) Mark G. Benton, Sr. The Boeing Company. AIAA 2008 Joint Propulsion Conference Hartford, Connecticut July 23, 2008
|
|
- Kerry McKinney
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Crew and Cargo Landers for Human Exploration of Mars Vehicle System Design (AIAA ) The Boeing Company AIAA 2008 Joint Propulsion Conference Hartford, Connecticut July 23, 2008 Slide 1 of 25 Slides 2008
2 Spaceship Discovery Architecture for Human Solar System Exploration Spaceship Discovery Conceptual design study Four design reference missions DRM 1: Moon high-energy DRM 2: Mars low-energy DRM 3: Mars high-energy DRM 4: Callisto high-energy DRM 2 Summary Assembly in 556 km (300 nmi) altitude, circular Earth orbit Transfer orbit to Mars: 259 d Propulsive capture into 556 km (300 nmi), circular Mars orbit Wait time in Mars orbit: 454 d Transfer orbit to Earth: 259 d Propulsive capture into 1854 km (1000 nmi), circular Earth orbit Total mission duration: 972 d Two Types of Mars Landers LM2 piloted crew lander LM3 autonomous cargo lander Six landers transported to Mars (3) LM2 and (3) LM3 Engineering Module (EM) Closed Brayton Cycle (CBC) Electrical Gen. System (3) SSD-DRM2-v2 Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Engine (3) Deployable Solar / Thermal Shade (2) Main LH 2 Propellant Core Tank (CT) (4) Very Low Boil-off Cryo. Retention Sys. Abort Propulsion System (APS) Main Engine Main LH 2 Propellant Drop Tank (DT) (6) Spaceship Discovery Side View - Main Ship Artificial Gravity (AG) Centrifuge Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) Biological Shield (LH 2 & H 2 O) Spaceship Discovery Side View Cutaway Key Features Service Module (SM) 5-Port Docking Module (DM) Moon & Callisto Lander Module LM1 (DRMs 1, 4) Crew Module (CM) Mars Lander Modules LM2, LM3 (DRMs 2, 3) Reentry Module (RM) Spaceship Discovery with Six LM2/LM3 Landers Attached DRM2 Configuration for Trans-Mars Injection Slide 2 of 25 Slides 2008
3 Spaceship Discovery DRM 2 Mars Exploration Mission Details Mars Mission Assumptions 6-person crew Two manned landing attempts 1/2 of crew on surface at a time: 3 crew per mission 3 crew do science in orbit Base camp w/ cargo-only LM3 4.6 MT of cargo 6.0 MT nuclear gen. (40 kw) Each manned mission (1) LM2: Crew, 0.5 MT cargo (1) LM3: Hab., 4.0 MT cargo Extra (6 th ) lander: LM2 dedicated for rescue DRM2 Requirements Wait time at Mars = 454 days 7 d in orbit before 1 st landing 4 d between landing missions 2 nd mission ends 7 d before TEI Total surface time = 436 days Endurance for each mission: 218 d + 10% margin = 240 d LM2 can perform 24 d mission on its own (contingency) Surface rendezvous with LM3 enables full 218 d mission Slide 3 of 25 Slides Trans-Mars Injection (TMI) Burn Mars Orbit Insertion (MOI) Burn 2008
4 Mars Lander Design Challenges Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) Aero braking selected as primary deceleration method (to minimize mass) Difficult to decelerate in Mars thin atmosphere, but aeroheating is significant Advantages of Viking shape for aero braking (70-deg. sphere-cone forebody) Low ballistic coefficient, C B = m / C d S Ref (nominal 64 kg/m 2 ) High hypersonic C d, good stability, and tolerable peak deceleration A flight-proven shape, with extensive aerodynamic data Used for every Mars landing to date or planned (But only up to 2.0 MT) Large mass ( T) needed for sufficient cargo for human exploration ~1.0 MT Viking entry vehicles had C B of 64 kg/m 2 with a base diameter of m An 80 MT entry vehicle would need a 32 m dia. heatshield (deemed impractical) Divided 80 MT into four 20 MT landers, each w/ more achievable diameter of 16 m Inflatable heatshield extension (HSE) enables low ballistic coefficient Increases base dia. From 7.5 to 16.0 m (achieves C B of 66 kg/m 2 nominal Viking ) Maximum internal clear diameter of launch fairings assumed to be 8.0 m Inflatable heatshields have been studied for many years and show feasibility Implementation of CG offset needed for Apollo-type steering Not possible to relocate sufficient mass to achieve required 0.28 m CG offset Rigid heatshield/hse asymmetric to vehicle centerline but symmetric to Viking OML Vehicle flies hypersonically at 3 degrees of incidence with forebody = 0 Implementation of parachute deceleration and powered descent (PD) phases Earlier design had 2-stg. parachute system, but insufficient time for 2 nd stage to deploy Parachute sizing trade used to size larger single parachute w/ longer PD phase Parachute based on 19.7 m dia. disk-gap-band (DGB) flight tested in Viking program Parachute diameter increased to 27 m, vehicle total mass increased to 21.5 MT SSD-LM2-v4 Side View with Lander Vertical Axis Normal HSE Attached to Rigid Central Heatshield Scaled Viking Lander OML Side View w/ Vert. Axis at 3 deg. Incidence Front View w/ Lander Vertical Axis Normal Slide 4 of 25 Slides 2008
5 The need for six landers Two pairs of LM2 & LM3 landers permit two independent, manned landing attempts 3 rd LM3: dedicated cargo/power 3 rd LM2: dedicated rescue veh. Requirements & Assumptions Mars Landing Mission Design Lander design considerations EDL for elevation 0.0 m or lower ~ 1/2 of equatorial surface 250 km orbit based on a study for Mars sample return mission Two-stg ascent reduces EDL landed mass stress vs SSTO Stable, w/ sufficient altitude to enable rescue of crew Enables LM2 abort-to-orbit during powered descent Able to return to parking orbit from latitude degrees Utilizes Mars 241 m/s rotational speed at equator Booster allocation 120 m/s for 2.0 deg. plane change Orbiter allocation 120 m/s for 2.0 deg. plane change & 32 m/s for orbital maneuvering Entry Interface h = 150 km V Rel = km/s Descent Xfer Orbit h A = 550 km h P = 125 km Deorbit Burn V = km/s a b a LM2/LM3 EDL Mission Profile LM2/LM3 Landing Zones (a, b) EDL Powered Descent V T = km/s Total Orbital Maneuvering, Deorbit, & Powered Descent Burns V T = km/s Orbiter Ascent Burn 2 V 2 = km/s Orbiter Xfer Orbit h A = 556 km h P = 250 km Orbiter Ascent Burn 1 V 1 = km/s LM2 Ascent Mission Profile Booster Ascent Burn V T = km/s Intermediate Circular Orbit V = km/s Parking Orbit H = 556 km V = km/s Slide 5 of 25 Slides 2008
6 Mars Landing Mission Description Launch, Transit, and Landing Preps Launch and Assembly (a) Modular Spaceship Discovery design - Assembled in LEO Modules launched into 556 km (300 nmi) assembly orbit Assembly completed during approximately one year Max. launch dimensions: 32.0 m long x 8.0 m dia. Max. mass 50 MT incl. fairing & airborne support equip. (2) 21.5 MT LM2 / LM3 landers launched together Outbound Transit and Landing Preparations (b - e) (6) landers docked to Spaceship Discovery docking module (3) LM2 crew landers (3) LM3 cargo landers Hibernation mode during transit Capture into Mars parking orbit Lander undocks in Mars orbit HSE inflated and checked out Deorbit burn injects vehicle into descent transfer orbit (a) Notional Launch Configuration Inflatable HSE Stowed Under Fixed Central Heatshield (c) In Transit HSE Stowed (d) Inflate Heatshield Extension (b) Outbound Transit (e) Deorbit Burn Slide 6 of 25 Slides 2008
