State of Louisiana Initial Oil Spill Response Plan Deepwater Horizon Incident.

Transcription

1 State of Louisiana Initial Oil Spill Response Plan Deepwater Horizon Incident May 2, 2010

2 In an effort to assist the removal of oil from our coastal waters, minimize the interface of oil and Louisiana s fragile coastal wetlands, marine wildlife and the communities and economies embedded therein, the State of Louisiana provides the following initial near-shore action plan and requests that it be implemented immediately. This plan was developed in coordination with affected coastal parishes. The action is feasible and cost effective when considering the potential damage that threatens our coast. The central tenet of this plan is immediate and robust action supported by the people of Louisiana who stand ready, willing, and able to assist in anyway to protect their lives and livelihoods. The state requests that all relevant training be conducted at designated sites identified herein. These training efforts should be authorized immediately and coordinated directly with coastal parishes. Training shall include: financial management under OPA90, relevant regulatory and legal guidelines, material handling, boom deployment and monitoring, oil collection protocols, and active containment strategies (containment strategies as a second line of defense) to all interested people. Training shall be offered coast wide in Chalmette, Belle Chasse, Slidell, Houma, Golden Meadow, Morgan City, Abbeville, and Lake Charles. A concurrent action following approval of this plan is to immediately deploy booms (per the Boom Measure described below) in all of the areas identified in Appendix 1 from the mouth of the Mississippi River to the Louisiana-Mississippi State line. We request that coastal parishes be authorized to lead and direct boom deployment within their respective jurisdictions. These deployment strategies may consist of: parish deployment, parish contractors (including trained fishing fleets), invoicing directly to BP, BP contractors operating under parish direction, or parishes delegating deployment to BP. Teams charged with these deployments should utilize the human resources and vessels available through trained citizens and volunteers in coordination with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. This workforce is available for deployment efforts, to aid in logistics, transport of materials to and from the boom deployment sites, as well as monitoring and operations of sites as appropriate. Additional plan elements including Shoreline Cleanup Assessment Team (SCAT) deployment, oil clean up, and remediation and environmental assessment, are to be implemented as directed by the Unified Command in concert with the above measures. Local knowledge, the experience and expertise of Oil Spill Response Organizations (OSRO), and the latest intelligence information on oil location and forecasts will drive the location and intensity of activity. It is assumed that the logistics and coordination will be executed by the OSRO tasked with the effort. However, the State stands ready to assist if any issues arise that may slow the pace of this much-needed and delayed response. All of this will ensure that the response is as efficient and effective as possible and allow for rapid reaction to changing conditions. 2

3 Introduction On April 20, 2010, an explosion occurred on the semisubmersible drilling platform Deepwater Horizon during deepwater drilling activities on the outer continental shelf southeast of the Mississippi River bird s-foot delta. Two days later, as fire-fighting activities continued, the Deepwater Horizon sank into the Gulf of Mexico. Shortly thereafter, it was determined that the drilling assembly was leaking raw petroleum at an estimated 5,000 barrels (approximately 210,000 gallons) per day into the northern Gulf. That leak continues as of the writing of this report. Current well conditions remain dynamic. According to BP, the well has the capacity to produce a maximum of 110,000 to 164,000 barrels per day. In addition, it is also understood that a relief well, including a 90-day drill time, will be an integral part of efforts to cap the well. The continuing oil spill currently threatens priceless ecological, cultural, recreational and economic resources of the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. As a result, significant State resources have been mobilized to respond to the event. Several agencies of the State of Louisiana have been involved, including the following: Office of Coastal Protection and Restoration (CPRA s implementation arm) Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Department of Transportation and Development, Louisiana Recovery Authority, Louisiana Workforce Commission, Department of Health and Hospitals, Department of Transportation and Development, Department of Economic Development, State Police, Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, and Oil Spill Coordinator s Office. Relevant resources agencies met to develop a joint plan considering many factors, including: Louisiana s most sensitive coastal resources, potential spill impacts, deployment schedules and resource considerations. This plan presents a set of recommended actions based on current information, agency discussions and parish input. The State s hope is that the Incident Command Structure will consider this plan for incorporation into the Incident Action Plan (IAP). These actions outline a series of steps, intended to be taken in coordination with those already identified/approved by the state and coastal parishes and those in the IAP that will support the Unified Command s strategy of keeping the oil spill away from Louisiana s sensitive coastal areas. The majority of this document describes necessary action to keep the oil spill from entering Louisiana s coastal wetlands, based on the assumption that removal of the released oil will be much easier and less damaging to fragile coastal ecosystems if done in the open waters of the 3

