OSU PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY SPRING TERM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "OSU PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY SPRING TERM"

Transcription

1 OSU PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY SPRING TERM FACILITIES SERVICES CAMPUS PLANNING SEPTEMBER 6, 2012

2

3 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 OSU PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY... 4 Background... 4 Methodology... 4 Timeframe... 4 Parking Space and Lot Types... 4 Table 1: OSU Parking Categories... 4 Adjustment to Calculation and Space Types included in Annual Report... 5 Parking Facilities... 5 Table 2: Lots with Metered... 5 Additional Parking Facilities (New Lots)... 5 Table 3: New General Purpose and University Support Parking Areas... 6 Decommissioned Parking Facilities... 6 Table 4: Decommissioned Parking Areas... 6 Additional Revisions to OSU Parking Facilities Inventory... 7 Table 5: Reconfigured Parking Areas... 7 Campus Population... 7 Student Enrollment... 7 Table 6: Student Enrollment Trends... 7 OSU Employment... 7 Table 7: Employment Trends... 8 Overall Campus Population... 8 Table 8: Campus Population... 8 Parking Permit System... 8 Overview... 8 Permit Sales... 8 Table 9: Permit Sales - Fall Term... 9 Figure 1: Fall Term Parking Permits per OSU Population ( )... 9 Table 10: Permit Sales - Spring Term Figure 2: Spring Term Parking Permits per OSU Population ( ) Parking Capacity...11 Capacity Changes due to Methodology Refinement Table 11: Capacity Reduction through Methodology Refinement Parking Capacity Table 12: Parking Lot Capacity for OSU General Use Lots Figure 3: OSU General Use Parking Capacity 2007 to Table 13: OSU Motorcycle Areas Parking...13 Campus Table 14a: OSU Parking Table 14b: OSU Parking Parking by Type Figure 4: of Parking Space Type 2007 to Table 15: of Motorcycle Areas September 6,

4 Parking by Sector Figure 5: of Parking Space Type 2007 to Parking Deck Table 16: Parking Garage General Use and University Support by Floor Table 17: Parking Garage of General Use Vehicle by Floor Figure 6: of Parking Garage by Floor Future Parking Facilities...16 Attachments Attachment A - Parking Survey Overview Map Attachment B - Parking Capacity by Campus Sector Map Attachment C - Campus Survey Results Map Attachment D Parking Capacity & Space Types Attachment E OSU Campus Parking Survey Details Additional Information/Contacts For additional information or questions concerning this report, please contact Rebecca Houghtaling, Campus Planner, at or Rebecca.Houghtaling@oregonstate.edu. September 6,

5 Executive Summary OSU s parking utilization rate for Spring Term 2012 is 68 percent during peak hours of 10 am and 2 pm. Parking Garage (0205) i floors one through three are highly utilized (83 percent, 99 percent, and 74 percent respectively), while the top two floors have a very low utilization rate (16 percent and 5 percent respectively). The slight decrease in the total campus parking utilization over the past five years is partially the result of changes in data collection methodology and differences in the utilization of parking lots constructed to replace displaced parking. Based on discussions with City of Corvallis Planning and Engineering Division staff, OSU implemented a parking methodology and utilization reporting change during academic year Historically, OSU included University Support spaces, as well as some Non-Public and Non-OSU lots, in the parking utilization calculation; this did not accurately reflect utilization of General Use spaces across campus. Starting this year, OSU will collect data on all sixteen campus parking space types but only report on the ten (10) General Purpose space types since these are the only spaces available to students, staff, and visitors. General Use spaces increased from 7,007 to 7,234 between academic year and ; this is the result of new parking facilities along Washington Avenue, the expansion of the Bloss Hall South Lot (3270) near Western Blvd, and the activation of Furman Hall West Lot (3250) which had been closed during the building s renovation. OSU added forty-one (41) additional ADA compliant spaces in Although the construction of ADA spaces typically results in a slight reduction in the number of spaces in an existing lot due to the additional space required for the access aisle, OSU is committed to making campus more accessible, which is evident in the 21 percent increase in ADA spaces since Forty-nine (49) motorcycle areas were inventoried for the first time in Three (3) parking facilities were decommissioned to facilitate new construction on OSU main campus, which reduced the capacity in Sector C by sixty-one (61) parking spaces. OSU added thirty-two (32) General Use and University Support facilities (510 total spaces) to the parking inventory this academic year, and the expansion of the Washington Ave Southwest Lot (3201) and construction of Washington Ave & 11 th St Southeast Lot (3227) in Sector D were in response to the reduction of spaces in Sector C. Adjustments to the methodology reduced the overall parking capacity by 618 spaces (i.e., the sum of the 454 Non-Public and Non-OSU spaces and the 164 Service spaces) for the past four years. A comparison of this year s parking capacity and the adjusted capacity for previous four years reveals a loss of 203 parking spaces (i.e., a -3 percent change in General Use parking capacity) since Since 2007, student enrollment has increased between three and nine percent annually, with a total increase in fall enrollment of 26 percent and spring enrollment of 29 percent. The number of employees has increased by 11 percent during the same time period. Consequently, the total population on OSU main campus has increased from nearly 25,000 in Fall Term 2007 to over 30,000 in fall The number of students purchasing parking permits during the Fall Term has varied considerably over the past five years, while the number of Faculty/Staff buying permits has remained relatively constant during this same time period. Both fall and spring utilization counts were collected during the academic year. The report is based on the spring utilization count to provide continuity for comparison of on- and offcampus utilization numbers by the OSU - City of Collaboration Effort s Parking and Transportation Work Group. September 6,

6 OSU Parking Study Background Oregon State University s Campus Master Plan (CMP) includes policies that specify how OSU will address existing and future parking demand. CMP Chapter 7 Parking Plan requires the planning of new parking facilities if the campus parking utilization rate reaches or exceeds 85 percent. The intent of this policy is to ensure that additional parking facilities would be ready for construction if parking usage was to exceed 90 percent or at the time a new construction project is proposed (CMP 7.2.7). The Campus Master Plan further specifies that OSU will monitor parking usage rates at least once per year and provide monitoring results to the city (CMP ). The OSU Parking Study is an analysis of the parking conditions for on-campus parking facilities during the academic year (refer to Attachment A - Parking Survey Overview Map). Methodology Timeframe Typically, the annual parking utilization study is conducted the fourth week of the fall academic term, which is normally when a university is at its peak enrollment. The study takes place over a two-day period, and each of the OSU General Use parking lots is counted once on both a typical laboratory day (i.e., Tuesday) and a typical lecture day (i.e., Wednesday). The percent utilization for each lot is averaged over the two days. During the academic year, OSU conducted fall and spring utilization counts, both collected during the fourth week of each term. The spring utilization count occurred on Tuesday, April 24 th and Wednesday, April 25 th. This is the same two-day period during which the neighborhoods within the OSU City of Corvallis Collaboration Study Area were counted. All parking lots, regardless of type, were inventoried unless access to the lot was restricted (e.g., EPA Complex South Lot (3104)). Four teams of two, each with a representative from Transit and Parking Services and Campus Planning, completed the counts. To provide continuity for comparison of on- and off-campus utilization numbers, OSU elected to base the report on the spring utilization counts. Parking Space and Lot Types Oregon State University has sixteen (16) types of parking spaces, as well as three (3) different types of lots. Parking spaces can be divided into two categories, General Purpose and University Support (refer to Table 1: OSU Parking Categories). The General Purpose spaces typically require a permit or day fee, but they offer short-term and all-day parking for people coming to campus. The ten (10) types of General Purpose spaces include: Faculty/Staff, Student/Visitor, ADA, ADA Van, ADA Wheelchair, Reserved, Visitor, Metered, Free, and Motorcycle. Motorcycles park in designated areas rather than spaces; so this type is not included in the parking lot percent utilization. In addition to General Purpose spaces, there are six (6) types of University Support spaces. These spaces are not open to the general public and serve as short-term loading areas, over-night parking for vehicles restricted to campus or university residential areas, as well as those temporarily unavailable due to construction. The six (6) University Support space types include: Timed, Service, Dedicated, Residential, Government, and Construction. Table 1: OSU Parking Categories General Purpose University Support Faculty/Staff Timed Student/Visitor Service ADA Dedicated ADA Van Residential ADA Wheelchair Government Reserved Construction Visitor Metered Free Motorcycle (areas)* * Not included in utilization calculation due to space - area variations Within OSU s main campus, there are three types of parking lots: General Use, Non-OSU, and Non-Public (refer to Attachment A for locations). The OSU General Use Lots are either permitted or free parking, and the permitted lots are either Faculty/Staff or Student/Visitor. The Non-OSU lots are parking areas within the OSU September 6,

