicted Audit Limit (1) Limit (Leq) (Yes/No) (Leq) (Yes/No) EXISTING OPERATIONS Incineration and Disposal Facility - 24 Hour Operations Daytime Operations - 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 54.5 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 43.4 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 41.5 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 39.2 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 46.1 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes Nighttime Operations - 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 53.2 (dba) No 40.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 42.0 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 38.1 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 44.2 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes Landfill Operations - 7 am to 7 pm - Daytime Only POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 46.5 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 37.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 32.9 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 36.7 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes PHASE I NOISE ABATEMENT Incineration and Disposal Facility - 24 Hour Operations Daytime Operations - 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 53.6 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 42.3 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 40.5 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 38.3 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 44.5 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes Nighttime Operations - 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 53.2 (dba) No 40.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 42.0 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 38.1 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 44.2 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes Landfill Operations - 7 am to 7 pm - Daytime Only POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 46.5 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 37.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR4 Petrolia Line Residence 3 (East) 32.9 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 4 (West) 36.7 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes PHASE II NOISE ABATEMENT Incineration and Disposal Facility - 24 Hour Operations Daytime Operations - 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 52.1 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 42.2 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 40.3 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 38.2 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 43.3 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes Nighttime Operations - 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 51.6 (dba) No 40.0 (dba) No POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 41.9 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 40.1 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 38.0 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 43.0 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes Landfill Operations - 7 am to 7 pm - Daytime Only POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 46.5 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 37.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 32.9 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 36.7 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes PHASE III NOISE ABATEMENT Incineration and Disposal Facility - 24 Hour Operations Daytime Operations - 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 44.8 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 34.9 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 32.7 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 29.6 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 34.2 (dba) No 50.0 (dba) Yes Nighttime Operations - 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 39.8 (dba) No 40.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 33.0 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 30.6 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 27.1 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 30.5 (dba) No 45.0 (dba) Yes Landfill Operations - 7 am to 7 pm - Daytime Only POR1 Telfer Road Residence ( Mr. Allingham) 46.5 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR2 Petrolia Line Residence 1 (South of Road) 40.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR3 Petrolia Line Residence 2 (North of Road) 37.2 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR4 South Rokeby Residence 32.9 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes POR5 Petrolia Line Residence 36.7 (dba) No 55.0 (dba) Yes Note: (1) Minimum MOE sound level limits defined in NPC-300. CRA (3)

76 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 4 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - IMPULSE SOUND LEVELS -NIGHTTIME CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Compliance with Noise Impact Assessment at Distance to Sound Level Performance Performance Source No. Source Point-of-Reception Receptor at POR (1) (2) Limit (3) Limit Description (POR) (m) (dbai) (dbai) (Yes/No) is1 Baghouse Unit 1 - Pneumatic Cylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is2 Baghouse Unit 2 - Pneumatic Cylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is3 Baghouse Unit 3 - Pneumatic Cylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is4 Baghouse Unit 4 - Pneumatic Cylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes Notes: (1) Based on calculated L LM. (2) Calculated using Cadna A/ISO (3) MOE Minimum Nighttime Sound Level Limit Defined in NPC-300. CRA (24)

77 Page 1 of 2 TABLE C.1 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - STEADY STATE SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Unadjusted Sound Pressure Time-weighted Total Sound Tonal Penalty Reference Height Operation Reductions Equipment Movements Cadna Noise Source Description Data Quality 1/1 Octave Band Data Power Level Assessment Distance Absolute Above Roof Area Day Night Day Night Speed ID K 2K 4K 8K (dba) db(a) (m) (m) (m) (m 2 ) (min) (min) (#/Hour) (#/Hour) (km/h) Reference/Comments S1 Incinerator Stack PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S2 ID Fan PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S3 Primary Combustion Air Blower - TONAL PWL (db) YES NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S4 Secondary Combustion Air Blower PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S5 LDR Baghouse Stack PWL (db) NO NA 60 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S6 LDR Baghouse Fan PWL (db) NO NA 60 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S7 Carbon Black Injector - TONAL PWL (db) YES NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S8 Radiator Fan 1 PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S9 Radiator Fan 2 PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S10 Main ID Fan PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S11 Combustion Air Fan PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S22 Hopper Vibrator - TONAL PWL (db) YES NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S23 Conveyor Motor PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S24 Sludge Pump Truck PWL (db) NO NA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) STRIDL1-10 Idling Landfill Entrance 1-10 PWL (db) NO NA 60 0 N/A N/A N/A STRIDL1-5 Idling Entrance 1-5 A-weighted correction PWL (dba) STR1,2,4-9 On-Site Truck Route - Incinerator 1-2, On-Site Truck Route - Landfill PWL (db) NO NA NA NA 5, 10 1, 0 15, 15 CRA's Sound Level Reference Library - Moving Truck On-Site Truck Route - Inorganic Waste/to Landfill, Thermal Desorber A-weighted correction On-Site Truck Route - Burner Ash to LDR PWL (dba) STR3 On-Site Truck Route - Entrance PWL (dba) NO NA NA NA CRA's Sound Level Reference Library - Idling Truck S12A Combustion Air Intake Fan A - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S12B Combustion Air Intake Fan B - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction NA PWL (dba) S12C Combustion Air Intake Fan C - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S12D Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S13 Compressor 1 Exhaust - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S14A Compressor 1 Intake A PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S14B Compressor 1 Intake B PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S15 Compressor 1 Bay Door PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S16 Compressor 2 Bay Door PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S17A Compressor 2 Intake A PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction CRA (3)

78 Page 2 of 2 TABLE C.1 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - STEADY STATE SOUND LEVELS CLEAN HARBORS 4090 TELFER ROAD, R.R.#1, CORUNNA, ON Unadjusted Sound Pressure Time-weighted Total Sound Tonal Penalty Reference Height Operation Reductions Equipment Movements Cadna Noise Source Description Data Quality 1/1 Octave Band Data Power Level Assessment Distance Absolute Above Roof Area Day Night Day Night Speed ID K 2K 4K 8K (dba) db(a) (m) (m) (m) (m 2 ) (min) (min) (#/Hour) (#/Hour) (km/h) Reference/Comments PWL (dba) S17B Compressor 2 Intake B PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S18 Compressor 2 Exhaust PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S19 Incinerator Combustion Building BD PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S20 Incinerator Combustion Building BD2 PWL (db) NO 0 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) S21 Combustion Air Intake Fan D - TONAL PWL (db) YES 5 NA N/A N/A N/A A-weighted correction PWL (dba) SD1, SD2 20 tonne Bulldozer - Landfill PWL (db) NO NA N/A N/A N/A DEFRA, 20 tonne truck A-weighted correction PWL (dba) CRA (3)

79 Acoustic Assessment Report Prepared for: Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Conestoga-Rovers & Associates 651 Colby Drive Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2 October 2013 #51808 Report Number:24

80 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport (24) October2013 TableofContents Page Section1.0 Introduction...1 Section2.0 NoiseSourceSummary...2 Section3.0 PointofReceptionSummary...2 Section4.0 SoundLevelData ShortTermSteadyStateSoundLevelMeasurements ImpulseSoundLevelMonitoring AuditMeasurementsandModellingValidation...4 Section5.0 AssessmentCriteria...4 Section6.0 ImpactAssessment SteadyStateSoundLevels ImpulseNoiseSources NoiseAbatementPlan...7 Section7.0 Conclusions...8 ListofFigures (FollowingText) Figure1A NoiseSourceLocationPlan Figure1B NoiseSourceLocationPlan Figure2 PointofReceptionLocationPlan Figure3A NoiseContourPlot Existing Nighttime Figure3B NoiseContourPlot Phase1 Nighttime Figure3C NoiseContourPlot Phase2 Nighttime Figure3D NoiseContourPlot Phase3 Nighttime Figure4 NoiseContourPlot Impulse

81 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. Table1 NoiseSourceSummary ListofTables (FollowingText) AcousticAssessmentReport Table2A Table2B Table2C Table2D Table3 Table4 AppendixA AppendixB AppendixC AppendixD AppendixE PointofReceptionNoiseImpact ExistingUnattenuatedSoundLevels PointofReceptionNoiseImpact AttenuatedSoundLevels,Phase1 PointofReceptionNoiseImpact AttenuatedSoundLevels,Phase2 PointofReceptionNoiseImpact AttenuatedSoundLevels,Phase3 AcousticAssessmentSummary SteadyStateSoundLevels AcousticAssessmentSummaryImpulseSoundLevels ListofAppendices LandUseZoningDesignationPlan SummaryofInsignificantNoiseSources NoiseSpecificationandWorstCaseSimultaneousOperationsSummary ImpulseNoiseMeasurementsSummary Cadna/ASampleCalculationForWorstCasePOR (24) October2013