4 much easier and less damaging to fragile coastal ecosystems if done in the open waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Should that measure not be successful, this report adopts a multiple lines of defense strategy to minimize the extent of oil penetration into the coastal wetlands. Finally, this plan focuses on the areas (i.e., parishes) of the State that have immediate needs, or are likely to have impacts in the near term. We will continue to develop supplemental plans addressing the needs of interior parishes. These supplemental efforts will focus on situations where the perimeter measures are overwhelmed, and/or the oil penetrates inland. Action Plan Sequence Immediate Immediately deploy booms at all critical locations east of river as shown on maps included in Appendix 1 (by region) and Appendix 2-12 (by parish). o Utilize local fishing fleets and fishermen for transport, monitoring and deployment of boom. Establish regional staging areas for supplies. o Order and begin to store necessary supplies assuming extensive, long-lasting oil removal. Inventory, identify and organize multiple shore bases. o Prepare shore bases to store and handle recovery materials. o Organize professional, contract, and volunteer teams. Train local fisherman and others to be involved in clean up effort. o Training should include material handling, implementation of secondary and tertiary prevention techniques, boom deployment and monitoring, and oil collection protocols. As Soon as Oil Has the Potential to be within 5 Miles of Coastal Areas Establish booms in coastal areas as identified in appendices. Ready local teams for deployment. 72 to 36 Hours Prior to Oil Predicted to be within 5 miles of Land Stock implementation site/marinas. Deploy local teams to implement secondary and tertiary prevention measures. 36 Hours to Landfall and Ongoing Analyze and continue flow of supplies to staging areas and implementation sites. Continue management of local prevention teams and booms. Continue implementation of secondary and tertiary prevention measures. Active strategies for successive lines of defense. 4

5 Action Plan Measures Dispersants The decision to apply dispersants in near-shore waters is time-sensitive and complex. Given the potential impacts that dispersed oil may have on water-column and seafloor biota and habitats, thoughtful consideration is required prior to use of this technology relative to the potential impacts with and without dispersant application. The trade-offs in use of dispersants are a complex interplay of many variables, including the type of oil spilled, the volume of the spill, sea state, weather, water depth, degree of turbulence (thus mixing and dilution of the oil), and relative abundance and life stages of resident organisms. Some key points associated with tradeoffs that were considered in formulating the recommendations include: (1) oil spill dispersants do not actually reduce the total amount of oil entering the environment but do allow much faster bioremediation and removal from the surface; (2) mixing of the water column nearshore with waves and tides may actually mix oil naturally and disperse oil into the water column, particularly after aging for more than 7 days; (3) the nearshore shallow environment has some of the most productive fisheries in the world; and (4) the muddy environments have a microbial capacity to naturally decompose many of the oil products that contaminate wetlands (particularly with some enhancements). Dispersant Measure 1: Focus use of dispersants greater than 3 nautical miles (roughly 5 kilometers ) from the shoreline and in water depths greater than 33 feet (10 meters). Dispersant Measure 2 (near-shore): Determine the effectiveness of dispersal use between this 3-mile limit and the shoreline (in water depths greater than 10 meters) by utilizing field test as to effectiveness. Dispersant Measure 3 (near-shore): Refrain from using dispersants along shoreline, in wetlands, or in water less than 10 meters deep. Booms While the existing frontal marsh/coastline of Louisiana will no doubt be adversely impacted by interaction with the oil spill, it is imperative that we prevent the oil from being carried into the fragile interior marshes. There are numerous specific critical areas (gaps, chokepoints, etc.) along the marsh edge that have been identified as strategically located for deployment of boom measures to minimize the entrance of the oil into the interior marsh areas. These locations are provided in Appendix A by region and are listed by parish in Appendix B. OSRO entities are to be deployed to the areas within the projected landfall threat zone to install booms and sorbent matting. These units would consist of an OSRO advisor, a HazMat-trained supervisor, associated HazMat-trained personnel, and the resources required to manage and maintain these locations. A state regulatory agency oversight representative will also be assigned to monitor a site or group of sites to provide feedback to planning on implementation, effectiveness, and additional needs. 5