7 Campus Boundary but are utilized by an entity other than OSU such as the EPA, Hilton Garden Inn, and the OSU Foundation. The Non-Public lots are those lots where, aside from visitor spaces, access is restricted and/or limited to a specific group; examples of these lots are the Magruder Hall West Lot (3362), Housing and Dining Maintenance Center Lot (3351), Motor Pool West Lot (3334), Orchard Court Lot (3322), and the Facilities Services Shops Lot (3208). Adjustment to Calculation and Space Types included in Annual Report In fall 2011, Campus Planning staff met with representatives from the City of Corvallis Planning and Engineering Divisions to discuss proposed changes to the count methodology and utilization reporting. Historically, OSU has reported on four categories: Student/Visitor, Faculty/Staff, ADA, and Other. The utilization of each parking lot was based on the sum of the four categories. The Other category included Service, Reserved, Timed, Metered, and Visitor space types; however, not all of these space types were General Purpose. In addition, the collection method did not allow for the disaggregation of individual space types, which prevented analysis of the individual space types. Campus Planning staff recommended that OSU continue to collect data on all sixteen campus parking space types individually rather than in the aggregated Other category. However, OSU would only report on the ten General Purpose space types, as these are the only spaces available for use by students, staff, and visitors to campus. While this excludes a space type from the report which had historically been included (e.g., Service), City Staff concurred with the recommendation since these spaces have never been available for public parking. Furthermore, parking utilization would only include the General Purpose space types within the OSU General Use Lots (i.e., University Support space types and all spaces within Non-OSU and Non-Public lots would be excluded from the parking utilization report because they are not available for use by the general public). Parking Facilities There are two primary parking facilities on campus: a multi-level parking structure and surface parking lots. Campus parking facilities can include permitted, metered, and free parking spaces. While a majority of lots on campus are permitted, there are metered spaces in parking facilities in Sectors C, D, F, and G. Refer to Table 2: Lots with Metered for a listing of the individual lots and the number of spaces in each lot. Additionally, the City of Corvallis has metered spaces on the east side of 14 th Street south of Jefferson Avenue. Table 2: Lots with Metered OSU has free parking along Jefferson Way west of 35 th Street (3372) in Sector A, as well as free parking in the Sports Complex West Lot (3286) in Sector H and the Washington Way and 11 th Street Southeast Lot (3227) in Sector D. In addition, the City of Corvallis has free, onstreet parking on Orchard Ave between 27 th and 30 th Streets in Sector C; on 11 th Street and Madison Avenue in Sector D; and on 16 th, 17 th, and A streets in Sector G. Parking along city streets is not included in the utilization study. Number Description Sector 3206 McNary Hall North Meter Lot D Washington Ave D Central Campus Metered Lot C Kerr Administration South Lot C Kerr Administration West Lot C Bloss Hall South Lot G LaSells Stewart Center West Lot F S Sackett Place Meter C Student Legacy Park South Lot C S 30th Street Meter C S 26th Street C W Jefferson Way C Additional Parking Facilities (New Lots) Since the OSU Parking Study and Neighborhood Street Parking Study Fall Term 2010 was prepared, Oregon State University has constructed several new parking facilities, incorporated previously untracked parking facilities, expanded several parking areas, and re-opened lots that had been temporarily closed for construction staging. Refer to Table 3: New General Purpose and University Support Parking Areas for a list of all new parking facilities and the number of spaces per facility. September 6,

8 Table 3: New General Purpose and University Support Parking Areas Number Description Sector Notes 3103 Jefferson Street Building West Lot A 93 OSU General Use Lot, previously was Non-OSU Lot 3227 Washington Ave & 11TH ST Southeast D 90 Constructed following partial closure of lot South Farm RV Parking Lot J 125 New gravel RV parking for game day only 3244 Valley Library West Lot C 2 Existing area previously omitted from study 3250 Furman Hall West Lot C 11 Reopened following Furman Hall Renovation 3270 Bloss Hall South Lot G 72 Lot expanded with the ILLC project 3272 Cascade Hall North Lot G 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 3288 International Living Learning Center East G 4 Parking lot constructed with the ILLC project 3289 S 17TH Street and A Avenue Lot G 49 Parking lot constructed with the ILLC project 3294 Intramural LN Lot C 17 Expanded with decommission of Weatherford Pl lot 3305 Reed Lodge South Lot C 3 Existing area previously omitted from study 3308 Cordley Hall North Lot C 3 Existing area previously omitted from study 3340 Energy Center East Lot B 21 Constructed with the Energy Center project 0003_SSS19 Kelley Engineering Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0016_SSS19 Gleeson Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0022_SSS19 Owen Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0034_SSS19_E Kidder Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0034_SSS19_W Kidder Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0038_SSS19 Strand Agricultural Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0068_SSS19 Burt Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0081_SSS19_E Milam Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0081_SSS19_W Milam Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0083_SSS19_E Memorial Union C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0083_SSS19_W Memorial Union C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0091_SSS19 Gilmore Annex C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0096_SSS19 Sackett Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0109_SSS19 Weatherford Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0113_SSS19 Marketplace West Dining Hall C 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0137_SSS19 Hinsdale Wave Research Lab A 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0141_SSS19 Environmental Health and Safety Annex B 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 0200_SSS19 LaSells Stewart Center G 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study 2008_SSS19 Agriculture Research Center B 1 Loading zone previously omitted from study Decommissioned Parking Facilities Over the past few years, three (3) parking facilities were decommissioned to facilitate new construction on OSU s main campus, which reduced the number of parking spaces in Sector C by sixty-one (61). Furthermore, in reviewing the types of parking facilities included in the utilization study, Campus Planning staff noticed that on-street parking along two city streets had previously been included. Since the utilization study only pertains to OSU managed parking facilities (i.e., lots or on-street parking), these two (2) facilities also have been removed from the study. The implications of eliminating the on-street parking along two city streets from OSU s parking capacity is explained in the Capacity Changes due to Methodology Refinement section of this study. Refer to Table 4: Decommissioned Parking Areas for a list of the areas which were in previous studies but no longer part of OSU s parking facilities inventory, as well as the three (3) decommissioned parking lots. 510 Table 4: Decommissioned Parking Areas Number Description Sector Notes 3214 Madison Ave D 33 City street should not have been included in previous studies 3215 N 11TH ST D 20 City street should not have been included in previous studies 3264 Moreland Hall Lot C 14 Lot decommissioned for construction of Native American Cultural Center 3291 Weatherford Place C 5 Service spaces decommissioned to create fire lane 3314 Bates South Lot C 42 Lot decommissioned for construction of Hallie Ford Center 114 September 6,