82 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport (24) October Section1.0 Introduction ConestogaRovers&Associates(CRA)haspreparedanAcousticAssessmentReportUpdate(AAR)forthe CleanHarborsCanada,Inc.(CleanHarbors)facility(Facility)locatedat4090TelferRoad,R.R.#1in Corunna,Ontario.TheAARhasbeenpreparedtosupporttheFacility'sMinistryoftheEnvironment (MOE)EnvironmentalComplianceApproval(ECA)andwasupdatedasfollows: Satelliteimagerywasadded Updatedmeasurementsforexistingnoisesourcescompleted Removalofinsignificantnoisesources Updatedreceiverlocations Noiseabatementplanandacousticperformancespecifications CleanHarborsisafullyintegratedhazardouswastemanagementfacilitythatincludesbothlandfilland incinerationdisposalprocessesandanumberofancillarysupportoperationssuchaslaboratory services,management,andmaintenance.cleanharborsoperatesitslandfilloperationsbetween7a.m. to7p.m.,andtheincinerationanddisposalfacilitythatoperates24hoursperday,7daysperweek. Bothoperationsaresubjectofthisassessmentandevaluatedagainsttheappropriatenoiselimits. TheAARpresentedhereinprovidesanevaluationofthepotentialnoiseimpactsfromFacilitynoise emissionsgeneratedduringnormaloperationsonthesensitivereceptorslocatednearesttothefacility. TheAARwaspreparedconsistentwiththefollowingMOEguidance: NPC233,"InformationtobeSubmittedforApprovalofStationarySourcesofSound,October1995" "AppendixA SupportingInformationforanAcousticAssessmentReportorVibrationAssessment ReportRequiredbyaBasicComprehensiveCofA"asspecifiedintheMOEguidanceentitled"Basic ComprehensiveCertificatesofApproval(Air) UserGuide,April2004" NPC300, StationaryandTransportationSources ApprovalandPlanning,October2013 NPC103,"Procedures,August1978" N1,"NoiseGuidelinesforLandfillSites,October1998" TheFacilityislocatedonindustrial(M41)zonedlandandissurroundedbylandzonedpredominantly foragricultural(a1),andenvironmentalprotectionwoodlot(epwd)zonedlanduses.azoningmapis providedinappendixa. TheFacilityislocatedinamixedAcousticalClass2andClass3area,dependingontheproximityofthe sensitivereceivertotheadjacentroadcorridorsandtrafficvolumes.acousticalclass2areasare definedbynpc300asanacousticenvironmentwithelevateddaytimenoiselevels.acousticalclass3

83 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport (24) October areasaredefinedbynpc300asruralareaswithanacousticalenvironmentthatisdominatedbynatural soundshavinglittleornoroadtraffic. Section2.0 NoiseSourceSummary ThisAARfocusedonthesoundemissionsfromthenoisesourcesidentifiedattheFacilitywiththe potentialtoadverselyimpactthesensitivereceptors.thenoisesourcesummaryisprovidedintable1 andthesignificantnoisesourcelocationsareidentifiedonfigure1aand1b. ThefourBaghouseUnitsareimpulsivenoisesources.Therearenoothersourcesofimpulsenoiseatthe Facility. TheFacilityisnotasourceofvibration. TheothernoisesourcesattheFacilityhavenotbeenincludedsincetheyareconsideredinsignificant contributorstotheoverallfacilitynoiselevelatthesensitivereceptors.asummaryofinsignificant noisesourcesisprovidedintableb.1ofappendixb. Section3.0 PointofReceptionSummary Theidentificationofappropriatesensitivepoint(s)ofreceptionisnecessarytoconducttheassessment forthefacility.a"pointofreception"isanypointonthepremisesofapersonwheresound,originating fromotherthanthosepremises,isreceived.thepointofreceptionmaybelocatedonpermanentor seasonalresidences,hotels/motels,nursing/retirementhomes,rentalresidences,hospitals, campgrounds,parks,schools,cemeteries,orplacesofworship. TheobjectiveofthisAARistodeterminethepredictableworstcase1hourequivalentsoundlevel (1hourLeq)attheworstcasepoint(s)ofreception.Theworstcasepoint(s)ofreceptionis(are) definedasthesensitivereceptor(s)withthegreatestpotentialexposuretothefacilitynoisesources duetoproximityanddirectlineofsightexposure. Theworstcasesensitivepoint(s)ofreception(POR)are: POR1 nearestfaçadeofasinglestoreyresidenceontelferroadwestofthefacilityentrance (1.5mabovegrade[AG]) POR2 nearestfaçadeofasinglestoreyresidenceonpetrolialinenortheastofthefacility (1.5mAG)

84 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport POR3 nearestfaçadeofasinglestoreyresidenceonpetrolialinenortheastofthefacility (1.5mAG) POR4 nearestfaçadeofasinglestoreyresidenceonpetrolialineatbrigdenroadandnortheast ofthefacility(1.5mag) POR5 nearestfaçadeofatwostoreyresidenceonpetrolialineandnorthwestofthefacility (4.5mAG) ThelocationoftheworstcasePORsareidentifiedonFigure2. AllPORlocationswithin1,000moftheFacilitywereconsidered;however,thenoiseimpactatonlythe worstcaseandmostexposedporsarepresentedherein. Section4.0 SoundLevelData 4.1 ShortTermSteadyStateSoundLevelMeasurements ShorttermsoundlevelmeasurementsweretakenusingaBruelKjaer2270SysteminclusiveofaType1 PrecisionSoundLevelMeter(SLM),Model2270(SerialNumber );anda1/2inchfreefield condensermicrophonemodel4189(serialnumber ).theslmwascalibratedandcheckedat 114decibels(dBA)beforeandaftereachmeasurementperiodusingaBruelKjaerType4231Acoustic Calibrator(SerialNumber ). ThesounddescriptorusedintheimpactevaluationfortheFacilitynoisesourcesisthe1hourLeq, whichisatimeweightedenergyaverageofthesource.theleqsoundmeasurementsconsistedof shorttermreadingstakenoveranobservationtimeof15secondintervalswiththedetectorinslow responseusingaweighting,suchthatthesoundlevelsarereportedinunitsofdba.allmeasurements wererecordedandstoredintheslm.inaccordancewithnpc103"procedures,august1978" (NPC103),atleastthreemeasurementsweretakenforeachoftheFacilitynoisesources. Soundlevelmeasurementsweretakenatareferencedistancedependingontheheightofthesource(s) beingmeasuredandproximitytoothernoisesources.thelocationandreferencedistancewere selectedtoensurethatthereferencemeasurementwasavalidrepresentationofthedominant source(s)beingmeasured.themeasurementlocationwasselectedinordertomeasurethesound emittedinthedirectionoftheworstcaseexposureinlinewiththenearbysensitivereceptorswherever possibleand/ortominimizetheinfluenceofothernoisesourcesanddirectivityissues. SoundlevelmeasurementswereconductedonMarch27 th,october4 th,and17 th,2012,duringnormal operatingconditions.meteorologicalconditionsconsistedoflowwinds(lessthan15km/hr),low humidityandnoprecipitation (24) October2013 3

85 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport (24) October ThenoisemeasurementdataisprovidedinAppendixCandsummarizedinTableC ImpulseSoundLevelMonitoring ImpulsesoundlevelmeasurementswereconductedforthefourbaghouseunitsusingtheSLMin impulseresponseandinaccordancewithnpc103requirements.twentyconsecutiveimpulseswere measuredandrecordedina20minuteperiod. AsummaryoftheimpulsesoundlevelmeasurementsandthecalculatedL LM foreachsourceisprovided intabled.1ofappendixd. 4.3 AuditMeasurementsandModellingValidation Auditmeasurementswereconductedatvariouslocationsonandoffsiteattheworstcaseandmost exposedreceiverlocationidentifiedaspor1duringnormaloperatingconditions. Theauditmeasurementswereconductedduringperiodsofminimalbackgroundnoiseinfluenceand confirmedthatthepredominantenvironmentalnoisesourcesincludedthefollowingsources: IncineratorStack(S1) PrimaryCombustionAirBlower(S3) LDRBaghouseStack(S5) Theauditmeasurementswerealsousedtovalidatetheenvironmentalnoisemodelsetupparameters andthemodelledonandoffsitenoiseimpactswerewithin3dbaoftheauditmeasuredsoundlevels (priortotonaladjustment). Section5.0 AssessmentCriteria AssessmentcriteriamaybedeterminedforaPORbasedontheMOE'sminimumexclusionarysound levellimitsincomparisontothebackgroundsoundlevelsexperiencedinthearea.the"background soundlevel"isdefinedasthesoundlevelpresentintheenvironmentthatisproducedbynoisesources otherthanthosefromthefacility,andwouldincludetrafficsoundlevelsandsoundfromneighboring industrial/commercialactivity.thehigherofthetwoassessmentcriteriaisselectedforpurposeof assessment. TheFacilityislocatedinamixedAcousticalClass2andClass3area.AcousticalClass2areasaredefined bynpc300asanacousticenvironmentwithelevateddaytimenoiselevelsduetotrafficnoiseandlower

86 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport backgroundnoiselevelsduringthenighttimeperiod.acousticalclass3areasaredefinedbynpc300as ruralareaswithanacousticalenvironmentthatisdominatedbynaturalsoundshavinglittleornoroad traffic. POR1islocatedapproximately500msouthofPetroliaLineandisnotsignificantlyinfluencedbythe soundgeneratedfromroadtraffic.por2topor5arelocatedalongpetrolialineandtherefore evaluatedusingtheclass2exclusionarysoundlevellimits. Thefollowingtablepresentsthegenericminimumsoundlevellimitsexpressedasa1hourLeqthatcan beappliedtoassessthesoundlevelsemittedbythefacility'sstationarysteadystatenoisesourcesfor theindustrialandlandfilloperations: SoundLevelLimits(dBA) StationaryNoiseSources LandfillOperations TimePeriod 07:00 19:00 19:00 07:00 07:00 19:00 POR1(Class3) POR2(Class2) POR3(Class2) POR4(Class2) POR5(Class2) TheMOEminimumsoundlevellimitsforimpulsivesoundfromastationarysourceareevaluatedin termsofthelogarithmicmeanimpulsesoundlevel(llm).impulsenoisesourcesareevaluated individually.themoe'ssoundlevelcriteriaforfrequentimpulsivenoisesourcesrangefrom40to 50dBAIdependingonthesource,thetimeofoperation,andtheAcousticClassoftheareasubjectof theassessment.crahasconservativelyselectedtheminimumnighttimelimitof40dbaiand45dbai forclass3andclass2receivers,respectively. Section6.0 ImpactAssessment 6.1 SteadyStateSoundLevels Theworstcaseassessmentofsteadystatenoisesourcesattheselectedpointsofreceptionwasbased onmeasuredsoundpressurelevels.cadnaaacousticalmodellingsoftware(cadnaa),version4.3,was usedtomodelthepotentialimpactsofthesignificantnoisesources.cadnaacalculatessoundlevel emissionsbasedontheiso96132standard"acoustics AttenuationofSoundduringPropagation Outdoors".AsamplecalculationforworstcasePOR1isprovidedinAppendixE (24) October2013 5

