GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
|
|
- Miranda Hopkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Client: M/s Balmer lawrie & Co. Ltd., Kolkata Prepared by GEO TECHNOLOGIES ISO 9001:2008 Company # 5-83/ B, V.V Nagar Street No 8, Habsiguda Hyderabad Tel: , Cell: geotech999@gmail.com Website: GT / 0866 /
2 GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT REPORT No.: GT /0866/ PROJECT: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. CLIENT: M/s, Kolkata W. O. No.: BL/NI/MMLH/Vizag/WO-001 dated: Completion Date: 30 June 2014 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS: GEO TECHNOLOGIES ISO 9001:2008 COMPANY # 5-83/B, V. V. NAGAR HABSIGUDA, STREET No. 8 HYDERABAD Tele/Fax: ; M: geotech999@gmail.com Website: 1
3 CONTENTS S.NO. TITLE PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS LABORATORY TESTING 7 4. ANALYSIS OF DATA & RESULTS 8 5. SUB-SOIL PROFILE 9 6. RECOMMENDATIONS TABLE 1: Summary of Drilling TABLE 2 (a)-(c): Summary of results of Laboratory tests of soil : TABLE 3: Results of laboratory tests on rock samples TABLE 4 (a-b): Results of Chemical Tests of soil and water TABLE 5 (a-b): Results of Field and Lab CBR Tests TABLE 6 (a-d): Results of DCPT Tests APPENDIX-1: Calculations for SBC for Open foundations APPENDIX-2: Calculations for Pile Capaciy APPENDIX-3: Boundary wall foundations FIG 1: Site Plan showing locations of Bore Holes, CBR and DCPT 17. FIG 2: Combined Log of Bore holes 19. Annexure-1: Field Bore Log charts 20. Annexure-2: BIS Codes 2
4 1. INTRODUCTION The work of soil investigation for the proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub project at VPT, Visakhapatnam, was assigned to M/s GEO TECHNOLOGIES, vide Work Order No. BL/NI/MMLH/Vizag/Wo-001 dated: from M/s, Kolkata. Geotechnical investigations were carried out by drilling Nine (09) bore holes, conducting Standard Penetration Tests, collecting soil and rock samples and conducting relevant laboratory tests. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests and Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests (DCPT) were also conducted. Fig.1. gives the Site Plan of the proposed development, showing the locations of bore holes, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests and Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests (DCPT). The aim of investigations is to determine the depth of foundations and the Safe Bearing Capacity based on Field and Laboratory Investigations. All the investigations are carried out in accordance with the relevant BIS (IS) Codes. 3
5 2. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OBJECTIVE: The sub soil investigation was carried out to determine the nature of stratum and engineering properties of soil which may affect the mode of construction of the proposed structures, and to recommend the SBC of foundations accordingly. BORE HOLES: Nine (09) bore holes (BH-1 to BH-9) were drilled at the locations fixed by the client (Fig.1). Table-1 gives the details of the bore holes drilled. The bore holes were planned so as to yield complete information in the effective and critical zones under the foundations. DRILLING: Rotary Drilling was performed as per IS: The size of the casing used was 125 to 75 mm yielding samples of NX size. The following information was collected during the drilling operations: Depth-wise soil profile Depth and results of SPT Details of soil and rock samples collected Core recovery & RQD of rock Color of return water 4
6 STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT): Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at frequent intervals in the bore holes. These tests were performed as specified in IS: In this test, a standard weight is dropped through 75 cm height to drive the split-spoon sampler, and the number of blows required to effect three consecutive 15 cm penetrations is recorded. The first 15 cm penetration is considered as seating drive and neglected. Thereafter, the split-spoon sampler is further driven for 30 cm penetration or 100 blows, whichever is reached earlier. The total number of blows for the second and third 15 cm penetrations is designated as penetration resistance N. If less than 30 cm is penetrated, the number of blows and the depth penetrated are recorded, and N value is recoded as N > 100. If the number of blows exceeds 100, Refusal is said to have been reached and further testing is discontinued. FIELD BORE LOGS: All the details collected from the field operations are presented in Logs of Bore holes given in Annexure-1. These logs contain depth wise strata details, sample collection data, results of Standard Penetration Tests, core recovery data, and colour of return water etc. SAMPLES: All the samples collected were properly packed, labeled and transported to Geo Technologies Soil Testing Laboratory at Hyderabad. CBR TESTS : The CBR tests (CBR-1 to CBR-3) were conducted at three (3) locations shown in the site plan (Fig.1), at a depth of 30 cm. The tests were conducted in accordance with IS: 2720 (Part-31): 1969 Field Determination of California Bearing Ratio. The equipment comprises mechanical loading jack of 10 ton capacity, with bracket and swivel head. A bridge support is provided for a calibrated proving ring of capacity 5000 kg, with a dial gauge to read to an accuracy of mm. A 50-mm dia metal penetration piston 5
7 is used for penetration. A dial gauge held in a universal dial gauge clamp, supported by datum bar is used for measuring the penetration. One 5-kg, 250-mm dia annular metal weight, with a 53-mm dia central hole and two circular slotted weights of 5 kg & two circular slotted weights of 10 kg are used as surcharge weights. Equipment to provide reaction (truss, truck) are located such that the beam is over the centre of the surface under test. The load is applied at the rate of 1.25 mm / min. Load readings are recorded for penetrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 & 12.5 mm. Each test was conducted with three trials (at 3 adjacent points) in unsoaked and soaked conditions. Soil samples were also collected from the test locations for laboratory CBR tests. DCPT TESTS : Dynamic Cone Penetration tests were conducted at four locations as per IS Code: 4968 (Part-1): 1976 Method for Subsurface Sounding for Soils: Part 1: Dynamic Method using 50 mm Cone without Bentonite slurry. A 50 mmm dia, 60 cone screwed to the driving rod and hammer assembly was used for the test. This assembly is kept vertical with the cone resting on the ground to be tested. The cone is then driven into the soil by allowing a 65 kg hammer to fall freely through a height of 750 mm each time. The number of blows per every 100 mm penetration of the cone is noted. The process is repeated for three consecutive 100 mm penetration and the sum of number of blows is recorded as DCPT value (Ncd). When the Ncd value reaches 100, it is treated as refusal and driving is stopped. 6
8 3. LABORATORY TESTING The samples were tested at the Soil Testing Laboratory of GEO TECHNOLOGIES at Hyderabad. The following tests were performed on the Soil samples: Natural Moisture Content Atterberg s Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit) Bulk density & dry Density Specific gravity Particle size distribution (a) Sieve (b) Hydrometer Triaxial Shear / Direct Shear Consolidation Test Lab CBR Test (Unsoaked & Soaked) Chemical Analysis for ph, Sulphate & Chloride on soil / water All the tests were conducted in accordance with IS: 2720 (Methods of Tests for Soils). The following tests were conducted on rock samples: Unit weight of rock (Density) Water Absorption Porosity Uniaxial Crushing Strength These tests were conducted in accordance with IS: and IS:
9 4. ANALYSIS OF DATA & RESULTS BORE HOLE DATA: From the field observation charts, sub-soil profiles, showing the variation of soil strata with depth and SPT (N) values, are drawn for all the 9 bore holes. Fig. 2 gives the Combined Log of the 9 bore holes. Based on the results of lab tests, physical and engineering properties of soil and rock samples are tabulated. Tables 2(a) to 2(c) give the results of lab testing of soil samples. Table 3 gives the results of testing of rock samples. Tables 4(a) & 4(b) give the results of chemical tests on soil and water samples. ANALYSIS OF CBR DATA: CBR test data is analyzed for calculating CBR value as per IS Code: 2720 (Part 31): 1969, Clause 5. From the stress-penetration curves, the stress values corresponding to 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm penetrations are read, and the California Bearing Ratio is calculated as: CBR = (PT / PS) x 100, Where PT = Test stress value corresponding to the chosen penetration value, and PS = Standard stress for the same penetration value, taken from Table-1 of the Code (PS (2.5 mm) = 70 kg/cm 2 ; PS (5 mm) = 105 kg/cm 2 ). Tables 5 (a) & 5(b) give the results of Field and Lab CBR Tests. ANALYSIS OF DCPT DATA: The results Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests are presented as Ncd value versus depth. Table 6 gives DCPT results for four locations. DCPT (Ncd) values are, by and large, correlatable with SPT values at the corresponding depths in the nearby borehole data. 8
10 5. SUB-SOIL PROFILE Based on Nine (09) bore logs, the generalized subsoil profile at the site is as follows: Depth, m Strata N Value Clay / Silty clay / silty sand Clayey / Silty gravel / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) Below Refusal strata / Rock > 100 & Cores Thickness of the top soil layer varies from 3.5 m to 9.5 m in different bore holes, with an average of about 7 m. This layer consists of clay, silty clay and silty sand. N values in this layer are very low (2 to 7). These soils are soft and weak. It should be noted that filled-up soil exists only in the area of BH-7. Thickness of filling in the borehole is 4.3 m. The top soil is followed by clayey gravel / silty gravel to a depth of m, with N values varying over a wide limit (12 to 50), in different boreholes. This is underlain by / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) to a depth of m. N values in this layer vary from 38 to 100. No cores were recovered in SDR strata due to weathering and fissuring. SDR strata is followed by refusal strata (N > 100), consisting of SDR / weathered rock / Hard rock. Drilling was done through this layer up to 3 m from refusal strata in BH-3 and BH-6. Rock with core recovery is seen in bore holes BH-2, BH-3, BH-5, BH-6 and BH-9. Core recovery varies from 42% to 82%, and RQD varies from 0% to 50%. Water table was seen between ground level and 5.40 m in different bore holes. 9
11 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made for the proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub project at VPT, Visakhapatnam. These recommendations are based on Standard Penetration Tests and Laboratory Tests on samples from Nine (09) bore holes, three (3) Field and Lab CBR tests, and four (4) Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests. Sub-soil Profile: The subsoil profile at the site can be broadly generalized as follows: Depth, m Strata N Value Clay / Silty clay / silty sand Clayey / Silty gravel / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) Below Refusal strata / Rock > 100 & Cores The top layer essentially consists of clay / silty clay / silty sand. Filled-up soil is observed only in BH-7 to a depth of 4.3 m. Thickness of the top layer varies from 3.0 m (BH-2) to 9.4 m (BH-7). N (SPT) values in this layer are very low. The top soil is followed by clayey gravel / silty gravel to a depth of m, with N values varying over a wide limit (12 to 50), in different boreholes. This is underlain by / Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) to a depth of m. N values in this layer vary from 38 to 100. No cores were recovered in SDR strata due to weathering and fissuring. Ground water level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. DCPT (Ncd) values at the four test locations vary from 3 to 125 in the depth range 0 to 10 m, and are, by and large, correlatable with SPT values at the corresponding depths in the nearby borehole data. 10
12 Soil & Rock Properties: Properties of top soil (clay / silty clay / silty sand) can be summarized as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS 1498) CH / CL / SM Dry density, kn/m Specific gravity Liquid limit, % Plastic limit, % Cohesion, kn/m Angle of Internal Friction, Φ, deg Compressibility CBR (Soaked) Properties of clayey gravel / silty gravel are as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS 1498) GC / GM Unit weight, kn/m Specific gravity Liquid limit Plastic limit NP Cohesion, kn/m Angle of Internal Friction, Φ, deg Properties of rock are as follows: Parameter / Property Value IS Classification (IS: 12070) Very Poor to Poor Rock Classification No. V / IV Dry Density, g/cm Porosity, % Water Absorption Un-Confined Compressive Strength, kg/cm
13 FOUNDATIONS: Open foundations: Open (Footings / raft) foundations are recommended. Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) is recommended as follows: B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile SBC at Depth, m (t/m 2 ) m Silty clay 4 6 m Clayey gravel m Silty clay m Clay m Silty clay m Clayey m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m Silty clay m Clay 2 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Silty 0-1 m Silty clay m Clay m Clayey gravel 0-1 m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m Filling m Silty sand m Clay m Silty sand m Clay m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel Fill Fill Fill Fill Notes: 1. Ground level refers to MSL. 2. Ground water level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. 3. All foundations resting in clay / silty clay should be placed in sand bed. 4. Typical calculations for SBC are given in Appendix-1. 12
14 Pile foundations: Alternatively, Pile foundations may be considered. Pile Capacities for different lengths and diameters are given separately for each bore hole in the following table. B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile m Silty clay 4 6 m Clayey gravel m N= m SDR N> m Silty clay m Clay m Silty clay m Clayey 6-12 m N= m SDR N= m Rock m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m N= m SDR > m Rock m Silty clay m Clay 2 4 m Silty clay 4 6 m Silty 6-10 m N = m SDR N m Silty clay m Clay m Clayey gravel 6-9 m SDR N = m Rock m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m N = m SDR N= m Rock Length, m See Note Pile capacity Dia, mm Vertical Capacity, tonnes Safe lateral pile capacity, tonnes
15 B H No Ground Level, m + Soil Profile m Filling m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel (N= 50-85) m SDR N> m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m N = m SDR N= m Silty sand m Clay m Clayey gravel m m SDR N= m Rock SDR Soft Disintegrated Rock Notes on Pile foundations: 1. Ground level refers to MSL. Length, m See Note6 2. Groundwater level is generally at 0 2 m below the present GL. 3. Typical calculations for Pile capacities are given in Appendix Lateral Pile capacity is taken as 15% of Vertical capacity. Pile capacity Dia, mm All Piles considered to be of length 10 m, resting in gravel for 3 m depth. 6. (a) In BH-5 and BH-9, SDR is seen at a depth of 5 to 7 m. Vertical Capacity, tonnes Safe lateral pile capacity, tonnes (b) If SDR is reached earlier than 10 m, Piles may be rested in SDR strata, with an embedment of 1.5 m. (c) Suggested minimum length of socket is as follows: where D is the diameter of Pile. Rock Type Sound Rock Moderately weathered rock Soft Rock 7. All requirements of IS Code: 2911 shall be adhered to. 8. For other Pile Capacities, Pile dia / length may be modified. Embedment Length 1 2 D 2 3 D 3 4 D