9 Additional Revisions to OSU Parking Facilities Inventory In clarifying and developing consistent methodology for the parking utilization study, Campus Planning staff found that several parking facilities had been combined since These changes, however, had not been documented. There also were inconsistencies in how OSU General Use Lots had been inventoried. Campus Planning staff and Transit and Parking Services staff reviewed all of the parking facilities to determine if the facility should have been combined with another or should have remained a separate facility. Refer to Table 5: Reconfigured Parking Areas for a listing of the facilities which had been incorporated into another OSU parking facility prior to the utilization study. Table 5: Reconfigured Parking Areas Number Description Sector Notes 3225 Washington Meter D Lot combined with 3219: Washington Ave 3267 Waldo S. Lot C Lot incorporated into 3266: Waldo Hall East Lot 3290 E. Vet Med Lot F Lot incorporated into 3284: Valley Football Center Lot th S S of RR C Lot incorporated into 3300: S 26 ST th North C Lot incorporated into 3260: N 26th ST 3318 S. Orchard Street C Lot incorporated into 3316: Orchard Ave South Lot 3336 EHS Annex B Lot incorporated into 3333: National Forage Seed Center East Lot Campus Population Student Enrollment Historically, parking utilization studies have been based on data collected the fourth week of the fall term; this academic year, however, the study is based on data collected the fourth week of the spring term to facilitate efforts of the OSU City of Corvallis Collaboration Effort Parking and Transportation Work Group. Therefore, fall and spring term data for the past five academic years has been included in Table 6: Student Enrollment Trends to show trends for both time periods. Since 2007, student enrollment has increased annually between three to nine percent, with a total increase in fall enrollment of 26 percent and spring enrollment of 29 percent. Although spring term enrollment is traditionally less than fall term, the annual percent change for fall and spring terms has been relatively comparable. Table 6: Student Enrollment Trends Academic Fall Term Spring Term Year October Enrollment Change* April Enrollment Change* ,362 ~ 17,642 ~ ,753 2% 17,987 2% ,320 3% 18,851 5% ,969 8% 20,498 9% ,761 8% 22,270 9% ,977 5% 23,265 4% * change is the change in population when compared with the previous year's enrollment for the same term. Source: OSU Office of Institutional Research, Enrollment/Demographic Reports, Enrollment Summary, OSU Employment Just as enrollment at Oregon State University has increased over the past five years, so too has the number of employees. Table 7: Employment Trends includes faculty/unclassified, classified, and temporary staff. Graduate assistants and student employees are not included as staff as they are captured within the student enrollment data. Since 2007, the number of employees has increased by 11 percent. Faculty/unclassified staff comprise over two-thirds of the employees on campus, while classified staff represent approximately 25 percent and temporary employees less than ten percent. September 6,

10 Table 7: Employment Trends Academic Year Faculty / Unclassified Fall Term - October Classified Temp Staff Change* Faculty / Unclassified Spring Term - April Classified Temp Staff Change* ,372 1, ,966 ~ 3,405 1, ,038 ~ ,372 1, ,066 2% 3,467 1, ,177 3% ,472 1, ,170 2% 3,467 1, ,109-1% ,528 1, ,249 2% 3,643 1, ,374 5% ,721 1, ,512 5% 3,815 1, ,571 4% * change is the change in total employees when compared with the previous year's employment. Source: OSU Office of Institutional Research, Faculty/Staff Reports, Employment Reports, Overall Campus Population Due to increased enrollment and employment over the past five years, the overall population on campus has risen by 23 percent. As Table 8: Campus Population illustrates, the total population on OSU main campus has increased from nearly 25,000 in Fall Term 2007 to over 30,000 in Fall Term Table 8: Campus Population Academic Year Fall Term - October Enrollment Employment Change* Spring Term - April Enrollment Employment Change* ,753 4,966 24,719 ~ 17,987 5,038 23,025 ~ ,320 5,066 25,386 3% 18,851 5,177 24,028 4% ,969 5,170 27,139 7% 20,498 5,109 25,607 7% ,761 5,249 29,010 7% 22,270 5,374 27,644 8% ,977 5,512 30,489 5% 23,265 5,571 28,836 4% * change is the change in total population when compared with the previous year's total population. Source: OSU Office of Institutional Research, Enrollment/Demographic Reports, Enrollment Summary and Employment Reports, Parking Permit System Overview OSU s parking system and shuttle are funded through the sale of parking permits. While there are several free parking areas on campus, most OSU General Use Lots are permitted for either Faculty/Staff or Student/Visitor use. The type of permit is denoted at the entrance to the parking area; however, Faculty/Staff permits also may be used in Student/Visitor areas. Transit and Parking Services (TAPS) sells annual, term, and ten-day permits, as well as special permits for motorcycles, emeritus faculty, and vendors. For short term visits, there are metered spaces, or individuals can purchase daily passes at TAPS or hourly passes from a Pay-and-Display machine. Permit Sales As shown in Table 9: Permit Sales Fall Term and as illustrated by Figure 1: Fall Term Parking Permits per OSU Population, the number of students purchasing parking permits during the Fall Term has varied considerably over the past five years. The number of faculty and staff buying permits each fall has remained relatively constant during this same time period; however, OSU employment over the last five years also has increased, resulting in a slight decline in the percent of employees purchasing a permit each fall. September 6,

11 Table 9: Permit Sales - Fall Term Students Academic Year Enrollment Permits Purchased^ with Permit Change* Employment Faculty / Staff Permits Purchased^ with Permit Change* ,753 3,597 18% ~ 4,966 2,685 54% ~ ,320 1,131 6% -69% 5,066 2,744 54% 2% ,969 2,551 12% 126% 5,170 2,718 53% -1% ,761 1,657 7% -35% 5,249 2,759 53% 2% ,977 3,036 12% 83% 5,512 2,672 48% -3% * change is the change in total permits purchased when compared with the previous year's permit sales. ^Permit sales represent the sum of the annual and term permits sold, minus any permits returned, as of the utilization count. Source: OSU Transit and Parking Services Figure 1: Fall Term Parking Permits per OSU Population ( ) 35,000 30,000 OSU Population (Students and Faculty / Staff) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5, Students with Permits 3,597 1,131 2,551 1,657 3,036 Staff & Faculty with Permits 2,685 2,744 2,718 2,759 2,672 Students without permits 16,156 19,189 19,418 22,104 21,941 Staff & Faculty without permits 2,281 2,322 2,452 2,490 2,840 Spring Term permit sales for the past five years are included to provided context for this year s utilization count, which was conducted during Spring Term. Table 10: Permit Sales - Spring Term and Figure 2: Spring Term Parking Permits per OSU Population include the Student and Faculty/Staff permits sold through the fourth week of the Spring Term. Permit sales represent the sum of the annual and term permits sold (if applicable) minus any permits returned ii. Faculty/Staff permit sales are only slightly greater than the number sold through the fourth week of the fall term; however, the number of Student permits sold is significantly greater when compared to those sold as of the fall term. The variation in Faculty/Staff and Student permit sales between fall and spring terms may be related to a Faculty/Staff purchasing program; Faculty/Staff can purchase a permit in the fall and have the cost deducted from their salary over the course of the year. The increase in number of Student permits sold throughout the year is likely the result of permits being purchased by students starting in winter or spring term. September 6,