87 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport (24) October TheworstcasecumulativeFacilitywideattenuatedsoundlevelsestimatedatthereceptor(s)included attenuationaffectsduetogeometricdivergence,atmosphericattenuation,barriers/berms,ground absorptionanddirectivity,asapplicableforallsignificantnoisesourcesoffsitebuildingswereinputas interveningstructures. CadnaAmodellingassumptionsusedinthisAARincluded: NoiseSources:Allsourcesweremodelledusingthe1/1octavebanddatafromsource measurements,manufacturer'ssoundleveldata,orreferencematerials.movingpointlinesources arebasedontheinputsoundleveldataandthephysicaldimensionsofthetravelpathforthe mobilesources. NoiseSourceElevation:TheheightsofthesourcesaresummarizedinTableC.1ofAppendixC. ReflectionOrder:Amaximumreflectionorderof1.0wasusedtoevaluateindirectnoiseimpact fromonereflectingsurface. GroundAbsorption:Themodelwassetupwithagroundabsorptionfactorof0.25to1.0as applicable. Receptorelevation:PORreceptorheightsweremodelledappropriatelytorepresenttheworstcase elevation. TimeweightedAdjustment:Timeweightedadjustmentsforsourcesthatdonotoperate continuouslyaresummarizedintablec.1. Tonality:A+5dBAadjustmentwasappliedfortonalsources. BuildingSurfaces:Thebuildingsaremodelledasreflectivesurfaces. TheunattenuatedsoundlevelsestimatedatthePORsaresummarizedinTable2A.Sincethe unattenuatedsoundlevelsestimatedatallporsdonotmeetthelimitsforsteadystatenoisesources, anappropriatenoisecontrolprogrammustbedeterminedinordertomitigatethefacility'ssignificant noisesourcestoappropriatelevels. 6.2 ImpulseNoiseSources TheworstcaseassessmentofimpulsenoiseattheselectedPOR(s)wereestimatedbasedonthe AweightedLogarithmicMeanImpulseSoundLevel(LLM)frommeasuredimpulsesoundpressurelevels andreferencedistances.theunattenuatedimpulsivesoundlevelmeasurementsaresummarizedin TableD.1. TheLLMvalue(enteredfor500HzinaccordancewithISO96132)andreferencedistancewasinputto CadnaandtheoffsiteenvironmentalnoiseimpactwasestimatedateachPOR.

88 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport TheunattenuatedimpulsenoiseimpactatthePORsissummarizedinTable4.Theimpulsenoise impactsarebelowtheminimummoelimits. 6.3 NoiseAbatementPlan Thecumulativeattenuatedsteadystatesoundlevels(attenuated1hourLeqs)estimatedatthePORs werebasedonthefollowingproposedabatementmeasuresandminimumperformancereduction valuesperoctaveband(oracousticequivalent): PhaseI CompletedbyendofDecember2013 SilencerforLDRBaghouseStack(S5) Octaves K 2K 4K 8K IL Note: IL InsertionLoss Theattenuatedphase1soundlevelsestimatedattheworstcasePORsaresummarizedinTable2B. PhaseII CompletedbyendofDecember2015 EnclosureandSilencerforPrimaryCombustionBlower(S3) Octaves K 2K 4K 8K IL Note: IL InsertionLoss Theattenuatedphase2soundlevelsestimatedattheworstcasePORsaresummarizedinTable2C. PhaseIII CompletedbyendofDecember2020 SilencerforIncineratorStack(S1) Octaves K 2K 4K 8K IL Theattenuatedphase3soundlevelsestimatedattheworstcasePORsaresummarizedinTable2D (24) October2013 7

89 CleanHarborsCanada,Inc. AcousticAssessmentReport Section7.0 Conclusions TheattenuatedsteadystateandimpulsesoundlevelsestimatedatthePORsarebelowtheMOE's minimumexclusionarysoundlevellimitasapplicableandassummarizedintable3andtable4, respectively. AllnoisecontrolswillbeinstalledwithintheproposedscheduledetailedinSection6.3andcommencing uponissuanceofafinaleca. CRArecommendsthatanyfutureequipmentcontributelessthan30dBAattheapplicablePOR(s).This isbasedonacceptedstandardengineeringpracticeswheresoundlevelsthatareaminimumof10dba lowerthananothersoundlevelwillnothaveanimpactontheoverallnoiselevel.therefore,basedon themoeexclusionarynighttimesoundlevellimitof40dbaasourcecontributing30dbaorlesswould beconsideredinsignificant (24) October2013 8

90 S S21 S23 STRIDL STR3 Existing Berm H=7m STR6 STR9 S8 S9 S12A-D S11 S STRIDL1 STRIDL2 STRIDL3 S6 S5 STR STRIDL4 STRIDL5 STR STR S3 S4 S19 S18 S13 S17A-B S15 S16 S14A-B S20 S7 S1 S i1-i Point Source Line Source vert. Area Source Road Building Cylinder Barrier Embankment Receiver Calculation Area ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 1A NOISE SOURCE LOCATION PLAN

91 SD2 SD1 STR STRIDL10 STR STRID Existing Berm H=7m S21 S10 S23 S12A-D STRIDL STR STR STR9 S11 S8 S9 S Point Source Line Source vert. Area Source Road Building Cylinder Barrier Embankment Receiver Calculation Area ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 1B NOISE SOURCE LOCATION PLAN

92 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR Point Source Line Source vert. Area Source Road Building Cylinder Barrier Embankment Ground Absorption Contour Line Receiver Calculation Area ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 2 POINT-OF-RECEPTION LOCATION PLAN

93 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR > 30.0 db > 35.0 db > 40.0 db > 45.0 db > 50.0 db > 55.0 db > 60.0 db > 65.0 db ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 3A NOISE CONTOUR PLOT- EXISTING - NIGHTTIME

94 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR > 30.0 db > 35.0 db > 40.0 db > 45.0 db > 50.0 db > 55.0 db > 60.0 db > 65.0 db ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 3B NOISE CONTOUR PLOT- PHASE 1 - NIGHTTIME

95 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR > 30.0 db > 35.0 db > 40.0 db > 45.0 db > 50.0 db > 55.0 db > 60.0 db > 65.0 db ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 3C NOISE CONTOUR PLOT- PHASE 2 - NIGHTTIME

96 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR > 30.0 db > 35.0 db > 40.0 db > 45.0 db > 50.0 db > 55.0 db > 60.0 db > 65.0 db ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 3D NOISE CONTOUR PLOT- PHASE 3 - NIGHTTIME

97 POR POR POR2 POR4 POR > 30.0 db > 35.0 db > 40.0 db > 45.0 db > 50.0 db > 55.0 db > 60.0 db > 65.0 db ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN HARBOUR CANADA INC. - LAMBTON, ONTARIO FIGURE 4 NOISE CONTOUR PLOT- IMPULSE