16 Boundary wall foundations Specific Recommendations for Boundary Wall Foundation: The soils from 0 7 m are weak and soft soils (Clay /silty clay/silty sand). N values are less than 10. Considering the soft soils, the following alternatives are suggested: Open foundations at a depth of 3 m with SBC of 10 t / sq m, and sand bed. SBC calculations are given in Appendix 1 Alternatively, 10 m long Piles may be used. Pile dia may be 300 mm with a vertical pile capacity of 20 tonnes. Pile capacity calculations are given in Appendix-3. PAVEMENT: It should be noted that the top soil essentially consists of clay / silty clay / silty sand. Thickness of this layer varies from 3.0 m to 9.5 m below existing ground level in different boreholes. Filled up soil of thickness 4.3 m exists in the area of Bore Hole-7. Soaked CBR values of the top soil (clay/silty clay/silty sand) are quite low (3% to 4%). Design: As per Tender Document, Axle load transferred for each side of front axle of container handling Reach Stacker equipment is taken as 50 MT. Sri Mohan Kumar, Manager, Railway Division, AARVEE Consultants, has given Cumulative Standard Axles as million times with full load over the surface. From IRC: (Guidelines for Design of Flexible Pavments), Fig. 1 ( Pavement design Thickness Chart ), For CBR = 3 %, and Cumulative Standard Axles = 2 million, Total Pavement Thickness T = 580 mm, say 600 mm 15
17 Pavement design of Combination Block for 2 million Cumulative Standard Axles is as follows (IRC: ): Total Pavement Thickness T = Y + Z = 600 mm Where Y = Thickness of Granular Base = 225 mm Z = Thickness of Granular Sub Base = 375 mm X = Thickness of Surfacing = 20 mm 16
18 Base Material: This requires the load spreading properties to reduce the stresses on the subgrade. This has an important bearing on the performance of block pavement. Since the available strata are unsuitable, base course should consist of unbound crushed rock, water bound macadam, wet mix macadam, cement-bound crushed rock / granular materials, and lean cement concrete. In broad terms, whenever the subgrade is weak (with CBR < 5 %, as in the present case), use of bound granular materials like cement treated crushed rock, requiring a relatively thinner base, is recommended. Sub - base Material: The quality of sub-base materials includes natural gravels, cement treated gravels, sand stabilized sub grade materials. The quality of sub grade materials should be in conformance with IRC: (Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements). Drainage: Drainage of the pavement structural section improves its performance. Adequately designed sub surface drainage system consisting of an open graded drainage layer with collector and outlet pipes should be provided (IRC: ). 17
19 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL & WATER: Results of Chemical analysis of soil are as follows: Parameter Range Average ph Chlorides as Cl, ppm Sulphates as SO4, ppm Results of Chemical analysis of water are as follows: Parameter Range Average ph Chlorides as Cl, mg/l Sulphates as SO4, mg/l The values of Chlorides and Sulphates in water are in excess of permissible limits as per IS: 456, and may have deleterious influence on concrete and steel. Effective precautionary measures are required. Use of Sulphate-Resistant Cement and Corrosion-Resistant Steel is recommended for sub-structure. (Dr. D. BABU RAO) M.E., Ph.D. (USA), MIGS Former Professor & Head of Civil Engineering Principal Geotechnical Consultant (Dr. N. VENKAT RAO) M.Sc. Tech., Ph.D. FAEG, MIGS Former Professor & Head of Geophysics Geological Consultant & Proprietor 18
20 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF DRILLING S.No. DEPTH DRILLED, (m) GL, (m) DEPTH OF WATER LEVEL, (m) RL of Water BH BH BH BH BH BH BH BH BH
21 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 2: SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTS TABLE 2(a): Specific gravity, NMC, Bulk and Dry Density, Atterberg Limits (LL, PL, PI) & Consolidation test (Compressibility, Cc) SNo BH No. D, m Soil 1 Sp. Gr. NMC Bulk density kn/m 3 Dry density Atterberg Limits LL PL PI 3.0 Silty clay Clayey NP gravel BH gravel NP gravel NP gravel NP Clay Clayey NP gravel BH gravel NP gravel NP gravel NP BH Clay Clayey gravel Clayey gravel NP NP gravel NP gravel NP Silty Clay Silty gravel NP BH gravel NP gravel NP Clay Clay BH Clay Silty gravel NP Cc 20
22 Table-2(a) Contd SNo 24 BH No. D, m Soil Sp. Gr. NMC Bulk density kn/m 3 Dry density Atterberg Limits LL PL PI 2.0 Clay Cc Clay BH Clayey gravel NP gravel NP gravel NP Silty Sand clay BH clay Silty gravel NP gravel NP clay BH clay clay gravel NP clay BH Clayey gravel NP gravel NP NOTATION: D Depth, m, Sp. Gr. Specific gravity, NMC Natural Moisture Content %, LL Liquid Limit %, PL.. Plastic Limit %, PI.. Plasticity Index, NP.. Non plastic, Cc Compressibility. 21
23 TABLE 2(b): Particle size Distribution (Sieve & Hydrometer) S. No BH No. D, m Soil Grain Size, % Gr Sa Si Cl Silty clay BH-1 Clayey gravel Silty clay BH-2 Clayey gravel Clay BH gravel Silty gravel BH gravel Clay BH Silty gravel Clayey gravel BH gravel clay BH gravel clay BH gravel gravel BH clay Clayey gravel gravel Notation: D Depth, m Gr >4.75 mm Sa Sand mm Si Silt mm Cl Clay < mm, 22
24 TABLE 2(c): Direct / Triaxial Shear Tests S. No BH No. D, m Soil Direct Shear Triaxial Shear C, kn/m 2 Φ, deg C, kn/m 2 Φ, deg Clay Clayey gravel BH gravel gravel Clay Clayey gravel BH gravel gravel Clay Clayey gravel 7 30 BH Clayey gravel gravel Silty Clay Silty gravel BH gravel gravel Clay BH Clay Silty gravel Clay Clay 57 0 BH Clayey gravel gravel Silty Sand clay BH clay Silty gravel gravel clay 59 0 BH gravel clay 49 5 BH gravel C Cohesion, kn/m 2, Φ Angle of Internal Friction, deg. 23
25 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 3: RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTS ON ROCK SAMPLES BORE HOLE No. DEPTH OF SAMPLE (m) Unit Weight, kn/m 3 Porosity (%) Water absorption UCC, kg/cm 2 BH BH UCC Unconfined Compressive Strength TABLE - 4 (a): RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SOIL Sno. Parameter Units BH-2, SPT-2.0m BH-5, SPT-4.0m BH-8, SPT-6.0m 1 ph (1:5 Solution) Chlorides as Cl Ppm Sulphates as SO4 Ppm TABLE - 4 (b): RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER Sno Parameter Units Bore Water-1 Bore Water-2 Permissible values as per IS: ph Not less than 6 2 Chloride as CaCo3 mg/l for Concrete 500 for Reinforced Concrete 3 Sulphate as CaCo3 mg/l
26 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 5 (a): RESULTS OF FIELD CBR TESTS S. No. Test No. Location Sample Depth, m Soil Unsoaked CBR, % Soaked CBR, % 1 FCBR-1 Near BH Silty sand FCBR-2 Near BH-4& Silty clay FCBR-3 Near BH Silty clay TABLE - 5 (b): RESULTS OF LAB CBR TESTS S. No. Sample No. Location Soil Unsoaked CBR, % Soaked CBR, % 1 CBR-1 FCBR-1 Silty sand CBR-2 FCBR-2 Silty clay CBR-3 FCBR-3 Silty clay Note: Lab CBR values are generally less than Field CBR values since in field CBR test, a larger volume of soil, and hence more representative sample, is tested, and since the density of compacted CBR mould would generally be less than in-situ density as the in-situ soil is in confined condition unlike the laboratory mould. 25
27 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. TABLE - 6: RESULTS OF DCPT TESTS Table-6(a): DCPT-1 (Near BH-1) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) Table-6(b): DCPT-2 (Near BH-3) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) Table-6(c): DCPT-3 (Near BH-5) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd) Table-6(d): DCPT-2 (Near BH-8) Sno Depth DCPT (N cd)