7 Three Main EDL s Aero Deceleration Mars Landing Mission Description Overview of EDL s Start: 150 km entry interface Deploy parachute M = 3.0 Parachute Deceleration Full inflation M = 2.7 Jettison heatshield, HSE, landing gear doors M = 0.76 Powered Descent Jettison parachute M = 0.74, start rocket engines End: Soft landing MOLA Altitude (km) Axial Velocity vs. Altitude ,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Velocity (m/s) Drag, Lift, and Thrust Forces vs. Time 1, Aero Entry Deceleration Parachute Deceleration Powered Descent Start DGB Deployment M = 3.0, h = 13.9 km Jettison Heatshield, HSE, & Landing Gear Doors M = 0.76, h = 5.5 km Force (kn) Drag Force Lift Force Thrust Force DGB Fully Inflated M = 2.7, h = 13.3 km Jettison Parachute & Start Powered Descent M = 0.74, h = 4.4 km Start Hover h = 25 m Soft Landing h = 0 m Time From Entry Interface (s) EDL Mission Profile Final Descent Slide 7 of 25 Slides 2008
8 Mars Landing Mission Description EDL: Entry & Parachute s Aero Braking (a, b, and c) Aerodynamic deceleration RCS/ offset CG control for Apollo-type lift & steering 4.7 g maximum deceleration DGB parachute deceleration Redundant DGB parachute carried (2 for 1 redundancy) 3.3 g maximum deceleration Jettison heatshield (8) solid motors fire for 5 s for clean separation, drive heatshield 1.3 km downrange Axial Acceleration vs. Time (a) Atmospheric Entry (b) Parachute Deceleration Aero Entry Deceleration Parachute Deceleration Powered Descent Acceleration (Earth g's) Time From Entry Interface (s) (c) Jettison Heatshield and Deploy Landing Gear Slide 8 of 25 Slides 2008
9 Mars Landing Mission Description EDL: Powered Descent Powered Descent (d, e) Gravity turn and vertical descent at T/W = 2.0 (constant) DS: (8) throttleable descent engines (8 for 6 redundancy) LM2: gimballed main engine x-fed w/ descent propellant LM3: (5) gimballed descent engines (same type as DS) LM2 abort-to-orbit during any point in powered descent Descent section jettisoned Switch to ascent propellants (d) Gravity Turn: T/W = 2.0 Flight Path and Thrust Vector Angles vs. Time - Powered Descent Thrust Vector or Flight Path Angle (Deg.) Flight Path Angle Gravity Turn Thrust Vector Angle Vertical Descent Timed Hover Soft Landing Time From Entry Interface (s) (e) Vertical Descent: T/W = 2.0 Slide 9 of 25 Slides 2008
10 Mars Landing Mission Description Powered Descent, Continued Hover & Soft Landing (f, g, h) LM2: Main engine shut down LM3: (5) Central eng. shut down Timed hover: Up to 10 s Determine final trajectory to avoid surface obstacles Descent: 0.74 < T/W < 1.29 Soft landing at vertical velocity less than 2.0 m/s LM2 abort-to-orbit during any point in powered descent Booster engine ignited Descent section jettisoned (f) Hover: T/W = 1.0 T/W and Axial Acceleration vs. Time - Powered Descent T/W (Non-Dim.) or Acceleration (Earth g's) Gravity Turn Vehicle T/W Axial Acceleration Vertical Descent Timed Hover Soft Landing (g) Descent: T/W = Time From Entry Interface (s) (h) Final Braking: T/W = 1.29 Slide 10 of 25 Slides 2008
11 Mars Landing Mission Description Mars Surface Operations Mars Surface Ops (a, b, & c) (2) LM3s land before LM2 LM3 w/ nuclear generator and 4.6 MT cargo (LM3-GEN) LM3 w/ crew habitat and 4.0 MT cargo (LM3-HAB) (2) LM3s traverse the surface Up to 1.0 km/d Rendezvous & wait for LM2 LM2 lands near LM3 site Homes on LM3 beacons Lands within 10 km Waits for LM3s, up to 24 d LM3s traverse the surface Up to 1.0 km/d Rendezvous w/ LM2 Base camp setup LM3s unload cargo LM3 GEN moves ~500 m (connected w/ power cable) LM3 HAB docks w/ LM2 Three-level LM3 crew habitat 58 m 3 pressurized volume Protection from radiation and dust storms Ultraflex 5.5 m dia., Steerable Solar Array (2 places) 5.0 kw Tot. (a) LM3 Landed Configuration Surface Docking Adaptor (2 places) Surface Docking System (b) LM2 Landed Configuration 5 cm H 2 O Radiation Shield HAB LSS Supercritical LO 2 Tk. (6 pl) HAB LSS H 2 O Tank (Toroidal) Slide 11 of 25 Slides (c) LM2 and LM3 HAB Docked on Surface for Long-Term Mission 2008
12 Mars Landing Mission Description Mars Surface Ops., Continued Mars Surface Ops (d and e) Base camp inventory LM3-HAB docked w/ LM2 LM3-GEN provides power Cargo: Rover, inflatable habitat, scientific and communications gear Preparations for LM2 ascent Crew stores samples in LM2 Crew leave PLSS units behind, use ELSS for suits LM3-HAB undocks and moves a safe distance away Preparations for 2 nd mission LM3s on surface wait for 2 nd landing mission (LM2 & LM3) Surface rendezvous as before Optional Capabilities 2 nd landing mission could utilize both LM3-HABs (shown) 3 rd LM3 could carry ISRU plant, enabling entire crew of 6 to land LM2 contingency mission 24 day duration Small rover and science equipment (500 kg cargo) Slide 12 of 25 Slides (d) LM2 (Center) Docked w/ Two LM3 Habitat/ Cargo Landers (2 nd LM3 Optional) Top View of Notional Mars Base Camp 2008 (e) LM3 w/ 40 kw Nuclear Generator and Cargo Power Cable
13 Mars Landing Mission Description Ascent, Rendezvous, & Docking s Booster Ascent (a, b, and c) Two-stage LM2 launches from descent section Ascent to 250 km intermediate orbit using booster propellants Same configuration for abort to orbit in powered descent Main ship could rescue crew in intermediate orbit if required Booster jettisoned in orbit Orbiter Ascent (d, e) Orbiter maneuvers for correct orbital alignment Orbiter uses Hohmann transfer to raise orbit to 556 km orbit Orbiter performs rendezvous and docking w/ main ship Crew transfers to main ship Orbiter jettisoned in orbit Preparations for 2 nd manned landing or return to earth (a) Ascent to Intermediate Orbit (b) Ascent to Intermediate Orbit End of 1 st Mission (c) Jettison Booster in Intermed. Orbit (d) Orbiter Ascent to Parking Orbit End of 2 nd Mission (e) Rendezvous and Docking Slide 13 of 25 Slides 2008
14 Vehicle Systems (a through d) Key Enabling Technologies LM2 / LM3 Mars Exploration Landers Larger diameter Viking heritage, DGB parachutes (up to 30 m) Inflatable, lightweight, damagetolerant, ablative heatshield Long-term, low-loss storage systems for cryogenic liquids Precision GN&C for EDL LM3 initial targeting LM2 landing near LM3 Exploration Systems Exploration equipment Life support systems Power generation systems Rugged space suits Inflatable habitats Rover vehicles Avionics & communications Scientific equipment In-Situ Resource Utilization to Reduce consumables Increase scientific returns (a) DGB Parachutes (b) Inflatables for HSE (b) Cryo Consumable Storage Slide 14 of 25 Slides (d) Precision GN&C for Entry, Descent, and Landing 2008
15 Summary Spaceship Discovery LM2 & LM3 Mars Exploration Landers Conclusion LM2 & LM3: Proposed solution for landing humans on Mars Part of Spaceship Discovery -or- Architectures utilizing MOR Build on a successful heritage Viking geometry EDL concept for multiple Mars unmanned landers Flight tested parachutes Inflatable HSE enables a low C B in a reasonable fairing size Extensively studies & tests show concept is feasible Designed for crew safety Descent abort-to-orbit Rescue on surface Rescue in orbit Dual mission sets of landers Enhance mission redundancy Design & CONOPS minimizes developmental risk and cost Flight-tested HW & methods LM2 & LM3 commonality Slide 15 of 25 Slides Trans-Earth Injection (TEI) Burn LM2 Ascent to Orbit (Booster) Burn 2008