98 Page1of1 TABLE1 NOISESOURCESUMMARY CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON CadnaA SoundPower Source Sound NoiseControl ID SourceDescription SourceType Level(1) Location(2) Characteristics(3) Measures(4) (dba) S1 IncineratorStack Point O S S S2 IDFan Point O S U S3 PrimaryCombustionAirBlower Point O S S/E S4 SecondaryCombustionAirBlower Point 96.9 O S U S5 LDRBaghouseStack Point 97.7 O S S S6 LDRBaghouseFan Point O S U S7 CarbonBlackInjectorTONAL Point 99.0 O S,T U S8 RadiatorFan1 Point 99.0 O S U S9 RadiatorFan2 Point 99.0 O S U S10 MainIDFan Point 92.6 O S U S11 CombustionAirFan Point O S U S22 ConveyorMotor Point O S U S23 SludgePumpTruck Point O S U STRIDL1 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance1 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL2 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance2 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL3 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance3 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL4 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance4 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL5 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance5 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL6 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance6 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL7 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance7 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL8 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance8 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL9 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance9 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL10 IdlingTruck@LandfillEntrance10 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL1 IdlingTruck@Entrance1 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL2 IdlingTruck@Entrance2 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL3 IdlingTruck@Entrance3 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL4 IdlingTruck@Entrance4 Point 88.9 O S U STRIDL5 IdlingTruck@Entrance5 Point 88.9 O S U SD1 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill Point O S U SD2 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill Point O S U!00!STR1 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator1 MovingPointLine O S U!00!STR2 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator2 MovingPointLine O S U!00!STR3 OnSiteTruckRouteEntrance MovingPointLine O S U!01!STR4 OnSiteTruckRouteLandfill MovingPointLine O S U!00!STR6 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWaste MovingPointLine O S U!00!STR7 OnSiteTruckRouteBurnerAshtoLDR MovingPointLine O S U!01!STR8 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWastetoLandfill MovingPointLine O S U!00!STR9 OnSiteTruckRouteThermalDesorber MovingPointLine O S U S12A CombustionAirIntakeFanATONAL VerticalArea 93.3 O S,T U S12B CombustionAirIntakeFanBTONAL VerticalArea 93.3 O S,T U S12C CombustionAirIntakeFanCTONAL VerticalArea 93.3 O S,T U S12D CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL VerticalArea 93.3 O S,T U S13 Compressor1ExhaustTONAL VerticalArea O S,T U S14A Compressor1IntakeA VerticalArea 98.2 O S U S14B Compressor1IntakeB VerticalArea 98.2 O S U S15 Compressor1BayDoor VerticalArea O S U S16 Compressor2BayDoor VerticalArea O S U S17A Compressor2IntakeA VerticalArea 92.3 O S U S17B Compressor2IntakeB VerticalArea 92.3 O S U S18 Compressor2Exhaust VerticalArea 97.9 O S U S19 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD VerticalArea 96.5 O S U S20 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD2 VerticalArea 91.5 O S U S21 CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL VerticalArea O S,T U ImpulseNoiseSources is1 BaghouseUnit1PneumaticCylinder Impulse O I U is2 BaghouseUnit2PneumaticCylinder Impulse O I U is3 BaghouseUnit3PneumaticCylinder Impulse O I U is4 BaghouseUnit4PneumaticCylinder Impulse O I U Notes: (1) SoundPowerLevel(PWL)indBAcalculatedfromsoundpressurelevelandreferencedistanceandincludes+5dBAtonalpenaltyifapplicable. ResultingPWLbasedondimensionsofverticalareasourceortravelpathandequipmentmovementsformovingpointline/areasources. (2) SourceLocation: O located/installedoutsideofbuilding I located/installedinsideofbuilding (3) SoundCharacteristics: S Steady Q QuasiSteadyImpulsive I Impulsive B Buzzing T Tonal C Cyclic TW TimeWeighted (4) NoiseControlMeasures: S silencer,acousticlouvre,muffler A acousticlining,plenum B barrier,berm,screening L lagging E acousticenclosure O other U uncontrolled AC administrativecontrol CRA051808(24)

99 Page1of1 TABLE2A POINTOFRECEPTIONNOISEIMPACTUNATTENUATEDEXISTINGFACILITYWIDESOUNDLEVELS CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence3(East) PetroliaLineResidence4(West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime CadnaA Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. ID SourceDescription Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) IncinerationandDisposalFacility S1 IncineratorStack dBA 51.3dBA dBA 41.4dBA dBA 39.6dBA dBA 37.7dBA dBA 42.8dBA S2 IDFan dBA 20.7dBA dBA 12.6dBA dBA 11.2dBA dBA 12.7dBA dBA 17.5dBA S3 PrimaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 48.3dBA dBA 26.6dBA dBA 25.0dBA dBA 21.1dBA dBA 38.1dBA S4 SecondaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 26.7dBA dBA 15.7dBA dBA 13.7dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 17.1dBA S5 LDRBaghouseStack dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S6 LDRBaghouseFan dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S7 CarbonBlackInjectorTONAL dBA 5.7dBA dBA 0.8dBA dBA 2.3dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 2.3dBA S8 RadiatorFan dBA 26.1dBA dBA 17.6dBA dBA 15.9dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 17.5dBA S9 RadiatorFan dBA 25.4dBA dBA 17.4dBA dBA 16.0dBA dBA 14.5dBA dBA 18.2dBA S10 MainIDFan dBA 21.0dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 11.7dBA dBA 8.4dBA dBA 11.1dBA S11 CombustionAirFan dBA 25.9dBA dBA 26.8dBA dBA 24.2dBA dBA 13.4dBA dBA 15.9dBA S22 ConveyorMotor dBA 20.3dBA dBA 25.4dBA dBA 22.8dBA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 10.8dBA S23 SludgePumpTruck dBA 26.9dBA dBA 24.9dBA dBA 22.3dBA dBA 19.1dBA dBA 18.0dBA STRIDL dBA 20.1dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.5dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 22.4dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 3.8dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 10.4dBA STRIDL dBA 21.6dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 1.1dBA dBA 9.5dBA STRIDL dBA 21.3dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 21.0dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 1.5dBA dBA 9.2dBA STR1 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator1 NA 36.9dBA 29.9dBA NA 24.6dBA 17.6dBA NA 22.3dBA 15.4dBA NA 19.5dBA 12.5dBA NA 24.5dBA 17.5dBA STR2 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator2 NA 36.8dBA 29.8dBA NA 23.6dBA 16.6dBA NA 21.9dBA 14.9dBA NA 19.4dBA 12.4dBA NA 25.9dBA 18.9dBA STR3 OnSiteTruckRouteEntrance NA 27.0dBA 27.0dBA NA 11.4dBA 11.4dBA NA 9.9dBA 9.9dBA NA 7.1dBA 7.1dBA NA 15.8dBA 15.8dBA STR6 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWaste NA 31.8dBA 68.2dBA NA 18.8dBA 81.2dBA NA 16.6dBA 83.4dBA NA 13.9dBA 86.1dBA NA 18.6dBA 81.4dBA STR7 OnSiteTruckRouteBurnerAshtoLDR NA 39.4dBA 65.3dBA NA 26.5dBA 78.3dBA NA 24.5dBA 80.3dBA NA 21.9dBA 82.8dBA NA 27.7dBA 77.1dBA STR9 OnSiteTruckRouteThermalDesorber NA 33.5dBA 66.5dBA NA 19.0dBA 81.0dBA NA 17.1dBA 82.9dBA NA 14.4dBA 85.6dBA NA 20.2dBA 79.8dBA S12A CombustionAirIntakeFanATONAL dBA 11.5dBA dBA 14.1dBA dBA 11.6dBA dBA 8.5dBA dBA 5.4dBA S12B CombustionAirIntakeFanBTONAL dBA 16.2dBA dBA 15.6dBA dBA 13.1dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 9.6dBA S12C CombustionAirIntakeFanCTONAL dBA 17.9dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 6.9dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 9.2dBA S12D CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 12.4dBA dBA 9.1dBA dBA 7.1dBA dBA 4.8dBA dBA 4.0dBA S13 Compressor1ExhaustTONAL dBA 30.4dBA dBA 11.8dBA dBA 10.5dBA dBA 8.2dBA dBA 21.6dBA S14A Compressor1IntakeA dBA 20.1dBA dBA 1.8dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 2.7dBA dBA 10.2dBA S14B Compressor1IntakeB dBA 22.4dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 12.5dBA S15 Compressor1BayDoor dBA 9.9dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 3.2dBA dBA 3.0dBA S16 Compressor2BayDoor dBA 12.2dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 4.5dBA S17A Compressor2IntakeA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 2.5dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 10.9dBA S17B Compressor2IntakeB dBA 20.5dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 7.7dBA dBA 11.4dBA S18 Compressor2Exhaust dBA 24.4dBA dBA 13.6dBA dBA 8.3dBA dBA 5.9dBA dBA 15.8dBA S19 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 26.0dBA dBA 2.0dBA dBA 0.1dBA dBA 6.2dBA dBA 16.2dBA S20 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 7.8dBA dBA 6.3dBA dBA 4.6dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 4.7dBA S21 CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 15.6dBA dBA 21.8dBA dBA 19.3dBA dBA 15.8dBA dBA 8.6dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 54.5dBA 53.2dBA 43.4dBA 42.0dBA 41.5dBA 40.2dBA 39.2dBA 38.1dBA 46.1dBA 44.2dBA LandfillOperations STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STR4 OnSiteTruckRouteLandfill NA 29.8dBA 0.0dBA NA 34.1dBA 0.0dBA NA 30.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.6dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.8dBA 0.0dBA STR8 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWastetoLandfill NA 37.0dBA 0.0dBA NA 26.7dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 20.2dBA 0.0dBA NA 29.7dBA 0.0dBA SD1 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA SD2 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 46.5dBA NA 40.2dBA NA 37.2dBA NA 32.9dBA NA 36.7dBA NA Notes: (1) SoundLevelattheReceptorwascalculatedusingCadnaAAcousticalModellingSoftware. IndicatesNoiseSourceSubjectofAbatement. IndicatesWorstCaseSoundLevel CRA051808(24)