6 For this initial phase, it is estimated that approximately 760,000 linear feet of boom would be needed to adequately implement and maintain this initial near-shore plan. This includes a number of identified critical areas located throughout the Louisiana coast, from the Mississippi State line at the Pearl River to Sabine Pass at the Texas State line. The effectiveness of implementing booming strategies will depend on site-specific conditions, such as water velocities, tidal influence, wind speed, and wave height. As such, each site will require site-specific placement and maintenance strategies that have the flexibility to adapt to changing weather, site, and impact-threat conditions as determined by the assigned OSRO advisor in accordance with industry-accepted Best Management Practices. It is critical that all local resources (parish officials, local fishermen, etc.) be consulted and utilized for the identification of likely oil collection points, potential areas of need, and additional areas of concern. As stated, boom measures will be site specific. However, at a minimum, the OSRO should consider the following measures and materials. Towed Boom Measures: U-booming, two boats required; V-booming two tow boats, one skimming vessel; and J-booming, one tow boat, one tow/skimming vessel. Anchored Boom Measures: U-booming, anchors at upstream ends; deflection booming (more typical), requires adequate number and size of anchors to keep the boom in longitudinal tension in order to avoid scalloping and subsequent loss of oil due to entrainment, deployed boom must be tended periodically to maintain effectiveness as environmental conditions change. Barge Boom Measures: For larger waterways with widths not manageable by booms alone (such as the Rigolets) locally available barges could be put in place, loaded to increase depths of drafts, and configured in an appropriate exclusion or deflection booming strategy as dictated by site conditions. Types of Retention Booms: Internal foam flotation boom; self-inflating boom; pressure-inflatable boom; fence boom; shore-sealing boom; sorbent boom. Sorbents To supplement the booming activities, sorbent materials (booms, pads, and/or loose material) will be used to collect the initial amounts of oil encountered and will be managed onsite to minimize the amounts of oil that may penetrate the booms. Sorbent booms or pads have low capacity but very high efficiency. As such, total amounts of needed sorbent will depend highly on the amounts of oil encountered at each site and must be replaced when sorbency limits are reached. Sorbent boom is intended for use in areas too small or sensitive for other skimmers. Sorbent types actually applied will be tailored to parochial conditions. Additional quantity information is provided in Appendix 1. 6

7 Spud Barges Spud barges are to be stationed across the coast to serve as mobile field bases. The 20 barges are capable of transporting materials necessary for the incident, as well as providing food and shelter for the OSRO and SCAT teams and first aid as necessary. Being mobile, these barges are to be deployed as conditions change and areas of critical need shift. Training All persons involved in executing this plan shall have the appropriate level of training commensurate with their role. Each boom deployment and response site will have a supervisor that has necessary 40-hour HAZWOPR and 8-hour HAZWOPR Supervisory training. While many of the OSRO have extensive training, the large number of interested citizens (e.g., commercial fisherman) and volunteers will be required to have the minimum 4-hour oil spill safety training. Training will be provided in coastal communities throughout Louisiana immediately. This will be organized by BP and the Coast Guard in coordination with the state and coastal parishes as needed to provide the maximum number of people with training as quickly as possible. Secondary and Tertiary Lines of Defense If oil is to overwhelm the booms and enter the interior wetlands, additional actions must be taken immediately to limit the damage; these actions are considered secondary and tertiary lines of defense. SCAT will continually monitor the wetlands to report any areas that are being damaged. Supplemental plans involving successive lines of defense are under development. Assessment It is critical that areas potentially adversely affected by oil from this spill are assessed to determine removal techniques, the extent of damage to the wetlands, wetland-dependant species, aquatic habitats, and aquatic organisms. This will involve near-term and long-term monitoring and restoration and remediation plans. The damage to infrastructure must also be assessed. 7