16 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM2 Crew Lander Elevation Views Abbreviations and Acronyms ADM Array Drive Mechanism AS Ascent Section ASB Ascent Booster ASO Ascent Orbiter DGB Disk-Gap-Band DOT Deorbit Thruster DS Descent Section FDE Fixed Descent Engine GDE Gimballed Descent Eng. HAB Crew Habitat HS - Heatshield HSE Heatshield Extension HSM HS Separation Motor LGR Landing Gear LSS Life Support System ME Main Engine OML Outer Moldline PRP Propellant PRS Pressurization RCS Reaction Control System SCR Supercritical SDA Surface Docking Adaptor SDS Surface Docking System VDW Vehicle Drive Wheel VDM Vehicle Drive Motor Slide 16 of 25 Slides SSD-LM2-v4 ASO: Crew Cabin Tunnel to Air Lock in DS Air Lock in DS DS DOT (8 pl) & RCS Fuel Cell Cutaway: AS, Airlock, & Cargo Bay Descent / Ascent ME AS w/ DS Cutaway: Fuel Cell Bays 2008 ASB: PRP and PRS Tanks & ME SDA (2 pl) AS RCS Thruster Quad HSM (8 pl) DS Fuel Cell /LSS SCR LH 2 Tks. (2 pl) DS Fuel Cell /LSS SCR LO 2 Tks. (2 pl) FDE (8 pl) Avionics Bay DS PRP & PRS Tanks DS Thrust Cylinder Structure Pri. Struc. Cutaway: PRP/LGR Bays (LGR Stowed) Landed CG Landing Pad Cutaway: PRP/LGR Bays (LGR Depl.) Deploy w/ Pyros, Spring & Gravity Assist LGR Door (Jett. w/ HS) DS PRP & PRS Tanks m Stroke, & m Leveling Strut
17 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM2 Crew Lander Section Views LM2-Specific Design Features Two-way transport of crews between Mars orbit and surface Single-stage Descent Section (DS) Two-stage Ascent Section (AS) 1 st stg: Ascent Booster (ASB) 2 nd stg: Ascent Orbiter (ASO) Gimballed, fixed thrust, ME for descent and ascent: 98.2 kn Crew: 3 (4 for rescue) Payload: 500 / 140 kg (DS/AS) Endurance:27 / 3 d (DS/AS) DS power: LH 2 / LO 2 fuel cells AS power: Batteries Airlock for surface egress Surface docking adaptors (2) Cargo bay for contingency mission payload (500 kg) Designed for abort to orbit during descent and landing Coverage during all phases of the powered descent SSD-LM2-v4 DS DOT (8 pl) DS Avionics Bay DS RCS Crew Cabin LSS SCR LO 2 Tanks Tunnel to Airlock in DS Tunnel to Airlock in DS RCS Thruster Quad Ascent Orbiter Upper Level Crew Seat LSS H 2 O Tanks Tunnel to SDA in DS AS Orbiter ME (6 pl) DS DGB Parachute Mortar (2 pl) ASO PRP Tank (8 pl) DS Surface Access Door Pair (2 pl) ASB PRP and PRS Tanks & ME DS RCS Thruster (8 pl) Fuel Cell Fixed DE (8 pl) Airlock in DS SDA in DS (2 pl) ASB & DS Mid-Level (LGR Stowed) Cargo Bay DS Fuel Cell/ LSS SCR LH2 Tanks (2 pl) DS-AS Pyro Sep. Bolts (6 pl) Fuel Cell / LSS SCR LO2 Tks. (2 pl) PRP/ PRS Tks. ASO Lower Level and DS Upper Level DS Lower Level (LGR Depl.) Air Lock Slide 17 of 25 Slides 2008
18 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM3 Cargo Lander Elevation Views LM3-Specific Design Features One-way autonomous transport of cargo to surface of Mars Design commonality with LM2: Descent section (DS) Overall geometry Mass properties Engines & subsystems EDL flight profile Surface power: Solar arrays (5 kw) and batteries Surface mobility: 90 m/hr during daylight conditions (~ 1 km/day) Surface docking system (to mate to an LM2 or another LM3) Surface Docking Adaptor (1) Crew Habitat (HAB) In place of LM2 AS Net landed cargo: 10.6 T LSS consum./ food (6.6 T) Exploration equip. (4.0 T) Mission endurance: 240 d LM2 maximum (30 d) LM3 maximum (210 d) 218 d + 10% margin SSD-LM3-v4 5 cm H 2 O Radiation Shield SDA HAB LSS SCR LO 2 Tk. (6 pl) Air Lock DS DOT (8 pl) & RCS DS RCS Thruster (8 pl) DS Batteries 3-Level HAB Cutaway: HAB, Airlock, & Cargo Bay 3-Level HAB RCS Thruster Pair SDS (Stowed) LSS H 2 O Toroidal Tank DS DGB Chute Mortar (2 pl) DS ADM (2 pl) DS Solar Array (Stowed) (2 pl) GDE (5 pl) FDE (8 pl) HAB w/ DS Cutaway: Cargo Bays Avionics Bay DS PRP & PRS Tanks DS Thrust Cylinder Structure Pri. Struc. Steerable VDW/ VDM Bogey Cutaway: PRP/LGR Bays (LGR Stowed) Landed CG Cutaway: PRP/LGR Bays (LGR Depl.) Bogey Link Folds for LGR Stowage LGR Door (Jett. w/ HS) DS PRP & PRS Tanks Bogey Link Extends to Land, Folds to Traverse Slide 18 of 25 Slides 2008
19 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM3 Cargo Lander Section Views LM2/LM3 Common Features Heatshield OML scaled from Viking 70-degree sphere-cone EDL flight profile Apollo steering: CG offset and lifting for precision guidance Lightweight composite structures Storable MMH & N 2 O 4 propellants 6-axis reaction control system 3 yr service life (DRM 2) SSD-LM3-v4 Dining Area Kitchen Area Computer Station and Bookshelves Ladder to HAB Mid- Level Lounge w/ Entertainment Center DS Surface Access Door Pair HAB LSS Toroidal H 2 O Storage Tk. DS RCS Thruster (8 pl) HAB Lower Level Food Storage Bay SDS (Stowed) Solar Array (Stowed) & ADM (2 pl) HAB LSS SCR LO 2 Tks. (6 pl) SDA in DS LM2/LM3 Common DS Primary structure Descent propellant system Descent engines (8) Deorbit thrusters (8) RCS thrusters (16) HS, HSE, and thermal protection DGB Parachutes (2) Primary & redundant Landing gear Air lock & cargo bay LM3 has (2) cargo bays in place of LM2 fuel cell bays DS Avionics Bay HAB Upper Level, Crew Living Space DS DOT (8 pl) DS RCS HAB: Berthing, Medical, Shower, & Toilet HAB Mid-Level & DS Upper Level Tunnel to SDS in DS Bunk (Stowed) Ladder to HAB Lower Level Tunnel to Air Lock in DS Battery HAB Lower Level & DS Mid-Level (LGR Stowed) DS PRP & PRS Tks. Cargo Bay Air Lock SDS (Stowed) Cargo Bay DS Lower Level (LGR Depl.) Solar Array Stowed (2 pl) Slide 19 of 25 Slides 2008
20 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data DGB Parachute Sizing Trade Mach Number for Heatshield Separation, DGB Jettison, & Start of Powered Descent Mach Number m DGB Simulation Did Not Close Increasing Risk for HS Sep & Start of PD Selected 27 m DGB Parachute Diameter Increasing Risk in Technology Developmt. PD Start w/ M > 0.9 Not Considered Feasible DGB Parachute Diameter (m) Mass (kg) Mach Number for HS Separation, DGB Jettison, & Start of PD m DGB Simulation Did Not Close PD Start w/ M > 0.9 Not Considered Feasible Increasing Mass Penalty for Smaller DGB Dia. Parachute Sizing Parametric Selected 27 m DGB Parachute Diameter Decreasing Mass Benefit for Larger DGB Dia. Propellant, DGB, & Structures Mass Propellant Consumed for Soft Landing Installed DGB Parachute Mass Delta Descent Sect. Structures Mass DGB Parachute Diameter (m) Data for Parachute Sizing Parametric: DGB Parachute Diameter (m) = DGB parachute Area (m 2 ) = DGB Parachute Installed Mass (kg) = Mach No. for Jettisoning DGBs and Start of PD (Non-d.) = Velocity for Jettisoning DGBs and Start of PD (m/s) = Altitude for Jettisoning DGBs and Start of PD (m) = 8,322 6,516 5,719 5,200 4,770 4,423 4,089 3,836 3,249 Total Propellant Mass Consumed for Soft Landing (kg) = 3, , , , , , , , ,353.3 Max. Axial Force During DGB Deploymt. (kn) = Axial Force Normalized to a 22.0 m DGB Parachute = Upper Descent Section DGB B/U Structure Mass (kg) = Descent Section Propellant Tank Structural Mass (kg) = Descent Section Structural Mass Changes (kg) = Delta Struct. Mass Normalized to a 22 m DGB (Non-d.) = Delta Descent Section Structure Mass (kg) = Total Mass of DGBs, Propellant, & Structure (kg) = Slide 20 of 25 Slides 2008