100 Page1of1 TABLE2B POINTOFRECEPTIONNOISEIMPACTPHASEIATTENUATEDSOUNDLEVELS CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence3(East) PetroliaLineResidence4(West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime CadnaA Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. ID SourceDescription Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) IncinerationandDisposalFacility S1 IncineratorStack dBA 51.3dBA dBA 41.4dBA dBA 39.6dBA dBA 37.7dBA dBA 42.8dBA S2 IDFan dBA 20.7dBA dBA 12.6dBA dBA 11.2dBA dBA 12.7dBA dBA 17.5dBA S3 PrimaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 48.3dBA dBA 26.6dBA dBA 25.0dBA dBA 21.1dBA dBA 38.1dBA S4 SecondaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 26.7dBA dBA 15.7dBA dBA 13.7dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 17.1dBA S5 LDRBaghouseStack dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S6 LDRBaghouseFan dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S7 CarbonBlackInjectorTONAL dBA 5.7dBA dBA 0.8dBA dBA 2.3dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 2.3dBA S8 RadiatorFan dBA 26.1dBA dBA 17.6dBA dBA 15.9dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 17.5dBA S9 RadiatorFan dBA 25.4dBA dBA 17.4dBA dBA 16.0dBA dBA 14.5dBA dBA 18.2dBA S10 MainIDFan dBA 21.0dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 11.7dBA dBA 8.4dBA dBA 11.1dBA S11 CombustionAirFan dBA 25.9dBA dBA 26.8dBA dBA 24.2dBA dBA 13.4dBA dBA 15.9dBA S22 ConveyorMotor dBA 20.3dBA dBA 25.4dBA dBA 22.8dBA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 10.8dBA S23 SludgePumpTruck dBA 26.9dBA dBA 24.9dBA dBA 22.3dBA dBA 19.1dBA dBA 18.0dBA STRIDL dBA 20.1dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.5dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 22.4dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 3.8dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 10.4dBA STRIDL dBA 21.6dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 1.1dBA dBA 9.5dBA STRIDL dBA 21.3dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 21.0dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 1.5dBA dBA 9.2dBA STR1 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator1 NA 36.9dBA 29.9dBA NA 24.6dBA 17.6dBA NA 22.3dBA 15.4dBA NA 19.5dBA 12.5dBA NA 24.5dBA 17.5dBA STR2 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator2 NA 36.8dBA 29.8dBA NA 23.6dBA 16.6dBA NA 21.9dBA 14.9dBA NA 19.4dBA 12.4dBA NA 25.9dBA 18.9dBA STR3 OnSiteTruckRouteEntrance NA 27.0dBA 27.0dBA NA 11.4dBA 11.4dBA NA 9.9dBA 9.9dBA NA 7.1dBA 7.1dBA NA 15.8dBA 15.8dBA STR6 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWaste NA 31.8dBA 68.2dBA NA 18.8dBA 81.2dBA NA 16.6dBA 83.4dBA NA 13.9dBA 86.1dBA NA 18.6dBA 81.4dBA STR7 OnSiteTruckRouteBurnerAshtoLDR NA 39.4dBA 65.3dBA NA 26.5dBA 78.3dBA NA 24.5dBA 80.3dBA NA 21.9dBA 82.8dBA NA 27.7dBA 77.1dBA STR9 OnSiteTruckRouteThermalDesorber NA 33.5dBA 66.5dBA NA 19.0dBA 81.0dBA NA 17.1dBA 82.9dBA NA 14.4dBA 85.6dBA NA 20.2dBA 79.8dBA S12A CombustionAirIntakeFanATONAL dBA 11.5dBA dBA 14.1dBA dBA 11.6dBA dBA 8.5dBA dBA 5.4dBA S12B CombustionAirIntakeFanBTONAL dBA 16.2dBA dBA 15.6dBA dBA 13.1dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 9.6dBA S12C CombustionAirIntakeFanCTONAL dBA 17.9dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 6.9dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 9.2dBA S12D CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 12.4dBA dBA 9.1dBA dBA 7.1dBA dBA 4.8dBA dBA 4.0dBA S13 Compressor1ExhaustTONAL dBA 30.4dBA dBA 11.8dBA dBA 10.5dBA dBA 8.2dBA dBA 21.6dBA S14A Compressor1IntakeA dBA 20.1dBA dBA 1.8dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 2.7dBA dBA 10.2dBA S14B Compressor1IntakeB dBA 22.4dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 12.5dBA S15 Compressor1BayDoor dBA 9.9dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 3.2dBA dBA 3.0dBA S16 Compressor2BayDoor dBA 12.2dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 4.5dBA S17A Compressor2IntakeA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 2.5dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 10.9dBA S17B Compressor2IntakeB dBA 20.5dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 7.7dBA dBA 11.4dBA S18 Compressor2Exhaust dBA 24.4dBA dBA 13.6dBA dBA 8.3dBA dBA 5.9dBA dBA 15.8dBA S19 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 26.0dBA dBA 2.0dBA dBA 0.1dBA dBA 6.2dBA dBA 16.2dBA S20 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 7.8dBA dBA 6.3dBA dBA 4.6dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 4.7dBA S21 CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 15.6dBA dBA 21.8dBA dBA 19.3dBA dBA 15.8dBA dBA 8.6dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 53.6dBA 53.2dBA 42.3dBA 42.0dBA 40.5dBA 40.2dBA 38.3dBA 38.1dBA 44.5dBA 44.2dBA LandfillOperations STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STR4 OnSiteTruckRouteLandfill NA 29.8dBA 0.0dBA NA 34.1dBA 0.0dBA NA 30.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.6dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.8dBA 0.0dBA STR8 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWastetoLandfill NA 37.0dBA 0.0dBA NA 26.7dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 20.2dBA 0.0dBA NA 29.7dBA 0.0dBA SD1 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA SD2 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 46.5dBA NA 40.2dBA NA 37.2dBA NA 32.9dBA NA 36.7dBA NA Notes: (1) SoundLevelattheReceptorwascalculatedusingCadnaAAcousticalModellingSoftware. IndicatesNoiseSourceSubjectofAbatement. CRA051808(24)

101 Page1of1 TABLE2C POINTOFRECEPTIONNOISEIMPACTPHASEIIATTENUATEDSOUNDLEVELS CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence3(East) PetroliaLineResidence4(West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime CadnaA Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. ID SourceDescription Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) IncinerationandDisposalFacility S1 IncineratorStack dBA 51.3dBA dBA 41.4dBA dBA 39.6dBA dBA 37.7dBA dBA 42.8dBA S2 IDFan dBA 20.7dBA dBA 12.6dBA dBA 11.2dBA dBA 12.7dBA dBA 17.5dBA S3 PrimaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 24.4dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 14.3dBA S4 SecondaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 26.7dBA dBA 15.7dBA dBA 13.7dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 17.1dBA S5 LDRBaghouseStack dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S6 LDRBaghouseFan dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S7 CarbonBlackInjectorTONAL dBA 5.7dBA dBA 0.8dBA dBA 2.3dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 2.3dBA S8 RadiatorFan dBA 26.1dBA dBA 17.6dBA dBA 15.9dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 17.5dBA S9 RadiatorFan dBA 25.4dBA dBA 17.4dBA dBA 16.0dBA dBA 14.5dBA dBA 18.2dBA S10 MainIDFan dBA 21.0dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 11.7dBA dBA 8.4dBA dBA 11.1dBA S11 CombustionAirFan dBA 25.9dBA dBA 26.8dBA dBA 24.2dBA dBA 13.4dBA dBA 15.9dBA S22 ConveyorMotor dBA 20.3dBA dBA 25.4dBA dBA 22.8dBA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 10.8dBA S23 SludgePumpTruck dBA 26.9dBA dBA 24.9dBA dBA 22.3dBA dBA 19.1dBA dBA 18.0dBA STRIDL dBA 20.1dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.5dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 22.4dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 3.8dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 10.4dBA STRIDL dBA 21.6dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 1.1dBA dBA 9.5dBA STRIDL dBA 21.3dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 21.0dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 1.5dBA dBA 9.2dBA STR1 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator1 NA 36.9dBA 29.9dBA NA 24.6dBA 17.6dBA NA 22.3dBA 15.4dBA NA 19.5dBA 12.5dBA NA 24.5dBA 17.5dBA STR2 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator2 NA 36.8dBA 29.8dBA NA 23.6dBA 16.6dBA NA 21.9dBA 14.9dBA NA 19.4dBA 12.4dBA NA 25.9dBA 18.9dBA STR3 OnSiteTruckRouteEntrance NA 27.0dBA 27.0dBA NA 11.4dBA 11.4dBA NA 9.9dBA 9.9dBA NA 7.1dBA 7.1dBA NA 15.8dBA 15.8dBA STR6 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWaste NA 31.8dBA 68.2dBA NA 18.8dBA 81.2dBA NA 16.6dBA 83.4dBA NA 13.9dBA 86.1dBA NA 18.6dBA 81.4dBA STR7 OnSiteTruckRouteBurnerAshtoLDR NA 39.4dBA 65.3dBA NA 26.5dBA 78.3dBA NA 24.5dBA 80.3dBA NA 21.9dBA 82.8dBA NA 27.7dBA 77.1dBA STR9 OnSiteTruckRouteThermalDesorber NA 33.5dBA 66.5dBA NA 19.0dBA 81.0dBA NA 17.1dBA 82.9dBA NA 14.4dBA 85.6dBA NA 20.2dBA 79.8dBA S12A CombustionAirIntakeFanATONAL dBA 11.5dBA dBA 14.1dBA dBA 11.6dBA dBA 8.5dBA dBA 5.4dBA S12B CombustionAirIntakeFanBTONAL dBA 16.2dBA dBA 15.6dBA dBA 13.1dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 9.6dBA S12C CombustionAirIntakeFanCTONAL dBA 17.9dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 6.9dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 9.2dBA S12D CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 12.4dBA dBA 9.1dBA dBA 7.1dBA dBA 4.8dBA dBA 4.0dBA S13 Compressor1ExhaustTONAL dBA 30.4dBA dBA 11.8dBA dBA 10.5dBA dBA 8.2dBA dBA 21.6dBA S14A Compressor1IntakeA dBA 20.1dBA dBA 1.8dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 2.7dBA dBA 10.2dBA S14B Compressor1IntakeB dBA 22.4dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 12.5dBA S15 Compressor1BayDoor dBA 9.9dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 3.2dBA dBA 3.0dBA S16 Compressor2BayDoor dBA 12.2dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 4.5dBA S17A Compressor2IntakeA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 2.5dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 10.9dBA S17B Compressor2IntakeB dBA 20.5dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 7.7dBA dBA 11.4dBA S18 Compressor2Exhaust dBA 24.4dBA dBA 13.6dBA dBA 8.3dBA dBA 5.9dBA dBA 15.8dBA S19 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 26.0dBA dBA 2.0dBA dBA 0.1dBA dBA 6.2dBA dBA 16.2dBA S20 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 7.8dBA dBA 6.3dBA dBA 4.6dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 4.7dBA S21 CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 15.6dBA dBA 21.8dBA dBA 19.3dBA dBA 15.8dBA dBA 8.6dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 52.1dBA 51.6dBA 42.2dBA 41.9dBA 40.3dBA 40.1dBA 38.2dBA 38.0dBA 43.3dBA 43.0dBA LandfillOperations STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STR4 OnSiteTruckRouteLandfill NA 29.8dBA 0.0dBA NA 34.1dBA 0.0dBA NA 30.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.6dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.8dBA 0.0dBA STR8 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWastetoLandfill NA 37.0dBA 0.0dBA NA 26.7dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 20.2dBA 0.0dBA NA 29.7dBA 0.0dBA SD1 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA SD2 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 46.5dBA NA 40.2dBA NA 37.2dBA NA 32.9dBA NA 36.7dBA NA Notes: (1) SoundLevelattheReceptorwascalculatedusingCadnaAAcousticalModellingSoftware. IndicatesNoiseSourceSubjectofAbatement. CRA051808(24)