8 Appendices Appendix 1.Combined Maps and Plans Appendix 2.Orleans Parish Appendix 3.Plaquemines Parish Appendix 4.St. Bernard Parish Appendix 5.St. Tammany Parish Appendix 6.Cameron/Calcasieu Parishes Appendix 7.Iberia Parish Appendix 8.Jefferson Parish Appendix 9.Lafourche Parish Appendix 10...St. Mary Parish Appendix 11...Terrebonne Parish Appendix 12 Vermillion Parish

9 Appendix 1: Combined Maps and Plans

10 East of River (includes all of Plaquemines Parish) Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish Orleans 4 3,144 14,148 3, $7,004,344 Plaquemines 45 22, ,104 25, $55,676,459 St. Bernard 31 16,413 73,859 18, $40,580,536 St Tammany 2 2,439 10,976 2, $4,461,166 Subtotal 82 44, ,086 50, Cost (30 days) $25,260,750 $7,578,225 $3,183,529 $5,250,000 $65,250,000 $125,000 $175,000 $900,000 $107,722,504 Approximate Daily Rate $3,590,750 West Side of River (Excluding Plaquemines Parish) Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish Cameron/Calcasieu 4 4,844 21,798 5, $8,572,469 Iberia 8 12,454 56,043 14, $16,967,576 Jefferson 3 6,104 27,468 6, $6,855,021 Lafourche 30 10,136 45,612 11, $33,726,656 St. Mary 5 3,419 15,386 3, $9,044,261 Terrebonne 54 40, ,068 45, $76,007,439 Vermilion 18 14,530 65,385 16, $26,698,886 Subtotal , , , Cost (30 days) $51,469,875 $15,440,963 $4,736,471 $9,750,000 $94,500,000 $175,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 $177,872,308 Approximate Daily Rate $5,929,077 Total Cost (30 days) $76,730,625 $23,019,188 $7,920,000 $15,000,000 $159,750,000 $300,000 $475,000 $2,400,000 $285,594,813 Approximate Daily Rate $9,519,827 Cost Calculation Assumptions Containment Boom per Linear Foot $125 Secondary and Tertiary Prevention per Linear Foot $150 Secondary and Tertiary Materials $600 Mobile Deployment Sites (Spud Barges) per day $25,000 SCAT Teams, Per Day $75,000 Staging Areas, Per Month $25,000 Shore Bases, Per Month $25,000 Training Sites, Per Site $300,000 Costs assume 30 day costs of response operations *Assuming 3 Booms per location and 1.5 factor for curvature **Assuming need about 1/4 of solid boom legth

11

12 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION PLANNING UNIT ± Lake Borgne Bobs Lakes Lake Eugenie Lake Salvador Gulf IntracoastalWaterway Bayou Perot Bayou Rigolettes Lake Lery Lake Jean Louis Robin Bay Gardene MRGO 19 Lake Coquille Lake Calebasse Black Bay Flat Bay 24 Lake Eloi Lake Athanasio 25 Eloi Bay Little Lake Lake Round Laurier Lake Mud Lake Wilkinson Bay Bayou Mississippi River 39 Grande Cheniere BAY 148 SANSBOIS Long Bay **DRAFT May 2, Miles

13 Bayou Perot Little Lake Bayou PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION Rigolettes PLANNING UNIT 2 Mud Lake Round Lake 46 Lake Laurier Bayou Mississippi River Wilkinson 152 Bay BAY SANSBOIS 40 Grande Cheniere Bay Gardene 3 67 Long Bay Middle Fork Bayou L'ours Hackberry Bay Adams Barataria Bay Bay Bay Pomme D'or Yellow Cotton Bay 136 Bayou Laf ourche Southwest Louisiana Canal ± 4 West Bay **DRAFT May 2, Miles