28 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-1: CALCULATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY FOR OPEN FOUNDATIONS a) Foundations resting in clay / silty clay at 2 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 2 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 16.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 6.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 35 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 0 deg Nc = 5.14 Nq =1.0 Nr = 0,0 Using IS Code: formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 cnc + r D ( Nq - 1) r B Nr = 234 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 78 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 8 t / sq m, with sand bed. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009( Part 1)-1978 Settlement = [ p B ( 1- µ 2 ) I ] / E Where, p = Pressure, kn/ sq m = 78 kn/ sq m µ = Poisson s ratio = 0.5 E = Young s Modulus = 5000 kn/sq m I = Influence Factor =0.95 Substituting, Settlement = 22.5 mm < 40 mm (OK) a) Foundations resting in clay / silty clay at 3 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 3 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 16.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 6.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 45 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 0 deg Nc = 5.14 Nq =1.0 Nr = 0,0 Using IS Code: formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 cnc + r D ( Nq - 1) r B Nr = 300 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 100 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 10 t / sq m, with sand bed. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009( Part 1)-1978 Settlement =[ p B ( 1- µ 2 ) I ] / E Where, p = Pressure, kn/ sq m = 100 kn/ sq m µ = Poisson s ratio = 0.5 E = Young s Modulus = 5000 kn/sq m I = Influence Factor =0.95 Substituting, Settlement = 28.5 mm < 40 mm (OK) 27
29 b) Foundations resting in clay gravel / silty gravel at 3 m depth: i)shear Criterion : Assumed depth of foundation D= 3 m Assumed width of foundation B= 2 m Unit wt of soil = 17.0 kn/cum Submerged unit wt r = 7.2 kn/cu m Cohesion c = 32 kn / sq m Angle of internal friction = 30 deg Nc = Nq =7.36 Nr =6.64 Using IS Code: formula : Net ult BC = 1.3 c Nc + r D ( Nq - 1) r B Nr = 619 kn/sq m With a FS of 3.0, SBC = 206 kn/ sq m Recommended SBC is 20 t / sq m. ii)settlement Criterion : As per IS: 8009 (Part 1)-1978 (Fig. 9) For B= 2, N = 35 Settlement in m per unit pressure (kg/sq cm) =0.006 Settlement for Pressure of 200 kn/sq m (2 kg/sq cm) = 0,006 x 2 x 1000 =12 mm < 40 mm (OK) 28
30 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-2: Typical Calculations for Pile Capacity a) Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 450 mm Vertical Load: Perimeter = P = m C/S area A =.0.16 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.16 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 1389 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x x 3 = 17 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = = 1406 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 562 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 50 tonnes 29
31 b) Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 600 mm Vertical Load : Perimeter = P = m C/S area A =0.28 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.28 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 2430 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x x 3 = 22.6 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = = 2453 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 981 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 75 tonnes 30
32 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. APPENDIX-3 Typical Calculations for Boundary wall foundations Cast in situ Bored RCC Piles : Pile Diamter D = 300 mm Vertical Load : Perimeter = P = 0.94 m C/S area A =.0.07 sq m Length of pile L = 10 m, including 3 m embedment in gravel Unit weight r = 16 kn/cu m Effective unit wt r = 6.2 kn/ cum End bearing : Average angle of internal friction at pile tip φ = 40 deg ( for N = 50) IS :6403 Corresponding Nq value is 140 (IS: ) Ultimate pile capacity in bearing : Q b = A r L Nq = 0.07 x 6.2 x 10 x 140 = 607 kn Skin friction : Neglect skin friction in clay/silty clay For gravel : Angle of wall friction = δ = 30 degrees (assumed) Earth pressure coefficient K = 0.75 ( assumed ) fs= 0.5 x r x L x K x tan δ = 0.5 x 6.2 x 3 x 0.75 x 0.58 = 4 kn/ sq m Qf = fs x P L = 4 x 0.94 x 3 = 11 kn Pile capacity = Qb + Qf = = 618 kn With a FS of 2.5, Safe Pile capacity = 247 kn Recommended vertical Pile capacity = 20 tonnes Pile dia may be modified for other capacities. 31
33 Annexure-1 FIELD BORE CHARTS 32
34 . DTL C IN Z NATS UDNI H WBM ROAD BUILDING PIPE LINE BUILDING PIPE LINE BUILDING EXISTING COMPOUND WALL BUILDING LLA WDNUOP MOC GNI TSI XE BUILDING DEHS DEHS PIPE LINE FENCING LLA WDNUOP MOC GNI TSI XE G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG EGIDRB G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG HGI W G IN PPI HS NAVARS S/ M N WODOG (A DRAY KCATS RE IN AT NOC O ) T G ES IN PPI NE HS IC L( NAVARS S/ M PILLAR MINDI VILLAGE DW NUOP MOC GNI TSI XE ALL UNDW G IST PO EX OM IN C LLA LLA DW NUOP MOC GNI TSI XE 19 DAOR GATE EGE LL I IV ND I M C5.2 4 c LL A UN D PO TI NG IS EX W M CO )st D A O R YR TE MEC LLE W HTL: R.L : 9.57 UL VE RT C UL VE RT C RD: 7.22 RD: 7.27 RD: 7.17 RD: 8.27 RD: 6.99 R.L : 9.28 R.L : 9.5 HTL: HTL: HTL: HTL: R.L : 9.27 R.L : 8.87 HTL: HTL: R.L : 9.2 R.L : 8.66 R.L : 8.45 ET AG PIPE LINE TREVL UC FENCING 411 PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR 19 PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR PILLAR 1 2 in ar Dnep O wlo Fr et a W ROAD Dnep O a W Fr et ar wlo ni ar wlo D nep O Fr et a W ni HTL: HTL: B.H:-9 E= N= Z=5.56 R.L : 8.97 R.L : 8.36 DAOR M Dnep O et a W PILLAR ni ar Fr wlo HTL: HTL: B.H :- 3 E= N= Z= 4.45 DCPT-2 E= N= Z=4.45 R.L : 8.85 R.L : 8.11 RD: 7.43 RD: 7.23 RD: 7.51 RD: 7.11 RD: 7.2 RD: 7.18 ni ar D nep O wlo rf et a W PIPE CULVERT RD: 6.85 RD: 6.7 RD: 7 RD: 7.09 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.34 RD: 6.04 RD: 5.94 RD: 5.9 RD: 5.68 RD: 5.58 RD: M 85 M86. M M M M RD: 4.71 Dnep O te a W Fr ar wlo ni CBR-3 E= N= Z=3.70 B.H - 2 E= N= Z=3.91 BH:-1 E= N= Z=5.31 DCPT-1 E= N= Z=6.49 M HTL: HTL: M M ni ar D nep O wlo Fr et a W R.L : 8.36 R.L : 7.72 Ø900 HUME PIPES R.L : 8.16 R.L : 7.67 CULVERT RD: 6.82 RD: 6.79 RD: 7.04 RD: 7.02 CULVERT RD: 5.5 RD: M HTL: RD: 5.48 RD: 5.38 RD: 5.35 RD: 5.44 RD: 5.25 RD: 5.31 RD: 5.32 RD: 5.39 RD: 5.36 HTL: HTL: RD: 5.46 RD: 5.6 R.L : 8.4 R.L : 7.96 R.L : 7.92 HTL: R.L : 8 HTL: R.L : 8.18 RD: 5.51 RD: 5.43 RD: 6.72 RD: 6.71 RD: 6.47 HTL: HTL: RD: 6.51 R.L : 7.96 RD: 5.42 RD: 5.44 R.L : 8.05 R.L : 7.47 RD: 5.44 R.L : 7.28 R.L : 6.74 R.L : 6.98 R.L : 6.45 R.L : 6.75 R.L : 6.29 STATION:- BLCL-1 E= N= Z=7.121 R.L : 6.51 R.L : 6.07 VPT TBM-20 R.L: RD: 6.13 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.35 RD: 6.09 RD: 5.43 RD: 5.48 RD: 5.34 RD: 5.4 RD: 5.37 RD: 6.43 RD: 6.41 RD: 6.19 RD: 5.44 M M RD: 6.19 RD: 5.46 RD: 6.06 RD: 5.4 RD: 5.67 B.H:- 4 E= N= Z= M RD: 5.43 RD: M M M M M B.H = 5 E= N= Z= 4.41 DCPT-3 E= N= Z=4.40 CBR:-2 E= N= Z=4.46 B.H :- 6 E= N= Z=3.85 M86. 7 RD: 5.83 RD: 6.1 RD: 6.28 RD: 6.11 RD: 5.36 RD: M 64 B.H :- 7 E= N= Z= 6.55 B.H :- 8 E= N= CBR:-1 E= N= Z=5.09 Z=3.85 M M71. DCPT-4 E= N= Z=3.72 FIG:1 SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS BORE HOLES, CBR & DCPT Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh BORE HOLES DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RD: 6.12 RD: 5.57 RD: 5.51 RD: 6 RD: 5.89 RD: 5.71 RD: RD: RD: RD: RD: 5.19 M M RD: 5.83 RD: 4.35 RD: 3.91 RD: 5.32 R.L : 6.23 R.L : 5.83 RD: 5.37 RD: 5.44 RD: 5.3 RD: 5.03 RD: 5.24 R.L : 5.92 R.L : 5.67 RD: 5.69 RD: 5.95 RD: 5.94 RD: 5.88 RD: 5.14 RD: 5.09 RD: 5.84 RD: 5.54 RD: 5.7 RD: 5.59 RD: 5.76 RD: 5.52 RD: 5.93 RD: 6.06 RD: 5.92 RD: 6.01 RD: 6.05 RD: 6.06 RD: 6.28 RD: 6.08 RD: 6 RD: 6.29 RD: 6.21 RD: 6.09 RD: 5.27 RD: 5.56 RD: 4.93 RD: 5.43 RD: 5.7 RD: 5.14 RD: 5.26 RD: 5.56 RD: 5.76 RD: 6.3 RD: 6.29