21 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data Descent Flight Performance Axial Velocity vs. Altitude Lander and Heatshield Trajectories ,000 5,000 Heatshield Traject. Lander Trajectory MOLA Altitude (km) 10 MOLA Altitude (m) 4,000 3,000 2, , ,000 Velocity (m/s) Distance from Separation (m) Lander and Heatshield Altitudes vs. Time 6,000 5,000 Heatshield Traject. Lander Trajectory MOLA Altitude (m) 4,000 3,000 2,000 1, Time from Separation (s) Slide 21 of 25 Slides 2008
22 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM2 Ascent Flight Performance Altitude vs. Inertial Velocity Components Flight Path and Thrust Vector Angles vs. Time Burnout MOLA Altitude (km) Vertical Velocity Burnout Horizontal Velocity - Includes m/s Equatorial Rotation Angle from Horizontal (Degrees) Thrust Vector Angle Flight Path Angle ,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Velocity (m/s) Elapsed Time From Ignition (s) Altitude vs. Acceleration Components Axial Thrust and Drag Forces vs. Time Burnout Thrust Force MOLA Altitude (km) Vertical Acceleration Horizontal Acceleration Burnout Axial Force (kn) Drag Force Acceleration (m/s 2 ) Elapsed Time From Ignition (s) Slide 22 of 25 Slides 2008
23 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data LM2 Abort-to to-orbit Flight Performance (a) Altitude vs. Time for Abort Scenarios 250 MOLA Altitude (km) Abort Scenario 1 Abort Scenario 2 Abort Scenario 3 Abort Scenario 4 Abort Scenario Elapsed Time From Abort (s) Altitude vs. Time for Abort Scenarios 5,000 4,000 MOLA Altitude (m) 3,000 2,000 Abort Scenario 1 Abort Scenario 2 Abort Scenario 3 Abort Scenario 4 Abort Scenario 5 1, Elapsed Time from Abort (s) Slide 23 of 25 Slides 2008
24 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data Dimensions and Mass Properties Ascent Orbiter Lander Module 2 (LM2) Ascent Booster Total Ascent Descent Section Overall Vehicle Lander Module 3 (LM3) Payload Carrier Descent Section Overall Vehicle Dimensions (m) Length Overall Diameter * Mass (kg) Dry Payload (Incl. Crew) ** , ,000 4,000 Structure, Tanks, Insulation ,213 1,547 2,760 2,197 1,897 4,094 ECLSS & Avionics Parachute System Main Engine (Installed) Reaction Control System Dry Mass Margin (15%) Life Support Consumables , ,615 RCS Propellant (Usable) Main Propellant (Usable) 231 9,950 10,181 3,461 13, ,461 3,461 Total Mass 2,050 11,150 13,200 8,300 21,500 9,790 11,710 21,500 Dry Mass Fraction *** * Diameters for LM2 and LM3 in the Overall Vehicle columns shows dimensions with inflatable HSE inflated. ** For LM3, Includes 500 kg allocation for module-module surface docking system. *** = (Payload + Structure/Insulation/Shielding + Engines & Subsystems (Including Propellant Residuals)) / Total Mass Slide 24 of 25 Slides Ascent Orbiter* Descent Section Overall Vehicle * Ascent Orbiter consumables are reserved for ascent and contingency and are not included in surface endurance calculations Lander Module 2 (LM2) Lander Module 3 (LM3) Total Payload Carrier Descent Section Overall Vehicle Usable on Surface* Design Assumptions (kg/man-day) Breathing Oxygen Water Dried & Condensed Food Endurance on Surface of Mars Total (man-days) Crewmembers (days) Consumables Mass (kg) Breathing Oxygen Water ,725 4,725 5,339 Dry Food ,260 1,260 1,422 Total ,615 6,615 7,540
25 Backup: LM2/LM3 Design Data Nominal and Abort Performance Major Propulsive Burns Ascent Orbiter Orbit Raising Lander Module 2 (LM2) Ascent Booster Total Ascent Booster Ascent Descent Section Overall Vehicle Deorbit & Braking Lander Module 3 (LM3) Payload Carrier Descent Section Overall Vehicle Deorbit & Braking Req'd. Delta Velocity (km/s) V - Ideal, Req'd. for Burn V - Maneuvers & Losses V - Subtotal V - Total Incl. 1% FPR * Performance Parameters ** Specific Impulse (I SP ) Mass Ratio (M i / M f ) Burn Propellant Fraction Initial Thrust / Weight *** Final Thrust / Weight *** Mass (kg) Operating Empty Mass 1,819 1,200 3,019 4,839 7,858 9,790 8,249 18,039 Main Propellant for Burn 231 9,950 10,181 3,461 13, ,461 3,461 Total Mass 2,050 11,150 13,200 8,300 21,500 9,790 11,710 21,500 * FPR = Flight Performance Reserve ** Heat shield (772 kg) jettisoned before landing braking. *** For AS Booster & Orbiter, Referenced to Mars' gravity (g M = m/s 2 ); For DS During Powered Descent. Orbit Requirements, Abort 250 km Baseline Scenarios 1, 2 ATO 1 ATO 2 ATO 3 ATO 4 ATO 5, & Baseline Ascent Orbit Ascent Initial Conditions Initiation Altitude (m) 4,423 3,015 2,010 1, Initial Flight Path Angle (deg.) Initial Horiz. Relative Velocity (m/s) Initial Vertical Relative Velocity (m/s) Results Altitude Minimum in Trajectory (m) 1, Altitude Required / Achieved (km) Velocity Required / Achieved 3 (m/s) 3,553 3,417 3,349 3,348 3,391 3,482 3,553 Add'l. V Req'd. for Inter. Orb. (m/s) Ascent Orbiter V Available 4 (m/s) V Deficit for Orbit Raising (m/s) Abort Scenario 1 initiated from the start of powered descent. 2 Abort Scenario 5 initiated from a low-altitude hover. 3 Velocity required for 250 km intermed. orbit includes allocation of 6 m/s for up to 12.5 degrees of launch latitude (equatorial ascent would need 6 m/s less V) plus an allocation of 120 m/s for 2.0 deg. plane change during ascent. 4 Ascent Orbiter delta velocity available to augment booster performance includes an allocation of 120 m/s for a Slide 25 of 25 Slides 2.0 degree plane change during orbit raising plus 32 m/s for rendezvous and docking for a total of 182 m/s. 2008
Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms. Team C5 Matthew Marcus Chris O'Hare Alex Slafkosky Scott Wingate
Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Matthew Marcus Chris O'Hare Alex Slafkosky Scott Wingate Presentation Overview Design requirements Initial crew capsule design choice Pressure vessel design Pressure loads
More informationLaunch Vehicle Performance Estimation:
Launch Vehicle Performance Estimation: John Schilling john.schilling@alumni.usc.edu (661) 718-0955 3 December 2009 Precise determination of launch vehicle performance typically requires the use of three-
More informationThe Quarter Pounder A Vehicle to Launch Quarter Pound Payloads to Low Earth Orbit
The Quarter Pounder A Vehicle to Launch Quarter Pound Payloads to Low Earth Orbit Ed LeBouthillier 1 Contents Introduction... 3 Requirements... 4 Orbital Altitudes... 4 Orbital Velocities... 4 Summary...4
More informationAltair Constellation Returns Humans to the Moon
Altair Cover Page Altair Constellation Returns Humans to the Moon Clinton Dorris Deputy Manager Altair Project Office Constellation EXPLORATION ROADMAP 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