14 84 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION SIX MILE LAKE 86 ATCHAFALAYA BAY PLANNING UNIT 3a Lake Salvador Waterway Bayou Perot Bayou Gulf Intracoastal Bayou Lafourche Rigolettes Little Lake Southwest Louisiana Canal Lake Round Laurier Lake Mud Lake Middle Fork Bayou L'ours Hackberry Bay 143 Wilkinson Bay 149 Lery Bayou Barataria Bay 144 Mississippi River Cheniere Grande BAY 35 SANSBOIS Lake Jean Louis Robin Bay Gardene 1 16 Long Bay MRGO Lake Coquille Lake Calebasse 15 Black Bay 0 Lake Elo 59 Lake A 21 Adams Bay Yello Bay Pomme D'or Ba ± 8 **DRAFT May 2, Miles

15 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION PLANNING UNIT 3b SIX MILE LAKE VERMILION BAY ATCHAFALAYA BAY ± 5 **DRAFT May 2, Miles

16 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION PLANNING UNIT 4 SABINE LAKE CALCASIEU LAKE GRAND LAKE WHITE LAKE VER ± 8 **DRAFT May 2, Miles

17 Appendix 2: Orleans Parish

18 Initial Orleans Parish Plan Summary Secondary and Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Orleans $7,004,344 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Chalmette Orleans Blind Rigolets Staging Sites: Chalmette Lake Orleans Borgne Shore Bases: Michoud Orleans 160 1,203 Chef Menteur Pass Bayou Thomas Orleans 163 Lake Borgne Total 3,144

19 St. Tammany St. Bernard Bobs Lakes Lake Borgne 33 Lake Eugenie 29 Jefferson Plaquemines PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION ORLEANS PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ± 28 Flat Bay

20 Appendix 3: Plaquemines Parish

21 Initial Plaquemines Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Plaquemines $55,676,459 Training Sites: Belle Chasse Staging Sites: Port Sulphur, Pointe a la Hache Shore Bases: Port Sulphur, Pointe a la Hache, Venice

22 Initial Plaquemines Parish Boom Location Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Plaquemines Bayou Lamoque Plaquemines Entrance to Cox Bay Plaquemines Entrance to Cox Bay Plaquemines Upper Grand Bay Plaquemines Entrance south of Uhlan Bay Plaquemines Uhlan Bay Plaquemines Big Four Bayou Plaquemines Bayou Ponton North Plaquemines Bayou Ponton South Plaquemines Bayou Ponton South Plaquemines Bakers Bay NW Plaquemines Bay Lafourche NW Plaquemines Entrance to Bayou Ponton Plaquemines Entrance near Pintail Flat Entrance to Lake Cuatro Plaquemines Caballo Plaquemines North Lake Pato Caballo Plaquemines Plaquemines Plaquemines Plaquemines Plaquemines Plaquemines Plaquemines Grand Bayou/(Northern) Bay Lanaux Socola Canal Number Two/Bayou Grande Cheniere NE of Duhuy, Bayou Grande Cheniere N of Two Sisters Bayou Grande Cheniere S of Magnolia Oil&Gas Bayou Grande Cheniere E of Bayou Bayou Grande Cheniere SE of Wilkinson Bayou Grande Cheniere Plaquemines E of Wilkinson Bayou Grande Cheniere Plaquemines Hermitage Bayou Plaquemines Hermitage Bayou Plaquemines 44 1,725 Lake Wilkinson's Bayou Plaquemines Wilkinson's Canal South of Oaks Bayou Plaquemines Inlet to False River Plaquemines Battle Ground Bay Plaquemines Bullseye Bayou Plaquemines Cow Bayou Plaquemines Bayou Law Plaquemines John Bayou Plaquemines Fucich Bayou Plaquemines Grand Bayou Plaquemines 146 1,382 Robinson Canal Plaquemines Robinson Canal Plaquemines 146 1,436 Robinson Canal Plaquemines Bayou Adams Bay Plaquemines Bayou Dulac Plaquemines Bayou Dupont Plaquemines 150 1,346 Wilkinson Bayou Plaquemines Petit Bay Chene Fleur Plaquemines 152 1,521 Bay Batiste Total 22,912