35 0.0m 4.0m 6.0m 11.5m 12.0m BH-1 GL= Silty clay 2m N=5 2.2m 4m N=12 Clayey 6m N=38 8m N=56 10m N=86 SDR 12m N=> m 1.2m 2.0m 3.3m 6.0m 12.0m 14.0m 15.0m BH-2 GL= FIG:2 LOG OF BORE HOLES Project: Soil Investigation for Proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Silty clay Clay 1.8m 2m N=5 Silty clay 4m N=25 Clayey 6m N=51 8m N=68 10m N=81 12m N=88 SDR 14m N=>100 Rock 0.0m 1.2m 3.4m 7.5m 11.4m 14.6m BH-3 GL= m Silty sand 2m N=5 Clay 4m N=34 Clayey 6m N=45 8m N=57 10m N=70 12m N=87 SDR 14m N=> m 1.5m 2.0m 4.0m 6.0m 10.0m 15.0m BH-4 GL= Silty clay 1.2m Clay 2m N=3 Silty clay 4m N=47 Silty 6m N=49 8m N=65 10m N=73 12m N=91 SDR 14m N=> m 1.0m 5.2m 6.0m 9.0m 10.0m BH-5 GL= Silty clay 1.4m 2m N=3 Clay 4m N=4 5.2m N=51 Silty 6m N=91 SDR 8m N=94 9m N=>100 Rock 0.0m 1.0m 5.6m 8.0m 9.8m 14.8m BH-6 GL= m Silty sand 2m N=4 Clay 4m N=7 6m N=29 Clayey 8m N=56 10m N=95 12m N=96 SDR 14m N=> m 4.3m 5.8m 9.4m 12.0m 13.2m 15.0m BH-7 GL= m N=8 Filling 4m N=7 Silty sand 5.4m 6m N=5 Clay Clayey SDR 0.0m 1.6m 6.5m 8.0m 10.6m 14.0m BH-8 GL= m Silty sand 5m N=4 2m N=2 8m N=7 10m N=50 12m N=85 14m N=>100 4m N=3 Clay 6m N=5 Clayey 8m N=31 10m N=60 12m N=94 SDR 14m N=> m 1.2m 3.7m 6.0m 6.7m 9.0m 10.0m BH-9 GL= m Silty sand 2m N=4 Clay 4m N=29 Clayey 6m N=47 7m N=85 SDR 9m N=>100 Rock NOT TO SCALE N= value WATER TABLE Rock 17.6m Rock 17.8m
36 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART SPT BORE HOLE NO. 1 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 2.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m Silty clay Clayey 2.00 SPT UDS 4.00 SPT D/S 6.00 SPT D/S 8.00 SPT D/S SPT D/S Red yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow SDR yellow SPT 17cm/50blows >50 SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
37 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Silty clay Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 2 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.80m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Reddish Rate of Drill Min/m Clay Silty clay 2.00 SPT UDS Reddish Reddish Clayey 4.00 SPT D/S 6.00 SPT D/S 8.00 SPT SPT SDR D/S D/S SPT SPT cm/100blows 88 > Rock 11+13= no+6 sp 48% 24% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
38 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Silty sand Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 3 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m Clay 2.00 SPT UDS Red Clayey 4.00 SPT D/S 6.00 SPT D/S SPT D/S SPT D/S SDR SPT SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces BH-3 Cont..
39 BH-3 Cont..d Project: Balmer & lawrie- vizag Ground Level: BORE HOLE Dia. Of Casing: NX NO. 3 Date : to Water Table: 0.20m Depth Sampling SPT Details of Rock core Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) Pieces SDR D/S SPT 10cm/50blows >50 FIELD BORE LOG CHART N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Recovery Core sample small 67% 11% Milky Rock Core sample small 75% 11% Milky Core sample 10+13= small 82% 23% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m
40 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Silty clay Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 4 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m Clay Silty clay SPT UDS 4.00 SPT D/S 6.00 SPT SPT D/S SPT D/S Brownish SPT SDR Silty SPT 10cm/100blows > D/S Brownish Brownish SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
41 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Silty clay 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART BORE HOLE NO. 5 Depth Sampling SPT Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 1.40m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m Clay SPT UDS 4.00 SPT D/S 5.20 SPT Silty 6.00 SPT D/S SPT SDR SPT 12cm/100blows >100 2no+5 Milky Rock Core sample 12+10= % 22% sp Grey SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
42 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Silty sand Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 6 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.20m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m Clay 2.00 SPT UDS 4.00 SPT D/S Red Clayey 6.00 SPT D/S 8.00 SPT D/S SDR SPT D/S SPT D/S SPT 11cm/50blows > Rock Core sample Core sample _ Total small 1+10 small 60% 67% _ 11% Milky Milky Core sample =50 small 79% 50% Milky SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
43 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Filling Sampling 2.00 SPT SPT FIELD BORE LOG CHART Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT BORE HOLE NO. 7 Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 5.40m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m Silty sand 5.00 SPT Red Red SPT UDS Clay 8.00 SPT D/S Clayey SPT D/S SPT D/S SDR SPT 12cm/50blows > D/S SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
44 FIELD BORE LOG CHART Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Sampling BORE HOLE NO. 8 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) SPT Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.00m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery 1.00 D/S Silty sand Red RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Rate of Drill Min/m Red 2.00 SPT UDS SPT Clay 5.00 D/S SPT Clayey 7.00 D/S 8.00 SPT D/S SPT D/S SPT SDR D/S SPT 13cm/50blows >50 SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
45 Project: Soil Investigation for proposed Multi Modal Logistic Hub at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Depth Sampling 1.00 D/S FIELD BORE LOG CHART BORE HOLE NO. 9 Length No. blows for (m) of Log of Depth Type Description Penetration of Run Bore (m) From To (m) ( )cm Value Pieces(cm) Silty sand SPT Ground Level: Dia. Of Casing: NX Water Table: 0.00m Details of Rock core N >10cm core Total No. of % of core Length (cm) Pieces Recovery RQD Value % Avg. RQD % Water colour Red Rate of Drill Min/m Red 2.00 SPT UDS Clay Clayey 4.00 SPT D/S 6.00 SPT SPT SDR 8.00 D/S SPT 9cm/50blows > Rock Core sample % 10% Milky small SDR=Soft Disintigrated Rock cm/50= no.of blows sp=small pieces vsp=very Small Pieces
46 Annexure 2 BIS (IS) CODES 1. IS: : Method of Standard Penetration Test for Soils. 2. IS: 4968 (Part 1) 1976: Method for subsurface sounding for soils. 3. IS: 2132: Code of Practice for thin walled tube sampling of Soils. 4. IS: 2720 Part I various parts: Methods of Laboratory Tests for Soils. 5. IS: : Classification and Identification of Soils for General Engineering Purpose. 6. IS: : Code of Practice for determination of Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. 7. IS: : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on Rocks. 8. IS: (Part I): Code of Practice for calculation of settlements of Foundations. 9. IS: Appendix I: Classification and Characteristics of Rocks. 10. IS: : Code of Practice for Site Investigations for Foundations. 11. IS: : Code of Practice for presentation of drilling information and core description in foundation investigation. 12. IS: 4078: Code of Practice for indexing and storage of drill cores. 13. IS: : Diamond Core Drilling for Site Investigation. 14. IRC: : Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements. 15. IS: 2720 (Part-31): 1969 Field Determination of California Bearing Ratio. 16. IS: 4968 (Part-1) 1976: Method for Subsurface Sounding for Soils: Part 1: Dynamic Method using 50 mm Cone without Bentonite slurry.
REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE
REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE CLIENT: KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE 0 GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
More informationREPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE
REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE CLIENT: KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE 0 GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
More informationUNIT-I SOIL EXPLORATION
SIDDHARTH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS :: PUTTUR Siddharth Nagar, Narayanavanam Road 517583 QUESTION BANK (DESCRIPTIVE) Subject with Code : Geotechnical Engineering - II (16CE127) Year & Sem: III-B.Tech & II-Sem
More informationFIGURES APPENDIX A SYMBOL SAMPLING DESCRIPTION Location of sample obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 Standard Penetration Test with recovery Location of sample obtained using thin-wall
More informationA REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK NEW HAJ TOWER COMPLEX HOOGHLY RIVER BRIDGE COMMISSIONERS
A REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK PROJECT : NEW HAJ TOWER COMPLEX LOCATION : REVISED CHANGED SITE ON PLOT NO. IIA/26, OF RAJARHAT NEW TOWN, KOLKATA Project Implementation Authority : HOOGHLY RIVER
More informationFINAL REPORT ON: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY TRAINING INSTITUTE AT NIMLI VILLAGE, TIJARA ALWAR, RAJASTHAN.
FINAL REPORT ON: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY TRAINING INSTITUTE AT NIMLI VILLAGE, TIJARA ALWAR, RAJASTHAN Submitted to: M/s. Nilayam Housing Pvt. Ltd. 4, Windmill Place Aya
More informationCENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1
CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No. 214030 Sheet No. 1 INTERIM REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED 66 KV GRID PLOT AT G-7, DWARKA, NEW DELHI. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description M/s.
More informationINSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad
INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad - 500 043 CIVIL ENGINEERING Tutorial Question Bank Name : FOUNDATION ENGINEERING Code : A60126 Class : III B. Tech II Semester Branch
More informationINSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK
INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad - 00 04 CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK Course Name Course Code Regulation Course Structure Course Coordinator Course Faculty
More informationm v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min
2.10 Problems Example 2.1: Design of Shallow Foundation in Saturated Clay Design a square footing to support a column load of 667 kn. The base of the footing will be located 1 m below the ground level
More informationReinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction
Lecture 32 Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction Prof. G L Sivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 Example calculation An 8 m high
More informationSCHEDULE OF RATES FOR GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR FAGMIL GRANULATED SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE PLANT AT CHITTORGARH, RAJASTHAN
PC107-PNCV-SOR-202 0 DOC. REV. 1 OF 6 (ANNEXURE-VII) FOR FAGMIL GRANULATED SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE PLANT AT CHITTORGARH, RAJASTHAN 0 11.04.16 ISSUED FOR TENDER GC GC BRIJESH REV REV DATE PURPOSE PREPD REVWD
More informationCONE PENETRATION TESTS
February 25, 2015 John Doe, P.E. Acme Engineering and Testing 1234 Test Avenue, Suite 204 Lake Wales, FL 33853 Re: Sample CPT Soundings Dear Mr. Doe, Direct Push Services, LLC (DPS) was retained by Acme
More informationSUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES
SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES (These notes are guidelines only and must not be included in the Contract Documents). 1. SCOPE These Notes are guidelines
More informationItem 404 Driving Piling
Item Driving Piling 1. DESCRIPTION Drive piling. 2. EQUIPMENT 2.1. Driving Equipment. Use power hammers for driving piling with specified bearing resistance. Use power hammers that comply with Table 1.
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Laboratory CIVIL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL LABORATORY Experiment no 8 Standard Penetration Test
OBJECTIVE To determine the Bearing Capacity of the soils. SCOPE This method describes the standard penetration test using the split-spon sampler to obtain the resistance of soil to penetration (N-value),
More informationEXPERIMENTS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. Smt. S. R. PATEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Dabhi, unjha Department of CIVIL engineering
EXPERIMENTS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Experiments in Geotechnical Engineering - II: Smt. S. R. PATEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Dabhi, unjha- 384170 Department of CIVIL engineering Subject : GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ii
More informationBearing Capacity and Settlement Response of PMS Tanks on Cohesionless Soil Lithology in Lekki, Lagos of Nigeria
Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research,, ():- (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN: 8 Bearing Capacity and
More informationPUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. Push Pier Systems PN #MBPPT
PUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. PN #MBPPT Push Pier Systems About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair and new construction
More informationInfluence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria
Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research, 201, 2 (4):20-27 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN: 22 0041 Influence
More informationCIVE 554/650. Geotechnical Engineering. Rock. Soil. Water. Site Investigation Techniques. CIVE Knight 1. 1/8/2006 CIVE Knight 1
CIVE 554/650 Site Investigation Techniques 1/8/2006 CIVE 554 - Knight 1 Geotechnical Engineering Soil Rock Water 1/8/2006 CIVE 554 - Knight 2 CIVE 554 - Knight 1 Key Soil Engineering Properties Compressibility
More informationTypical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations
Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations Density of soil: In geotechnical engineering, one deals with several densities such as dry density, bulk density, saturated
More informationFormation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m
DESIGN OF RETAINING WALL INTRODUCTION: This wall is designed for active earth pressure and live load surcharge pressure The loads for the purpose of design are calculated per meter length of wall. BASIC
More information1 CHAPTER 1. Standard Penetration Test: Corrections and Correlations. 1.1 General. 1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Page1 1 CHAPTER 1 Standard Penetration Test: Corrections and Correlations 1.1 General This chapter mainly focuses on the Standard Penetration Test, its correction and correlations with different soil properties.
More informationINFLUENCE OF FLY ASH IN STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF COHESIVE SOILS
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2016, pp. 67 72, Article ID: IJCIET_07_06_008 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=6
More informationCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA , United States.