12 Table 10: Permit Sales - Spring Term Academic Students Year Enrollment Permits Purchased^ with Permit Change* Employment Faculty / Staff Permits Purchased^ with Permit Change* ,987 4,276 24% ~ 5,038 2,851 57% ~ ,851 2,756 15% -36% 5,177 2,937 57% 3% ,498 2,776 14% 1% 5,109 2,903 57% -1% ,270 4,038 18% 45% 5,374 2,874 53% -1% ,265 4,115 18% 2% 5,571 2,976 53% 4% * change is the change in total permits purchased when compared with the previous year's permit sales. ^Permit sales represent the sum of the annual and term permits sold, minus any permits returned, as of the utilization count. Source: OSU Transit and Parking Services Figure 2: Spring Term Parking Permits per OSU Population ( ) 35,000 30,000 OSU Population (Students and Faculty / Staff) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5, Students with Permits 4,276 2,756 2,776 4,038 4,115 Staff & Faculty with Permits 2,851 2,937 2,903 2,874 2,976 Students without permits 13,711 16,095 17,722 18,232 19,140 Staff & Faculty without permits 2,187 2,240 2,206 2,500 2,595 Over the past five years, Fall Term enrollment rose by 26 percent and faculty/staff employment rose 11 percent; however, Student permit sales decreased by 4 percent while Faculty/Staff permit sales only increased by 4 percent during this same period. While the overall campus population increased by 23 percent, permit sales have not increased at the same rate. OSU has implemented more alternative transportation programs and facilities during this time period; however, it is not clear whether the reduction in permit sales is due to these measures or due to a decrease in parking demand on campus. September 6,

13 Parking Capacity Capacity Changes due to Methodology Refinement As described in the Adjustment to Calculation and Space Types Included in Annual Report section of this study, Oregon State University refined the parking capacity and utilization data collection and reporting methodology for the study. The result of this methodology adjustment will be a utilization study more closely reflecting student, staff, and visitors experience, as well as the establishment of a basis for future analysis of individual space types. Unfortunately, two unavoidable consequences of this change are the inability to do a one-to-one trend analysis of total parking capacity or of the Reserved, Visitor, Metered, and Free space types as these had been previously combined in the Other parking category. The shift to reporting only spaces in OSU General Use Lots limits a direct comparison of the total parking capacity over the past five years because previous studies included non-public lots and parking along city streets (e.g., Madison Ave (3214) and N 11 th Street (3215)). These areas have been removed from this year s study since the intent of the university s utilization study pertains to OSU managed parking facilities for the general public. As Table 11: Capacity Reduction through Methodology Refinement illustrates, this reduces the total parking capacity by 454 spaces. However, it is important to note that this adjustment is not a real loss in capacity, as the inclusion of these Non-Public lot spaces inflated the prior year s total capacity. Future utilization studies will employ the new methodology, thereby providing more precise analysis of capacity changes over time. Table 11: Capacity Reduction through Methodology Refinement Number Description Sector Number of Notes 3213 Madison Ave Co-op Lot D 45 Non-Public 3214 Madison Ave D 33 City Street 3215 N 11TH ST D 20 City Street 3223 N 16th ST West Lot C 157 Non-Public 3224 N 16th ST East Lot C 34 Non-Public 3322 Orchard Court Lot D 97 Non-Public 3351 Housing and Dining Maintenance Center Lot E 68 Non-Public 454 The other unavoidable consequence of the methodology refinement is analysis of individual space types. While the modifications will facilitate future analysis of the individual space types, the changes limit a direct comparison of the Reserved, Visitor, Metered, and Free space types since they had previously been combined with Service spaces in the Other parking category. Service spaces provide short-term parking for OSU owned vehicles that are used by employees to perform their jobs and that remain on campus overnight. Since Service spaces are not available for personal use by staff, students, or visitors, Services spaces have been removed from the reported capacity (i.e., shifted from General Use to University Support). The result is a further reduction in the total parking capacity for Academic Year ; however, the 164 Service spaces should not have been included in previous utilization studies. Revising the methodology did result in an additional parking type being added to the utilization report. In previous years, motorcycle areas were not included, due to the fact that more than one motorcycle can park within a single delineated area. Motorcycle areas require a permit but are intended for general use. Transit and Parking Services (TAPS) experienced an increase in annual Motorcycle permit sales from 123 to 190 between fall 2007 and While there has been some fluctuation in the sale of permits, TAPS has converted some vehicle parking spaces to motorcycle areas over the past five years to accommodate this type of transportation. In isolated areas of campus, motorcycle spaces are individually delineated, but most parking lots have a larger area for multiple bikes. In order to track and accurately convey capacity and utilization on campus, motorcycle areas will be assessed and reported on separately given the current differences in how they are delineated and used. September 6,

14 Parking Capacity Over the past five years, parking capacity on campus has decreased primarily due to the recent construction of the Linus Pauling Science Center, Hallie Ford Center, Student Success Center, and Native American Cultural Center in areas that previously had been parking lots. Upgrades to ADA parking spaces also have reduced the overall number of parking spaces on campus, as there is typically a net loss in total number of spaces in a lot due to the additional space required for an access aisle. Lastly, adjustments to the way parking is reported have further reduced the overall capacity by 618 spaces this year (i.e., the sum of the 454 Non-Public and Non- OSU spaces and the 164 Service spaces). Table 12: Parking Lot Capacity for OSU General Use Lots provides the parking capacity per type by academic year, including the adjusted capacity for the past four years (i.e., subtracting the capacity for the non-public lots and parking along city streets from the total capacity). A comparison of the current parking capacity with that of the previous four years reveals a loss of 203 parking spaces or a -3 percent change in General Use parking spaces since Table 12: Parking Lot Capacity for OSU General Use Lots Academic ADA Other* Student Faculty Year ADA Van Wheelchair Reserved Visitor Metered Free Service Adjusted ^ ,161 1, ,696 8,055 7, ,368 1, ,430 8,006 7, ,272 1, ,289 7,717 7, ,273 1, ,230 7,625 7, ,085 2, n/a 7,234 7,234 Note: ADA and Other counts were aggregated for academic years through *Prior to the count, this category included "university support" spaces which are not open to the general public. n/a: One-hundred sixty-four (164) Service spaces were removed from the reported capacity due to methodology changes ^Adjusted reflects the capacity of OSU General Use Lots (i.e., Non-OSU and Non-Public lots have been removed) Figure 3: OSU General Use Parking Capacity 2007 to 2012 Figure 3: OSU General Use Parking Capacity 2007 to 2012 illustrates the overall trend of the previously reported numbers (blue). It also includes the adjusted capacity (red), which subtracts the 454 Non-Public/Non-OSU spaces and the 164 Service spaces from the previously reported capacity. As Figure 3: OSU General Use Parking Capacity 2007 to 2012 shows, the reduction in total capacity over the past five years is not as significant when the 618 spaces are excluded from the other four years of capacity counts. Parking Capacity Reported 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Adjusted Parking Capacities 0 Furthermore, the adjusted capacity illustrates that there has been an increase in General Academic Year Use spaces over the past year, which is the result of the construction of new parking facilities along Washington Avenue, the expansion of the Bloss Hall South Lot (3270) near Western Blvd, and the activation of Furman Hall West Lot (3250), which had been closed during the building s renovation. OSU also constructed forty-one (41) new ADA compliant spaces between the and academic years. While the construction of these spaces typically results in the loss of one or two spaces from an existing lot due to the additional space required for the access aisle, OSU is committed to making campus more accessible, which is evident in the 21 percent increase in ADA spaces since the academic year. Parking Capacity September 6,