23 St. Charles Lake Calebasse 15 St. Bernard Waterway Black Bay Bayou Perot Bayou Rigolettes Bay Gardene Little Lake Jefferson Mud Lake Round Lake 46 Lake Laurier Wilkinson Bay Bayou 40 Mississippi River Grande Cheniere BAY SANSBOIS Long Bay Lafourche Middle Fork Bayou L'ours Hackberry Bay Adams Barataria Bay Bay Bayou Lafourche PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION PLAQUEMINES PARISH Bay Pomme D'or **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

24 Appendix 4: St. Bernard Parish

25 Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days St. Bernard $40,580,536 Training Sites: Chalmette Staging Sites: Chalmette Shore Bases: Port Sulphur, Pointe a la Hache, Venice Initial St. Bernard Parish Plan Summary

26 Boom Point Location Initial St. Bernard Parish Boom Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit St. Bernard Entrance to Terre aux Boeufs St. Bernard Bayou Bienvenue St. Bernard West Bayou Grande St. Bernard Entrance to canal NE of Bottle Bayou St. Bernard Entrance to Bayou Jean Louis Robin St. Bernard Entrance to Spanish Bayou St. Bernard Entrance to Spanish Bayou St. Bernard Entrance to Spanish Bayou St. Bernard Entrance to Spanish Bayou St. Bernard Entrance to Bayou Pisana St. Bernard Lake of Second Trees NW St. Bernard Lake of Second Trees North St. Bernard Entrance to Bayou Pointe en Pointe St. Bernard 23 1,269 West Halfmoon Lake St. Bernard Entrance to Bayou Eloi St. Bernard Bayou la Loutre St. Bernard 26 1,031 Treasure Pass St. Bernard Bayou Petre St. Bernard Bayou Ramon St. Bernard South Lake Eugenie St. Bernard Bayou Muscle St. Bernard Bayou Redfish St. Bernard Bobs Bayou St. Bernard Flat Bayou St. Bernard 34 1,130 Bayou Marron St. Bernard Lawson Bay St. Bernard Lake of the Mound St. Bernard Christmas Camp Lake St. Bernard 59 1,735 Lake MRGO St. Bernard Bayou Batola Bay St. Bernard Bayou Pollett Total 16,413

27 159 Orleans Lake Borgne Bobs Lakes Lake Eugenie Flat Bay Lake Lery MRGO Lake Eloi Eloi Bay 17 Lake Jean Louis Robin 16 Lake Coquille Lake Athanasio Lake Calebasse 15 Mississ Plaquemines Bay Gardene Black Bay PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION ST BERNARD PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

28 Appendix 5: St. Tammany Parish

29 Initial St. Tammany Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days St Tammany $4,461,166 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Slidell St Tammany 156 1,250 Pearl River Staging Sites: Slidell St. Tammany 157 1,189 West Mouth Shore Bases: Slidell Total 2,439

30 156 LITTLE LAKE 157 THE RIGOLETS Orleans 158 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION ST TAMMANY PARISH St. Bernard **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

31 Appendix 6 : Cameron/Calcasieu Parishes

32 Initial Cameron Parish and Calcasieu Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Cameron/Calcasieu 4 4,844 21,798 5, $8,572,469 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Cameron 68 1,101 Calcasieu Pass Cameron Mermentau Cameron Joseph's Harbor Cameron 69 2,558 Sabine Pass Total 4,844 Training Sites: Lake Charles Staging Sites: Cameron Shore Bases: Cameron, Grand Chenier, Johnsons Bayou

33 Acadia Calcasieu Jefferson Davis SABINE LAKE CALCASIEU LAKE LITTLE LAKE GRAND LAKE Vermilion THE RIGOLETS PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION CAMERON PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