LastD 4429 93 standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because it may not be technically possible to adequately
More informationConstruction Dewatering
Construction Dewatering Introduction The control of groundwater is one of the most common and complicated problems encountered on a construction site. Construction dewatering can become a costly issue
More informationDownloaded from Downloaded from /1
VI SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2003 Q. [1] [a] Draw a right angle four-arm intersection of two roads and show various conflicts points if [a] both roads are with way movements, and [b] one road is with
More informationInfluence of Fly Ash Content on Compaction Characteristics of Fly Ash Clay Mixture
Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume, No. 1, 16 Influence of Fly Ash Content on Compaction Characteristics of Fly Ash Clay Mixture Ashis Kumar Bera 1)* and Sayan Kundu 2) 1) Associate Professor
More informationTYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation
TYPES OF FOUNDATION Introduction: The lowest artificially built part of a structure which transmits the load of the structure to the soil lying underneath is called foundation. The supporting part of a
More informationSOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS
SOIL ANCHORS ignasi.llorens@upc.edu ETSAB/UPC - 2013 PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS Antecedents of passive anchors can be found in Nature. Roots feed plants and provide uplift resistance against the wind
More information3. Types of foundation
Foundation Engineering CE 48. Types of foundation & foundation materials Contents Introduction Shallow Foundations Deep Foundations Introduction Why different types of? General types of Introduction Why
More informationSample Project with EPB TBM according to DIN 4085
1 General The aim of the document is to provide information about the required input parameters and the necessary steps for the calculation of a face support pressure. This calculation is carried out under
More information1) INTRODUCTION 2) THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE
1 1) INTRODUCTION 2) THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE and Stingray earth anchors are driven tipping plate soil anchors for reaction of tensile loads. anchors have ultimate capacities up to 20 tons, and Stingray anchors
More informationSoil Stabilization using Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash
ISSN(Online): - ISSN (Print): - (An ISO : Certified Organization) Vol., Issue, July Soil Stabilization using Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash Er. Jasvir Singh, Er.Harpreet Singh Maan Assistant Professor, Department
More informationOP CHECKLIST FOR 1D CONSOLIDATION LABORATORY TEST
Page 1 of 5 WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS NHB Compiled by : LSS Checked by : GSS Approved by : OP-3-31. CHECKLIST FOR 1D CONSOLIDATION LABORATORY TEST Page 2 of 5 31.0 CHECKLIST ITEMS *(refer to respective
More informationSUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Page 1 of 101 Written by: Ming Zhu Date: 08/20/2008 Reviewed by: R. Kulasingam/J. Beech Date: 08/20/2008 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES 1. INTRODUCTION This Summary of Subsurface
More informationThe following notes supersede the related tender clauses and also become the part of tender document.
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd. ADDENDUM-1 Tender / Enq. : U6509-3060/ABM Item: Cooling Tower Package (143-X402) Project : 66-6509-700 Client: Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mahul The following notes supersede
More informationh o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s
TTT Products Limited Feb 2016. 1 of 6 The MultiPole advantage Introducing the TTT MultiPole an incredibly versatile pole due to its unique hollow core. The MultiPole is a multifunctional pole suitable
More informationIntroduction of world construction methods and trends. Franz-Werner Gerressen, Head of Method Development, Tokyo,
Introduction of world construction methods and trends Franz-Werner Gerressen, Head of Method Development, Tokyo, 2017-11-29 1 Introduction of world construction methods and trends Outline Single Pass Piling
More informationInflatable Packer Single & Double. Single & Double Packer Dimension. Wireline Packer. Water Testing Packer (WTP) Packer
Inflatable Packer Single & Double Single & Double Packer Dimension Wireline Packer Water Testing Packer (WTP) Packer Packer Working Pressure & Depth Chart Packer Water Hand Pump Packer Air Driven Pump
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS
SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS 1. SCOPE This specification details the six (6) stage permanent strain Repeated Load Triaxial (RLT) test for unbound and modified
More informationLEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD Clarke Place Richmond, BC V6V 2H9 T: F:
Appendix B TMEP Enhanced FEED Study eotechnical Foreshore Investigation - Findings Report Westridge Loading Facility, Burnaby, BC, April 7, 1 LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD. -1791 Clarke Place Richmond, BC VV
More informationh o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s
TTT Products Limited July 2017. 1 of 6 The MultiPole advantage The TTT MultiPole is an incredibly versatile pole due to its unique hollow core. The MultiPole is a multifunctional pole suitable for structural
More informationAn Introduction to Deep Foundations
An Introduction to Deep Foundations J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A. Paul Guyer is a registered mechanical engineer, civil engineer, fire protection engineer and architect with over 35 years experience in the
More informationLecture 8&9: Construction Dewatering
Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport Colleague of Engineering & Technology Construction & Building Engineering CB 523 Methods and Equipment for Construction 1 Lecture 8&9: Construction
More informationDynamic Cone Penetrometer SL970. Impact Test Equipment Ltd & User Guide. User Guide
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer SL970 Impact Test Equipment Ltd www.impact-test.co.uk & www.impact-test.com User Guide User Guide Impact Test Equipment Ltd. Building 21 Stevenston Ind. Est. Stevenston Ayrshire
More informationDepartment of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE Engineering Geology
Department of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE 218.3 Engineering Geology Assignment #3, Head, Pore Pressure & Effective Stress Due 08 Oct, 2010 NOTE: Numbered subscripts indicate depth, in metres, below
More informationSoils for civil engineering purposes
BRITISH STANDARD BS 1377-9: 1990 Incorporating Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 Methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purposes Part 9: In-situ tests ICS 93.020 Committees responsible for this British
More informationTheory of a vertically loaded Suction Pile in CLAY
11 Theory of a vertically loaded Suction Pile in CLAY Mainly based on the et Norske Veritas NV-RP-E303 1. Convention Water COG h L Soil COG t Figure 1 Suction Pile Figure 2 Suction pile with main parameters
More informationSOIL IMPROVEMENT BY VACUUM PRELOADING FOR A POWER PLANT PROJECT IN VIETNAM
18 th Southeast Asian Geotechnical & Inaugural AGSSEA Conference 29-31 May 213, Singapore Leung, Goh & Shen (eds) SOIL IMPROVEMENT BY VACUUM PRELOADING FOR A POWER PLANT PROJECT IN VIETNAM GOUW TJIE-LIONG
More informationPressuremeters in Geotechnical Design
Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design B.G. CLARKE Department of Civil Engineering University of Newcastle upon Tyne BLACK1E ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL An Imprint of Chapman & Hall London Glasgow Weinheim
More informationMechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads
Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads Tim Oliver VP Global Applications Technology Tensar International toliver@tensar.co.uk Effect of geogrid on particle movement SmartRock Effect of geogrid on
More informationHomework 2 PROBLEM No. 1
PROBLEM No. 1 In accordance with the project requirements, the contractor has obtained a 4 diameter core from below the shaft bottom. The core run was 5.0 and the total rock recovered was 4.2. A total
More informationStabilization of Black Cotton Soil using Alkali Activated Fly Ash
IJIRST International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology Volume 3 Issue 02 July 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil using Alkali Activated Fly Ash Prashant
More informationGROUND IMPROVEMENT USING RAPID IMPACT COMPACTION
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-, Paper No. 9 GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING RAPID IMPACT COMPACTION Henrik KRISTIANSEN 1, Michael DAVIES SUMMARY Geotechnical
More informationField Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.
5.23 Soil Compaction Testing Requirements Purpose This instruction has been developed to support projects where the reinstatement and compaction of soil is required following an excavation. The purpose
More informationDesign Data 22M. Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe. w w I = w - x 1000 (3) (SG x 1000)
Design Data M Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe There are several installation conditions where there is the possibility that concrete pipe may float even though the density of concrete is approximately.4
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
43 Module 3: Lecture - 5 on Compressibility and Consolidation Contents Stresses in soil from surface loads; Terzaghi s 1-D consolidation theory; Application in different boundary conditions; Ramp loading;
More informationDesaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential
Desaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential M. Ishihara, M. Okamura & T. Oshita Public Works Research Institute, Tsukuba City, Japan. ABSTRACT: It has been known that
More informationField Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.
5.23 Soil Compaction Testing Requirements Purpose This instruction has been developed to support projects where the reinstatement and compaction of soil is required following an excavation. The purpose
More informationFor a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.