More informationSmart Divert: A New Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture
Smart Divert: A New Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture AE89 MS Special Problems Report Space Systems Design Lab (SSDL) Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta,
More informationIAC-06-D4.1.2 CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CEV AND PLANETARY SURFACE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING Larry Bell
IAC-06-D4.1.2 CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CEV AND PLANETARY SURFACE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING Larry Bell Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA), University of Houston, USA e-mail: lbell@uh.edu
More informationPresentation Contents
OTOS Presentation Contents Mission Requirements Mission Operations Architecture Design Reference Missions Habitat Configuration CONOPS Life Support Contingency Accommodations Plans for Experimental Testing
More informationSmart Divert: A New Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture
7th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 9, Orlando, Florida AIAA 9-5 Smart Divert: A New Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Michael
More informationCubeSat Balloon Drag Devices: Meeting the 25-Year De-Orbit Requirement
CubeSat Balloon Drag Devices: Meeting the 25-Year De-Orbit Requirement Jerry K. Fuller, David Hinkley, and Siegfried W. Janson The Aerospace Corporation Physical Science Laboratories August, 2010 The Aerospace
More informationWATER ROCK. Lawndart The rocket goes straight up and comes down nose first at high speed. Disadvantages
Water Rocket Recovery Index What is a recovery system? A recovery system is a feature of a rocket that allows it to come back to Earth with minimal damage. Introduction This guide is intended to serve
More informationHuman Factors and Habitability
Human Factors and Habitability Discussion of Midterm Required Crew Volumes Human Physiological Adaptation to 0G Workstation Design Restraint Design Ideal Cabin Layout Habitability in Partial Gravity Stowage
More informationAssessing Compliance with United States Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Guidelines
Assessing Compliance with United States Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Guidelines R. L. Kelley 1, D. R. Jarkey 2 1. Jacobs, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, USA 2. HX5 - Jacobs JETS
More informationNanoRacks/Quad-M Rideshare Overview. Michael D. Johnson 10/12/2016
NanoRacks/Quad-M Rideshare Overview Michael D. Johnson 10/12/2016 Why NanoRacks/Quad-M Team? NRCSD Kaber Cygnus External Deployer NREP NR Airlock Dragon Trunk Deployer Centaur Aft Bulkhead Deployer Centaur
More informationIn parallel with steady gains in battery energy and power density, the coming generation of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) will enjoy increased
In parallel with steady gains in battery energy and power density, the coming generation of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) will enjoy increased range, endurance, and operational capability by exploiting
More informationIntroduction to Habitability
Introduction to Habitability Required Crew Volumes! Human Physiological Adaptation to 0G! Workstation Design! Restraint Design! Ideal Cabin Layout! Habitability in Partial Gravity! Stowage! Various Examples
More informationTeam Members. Surrey Space Centre (SSC): Study lead, payloads, ADCS (with Prof. Bong Wie), SK platform, sail technologies
A Solar Kite Mission to Study the Earth's Magneto-tail Dr. Vaios Lappas C. Underwood, Luis M. Gomes, B. Wie C. McInnes, L. Tarabini, K. Wallace + 18th AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference 18 AIAA/USU Small
More informationCrew Systems Design Project Group A8. Chrissy Doeren Kip Hart Kiran Patel Alex Slafkosky
Crew Systems Design Project Group A8 Chrissy Doeren Kip Hart Kiran Patel Alex Slafkosky Project Overview Objective: design a crewed spacecraft for a low cost lunar mission Crew: 3-95th percentile men Duration:
More informationUNITED KINGDOM ROCKETRY ASSOCIATION STUDY GUIDE SAFETY OFFICERS EXAMINATION AND LEVEL II FLIGHT CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION
UNITED KINGDOM ROCKETRY ASSOCIATION STUDY GUIDE SAFETY OFFICERS EXAMINATION AND LEVEL II FLIGHT CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION Page 1 of 15 This document is published by the Council of the United Kingdom Rocketry
More informationCONVENTIONAL ROCKET PROPULSION NON-CONVENTIONAL PROPULSION SOLAR SAILS TETHERS ELECTRIC SAILS
CONVENTIONAL ROCKET PROPULSION NON-CONVENTIONAL PROPULSION SOLAR SAILS TETHERS ELECTRIC SAILS THE REASON? DISTANCE!!! CONVENTIONAL ROCKET PROPULSION NON-CONVENTIONAL PROPULSION SOLAR SAILS TETHERS ELECTRIC
More informationTECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS
Off Airport Ops Guide TECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS Note: This document suggests techniques and procedures to improve the safety of off-airport operations. It assumes that pilots have received
More informationPreliminary Cost Analysis MARYLAND. Cost Sources Vehicle-level Costing Heuristics Applications Learning Curves Program-Level Analysis
Cost Sources Vehicle-level Costing Heuristics Applications Learning Curves Program-Level Analysis 2003 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Cost Analysis Direct Costs - directly
More informationThe Mars Science Laboratory Flight Software A Platform for Science and Mobility
The Mars Science Laboratory Flight Software A Platform for Science and Mobility Dr. Kathryn Anne Weiss, MSL FSW Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2012 California Institute of
More informationHow to Do Flight Testing for TARC. Trip Barber NAR TARC Manager
How to Do Flight Testing for TARC Trip Barber NAR TARC Manager The TARC Cycle Learn the rules and basic rocketry Design and fly your rocket on the computer Build your rocket to your design with real hardware
More informationCollege of Engineering
College of Engineering Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering MAE-250, Section 001 Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Final Project Bottle Rocket Written By: Jesse Hansen Connor Petersen
More informationJAXA-RM E The Ascent Plan of GCOM-W1 to the Afternoon Constellation (A-Train) March 2012 Toru YAMAMOTO *1, Ryo NAKAMURA *2, Toshitaka SASAKI *3,
JAXA-RM-11-014E The Ascent Plan of GCOM-W1 to the Afternoon Constellation (A-Train) March 2012 Toru YAMAMOTO *1, Ryo NAKAMURA *2, Toshitaka SASAKI *3, Kazunori SOMEYA *2, Masaaki MOKUNO *3, Norimasa ITO
More informationCrew Systems Project ENAE 483 Fall Team A2: Douglas Astler Stephanie Bilyk Kevin Lee Grant McLaughlin Rajesh Yalamanchili
Crew Systems Project ENAE 483 Fall 2012 Team A2: Douglas Astler Stephanie Bilyk Kevin Lee Grant McLaughlin Rajesh Yalamanchili Presentation Overview Requirements and Assumptions Trade studies and life
More informationModular Mars Analog Settlements. 2013, 2017 Kent Nebergall, All Rights Reserved.