102 Page1of1 TABLE2D POINTOFRECEPTIONNOISEIMPACTPHASEIIIATTENUATEDSOUNDLEVELS CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) PetroliaLineResidence3(East) PetroliaLineResidence4(West) POR1 POR2 POR3 POR4 POR5 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime CadnaA Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. Distanceto 7a.m.7p.m. 7p.m.7a.m. ID SourceDescription Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) Receptor SoundLevel(1) SoundLevel(1) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) (m) (Leq) (Leq) IncinerationandDisposalFacility S1 IncineratorStack dBA 30.6dBA dBA 23.4dBA dBA 21.9dBA dBA 20.3dBA dBA 23.1dBA S2 IDFan dBA 20.7dBA dBA 12.6dBA dBA 11.2dBA dBA 12.7dBA dBA 17.5dBA S3 PrimaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 24.4dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 14.3dBA S4 SecondaryCombustionAirBlower dBA 26.7dBA dBA 15.7dBA dBA 13.7dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 17.1dBA S5 LDRBaghouseStack dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S6 LDRBaghouseFan dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA S7 CarbonBlackInjectorTONAL dBA 5.7dBA dBA 0.8dBA dBA 2.3dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 2.3dBA S8 RadiatorFan dBA 26.1dBA dBA 17.6dBA dBA 15.9dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 17.5dBA S9 RadiatorFan dBA 25.4dBA dBA 17.4dBA dBA 16.0dBA dBA 14.5dBA dBA 18.2dBA S10 MainIDFan dBA 21.0dBA dBA 14.3dBA dBA 11.7dBA dBA 8.4dBA dBA 11.1dBA S11 CombustionAirFan dBA 25.9dBA dBA 26.8dBA dBA 24.2dBA dBA 13.4dBA dBA 15.9dBA S22 ConveyorMotor dBA 20.3dBA dBA 25.4dBA dBA 22.8dBA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 10.8dBA S23 SludgePumpTruck dBA 26.9dBA dBA 24.9dBA dBA 22.3dBA dBA 19.1dBA dBA 18.0dBA STRIDL dBA 20.1dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.5dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 22.4dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 3.8dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 10.4dBA STRIDL dBA 21.6dBA dBA 5.7dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 1.1dBA dBA 9.5dBA STRIDL dBA 21.3dBA dBA 5.0dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 9.3dBA STRIDL dBA 21.0dBA dBA 6.4dBA dBA 4.4dBA dBA 1.5dBA dBA 9.2dBA STR1 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator1 NA 36.9dBA 29.9dBA NA 24.6dBA 17.6dBA NA 22.3dBA 15.4dBA NA 19.5dBA 12.5dBA NA 24.5dBA 17.5dBA STR2 OnSiteTruckRouteIncinerator2 NA 36.8dBA 29.8dBA NA 23.6dBA 16.6dBA NA 21.9dBA 14.9dBA NA 19.4dBA 12.4dBA NA 25.9dBA 18.9dBA STR3 OnSiteTruckRouteEntrance NA 27.0dBA 27.0dBA NA 11.4dBA 11.4dBA NA 9.9dBA 9.9dBA NA 7.1dBA 7.1dBA NA 15.8dBA 15.8dBA STR6 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWaste NA 31.8dBA 68.2dBA NA 18.8dBA 81.2dBA NA 16.6dBA 83.4dBA NA 13.9dBA 86.1dBA NA 18.6dBA 81.4dBA STR7 OnSiteTruckRouteBurnerAshtoLDR NA 39.4dBA 65.3dBA NA 26.5dBA 78.3dBA NA 24.5dBA 80.3dBA NA 21.9dBA 82.8dBA NA 27.7dBA 77.1dBA STR9 OnSiteTruckRouteThermalDesorber NA 33.5dBA 66.5dBA NA 19.0dBA 81.0dBA NA 17.1dBA 82.9dBA NA 14.4dBA 85.6dBA NA 20.2dBA 79.8dBA S12A CombustionAirIntakeFanATONAL dBA 11.5dBA dBA 14.1dBA dBA 11.6dBA dBA 8.5dBA dBA 5.4dBA S12B CombustionAirIntakeFanBTONAL dBA 16.2dBA dBA 15.6dBA dBA 13.1dBA dBA 8.6dBA dBA 9.6dBA S12C CombustionAirIntakeFanCTONAL dBA 17.9dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 6.9dBA dBA 4.0dBA dBA 9.2dBA S12D CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 12.4dBA dBA 9.1dBA dBA 7.1dBA dBA 4.8dBA dBA 4.0dBA S13 Compressor1ExhaustTONAL dBA 30.4dBA dBA 11.8dBA dBA 10.5dBA dBA 8.2dBA dBA 21.6dBA S14A Compressor1IntakeA dBA 20.1dBA dBA 1.8dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 2.7dBA dBA 10.2dBA S14B Compressor1IntakeB dBA 22.4dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 12.5dBA S15 Compressor1BayDoor dBA 9.9dBA dBA 1.3dBA dBA 0.3dBA dBA 3.2dBA dBA 3.0dBA S16 Compressor2BayDoor dBA 12.2dBA dBA 3.7dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 4.5dBA S17A Compressor2IntakeA dBA 19.4dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 2.5dBA dBA 8.8dBA dBA 10.9dBA S17B Compressor2IntakeB dBA 20.5dBA dBA 0.9dBA dBA 0.7dBA dBA 7.7dBA dBA 11.4dBA S18 Compressor2Exhaust dBA 24.4dBA dBA 13.6dBA dBA 8.3dBA dBA 5.9dBA dBA 15.8dBA S19 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 26.0dBA dBA 2.0dBA dBA 0.1dBA dBA 6.2dBA dBA 16.2dBA S20 IncineratorCombustionBuildingBD dBA 7.8dBA dBA 6.3dBA dBA 4.6dBA dBA 2.1dBA dBA 4.7dBA S21 CombustionAirIntakeFanDTONAL dBA 15.6dBA dBA 21.8dBA dBA 19.3dBA dBA 15.8dBA dBA 8.6dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 44.8dBA 39.8dBA 34.9dBA 33.0dBA 32.7dBA 30.6dBA 29.6dBA 27.1dBA 34.2dBA 30.5dBA LandfillOperations STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STRIDL dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA STR4 OnSiteTruckRouteLandfill NA 29.8dBA 0.0dBA NA 34.1dBA 0.0dBA NA 30.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.6dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.8dBA 0.0dBA STR8 OnSiteTruckRouteInorganicWastetoLandfill NA 37.0dBA 0.0dBA NA 26.7dBA 0.0dBA NA 24.5dBA 0.0dBA NA 20.2dBA 0.0dBA NA 29.7dBA 0.0dBA SD1 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA SD2 OnsiteBulldozerLandfill dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA dBA 0.0dBA TotalFacilitySoundLevel(1hourLeq): 46.5dBA NA 40.2dBA NA 37.2dBA NA 32.9dBA NA 36.7dBA NA Notes: (1) SoundLevelattheReceptorwascalculatedusingCadnaAAcousticalModellingSoftware. IndicatesNoiseSourceSubjectofAbatement. CRA051808(24)