34 Appendix 7: Iberia Parish

35 Initial Iberia Parish Plan Summary Secondary and Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Iberia $16,967,576 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Abbeville, Morgan City Iberia Avery Vermilion Bay b Staging Sites: Port of Iberia Iberia Bayou Vermilion Bay b Shore Bases: Port of Iberia Iberia Bayou Carlin b Iberia GIWW b Iberia Oaks Vermilion Bay b Iberia Bayou Vermilion Bay b Iberia 175 5,035 Southside of Southwest point b Iberia 176 4,243 Northside of Southwest point b Total 12,454

36 Vermilion St. Mary 84 VERMILION BAY PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION IBERIA PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

37 Appendix 8: Jefferson Parish

38 Initial Jefferson Parish Plan Summary Total Width Secondary and Boom Length* Tertiary Prevention Secondary and Mobile Deployment Number of Cost Per Parish Parish Closure Points (ft) (ft) Length** (ft) Tertiary Materials Sites Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites for 30 days Jefferson $6,855,021 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Belle Chasse Jefferson 143 2,760 Caminada Bay Staging Sites: Golden Meadow Jefferson 144 2,692 Barataria Bay Shore Bases: Grand Isle Jefferson Southern portion Round Lake Total 6,104

39 144 Lafourche Plaquemines G U L F O F M E X I C O 143 PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION JEFFERSON PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

40 Appendix 9: Lafourche Parish

41 Initial Lafourche Parish Plan Summary Secondary and Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Lafourche $33,726,656 Training Sites: Golden Meadow Staging Sites: Golden Meadow, Fourchon Shore Bases: Golden Meadow, Fourchon

42 Initial Lafourche Parish Boom Location Boom Point Location Width Opening PARISH Point (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Middle Fork Bayou L'ours (E of Yankee Lafourche Canal East) Lafourche Middle Fork Bayou Yankee Canal East Lafourche Middle Fork Bayou L'ours (W of Yankee Canal East) Lafourche Middle Fork Bayou L'ours (N of Enfermer Oil/Gas) Lafourche Lafourche West Fork Bayou L'ours (S of King's Canal) West Fork Bayou L'ours (SW of King's Canal) Lafourche West Fork Bayou L'ours (SW of King's Canal2) Lafourche Bayou Lake Jesse (North) Lafourche Leeville Southwest Louisiana Canal Lafourche Bay Des Conards a Lafourche Bayou De La Valle a Lafourche Grand Bayou Blue a Lafourche Southwestern Louisiana Canal a Lafourche Bayou Courant a Lafourche Grand Gulf Of Mexico a Lafourche Grand Gulf Of Mexico a Lafourche Grand Gulf Of Mexico a Lafourche 142 1,362 Belle Pass Lafourche Bay Area Lafourche Bay Area Lafourche NE of Bay Jaque Lafourche NW of Bay Jaque Lafourche Intersection of Bayou Ferblanc with pipeline canal Lafourche Bay Vasier N of SW LA Canal Lafourche Bayou Ferblanc N of SW LA Canal Lafourche SW LA Canal at Bay Desespere Lafourche Pipeline canal south of SW LA Canal Lafourche NW Bay Macoin Lafourche NW Bay Macoin Lafourche Bayou Ferblanc near Bay Macoin Total 10,136

43 Middle Fork Bayou L'ours Hackberry Bay 146 Barataria Bay Terrebonne Plaquemines 134 Bayou Lafourche Southwest Louisiana Canal Jefferson PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION LAFOURCHE PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

44 Appendix 10: St. Mary Parish

45 Initial St. Mary Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days St. Mary $9,044,261 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Morgan City St. Mary Atchafalaya Bay b Staging Sites: Morgan City St. Mary Atchafalaya Bay b Shore Bases: Morgan City St. Mary 83 1,207 The Jaws b St. Mary Atchafalaya Bay b St. Mary 86 1,216 New Atchafalaya Bay b Total 3,419