Modular Mars Analog Settlements BEYOND THE LANDER KENT NEBERGALL Lander versus Settlement Analog Goals Lander Analog Goals High Fidelity to Space-X MCT form factor (10 M Cylinder) Micro-Settlement Analog
More informationFlight Systems Verification & Validation Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing
Flight Systems Verification & Validation Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Cj Giovingo Allen Chen, Mallory Lefland, Aaron Stehura, Gregory Villar International Planetary Probe Workshop June 12, 2018
More informationExploration Series. MODEL ROCKET Interactive Physics Simulation Page 01
MODEL ROCKET ------- Interactive Physics Simulation ------- Page 01 How high will your model rocket fly? At liftoff, the rocket engine is ignited and a thrust force is generated. The rocket accelerates
More informationRATE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SOUNDING ROCKETS
RATE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SOUNDING ROCKETS Josef Ettl, Johann Pfänder German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-834 Wessling, Germany e-mail: josef.ettl@dlr.de johann.pfaender@dlr.de, 1. ABSTRACT DLR/Moraba has a
More information5.0 Neutral Buoyancy Test
5.0 Neutral Buoyancy Test Montgolfier balloons use solar energy to heat the air inside the balloon. The balloon used for this project is made out of a lightweight, black material that absorbs the solar
More informationGive Wings to Imagination
Give Wings to Imagination Water rocket uses water as a propellant. PRINCIPLE It is based on the NEWTON S THIRD LAW OF MOTION. For a simple model, water rocket consists of a bottle having water above
More informationEntry Descent and Landing Tools
Entry Descent and Landing Tools Steve Lingard Vorticity Ltd Oxfordshire,UK Content Introduction Entry and Descent Dynamics Tools Airbag Design Environment LS-DYNA Applications Entry system dynamics Inflatable
More informationROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher
Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher Mini-Project 3 requires you to use MATLAB to model the trajectory of a tennis ball being shot from a tennis ball launcher to a player. The tennis ball trajectory model
More informationMETNET Mission for Mars. MetNet. Atmospheric science network for Mars
MetNet Atmospheric science network for Mars A.-M. Harri (1), R. Pellinen (1), V. Linkin (2), K. Pichkadze (3), M. Uspensky (1), T. Siili (1), A. Lipatov (2), H. Savijärvi (4), V. Vorontsov (3), J.Semenov
More informationMars Precision Landing Using Guided Parachutes John B. McKinney 1 The Boeing Company, Huntington Beach, CA, 92647
2th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar 4-7 May 29, Seattle, Washington AIAA 29-2983 Mars Precision Landing Using Guided Parachutes John B. McKinney 1 The Boeing
More informationAvionics System Project. Team D3 Dylan Carter, Jesse Cummings, Kenneth Murphy, Rajesh Yalamanchili
Avionics System Project Team D3 Dylan Carter, Jesse Cummings, Kenneth Murphy, Rajesh Yalamanchili Link Budgets for Communication Communication needs during the mission are divided into distinct phases,
More informationIntroducing The Gemma One
Introducing The Gemma One The Gemma One is a new generation clean vessel: a practical, safe, conservatively styled, amenity-rich, and highly automated boat that can be 100% powered by renewable energy,
More informationSUBSONIC PARACHUTES FOR FUTURE MARS MISSIONS
SUBSONIC PARACHUTES FOR FUTURE MARS MISSIONS John C. Underwood (1), Arrun Saunders (1), Steven B. Rogers (1), J. Stephen Lingard (1), Lionel Marraffa (2) and Luca Ferracina (3) (1) Vorticity Ltd, Chalgrove,
More informationDS Rocket Recovery System Description. Rev
DS Rocket Recovery System Description Rev.2016-09-26 Author: R.Nakka www.nakka-rocketry.net The DS rocket uses a dual-event recovery system. The first event occurs at apogee, when the Raven flight computer
More informationWater Reclamation MARYLAND. Fundamentals of water reclamation Water reclamation. Solids disposal. Potable Hygiene Urine U N I V E R S I T Y O F
Fundamentals of water reclamation Water reclamation Potable Hygiene Urine Solids disposal 1 2011 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu ISS Consumables Budget Consumable Design
More informationSAFE Europe: 30 th March 2010
Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd 2010. This copyrighted work contains Martin-Baker proprietary information and no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted or used in any form or by any means
More informationObjective: To launch a soda bottle rocket, achieve maximum time of flight, and safely land a payload (tennis ball).
Bottle Rocket Project 2016-17 Objective: To launch a soda bottle rocket, achieve maximum time of flight, and safely land a payload (tennis ball). Materials: 2 liter plastic soda bottle (carbonated beverage
More information3. How many kilograms of air is in the room?