103 Page1of1 TABLE3 ACOUSTICASSESSMENTSUMMARYSTEADYSTATESOUNDLEVELS CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON Pointof SoundLevelat Verifiedby Compliancewith Reception PointofReception PointofReception Acoustic Performance Performance ID Description Predicted Audit Limit(1) Limit (Leq) (Yes/No) (Leq) (Yes/No) EXISTINGOPERATIONS IncinerationandDisposalFacility24HourOperations DaytimeOperations7a.m.to7p.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 54.5(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 43.4(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 41.5(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 39.2(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 46.1(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes NighttimeOperations7p.m.to7a.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 53.2(dBA) No 40.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 42.0(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 38.1(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 44.2(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes LandfillOperations7amto7pmDaytimeOnly POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 46.5(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 37.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 32.9(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 36.7(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes PHASEINOISEABATEMENT IncinerationandDisposalFacility24HourOperations DaytimeOperations7a.m.to7p.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 53.6(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 42.3(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 40.5(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 38.3(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 44.5(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes NighttimeOperations7p.m.to7a.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 53.2(dBA) No 40.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 42.0(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 38.1(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 44.2(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes LandfillOperations7amto7pmDaytimeOnly POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 46.5(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 37.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR4 PetroliaLineResidence3(East) 32.9(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence4(West) 36.7(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes PHASEIINOISEABATEMENT IncinerationandDisposalFacility24HourOperations DaytimeOperations7a.m.to7p.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 52.1(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 42.2(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 40.3(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 38.2(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 43.3(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes NighttimeOperations7p.m.to7a.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 51.6(dBA) No 40.0(dBA) No POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 41.9(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 40.1(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 38.0(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 43.0(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes LandfillOperations7amto7pmDaytimeOnly POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 46.5(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 37.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 32.9(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 36.7(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes PHASEIIINOISEABATEMENT IncinerationandDisposalFacility24HourOperations DaytimeOperations7a.m.to7p.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 44.8(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 34.9(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 32.7(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 29.6(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 34.2(dBA) No 50.0(dBA) Yes NighttimeOperations7p.m.to7a.m. POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 39.8(dBA) No 40.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 33.0(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 30.6(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 27.1(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 30.5(dBA) No 45.0(dBA) Yes LandfillOperations7amto7pmDaytimeOnly POR1 TelferRoadResidence(Mr.Allingham) 46.5(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR2 PetroliaLineResidence1(SouthofRoad) 40.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR3 PetroliaLineResidence2(NorthofRoad) 37.2(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR4 SouthRokebyResidence 32.9(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes POR5 PetroliaLineResidence 36.7(dBA) No 55.0(dBA) Yes Note: (1) MinimumMOEsoundlevellimitsdefinedinNPC300. CRA078699(3)

104 Page1of1 TABLE4 ACOUSTICASSESSMENTSUMMARYIMPULSESOUNDLEVELSNIGHTTIME CLEANHARBORS 4090TELFERROAD,R.R.#1,CORUNNA,ON Compliancewith Noise ImpactAssessmentat Distanceto SoundLevel Performance Performance SourceNo. Source PointofReception Receptor atpor(1)(2) Limit(3) Limit Description (POR) (m) (dbai) (dbai) (Yes/No) is1 BaghouseUnit1PneumaticCylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is2 BaghouseUnit2PneumaticCylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is3 BaghouseUnit3PneumaticCylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes is4 BaghouseUnit4PneumaticCylinder POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes POR Yes Notes: (1)BasedoncalculatedL LM. (2)CalculatedusingCadnaA/ISO (3)MOEMinimumNighttimeSoundLevelLimitDefinedinNPC300. CRA051808(24)

105 Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Acoustic Assessment Report Appendix A Land Use Zoning Designation Plan (24) October 2013

106

Melancthon Pits Extension Noise Study Part of West Half of Lots 12 and 14, Concession 3 O.S. Township of Melancthon, County of Dufferin

Melancthon Pits Extension Noise Study Part of West Half of Lots 12 and 14, Concession 3 O.S. Township of Melancthon, County of Dufferin NOISE IMPACT STUDY - Project: 16099 Melancthon Pits Extension Noise Study Part of West Half of Lots 12 and 14, Concession 3 O.S. Township of Melancthon, County of Dufferin Prepared for: MHBC Planning c/o

More information

Proposed Goulbourn Pit and Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Goulbourn City of Ottawa

Proposed Goulbourn Pit and Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Goulbourn City of Ottawa NOISE IMPACT STUDY - Project: 10351 Proposed Goulbourn Pit and Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Goulbourn City of Ottawa Prepared for: 1394706 Ontario Inc. c/o McIntosh Perry Consulting

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS... VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 115-0395 2025 Guelph Line/Burlington Noise TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 1.0 THE PROJECT...1 1.1 INTRODUCTION...1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION...2 2.0 NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...2

More information

Canaan Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Cumberland City of Ottawa, Ontario

Canaan Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Cumberland City of Ottawa, Ontario NOISE IMPACT STUDY - Project: 13209 Canaan Quarry Noise Impact Study Geographic Township of Cumberland City of Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: Cornwall Gravel Co. Ltd. 390 Eleventh Street West Cornwall,

More information

COUNTY ROAD 22 HORSESHOE VALLEY ROAD. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. simcoe.ca

COUNTY ROAD 22 HORSESHOE VALLEY ROAD. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. simcoe.ca OCTOBER 2014 Municipal Class Environmental Assessment COUNTY ROAD 22 HORSESHOE VALLEY ROAD Project A Truck Climbing Lanes Project B Intersection Improvements simcoe.ca CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department 9/1/2009 Introduction Traffic studies are used to help the city determine potential impacts to the operation of the surrounding roadway network. Two

More information

DESIGN BULLETIN #66/2010

DESIGN BULLETIN #66/2010 DESIGN BULLETIN #66/2010 Highway Geometric Design Guide Chapter B, Climbing Lane Warrants for Two Lane Undivided and Four Lane Divided Highways - Revised Summary This Design Bulletin is being issued as

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY The Caledon Transportation Needs Study has been undertaken as a joint project by the Town of Caledon and the Region of Peel to determine the existing

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client

More information

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads 1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS The principal characteristics of each of the six groups of road classifications are described by the following figure

More information

Boherkill gravel pit restoration project

Boherkill gravel pit restoration project NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Boherkill gravel pit restoration project FITZSIMONS WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED Noise Impact Assessment Report prepared by Oliver Fitzsimons MSc. BSc. Noise Impact Assessment 2

More information

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future Alberta Highway 881 Corridor Management Plan Lac La Biche to Anzac Session Forum 1 - Highways March 2017 INTRODUCTION + 241 km long, 2

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

Roundabouts along Rural Arterials in South Africa

Roundabouts along Rural Arterials in South Africa Krogscheepers & Watters 0 0 Word count: 00 text + figures = 0 equivalent words including Title and Abstract. Roundabouts along Rural Arterials in South Africa Prepared for: rd Annual Meeting of Transportation

More information

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A APPENDIX A APPENDIX B Staff GIS Empey Hill Area West Legend 0 800 1600 2400 m. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only.

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

Welcome to the Public Meeting. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. December 4, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Welcome to the Public Meeting. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. December 4, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Welcome Welcome to the Transportation Master Plan Addendum December 4, 2012 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Please sign-in Background PIC#1 Public Information Centre #1 (PIC#1) was held on June 25, 2012. Feedback

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines City of Memphis Effective Date: December 1, 2013 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program 125 N. Main Street Memphis, TN 38103 (901) 576-6710 www.bikepedmemphis.com City of Memphis Executive Summary It is current practice

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,

More information

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax: 212 213-3191 www.akrf.com Draft Memorandum To: Michael

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY 5 th STREET & ENCHANTED PINES DRIVE JANUARY 2013 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERSECTION LOCATION MAP ii INTRODUCTION

More information

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE 10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 1.0 March 2017 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services

More information

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy The Corporation of the City of Sarnia School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy Table of Contents Overview And Description... 2 Role of the School Crossing Guard... 2 Definition of a Designated School Crossing...

More information

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No. December 11, 2015 Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Dear Ms. Maw: Re: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street,

More information

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines I. Purpose: The City of Elizabeth City is committed to ensure the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. One

More information

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES 5.1 PURPOSE (1) The purpose of the Traffic Safety Studies chapter is to provide guidance on the data collection requirements for conducting a

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual Post Office Box 664 101 Huntersville-Concord Road Huntersville, NC 28070 Phone 704-766-2220 Fax 704-992-5528 www.huntersville.org (c) 2017, Town

More information

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program 40 Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program OVERVIEW The City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program provides the basis for PXO implementation in Ottawa. The program s processes

More information

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING 2006 MAY REFERENCE: COUNCIL APPROVED BY COUNCIL MAY 23, 2006 CITY OPERATIONS - NO. 608 POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING A. All requests for traffic calming within the City shall be considered in accordance with

More information

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street Plumas Street Phase I Submitted to The Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Submitted by Zong Tian, Ph.D., P.E. Saeedeh Farivar Haiyuan Li, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Transportation Education

More information

APPENDIX R-2 VIBRATION AND OVERPRESSURE SOUND ASSESSMENT. RAINY RIVER PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment Report

APPENDIX R-2 VIBRATION AND OVERPRESSURE SOUND ASSESSMENT. RAINY RIVER PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment Report APPENDIX R-2 VIBRATION AND OVERPRESSURE SOUND ASSESSMENT RAINY RIVER PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment Report BLASTING VIBRATION AND OVERPRESSURE SOUND ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by: AMEC Environment

More information

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW August 17, 2015 Anthony Nicolini 2068358 Ontario Inc. (Darwin Group) 183 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 0M3 Dear Mr. Nicolini: Re: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 807-825 Montreal

More information

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE The City of Vaughan 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive Vaughan, Ontario Canada L6A 1T1 Tel (905) 832-2281 NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE REVISED JUNE 2010 APPLICABILITY The Neighbourhood

More information

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Frequently Asked s (FAQ) Study Process... 2 Rapid Transit Service and Operations... 5 Public Consultation... 8 Business Impacts... 8 Design and Property Impacts... 9 Construction Impacts...12 Traffic,