46 St. Martin SIX MILE LAKE Assumption 84 Assumption VERMILION BAY 86 Iberia 85 Terrebonne 153 ATCHAFALAYA BAY PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION ST MARY PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

47 Appendix 11: Terrebonne Parish

48 Initial Terrebonne Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Terrebonne $76,007,439 Training Sites: Houma Staging Sites: Houma Shore Bases: Dularge, Cocodrie, Point Aux Chenes

49 Boom Point Location Initial Terrebonne Parish Boom Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Terrebonne Blue Hammock Bayou b Terrebonne 88 1,050 Grand Pass a Terrebonne Oyster Bayou b Terrebonne Bayou De West a Terrebonne East Bay Junop a Terrebonne 92 2,340 Bayou Grand Caillou a Terrebonne 93 2,337 Grand Bayou Du Large a Terrebonne Taylors Bayou a Terrebonne Taylors Bayou a Terrebonne Bayou Jones a Terrebonne Bayou Saveur a Terrebonne Bayou Du Nord a Terrebonne Bayou Sale a Terrebonne Bayou Grand Caillou a Terrebonne Trouble Bayou a Terrebonne Houma Navigation Canal a Terrebonne Bayou Petit Caillou a Terrebonne Bayou Petit Caillou a Terrebonne Moss Bay a Terrebonne Moss Bay a Terrebonne Bayou Sale a Terrebonne Bayou Colyell a Terrebonne 106 2,063 Caillou Bay a Terrebonne 107 1,197 Pelican Bayou a Terrebonne 108 2,342 California Bay a Terrebonne Little Misale Bayou a Terrebonne Bayou Sale a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Petit Bayou Ter a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou La Fleur a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou Chitigue a Terrebonne Bayou Terrebonne a Terrebonne Bayou De Mangue a Terrebonne Bayou Dufrene a Terrebonne Bayou Dufrene a Terrebonne Madison Bay a Terrebonne Bayou Barre a Terrebonne 127 1,194 Lake Tambour a Terrebonne Lake Tambour a Terrebonne 129 1,254 Lake Tambour a Terrebonne Lake Billiot a Terrebonne Bayou Jean Lacroix a Terrebonne Channel at Lake Felicity a Terrebonne Bayou Leblanc a Terrebonne Palmetto Bayou b Terrebonne Plumb Bayou b Terrebonne Creole Bayou b Terrebonne 85 6,655 Lower Atchafalaya River b Total 40,015

50 ATCHAFALAYA BAY St. Mary Lafourche PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION TERREBONNE PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±

51 Appendix 12: Vermilion Parish

52 Initial Vermilion Parish Plan Summary Parish Closure Points Total Width (ft) Boom Length* (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Length** (ft) Secondary and Tertiary Materials Mobile Deployment Sites Number of Teams Staging Areas Shore Bases Training Sites Cost Per Parish for 30 days Vermilion $ 26,698,886 Boom Point Location PARISH Point Width Opening (Ft) Point Description X Coordinate Y Coordinate Planning Unit Training Sites: Abbeville Vermilion Rollover Bayou Staging Sites: Intracoastal City Vermilion Flat Lake Shore Bases: Intracoastal City, Pecan Island Vermilion Freshwater Bayou Vermilion Freshwater Vermilion Bay Vermilion 75 1,755 Freshwater Vermilion Bay Vermilion 76 1,060 GIWW Vermilion West cove of Southwest point b Vermilion Hog Bayou b Vermilion Hell Hole Bayou b Vermilion Prien Bayou b Vermilion Redfish Point Bayou b Vermilion Redfish Point Bayou b Vermilion Prien Bayou b Vermilion Fearman Lake Canal b Vermilion Four Mile Vermilion bay b Vermilion Canal b Vermilion Boston Vermilion Bay b Vermilion 189 7,857 Mud Point to East of Shallow Bayou b Total 14,530

53 WHITE LAKE 189 Cameron St. Mary Iberia PROPOSED POINTS OF PROTECTION VERMILION PARISH **DRAFT May 2, Miles ±