1. Astronomers use density as a clue to the composition of distant objects. Judging by the orbits of its moons the mass of Saturn is found to be 5.68 10 26 kg. (a) Use its mean radius 58 230 km to determine
More informationCRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. Plantation High School Team Optics
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Plantation High School Team Optics LAUNCH VEHICLE DIMENSIONS Total Length: 105 Diameter: 4 Upper Airframe: 40 Lower Airframe: 46 Coupler: 12 Coupler Band: 1.5 Composed of G12 Fiberglass
More informationDesigning a Model Rocket
Designing a Model Rocket Design Components In the following pages we are going to look at the design requirements for a stable single stage model rocket. From the diagram here you can see that the rocket
More informationAdvantages of Heritage Atlas Systems for Human Spaceflight
Advantages of Heritage Atlas Systems for Human Spaceflight Pollard, L. J. 1 and Tribbett, E. J. 2 United Launch Alliance, Littleton, CO, 80112 The current Atlas V launch vehicle has been developed through
More informationConceptual Design of the Descent Subsystem for the Safe Atmospheric Re-Entry Flight of Space Rider
7 TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Conceptual Design of the Descent Subsystem for the Safe Atmospheric Re-Entry Flight of Space Rider Alessandro Balossino *, Luciano Battocchio*,
More informationDynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels
DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 9-10, 2012 Design and Control Session Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels By Bradley Deghuee L-3 Communications 1 Introduction Specialized
More informationHistory of Space Shuttle:
History of Space Shuttle: Near the end of the Apollo space program, NASA officials were looking at the future of the American space program. At that time, the rockets used to place astronauts and equipment
More informationSpace Simulation MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Space Simulation. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Focus is on human-in-the-loop operational simulations, not component sims (e.g., thermal vacuum chambers) Microgravity Planetary surfaces Specialty simulations A vision and a challenge... 1 2012 David
More informationIAC-04-IAA DESIGN OF A HIGH-TENSION ELASTICALLY DEFORMING SPACE TETHER DEPLOYER
IAC-04-IAA-3.8.2 DESIGN OF A HIGH-TENSION ELASTICALLY DEFORMING SPACE TETHER DEPLOYER Bas Lansdorp, MSc Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands bas.lansdorp@lr.tudelft.nl Prof. ir. H.M.J.R. Soemers
More informationSpace Simulation MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Space Simulation. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #27 December 4, 2014 Focus of this lecture is on human-in-the-loop operational simulations, not component sims (e.g., thermal vacuum chambers) Microgravity Planetary surfaces Specialty simulations
More informationAerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber.
Chapters 2 and 3 of the Pilot s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25) apply to powered parachutes and are a prerequisite to reading this book. This chapter will focus on the aerodynamic fundamentals
More informationFuel for the Fire. Name Student Activity. Open the TI-Nspire document Fuel for the Fire.tns.
Open the TI-Nspire document Fuel for the Fire.tns. You ve probably heard about Neil Armstrong and his first footstep on the moon but have you ever considered the fuel it took to get there? Fueling NASA
More informationDemoSat II Design Guidelines
1. BALLOON DESCRIPTION AND CAPABILITIES This document defines key interfaces between the DemoSat teams and the Balloon for the purpose of establishing program responsibilities. 1.1 Balloon Interface General
More informationAircraft Performance Calculations: Descent Analysis. Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor
Aircraft Performance Calculations: Descent Analysis CEE 5614 Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Aircraft Descent Performance The top of descent point typically starts
More informationHabitability (continued)
Habitability (continued) Required Crew Volumes Human Physiological Adaptation to 0G Workstation Design Restraint Design Ideal Cabin Layout Habitability in Partial Gravity Stowage Various Examples 106 2017
More information2017 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
1 Lockheed Martin (LM) Space Systems Software Product Line Focused organization (LM1000) Deep Space Heritage Avionics/SW leveraged for LM1000 product line solution Combined Commercial and Civil Space Organizations
More informationFeasibility of Developing a Refrigerant-Based Propulsion System for Small Spacecraft
Feasibility of Developing a Refrigerant-Based Propulsion System for Small Spacecraft Carl Seubert, et al. Small Satellite Conference August 14 th 2007 Outline Background Propulsion system requirements
More informationPHYS 101 Previous Exam Problems
PHYS 101 Previous Exam Problems CHAPTER 14 Fluids Fluids at rest pressure vs. depth Pascal s principle Archimedes s principle Buoynat forces Fluids in motion: Continuity & Bernoulli equations 1. How deep
More informationCrew Systems Analysis for 10-Day Round-Trip to Moon
Crew Systems Analysis for 10-Day Round-Trip to Moon Ben Abresch Matt Marcus Sean Robert Nick Zarbo 10/18/2012 Mission Requirements 10 day nominal trip 3 contingency days Crew systems mass
More informationFlight Testing of a Low Cost De-Orbiting Device for Small Satellites
Flight Testing of a Low Cost De-Orbiting Device for Small Satellites Dana Turse *, Phil Keller*, Robert Taylor*, Mark Reavis*, Mike Tupper*, Chris Koehler Abstract Use of small and very small spacecraft
More information1. Which one of the following is a vector quantity? A. time B. speed C. energy D. displacement
1. Which one of the following is a vector quantity? A. time B. speed C. energy D. displacement 2. A car is travelling at a constant speed of 26.0 m/s down a slope which is 12.0 to the horizontal. What
More informationHiSST: International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science Technology November 2018, Moscow, Russia
HiSST: International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science Technology 26 29 November 218, Moscow, Russia L. Bussler 1, J. Wilken, S. Stappert, M. Sippel, I. Dietlein, E. Dumont Abstract Two-stage vertical
More informationTilt Detection Using Accelerometer and Barometric Measurements
Tilt Detection Using Accelerometer and Barometric Measurements Can this be used for reliable off-axis detection? John Derimiggio Marsa Systems, Inc 11/15/2018 Topics Accelerometer altimeter altitude calculation
More informationWinnipeg Headingley Aero Modellers. Things About Airplanes.
Winnipeg Headingley Aero Modellers Things About Airplanes. Table of Contents Introduction...2 The Airplane...2 How the Airplane is Controlled...3 How the Airplane Flies...6 Lift...6 Weight...8 Thrust...9
More informationSIMULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLIGHT CONDITIONS
SIMULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLIGHT CONDITIONS BY ADVANCED ALTITUDE SIMULATION Klaus SCHÄFER Institute of Space Propulsion, German Aerospace Centre (DLR) Lampoldshausen, 74239 Hardthausen, Germany klaus.schaefer@dlr.de
More informationME 239: Rocket Propulsion. Forces Acting on a Vehicle in an Atmosphere (Follows Section 4.2) J. M. Meyers, PhD
ME 239: Rocket Propulsion Forces Acting on a Vehicle in an Atmosphere (Follows Section 4.2) J. M. Meyers, PhD 1 Commonly acting forces on a vehicle flying in a planetary atmosphere: Thrust Aerodynamic
More informationCERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY IN THE MERCHANT NAVY MARINE ENGINEER OFFICER
CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY IN THE MERCHANT NAVY MARINE ENGINEER OFFICER EXAMINATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY STCW 95 CHIEF
More informationPresentation 2 Vehicle Systems - Daedalus
Presentation 2 Vehicle Systems - Daedalus 1 Outline Structures Nosecone Body tubes Bulkheads Fins Tail Cone Recovery System Layout Testing Propulsion Ox Tank Plumbing Injector Chamber Nozzle Testing Hydrostatic
More informationPhysics-based Entry, Descent and Landing Risk Model
Physics-based Entry, Descent and Landing Risk Model Ken Gee*a, Loc Huynhb, and Ted Manninga a b NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, USA Science and Technology Corporation, Moffett Field, USA Abstract:
More information13 JSTS Vol. 27, No. 2
13 JSTS Vol. 27, No. 2 Water Landing Impact of Recovery Space Capsule: A Research Overview Eiichiro NAKANO 1), Hideaki UCHIKAWA 1), Hideyuki TANNO 2), Ryu SUGIMOTO 3), 1) Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
More informationSaab Seaeye Cougar XT Compact
The Seaeye Cougar-XT Compact is a highly flexible and extremely powerful electric ROV with working depths of 300 metres. This system comes with almost all of the specifications of the very reliable Couger-XT
More informationwind wobble unstable
Rocket Stability During the flight of a model rocket, gusts of wind or thrust instabilities, can cause the rocket to "wobble", or change its attitude in flight. Poorly built or designed rockets can also
More informationThe Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc.