More information

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas 3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas 3.9.1 Introduction Parks and other recreational facilities such as trails, bicycle routes, and open space are important community resources. This section discusses

More information

CORPORATE. Transportation Department Traffic Services Division Neighbourhood Traffic Management Policy. Revision Date January 24, 2006

CORPORATE. Transportation Department Traffic Services Division Neighbourhood Traffic Management Policy. Revision Date January 24, 2006 CORPORATE POLICY NO. POLICY AND PAGE 1 of 10 PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 1998 REVISION JANUARY 2006 Tab Authority Subject Approved by Transportation Department Traffic Services Division Neighbourhood

More information

Appendix B Transportation Report

Appendix B Transportation Report Project File Report Appendix B Transportation Report Town of Whitby HMM Project No. 327878 Final Report October 2014 Revision and Version Tracking CP Rail Crossing at New Coronation Road Class EA Study

More information

CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan

CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan Omaha Public Power District North Omaha Station Omaha, Nebraska October 16, 2015 OPPD North Omaha Station CCR Landfill Fugitive Dust Control Plan Table of Contents Revision

More information

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document Existing Conditions Report - Appendix Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document This document defines the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the traffic forecasting

More information

84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited June 217 Project Summary Project Number 15255 June 217 Client Masri O Inc. Architects

More information

Transportation Impact Study Guidelines AS ADOPTED BY REGION OF WATERLOO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 REPORT NO. P

Transportation Impact Study Guidelines AS ADOPTED BY REGION OF WATERLOO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 REPORT NO. P Transportation Impact Study Guidelines AS ADOPTED BY REGION OF WATERLOO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 REPORT NO. P-13-088 HOUSEKEEPING EDITS APPLIED UPDATED TO FILE VERSION 4, JULY 22, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing

More information

Classification Criteria

Classification Criteria SCHEDULE D TO RECOMMENDED OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 40 SCHEDULE C-4 Road Criteria Criteria Traffic Service Objective Land Service/Access Typical Daily Traffic Volume Flow characteristics Travel Speed

More information

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES 1. Two-lane Rural Roads 1.1 Introduction The definition of rural area can be derived from the definition of urban areas. Officially,

More information

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:

More information

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Highway 111 Corridor Study Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,

More information

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING 1.1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1.1.1 Roadway Functional Classification The Multnomah County Comprehensive Framework Plan s Policy 34: Trafficways and the Functional Classification

More information

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

City of Homewood Transportation Plan City of Homewood Transportation Plan Prepared for: City of Homewood, Alabama Prepared by: Skipper Consulting, Inc. May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION... 1 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS 901 South Mopac Expressway Building V, Suite 220 Austin, Texas 78746 Texas P.E. Firm Registration No. F-929 Klotz Associates Final Report Submittal: March 20, 2015 Revised Final

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION... 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION... 2 VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 104-369-400 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard Phases 1 and 2/Burlington Noise 2 nd Update TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................

More information

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017 Langstaff Road Weston Road to Highway 7 Class Environmental Assessment Study WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017 Please sign in and join our mailing list Purpose of Open House #1 & Study Area York

More information

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary December 22, 2008 The Owl Canyon corridor (generally the connection between the I-25 / Larimer County Road 70 interchange and the US 287 / Larimer County

More information

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION 2016 TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction

More information

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL Page 1 of 7 DEPARTMENT: Engineering Services SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Policy (Revised June 6, 2017) Policy Statement: The provision of traffic calming measures

More information

Defining Purpose and Need

Defining Purpose and Need Advanced Design Flexibility Pilot Workshop Session 4 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-6, 2010 Defining Purpose and Need In your agency s project development process, when do design engineers typically get

More information

List of Display Boards

List of Display Boards List of Display Boards Welcome Introduction Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Process Need and Justification for an Interchange Alternatives for Evaluation Vertical and Horizontal Alignments

More information

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand 6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION Bicycle and pedestrian travel along and in the vicinity of the corridor is part of the vision of Somerset and Hunterdon counties and the integrated

More information

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF Table of Contents Introduction 2 Review and Approval Process 5 Technical Guidelines 9... 10... 12 3. Separation Distance: Non-Signalized All-Turns

More information

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT A travel demand analysis was carried out to determine the operational issues and the potential benefit that adding traffic capacity would have on the road network. All the

More information

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS MEMO : Peter Steacy, P.Eng. Date: December 3, 2014 : Ian Borsuk, P.Eng. Job No.: 3414015-000 Subject: City of Ottawa O-Train Extension Planning & EA Study

More information

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343

More information

8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN

8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN 8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation contained in the following report

More information

This guidance applies to all five scenarios for toll facility implementation:

This guidance applies to all five scenarios for toll facility implementation: Introduction This guidance is specifically intended for use in the early stages of planning/development of a toll road project or for associated toll road feasibility studies -- before the beginning of

More information

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters: TN001 April 2016 The separated cycleway options tool (SCOT) was developed to partially address some of the gaps identified in Stage 1 of the Cycling Network Guidance project relating to separated cycleways.

More information

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE 2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 2.0.1 May 2018 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services initiated

More information

ESB TONAL NOISE ASSESSMENT. 30 May West Offaly Power Station. Report Author: Stephen Kearney

ESB TONAL NOISE ASSESSMENT. 30 May West Offaly Power Station. Report Author: Stephen Kearney Allegro Acoustics Limited, Unit 2A Riverside, Tallaght Business Park, Tallaght, Dublin 24 Tel/Fax: +353 (0) 1 4140485 ESB West Offaly Power Station TONAL NOISE ASSESSMENT 30 May 2016 Report Author: Stephen

More information

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents. N o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents. 84 Transportation CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION Transportation

More information

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 Prepared by Planning and Research Division Arkansas State

More information

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities 6G.01 Typical Applications Each temporary traffic control (TTC) zone is different. Many variables, such as location of work, highway type,

More information

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks Circulation, as it is used in this General Plan, refers to the many ways people and goods move from place to place in Elk Grove and the region. Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including

More information

Rationalizationn of Low Volume Roads in New Brunswick

Rationalizationn of Low Volume Roads in New Brunswick Rationalizationn of Low Volume Roads in New Brunswick Peter Allaby, P.Eng. M.A.Sc. Transportation Engineer Exp Services Inc. 602 Rothesay Avenue Saint John, NB E2H 2H1 Ph: (506) 646-8020 peter.allaby@exp.com

More information

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS CHAPTERFOUR SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS 4.1 SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Capacity analysis was performed on six selected roadways within the Dearborn County study area using the

More information

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE

More information

Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum. City of Mississauga Rathburn Road Transit Priority Measures Transit Project Assessment Process

Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum. City of Mississauga Rathburn Road Transit Priority Measures Transit Project Assessment Process City of Mississauga Rathburn Road Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail:

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNALS OR ROUNDABOUT AT THIS UNUSUAL INTERSECTION?

TRAFFIC SIGNALS OR ROUNDABOUT AT THIS UNUSUAL INTERSECTION? TRAFFIC SIGNALS OR ROUNDABOUT AT THIS UNUSUAL INTERSECTION? Presenting Author Phil Weber, P.Eng. GHD Inc. (The Home of Ourston Engineering) 11 Allstate Parkway, Suite 310 Markham, ON L3R 9T8 Phone (905)

More information

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects Word Count: 4,305 Submission Date: August 1, 2015 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 1420 South

More information

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road STAFF REPT ACTION REQUIRED Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road Date: February 2, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Etobicoke York Community Council Acting

More information

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Table of Contents I Introduction a. Purpose b. Key to successful projects c. What is Traffic Calming? II III IV V VI VII Definitions Street Classification

More information

Welcome to the Open House

Welcome to the Open House Leslie Street Between 19 th Avenue and Stouffville Road Addendum to Class Environmental Assessment Study Welcome to the Open House Please sign in at the front desk. March 28, 2017 Richmond Green Sports

More information

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02 1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver 1.02 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02 2 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver 1.02 FOREWORD FOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT

More information

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Level 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 7 km/h (4 mph)? Yes No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of

More information

D.13 Transportation and Traffic

D.13 Transportation and Traffic This section addresses transportation and traffic issues and impacts related to the Proposed Project. Section D.13.1 provides a description of the affected environment for the Proposed Project. Applicable

More information

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX May 24, 2009 Pedestrian Demand Index for State Highway Facilities Revised: May 29, 2007 Introduction

More information

CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101

CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 The electronic version of the Santa Barbara County

More information

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK Intersection Accident Database Enhancement Project (UPWP 4380) FINAL January 2008 Prepared By: Prepared For: Bergmann Associates 200 First Federal Plaza 28 East Main Street Rochester,

More information

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Brampton PathWays Planning and Design Guidelines 27 Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 CLASS 1 MULTI-USE PATH Off-road multi-use trails are the backbone of the Brampton PathWays Network. They are typically

More information

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study)

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study) Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study) Basim Jrew 1), Nidal Hussein 2) and Rami Al-Kouz 3) 1) Isra University, Jordan. E-Mail: basim.jrew@iu.edu.jo 2) Isra University, Jordan. E-Mail:

More information

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY I. PURPOSE The City of Kent continually strives to strengthen and protect its neighborhoods by improving the quality of life in residential areas. Traffic conditions

More information

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1331 Clyde Avenue, Suite 4 Ottawa ON K2C 3G4 Tel: (613) 722-442 Fax: (613) 722-2799 May 14, 213 File: 1638823 Robinson Park Development Corp. 5699 Power Road Ottawa, ON, K1G 3N4

More information