15 Motorcycle Areas were not included in previous parking utilization studies given multiple bikes can park in one area. Since the delineated areas provide parking for students and staff, OSU will assess and report on them separately. Refer to Table 13: OSU Motorcycle Areas for the current number of areas in OSU General Use lots. Parking Table 13: OSU Motorcycle Areas Academic Year Motorcycle Areas ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Motorcycle areas previously not surveyed Campus Parking utilization is calculated as the ratio of occupied spaces to the total parking spaces. iii OSU s parking utilization rate for Spring Term 2012 is 68 percent during peak hours 10 am and 2 pm. While Table 14a and 14b: OSU Parking show a slight decrease in the total campus parking utilization over the past five years, this is partially the result of changes in data collection methodology and differences in the utilization of parking lots constructed to replace displaced parking due to their location on campus. Parking facilities in Sector C historically have the highest utilization rates, while parking lots in other sectors have had lower utilization rates due to the greater distance of these lots from the campus core. Replacement of parking facilities in Sector C with new facilities in other sectors has contributed to the decline in utilization from 75 percent in to 65 percent in Parking utilization also has not been adjusted as the capacity number were; thus, it is not surprising that the percent utilization for Sectors C, D, and E is lower in academic year than the previous four years, as the residential non-public lots were included in previous years (e.g., Madison Ave Co-op Lot (3213), N 16 th St West Lot (3223), N 16 th St East Lot (3224), and Orchard Court Lot (3322)). Refer to Attachment B: Parking for a map of utilization by parking facility. Table 14a: OSU Parking Sector A % % % B % % % C 2,653 2,460 93% 2,606 2,285 88% 2,319 2,066 89% D 1,268 1,169 92% 1,265 1,058 84% 1,263 1,064 84% E % % % F 1, % 1, % 1, % G 1, % 1, % 1, % H % % % 8,192 6,066 75% 8,004 5,737 72% 7,717 5,497 72% Table 14b: OSU Parking Sector A % % B % % C 2,293 2,090 91% 1,839 1,647 90% D 1,217 1,075 88% 1,268 1,034 82% E % % F 1, % 1, % G 1, % 1, % H % % 7,625 5,669 71% 7,234 4,931 68% September 6,

16 Parking by Type The percent utilization of the different types of parking spaces has been fairly consistent over the past five years, as illustrated in Figure 4: of Parking Space Type 2007 to The noticeable change in the utilization of ADA and Other space types for the Spring Term 2012 time period can be partially attributed to difference in enrollment, capacity changes, as well as the revisions to data collection and reporting methodology in the academic year. Figure 4: of Parking Space Type 2007 to 2012 Students Faculty/Staff ADA Other 100% 90% 80% 70% Utilized 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (Fall Count) (Fall Count) (Fall Count) (Fall Count) (Spring Count) Year In addition to the General Use vehicle parking spaces, OSU collected data on motorcycle area utilization (refer to Table 15: of Motorcycle Areas). with at least one motorcycle were counted as utilized; however, areas vary by size across campus making it difficult to draw to fine a conclusion about their use. Table 15: of Motorcycle Areas Sector Capacity (areas) Areas B % C % D % E % F % G % % September 6,

17 Parking by Sector The OSU Campus Master Plan divides main campus into nine (9) sectors, each with its own development allocation and parking lots. Even with the revisions to the data report methodology and capacity changes, Figure 5: Sector Parking 2007 to 2012 reveals a fairly consistent trend in parking within Sectors A H over the past five years. iv One exception is Sector A, which has ranged from 63 to 97 percent. This range can be attributed to the relatively small number of OSU General Use lots within Sector A and the addition of 93 spaces in the Jefferson Street Building West Lot (3103) this spring. The other exception is Sector H, which is due mainly to the inclusion of the Sports Complex West Lot (3286) which was not included in previous utilization reports. Figure 5: of Parking Space Type 2007 to % 90% 80% 70% Utilized 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% A B C D E F G H Sector Attachment C: Sector map illustrates both individual parking lot utilizations and the sector utilization. On a sector by sector basis, Sector C has the highest utilization, while sectors F, G, and H maintain the lowest utilization. Sector F includes the three large parking lots surrounding Reser Stadium, and Sector G includes the Parking Structure. Parking Deck For the first time in spring 2012, OSU staff collected parking utilization data for the Parking Structure by floor, with the ramps between floors included with the lower floor s capacity counts. The five-story structure is located in the northwest corner of Sector G in close proximity to Reser Stadium, Gill Coliseum, CH2M Hill Alumni Center, and the LaSells Stewart Center. It is a permitted Student / Visitor facility, and it provides daily parking for students, overflow parking for faculty and staff, as well as event parking. September 6,

18 Table 16: Parking Garage General Use and University Support by Floor Number 0205 Floor General Use Motorcycle (areas) University Support Staff Student ADA Van Wheelchair Reserved Timed Visitor Metered Free Service First Second Third Fourth Fifth A review of the utilization of each floor s General Use vehicle spaces (i.e., excluding Motorcycle areas and Service spaces) of the parking garage reveals that floors one through three had the highest utilization (refer to Table 17: Parking Garage of General Use Vehicle by Floor and Figure 6: of Parking Garage by Floor ). The difference in utilization between floors one and two is the result of the eighteen (18) ADA spaces being vacant during the count. There were slight differences between first and second day counts. This difference is likely the result of an event occurring on campus during the second day count, since the parking garage is one of the primary locations where individuals attending events on main campus are directed to park. Table 17: Parking Garage of General Use Vehicle by Floor v Number Floor General Use Staff Student ADA Van Wheelchair Reserved Visitor Metered Free First % Second % 0205 Third % Fourth % Fifth % % Figure 6: of Parking Garage by Floor Future Parking Facilities Over the past few years, OSU encountered challenges to replacing displaced parking due to provisions in the construction bonds which precluded the university from assessing new construction projects to replace parking elsewhere on campus. Recently, OSU successfully changed the bond provisions and the money included in a project for replacing displaced parking spaces can be spent throughout main campus. Staff also is exploring ways to use the money that had been set aside but restricted by the old bonding language. Independently and in conjunction with the OSU City of Corvallis Collaboration Effort, campus planning staff is holistically reviewing OSU s current parking system and exploring opportunities to add an additional shuttle September 6,

19 and/or reconfigure existing shuttle routes to shorten the gap times. The Reser Stadium Lot (3281) continues to be underutilized except during game days. Adjusting shuttle service frequency and/or routes could make this and other perimeter lots a more viable option to students and staff for daily parking. As part of this holistic approach, staff is examining the possibility of a tiered parking rate to encourage use of the underutilized perimeter lots. Additionally, OSU is exploring ways to manage parking within sectors to address individual lots with a utilization rate over 85 percent. Transit and Parking Services and Campus Planning staff are also in the preliminary process of developing a new parking facility in Sector A, which currently has limited General Propose parking facilities. A parking facility in this sector was designated in Figure 7.3: Future Parking Facilities of the Campus Master Plan, and it is one of the closest locations to Sector C which is not a future building site. The parking lot would be served by an existing, as well as proposed, shuttle route, and it would help address demand for parking facilities given the change in use of the Jefferson Street Building. As OSU continues to develop, an additional parking garage will likely be needed. Given the cost of a multi-level parking structure, staff anticipates this will be included in one of the next biennium requests. i ii iii iv v In this report, a parking lot identification number is provided after the parking facility name, and Attachment A illustrates the location of each facility. Transit and Parking Services started selling term permits in fall Parking utilization is calculated for the ten (10) general purposes spaces in the OSU General Use Lots. It does not the six (6) include university support space types in the OSU General Use lots or any of the spaces in the Non-OSU or Non- Public lots. Note: Sector J is not included in Figure 5: of Parking Space Type 2007 to 2012 or this report, as the South Farm RV Parking Lot (3228) was added in 2011 and only used for football game RV parking. The percent utilization of the parking garage (0205) by floor is calculated based on the capacity of the General Use vehicle spaces; this does not include Motorcycle areas or Services spaces included in Table 16: Parking Garage Capacity by Floor. September 6,