The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science 009 Liquid Robotics Inc. J. Manley & T. Richardson: Liquid Robotics Inc. DBCP XXV Paris September 28, 2009 1 Wave Glider Overview Unique Two Part
More informationRocketSat V: AirCore. 4/18/09 Symposium Jessica (JB) Brown Mackenzie Miller Emily Logan Steven Ramm. Colorado Space Grant Consortium RocketSat V 1
: AirCore 4/18/09 Symposium Jessica (JB) Brown Mackenzie Miller Emily Logan Steven Ramm 1 Mission Statement is a team of undergraduate students working in collaboration with NOAA to collect and validate
More informationDevelopment of a Back Pressure Valve for the Spacesuit Water Membrane Evaporator (SWME)
45th 12-16 July 2015, Bellevue, Washington ICES-2015-338 Development of a Back Pressure Valve for the Spacesuit Water Membrane Evaporator (SWME) Brad Harris 1 and Thomas O. Leimkuehler 2 Paragon Space
More informationBACKGROUND TO STUDY CASE
BACKGROUND TO STUDY CASE German Aerospace Center (DLR) is using Andøya Rocket Range for a sounding rocket campaign. On 27th October 2005 a 300 kg payload (SHEFEX) was launched Due do a technical problems
More informationCansat 2016 Environmental Testing Requirements
Cansat 2016 Environmental Testing Requirements Version 1.2 8/5/2015 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...3 2.0 Drop Test...3 2.1 Drop Test Configuration...3 2.2 Drop Test Procedure...3 3.0 Vibration
More informationPhysics P201 D. Baxter/R. Heinz
Seat # Physics P201 D. Baxter/R. Heinz EXAM #1 September 20, 2001 7:00 9:00 PM INSTRUCTIONS 1. Sit in SEAT # given above. 2. DO NOT OPEN THE EXAM UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO. 3. Print your name (last name
More informationFirst Experimental investigations on Wheel- Walking for improving Triple-Bogie rover locomotion performances
First Experimental investigations on Wheel- Walking for improving Triple-Bogie rover locomotion performances M. Azkarate With the collaboration of ESA/TEC-MMA Table of Contents 2. The ExoTeR Rover: a Triple-Bogie
More informationSSC15-II-6. payload), allowing a new class of larger deployable payloads to utilize the ISS as a research platform.
SSC15-II-6 Paving the Way for Small Satellite Access to Orbit: Cyclops Deployment of SpinSat, the Largest Satellite ever Deployed from the International Space Station Matthew P. Hershey, Daniel R. Newswander,
More information5. Crew Exploration Vehicle
5.1 CEV Overview and Recommendations One of the keys to enable a successful human space exploration program is the development and implementation of a vehicle capable of transporting and housing crew on
More informationENAE 697 Overview and Introduction
ENAE 697 Overview and Introduction Course overview Goals Web-based content Syllabus Policies Project content Overview of space human factors and life support History of humans and flight Brief overview
More informationNORMAL TAKEOFF AND CLIMB
NORMAL TAKEOFF AND CLIMB CROSSWIND TAKEOFF AND CLIMB The normal takeoff is one in which the airplane is headed directly into the wind or the wind is very light, and the takeoff surface is firm with no
More informationA Discrete, Multiphase Flow Approach to Monopropellant-Based Micropropulsion
A Discrete, Multiphase Flow Approach to Monopropellant-Based Micropropulsion M. Ryan McDevitt Advisor: Darren Hitt, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering Program School of Engineering The University of Vermont
More informationLoad Responsive Multilayer Insulation Performance Testing
Load Responsive Multilayer Insulation Performance Testing S. Dye 1, A. Kopelove 1, and G. L. Mills 2 1 Quest Thermal Group, 6452 Fig Street Suite A, Arvada, CO 80004 USA 2 Ball Aerospace & Technologies
More informationVibration-Free Joule-Thomson Cryocoolers for Distributed Microcooling
Vibration-Free Joule-Thomson Cryocoolers for Distributed Microcooling W. Chen, M. Zagarola Creare Inc. Hanover, NH, USA ABSTRACT This paper reports on an innovative concept for a space-borne Joule-Thomson
More informationPreliminary Design Review
Crew Systems and Life Support Establishing a Recurring Human Presence on the Moon Preliminary Design Review Overview Preliminary Design Review of Crew Systems / Life Support aboard low-cost lunar lander
More information4. Lunar Architecture
4.1 Summary and Recommendations As defined by the Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), the lunar architecture is a combination of the lunar mission mode, the assignment of functionality to flight
More informationAIAA PROPELLANT TANK WITH SURFACE TENSION PMD FOR TIGHT CENTER-OF-MASS PROPELLANT CONTROL
AIAA 2008-4942 PROPELLANT TANK WITH SURFACE TENSION PMD FOR TIGHT CENTER-OF-MASS PROPELLANT CONTROL Walter Tam and Ian Ballinger ATK Space - Commerce and Don E. Jaekle, Jr. PMD Technology ABSTRACT A propellant
More informationA STUDY OF THE LOSSES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BOW THRUSTERS AND A CATAMARAN HULL
A STUDY OF THE LOSSES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BOW THRUSTERS AND A CATAMARAN HULL L Boddy and T Clarke, Austal Ships, Australia SUMMARY CFD analysis has been conducted on a 100m catamaran hull
More informationUniversity of Michigan Preliminary Design Review Project Wolverine: Butterfly Valve Drag Variation for Mile High Apogee
University of Michigan Preliminary Design Review Project Wolverine: Butterfly Valve Drag Variation for Mile High Apogee 2011-2012 University Student Launch Initiative Department of Aerospace Engineering
More informationTest Flights of the Revised ULDB Design
Test Flights of the Revised ULDB Design Michael S. Smith * Aerostar International, Inc., Sulphur Springs, TX 75482, USA Henry M. Cathey, Jr. Physical Science Laboratory, New Mexico State University, Wallops
More informationTable of Contents. Career Overview... 4
Table of Contents Career Overview.................................................. 4 Basic Lesson Plans Activity 1 Design a Straw Rocket I...................................... 5 Activity 2 Design a Straw
More informationLAUNCH IT. DESIGN CHALLENGE Design and build an air-powered rocket that can hit a target at least 5 feet away.
Grades 3 5, 6 8 10 60 minutes LAUNCH IT DESIGN CHALLENGE Design and build an air-powered rocket that can hit a target at least 5 feet away. MATERIALS Supplies and Equipment: Several pairs of scissors Balloon
More informationTransportation Engineering II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee
Transportation Engineering II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee Lecture - 28 Aircraft Characteristics Dear students, I welcome you back to the lecture
More information» Wind Propulsion for Cargo Ships «Performance Parameters and Operational Aspects
Prof. Capt. Michael Vahs Maritime Department / HS Emden-Leer Germany» Wind Propulsion for Cargo Ships «Performance Parameters and Operational Aspects Natural Propulsion Wageningen, 20.01.2011 Maritime
More informationCircular Motion - Horizontal
Circular Motion - Horizontal Outcome(s): explain and apply the concepts of centripetal acceleration and centripetal force, as applied to uniform horizontal circular motion. A bucket being swung around
More information