20 HARRISON BLVD TYLER AVE JACKSON AVE JACKSON AVE TYLER AVE TH ST 3311 JACKSON AVE HARRISON BLVD CAMPUS WAY A TH ST CAMPUS WAY JEFFERSON WAY WASHINGTON WAY WESTERN BLVD Miles E 3320 B CAMPUS WAY JEFFERSON WAY TH ST WASHINGTON WAY MEMORIAL PL WALDO PL WESTERN BLVD File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\prkg_utilization_GIS_2012\survey_overview_2012_11x17.mxd File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\_maps_2012\ Report Maps 2012\survey_overview_2012_11x17_08_07.pdf F TH ST C G H TH ST 15 TH ST 'E' AVE MAPLE TREE DR / CT JACKSON AVE TH ST 3209 'A' AVE 13TH ST D 'C' AVE 'E' AVE MADISON AVE JEFFERSON AVE ADAMS AVE 3227 'D' AVE JACKSON AVE Parking Study Survey Overview ADAMS AVE WESTERN BLVD 'D' AVE 8TH ST WASHINGTON AVE JACKSON AVE 5TH ST 4TH ST 7TH ST Campus Master Plan Features CMP Boundary CMP Sectors Non-OSU Lots Non-Public Lots 5TH ST 4TH ST 4TH ST 6TH ST Attachment A 5TH ST OSU General Use Lots Buildings 3RD ST Map produced: 08/07/12 7TH ST

21 JACKSON AVE HARRISON BLVD 9th ST TYLER AVE 27th ST JACKSON AVE A CAMPUS WAY B C WALDO PL D 14 TH ST Parking Study Parking MADISON AVE 10th ST 9th ST JACKSON AVE 7th ST JEFFERSON WAY JEFFERSON AVE 8th ST 6th ST MADISON AVE 35 TH ST WASHINGTON WAY 26 TH ST 15 TH ST 30 TH ST 0 WESTERN BLVD Miles E F G WESTERN BLVD 17th ST H 15th ST WESTERN BLVD File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\prkg_utilization_GIS_2012\prkg_utilization_report_2012_11x17.mxd File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\_maps_2012\ Report Maps 2012\prkg_utilization_report_2012_11x17_08_07.pdf 'A' AVE Attachment B Boundaries & Features 'C' AVE CMP Boundary CMP Sectors Buildings Lots Excluded from Study Non-Public Lots 'D' AVE Non-OSU Lots 'E' AVE WESTERN BLVD 'D' AVE 4th ST 5th ST Utilizaton 3rd ST 4th ST 0% - 24% 25% - 49% 50% - 69% 70% - 84% 85% - 100% Calculations are based on the average of two days of parking counts conducted on April 24th and 25th, Map produced: 08/07/12

22 HARRISON BLVD TYLER AVE JACKSON AVE JACKSON AVE TYLER AVE 27TH ST JACKSON AVE HARRISON BLVD CAMPUS WAY CAMPUS WAY CAMPUS WAY JACKSON AVE 14 TH ST Parking Study Sector JACKSON AVE JACKSON AVE 7TH ST A B C WALDO PL D 7TH ST JEFFERSON WAY 35 TH ST WASHINGTON WAY 30 TH ST 26 TH ST 15 TH ST JEFFERSON AVE 9 TH ST 8TH ST ADAMS AVE MADISON AVE 15TH ST 'E' AVE MAPLE TREE DR / CT 'A' AVE 13TH ST 'C' AVE 'D' AVE 'E' AVE WASHINGTON AVE 5TH ST 0 WESTERN BLVD E F G H Western Blvd File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\prkg_utilization_GIS_2012\sector_utilization_report_2012_11x17.mxd File:\\tss-share.tss.oregonstate.edu\FacSvc\Facilities\Campus Planning Dev\Planning\ParkingandTransportation\Parking\ParkingStudies\ \Mapping\_maps_2012\ Report Maps 2012\sector_utilization_report_2012_11x17_08_07.pdf Miles Boundaries & Features CMP Boundary CMP Sectors Buildings Lots Excluded from Study Attachment C Non-Public Lots Non-OSU Lots Lot Utilizaton WESTERN BLVD 0% - 24% 25% - 49% 50% - 69% 70% - 84% 85% - 100% 'D' AVE Sector 5TH ST 4TH ST 5TH ST 0% - 24% 25% - 49% 50% - 69% 70% - 84% 4TH ST 85% - 100% Calculations are based on the average of two days of parking counts conducted on April 24th and 25th, RD ST 4TH ST Map produced: 08/07/12

23 Attachment D: OSU Parking Space Types ADA designated for use by vehicles with ada placard ADA Van for use by vehicles with ada placard and signed van accessible ADA Wheelchair for use by vehicles with ada placard and signed wheelchair users only Dedicated dedicated for use by a particular building or program (includes vet med client, uhds, oregon state police, electric vehicles, etc.) Free for general use (not requiring any permit) Govt designated for vehicles with government license plates Metered with a meter requiring payment Motorcycle Areas designated for motorcycle use Reserved reserved for a particular person or department; designated with a Reserved sign Residential designated for residents of an attached building (includes East Greenhouse Resident, Co-op, etc.) Student within lots designated for Student/Visitor Parking Staff within lots designated for Staff Parking Service reserved for service vehilce use (includes FS, Rec Sports, Vendors, etc.) Visitor designated soley for visitor use Timed and designated areas with a time limit (includes loading zones, passenger drop-off, etc.) - does not included metered

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1200 CANAL STREET EXTENSION SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13210 DRAFT REPORT DATE: November 13,

More information

2015 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY

2015 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY Western Washington University 2015 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY Prepared for: Western Washington University January 2016 Prepared by: 11730 118 th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 Phone: 425-821-3665

More information

CAMPUS PARKING STUDY Analysis and Alternatives Executive Summary

CAMPUS PARKING STUDY Analysis and Alternatives Executive Summary S A L E M S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y CAMPUS PARKING STUDY Analysis and Alternatives Executive Summary M a y 2 2 0 1 8 C a m p u s C o m m u n i t y S S U N e i g h b o r h o o d A d v i s o r y C o

More information

2014 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY

2014 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY Western Washington University 2014 PARKING UTILIZATION STUDY Prepared for: Western Washington University January 2015 Prepared by: 11730 118 th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 Phone: 425-821-3665

More information

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations CIRCULATION AND PARKING roads and vehicular traffic The Campus Master Plan updates the campus transportation network through a multi-modal approach that encourages walking and biking while improving vehicular

More information

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility ADA Transition Plan FY19-FY28 Date: November 5, 2018 Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The federal statute known as the Americans with Disabilities

More information

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey SACOG-00-009 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Table of Contents

More information

Student Population Projections By Residence. School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/ /27. Prepared by:

Student Population Projections By Residence. School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/ /27. Prepared by: Student Population Projections By Residence School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/18 2026/27 Prepared by: Revised October 31, 2016 Los Gatos Union School District TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN ESTABLISHING TARGETS FOR FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES: HIGHWAY SAFETY SOUTHEASTERN

More information

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County. Transportation PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NON-MOTORIZED PLAN CONTENTS Goals, Policies, and Action Strategies Table 4 (Bike Facility Classifications and Descriptions) Table 5 (Bike Facility

More information

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION June 2015 CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION Introduction The Alpharetta Downtown Master Plan was developed in the fall

More information

MISO Energy and Peak Demand Forecasting for System Planning

MISO Energy and Peak Demand Forecasting for System Planning MISO Energy and Peak Demand Forecasting for System Planning Prepared by: Douglas J. Gotham Liwei Lu Fang Wu David G. Nderitu Timothy A. Phillips Paul V. Preckel Marco A. Velastegui State Utility Forecasting

More information

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan 1 Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan Public open house hours: to When it comes to on-campus transportation, what do you think is working well and what are some opportunities for improvement?

More information

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2014

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2014 UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2014 July 2015 1. Introduction... 1 1.1. Context... 1 1.2. Transportation Monitoring Program... 2 1.3. Changes at UBC Affecting Travel Patterns... 4 1.4.

More information

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus 040829040.15 Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus: 2012-2015 Overview The Miami Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducted a series

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY Pedestrian Survey Findings Survey Main Findings: Transit and walking are the main two modes used by both visitors and residents of the area, regardless

More information

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference 1.0 Project Description The Campus Cycling Plan, a first for the University, will provide a comprehensive and coordinated approach to support

More information

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6

More information

Downtown Bozeman Parking Study

Downtown Bozeman Parking Study Downtown Bozeman Parking Study A Project Completed for the City of Bozeman Parking Commission Prepared by David Veneziano, Ph.D. Research Scientist and Ahmed Al-Kaisy Ph.D. P.E. Program Manager Safety

More information

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 May 2010 Prepared for the City of Boulder by National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30th Street Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Table of Contents

More information

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit 1200, Scotia Place, Tower 1 10060 Jasper Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3R8 edmonton.ca/auditor Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit June 19, 2017 The conducted this project in accordance with the International Standards

More information

IBPI: Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Program

IBPI: Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Program Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning 12-1-2010 IBPI: Bicycle and Pedestrian Education

More information

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer 10A DATE: October 5, 2016 TO: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer Discussion and Provide Comments, Associated

More information

February 10, 2015 Project: P

February 10, 2015 Project: P Project: 142110P Transportation Planning Transit Planning Traffic Engineering Parking Planning Chris Corosky Armel Corporation Commerce Court West, 199 Bay Street, Suite 2900 P.O. Box 459, Toronto, Ontario

More information

Bicycle Rack Utilization Study & Bicycle Facilities Improvement Report

Bicycle Rack Utilization Study & Bicycle Facilities Improvement Report Bicycle Rack Utilization Study & Bicycle Facilities Improvement Report August 2006 SUMMARY Over 2200 bicycles were counted on May 17 th, a 10% increase from 2005. Around 2700 total bicycles were estimated

More information

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:

More information

LEED Pilot Credit Library

LEED Pilot Credit Library Pilot Credit 13: Bicycle Network, Storage, and Shower Rooms Applicable Rating Systems >> Requirements >> Submittals >> Additional Questions >> Background Information >> Changes >> Applicable Rating Systems

More information

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction: Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

More information

CHAPTER 4: IDENTIFICATION OF ROAD SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL

CHAPTER 4: IDENTIFICATION OF ROAD SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL CHAPTER 4: IDENTIFICATION OF ROAD SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL I. INTRODUCTION Transportation planning models are the primary tools used to predict future travel conditions. With

More information

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Functional classification is a system by which streets and roadways may be distinguished by types according to their function within the entire transportation network.

More information

U NIVERSITY OF B RITISH C OLUMBIA. Fall 2010 Transportation Status Report

U NIVERSITY OF B RITISH C OLUMBIA. Fall 2010 Transportation Status Report U NIVERSITY OF B RITISH C OLUMBIA Fall 2010 Transportation Status Report 1 April 2011 U NIVERSITY OF B RITISH C OLUMBIA Fall 2010 Transportation Status Report Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Context...

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES EECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES Topic and Purpose In 2007, the Mayor of Ottawa s Task Force on Transportation suggested adding a

More information

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Ridership Forecast Methodology and Results December 2013 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Assumptions...

More information

Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton

Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Fall 2006 Bicycle Parking Analysis: California State University, Fullerton Fall 2006 Report Author: John Carroll Department of Geography,

More information

3.0 Future Conditions

3.0 Future Conditions 3.0 Future Conditions In order to be able to recommend appropriate improvements to the transportation system of the Town, it is important to first understand the nature and volume of traffic that is expected

More information

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Comments 1. Under any Alternatives, MCDOT should provide better at-grade pedestrian crossing of Georgia Avenue and Forest Glen Road, including improved crosswalks with wider medians and adequate signal

More information

Transportation 101. Getting To, From & Around Campus

Transportation 101. Getting To, From & Around Campus Transportation 101 Getting To, From & Around Campus Campus Transportation Basics Take advantage of the campus alternative transportation network Download the bus tracking app TransLoc Rider Only park bicycles

More information

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY ROADWAY SYSTEM There are approximately 40 miles of roadways in Manitou Springs. For planning purposes, roadways are typically assigned a functional classification which defines

More information

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015 Vision Zero The City and County of San Francisco adopted Vision Zero San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network as a policy in 2014, committing an

More information

Fairview and Main Local Streets Improvement Plan

Fairview and Main Local Streets Improvement Plan PIM#2 Summary Report Meeting Format Date & Time: Location: Address: Prepared By: Community Open House August 11, 2016 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Red Lion Hotel 1800 W. Fairview Avenue, Boise Stephanie Borders,

More information

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network Prepared by: The University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research Prepared for: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

More information

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY A1 Roadway Resurfacing $23,846,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Roadway resurfacing A2 Signal Replacement $6,000,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Replace traffic signals. B1 W 6th St

More information

Los Angeles District 4 Data Analysis Report

Los Angeles District 4 Data Analysis Report Los Angeles District 4 Data Analysis Report January 218 Dixon Resources Unlimited Commissioned by: Los Angeles District 4 Council Office Table of Contents Introduction 4 Project Background 4 Data Collection:

More information

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING. Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, 2010 Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.ORG Meeting Agenda Handouts: o Meeting Agenda o Summary of East Seventh

More information

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2010-2020 Work Session #2 FOCUS GROUP 6 2 Group 6 Transportation Typical items to be discussed at each Focus Group Provide overview of Campus

More information

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines City of Memphis Effective Date: December 1, 2013 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program 125 N. Main Street Memphis, TN 38103 (901) 576-6710 www.bikepedmemphis.com City of Memphis Executive Summary It is current practice

More information

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data Project Delivery Delays with the implementation of the 2000 TIP became apparent early in the decade. In response to direction among policy officials, ARC began

More information

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946 This section describes the future transportation environment of the UW Tacoma campus and surrounding area. A description of the future conditions on campus in terms of the street system, traffic and intersection

More information

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale CPC Parking Lot Transportation Rationale Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September 2015 Novatech File: 114093 Ref: R-2015-153 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

January Project No

January Project No January 13 2015 Project No. 5070.05 Neil Connelly, Director University of Victoria, Campus Planning and Sustainability PO Box 1700 STN CSC Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Dear Neil: Re: UVic 2014 Traffic Final Report

More information

2.0 Existing Conditions

2.0 Existing Conditions 20 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Land Use, Future Growth Patterns, Physical Barriers Geographic Overview Sutter County s land use pattern is characterized by extensive agricultural areas, significant natural

More information

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE This chapter describes the current status and future plans for biking and walking in the City of Orange Cove. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES The Orange Cove General Plan

More information

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007 Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-

More information

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015 Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015 Abstract This report includes a proposed separated bike lane network for the White Flint Sector Plan area. Separated bike lanes create a

More information

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

5/7/2013 VIA  . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019) 5/7/2013 VIA EMAIL David Hung, Associate Planner Community Development Department, Current Planning Division City of Sacramento 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811 RE: University Village

More information

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic

More information

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices FY 2017-2026 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices November 1, 2017 Forecasted Growth Arlington continues to grow with a shift towards multi-family

More information

Table 1. Greatest Reductions in Traffic Volume

Table 1. Greatest Reductions in Traffic Volume Interstate MAX Light Rail Traffic Impact Summary Portland Office of Transportation October 2005 Summary The majority of streets after construction of the Interstate MAX light rail extension experienced

More information

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the purpose, authorization and focus of this Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), an identification of the Lead Agency, an outline

More information

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014 Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014 2 3 INTRODUCTION 4 Goal of our work: Identify and assess multi-modal

More information

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee SRF No. 7766 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee Rick Lane, P.E. DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: UNIVERSITY AVE REVIEW Our review of the University

More information

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study roc bike share Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study Executive Summary ~ January 2015 JANUARY 2015 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 3495 Winton Pl., Bldg E, Suite 110 Rochester,

More information

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need Chapter 2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Introduction The El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) would make transit and other transportation improvements along a 17.6-mile segment of the El Camino

More information

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2294170 Ontario Inc. February 2, 2017 117-652 Report_1.doc

More information

ALIVE. Proposal. Imagination. The. Toward a More Walkable and Less Car-Dependent Future. Learning. Vision. Action. Environment

ALIVE. Proposal. Imagination. The. Toward a More Walkable and Less Car-Dependent Future. Learning. Vision. Action. Environment The ALIVE Proposal Toward a More Walkable and Less Car-Dependent Future A Twelve Step Approach to Open Up Our Imagination Prepared for The Community of Corvallis, Oregon and Oregon State University by

More information

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.1 Jurisdiction 3 1.2 Purpose and Intent 3 1.3 Modification 3

More information

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2017

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2017 UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2017 March 2018 1. Introduction... 1 1.1. Context... 1 1.2. Transportation Monitoring Program... 2 1.3. Changes at UBC Affecting Travel Patterns... 5 1.4.

More information

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Staff Report Number: 16-214-CC Regular Business: Approve the Oak Grove University Crane Bike Improvement Concept Plan, authorize

More information

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study DRAFT Technical Memorandum #6 Cost and Benefit Evaluation Methodology August 2016 Prepared for: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

More information

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Chapter 5 Future Transportation Chapter 5 Future Transportation The Future Land Use Plan identifies the desired land use designations. The land uses desired for Crozet depend, in large part, on the success of the transportation system,

More information

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018 BISHOP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUILDING Proposed Land-use Change & Parking Modification 3601 SW 31st Street Topeka, Kansas 66614 CFS Project No. 185077 Traffic Impact Memorandum May 22, 2018 Prepared

More information

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS Transit Station Access Planning Tool Instructions Page C-1 Revised Final Report September 2011 TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

More information

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9. CHAPTER NINE: TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1 9.2 ASSUMPTIONS 9.1 9.3 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 9.1 9.4 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.3 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES Figure

More information

ELEMENT 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

ELEMENT 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ELEMENT 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TRANSIT, CIRCULATION, PARKING, PEDESTRIAN, & NON-VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Introduction The following narrative describes the concepts on which the transportation plan is

More information

The Citadel Parking Advisory Committee. Town hall 1 NOV 2018

The Citadel Parking Advisory Committee. Town hall 1 NOV 2018 The Citadel Parking Advisory Committee Town hall 1 NOV 2018 The Citadel Parking Advisory Committee Seat Representation Term Appointed by Current Rep. Faculty Member 2 years Faculty Senate Jeff Davis Staff

More information

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project. TRAVEL PLAN Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Background... 7 Building Users... 7 Transportation in Community Consultation... 7 Summary

More information

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS The purpose of this chapter is to describe potential bus improvement strategies and potential impacts or implications associated with BRT implementation within the existing

More information

CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS 2 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION / PARKING PLAN FUTURE GARY DRIVE PRIMARY VEHICULAR CIRCULATION 90 SECONDARY VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PRIMARY SERVICE ACCESS

More information

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report Preparedby: ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

More information

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements For additional design details for Marymoor Subarea infrastructure, refer to the 2017 Marymoor Subarea Infrastructure Planning Report. STREET REQUIREMENTS

More information

CHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation

CHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation CHAPTER 3 Transportation and Circulation 3.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This chapter evaluates traffic circulation, transit, parking, pedestrian, bicycle, and rail operational conditions in the Project

More information

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES 82 EAST BENCH MASTER PLAN 07 Introduction The East Bench transportation system is a collection of slow moving, treelined residential streets and major arteries that are the

More information

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION BACKGROUND Active transportation, also known as nonmotorized transportation, is increasingly recognized as an important consideration when planning and

More information

To: The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note.

To: The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note. Technical Note Project: Histon Road / Milton Road, Cambridge Parking Surveys To: Andy Harrison Subject: Survey Report v1.6 From: Jonathan Barlow Date: 18 th February 2016 cc: Richard Jones / Dave Boddy

More information

5.0 Roadway System Plan

5.0 Roadway System Plan Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,

More information

Campus Planning Office Transportation Update

Campus Planning Office Transportation Update Campus Planning Office 2013 Transportation Update 3 Introduction 4 Mode Split of Trips 5 Mass Transit 8 Automobile 10 Bicycle 14 Pedestrian 15 Looking Forward The 2013 Transportation Update compiles data

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat

More information

Site Improvements

Site Improvements Sections Included In This Standard: 1.1 Bicycle Facilities 1.2 Guardrails 1.3 Parking Bumpers 1.4 Traffic Signage 1.5 Traffic Signals 1.6 Traffic Impact Studies 1.7 Vision Triangle 1.8 Bus Stop Shelters

More information

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT A 2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was assembled from data provided by the Castle Rock Police Department

More information

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2012 READ, VOORHEES & ASSOCIATES TORONTO, ONTARIO Read, Voorhees & Associates

More information

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities DATE: January 12, 2018 TO: ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2018-12 TAC Funding and Programming Committee PREPARED BY: Joe Barbeau, Senior

More information

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Appendix 2 City of Mississauga Lakeshore Road FINAL REPORT Transportation Review Study December 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Study Purpose

More information

Evaluating the Influence of R3 Treatments on Fishing License Sales in Pennsylvania

Evaluating the Influence of R3 Treatments on Fishing License Sales in Pennsylvania Evaluating the Influence of R3 Treatments on Fishing License Sales in Pennsylvania Prepared for the: Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Produced by: PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Tel (904)

More information

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas 3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas 3.9.1 Introduction Parks and other recreational facilities such as trails, bicycle routes, and open space are important community resources. This section discusses

More information

Wesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units

Wesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units Wesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units 1 Summary This report presents an analysis of the changes in traffic volumes in the Wesbrook Place neighbourhood associated with a redistribution

More information

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments 1 INTRODUCTION Maintaining a high quality of life is the essence of this plan for transit and non-motorized transportation in Butte County. Curbing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by reducing congestion,

More information

Parking & Transportation Update Spring Parking

Parking & Transportation Update Spring Parking Parking & Transportation Update Spring 2018 As the beginning of the Spring 2018 semester rapidly approaches, Mason students, faculty and staff are reminded that traffic on and around the Fairfax campus

More information