Question 1 For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions. Figure 1 - Cantilever Pile Wall i. Estimate the net resulting horizontal
More informationDIRECTIONAL DRILLING
DIRECTIONAL DRILLING 1. General. Installation of pipelines through the levee embankment using directional drilling technology is prohibited. Installation of pipelines through a flood control project foundation
More informationRisk Assessment and Mitigating Measures Regarding Pile Installation at EBS Biohub Jetty
Geotechnical Safety and Risk V T. Schweckendiek et al. (Eds.) 2015 The authors and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative
More informationTZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE
www.ucanfast.com TECHNICAL MANUAL SECTION 2.2 PAGE 1 / 10 ä DESCRIPTION UCAN TZ torque controlled mechanical expansion wedge anchors have a Category 1 classification. They are used to resist static, wind
More informationBehavior of Square Footing Resting on Reinforced Sand Subjected to Static Load
IJIRST International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology Volume 3 Issue 02 July 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 Behavior of Square Footing Resting on Reinforced Sand Subjected to Static
More informationP Oskarshamn site investigation. Borehole: KAV01 Results of tilt testing. Panayiotis Chryssanthakis Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo
P-04-42 Oskarshamn site investigation Borehole: KAV01 Results of tilt testing Panayiotis Chryssanthakis Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo March 2004 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear
More informationIN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8
OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8 Scope This test method describes a test procedure for determining the density of bituminous mixes by means of a nuclear gauge
More informationMETHOD 2E - DETERMINATION OF LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION FLOW RATE. NOTE: This method does not include all of the
287 METHOD 2E - DETERMINATION OF LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION FLOW RATE NOTE: This method does not include all of the specifications (e.g., equipment and supplies) and procedures (e.g., sampling and analytical)
More informationFP McCann Tunnels and Shafts 1
FP M c Cann FP McCann Tunnels and Shafts 1 The McCann range of shaft and tunnel products have been developed to meet the requirements of the latest industry standards which include the British Tunnelling
More informationStability of Pipeline and details of Anchor blocks
Stability of Pipeline and details of Anchor blocks For Offshore pipeline laying at Gulf of Kutch, Gujarat. Client WELSPUN (I) LTD, Gujarat EPC Contactor PATEL CONSTRUCTION CO. Consultants Prof. R. Sundaravadivelu
More informationSept 23, 2014 LAB MANUAL
Sept 23, 2014 LAB MANUAL 1000.0 1000 STANDARD PRACTICES 1000.1 CALCULATIONS and FORMS Throughout this manual there are test calculation procedures. These calculations are provided so that a technician
More informationGround Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft
Ground Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft T. H. Hwang 1), H. J. Kim 2), and * J.H. Shin 3) 1), 2), 3) Department of Civil Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea 3) jhshin@konkuk.ac.kr
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF A ROBUST PUSH-IN PRESSUREMETER
DEVELOPMENT OF A ROBUST PUSH-IN PRESSUREMETER Roger Failmezger, P.E. In-Situ Soil Testing, L.C., Lancaster, Virginia, USA ABSTRACT A push-in pressuremeter was developed using slotted steel casing with
More informationDensity of Granular Material by Modified Sand-Cone Method for Thin Layers
Density of Granular Material by Modified Sand-Cone Method for Thin Layers 1. Scope: This test is for determining in-place density of granular materials that have a total thickness of 3 or less. 2. Apparatus:
More informationfor Prepared for: Mr. Greg Hartz Tompkins Trust Company 121 East Seneca Street Ithaca, NY 14850
Elwyn & Palmer Consulting Engineers, PLLC Subsurface Investigation Report for Proposed ew Headquarters and Drive-Through Tompkins Financial 118-119 East Seneca Street Ithaca, Y Prepared for: Mr. Greg Hartz
More informationHCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST
HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST Release Date: January 7, 2014 Sampling Coarse Aggregate PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST AASHTO T-2 Sampling of Aggregates Sampling From A Stockpile 1 When
More informationFehmarnbelt Fixed Link. Geotechnical Large Scale Testing
Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link. Geotechnical Large Scale Testing A. Reto Schreier GEO, Denmark, rsc@geo.dk B. Anders Tovsig Schaarup Andersen Per Aarsleff A/S, Denmark, ata@aarsleff.com C. Nataša Katić + Peter
More informationSITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE
LANDSLIDE RISK ASSESSMENT SOUTHERN REGION SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE LEGAL LOCATION: LSD 4-3-21-4 W5M and 1-4-21-4 W5M REFERENCE LOCATION ALONG HIGHWAY The slide area is located between
More informationWEDGE-ALL Wedge Anchors
WEDGE-ALL Wedge Anchors The Wedge-All wedge anchors are a non-bottom bearing, wedge-style expansion anchor for use in solid concrete or grout-fi lled masonry. A one-piece clip ensures uniform holding capacity
More informationA Slipway Structure for River Ship Repair
1 Paper N 0 : III.05 A Slipway Structure for River Ship Repair Zorislav Sorić, Radovan Vugrinec Predrag Kvasnička, Tomislav Kišiček Josip Galić, Leo Matešić Abstract: A slipway structure for ship repair
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON OPTIMUM INSTALLATION DEPTH OF PVD UNDER VACUUM CONSOLIDATION ABSTRACT
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON OPTIMUM INSTALLATION DEPTH OF PVD UNDER VACUUM CONSOLIDATION EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON OPTIMUM INSTALLATION DEPTH OF PVD UNDER VACUUM CONSOLIDATION J.-C CHAI i), N. MIURA
More informationDisplacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles
Seattle, WA Displacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles Dr. Huang Fuyun Fuzhou University 31 st May, 217 Outline Background ing introduction ing results Simple calculation
More informationGround control for slurry TBM tunnelling GEO Report 249
Cutter head Slurry feed line Excavation chamber Submerged wall Plenum air cushion Pressure bulkhead Opening at base of submerged wall Slurry suction line Nick Shirlaw Ground control for slurry TBM tunnelling
More informationTurfgrass and Environmental Research Online
Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online...Using Science to Benefit Golf Researchers at Michigan State University used engineering techniques to test the bearing capacity (resistance to surface deformation)
More informationCHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS
CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS 5.1 Introduction Using surcharging as the sole soil consolidation mean can take a long time to reach the desired soil settlement. Soil consolidation using prefabricated
More informationStandard Test Procedures Manual
STP 240-20 Standard Test Procedures Manual Section: 1. SCOPE 1.1. Description This method describes the test used to evaluate the thickness and bearing capacity of the subbase and subgrade using the Dynamic
More informationTHE EFFECT OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP FOOTING IN COHESIVE FRICTIONAL MEDIUM
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (ICCESD 2018), 9~11 February 2018, KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh (ISBN-978-984-34-3502-6) THE EFFECT OF EMBEDMENT
More informationDESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM
DESIGN OF BELL-MOUTH SPILLWAY AT BARVI DAM Akshay Haldankar 1, Mahesh Bhadra 2, Rahul Harad 3, Darpan Kapre 4, Dipali Patil 5 1,2,3,4 Under graduate,dept. of Civil Engineering, DRIEMS Neral. 5Assistant
More informationAnalysis of dilatometer test in calibration chamber
Analysis of dilatometer test in calibration chamber Lech Bałachowski Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland Keywords: calibration chamber, DMT, quartz sand, FEM ABSTRACT: Because DMT in calibration test
More informationLicensed Copy: Puan Ms. Norhayati, Petroliam Nasional Berhad, 12 March 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
BRITISH STANDARD BS 1377-1: 1990 Incorporating Amendment No. 1 Methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purposes Part 1: General requirements and sample preparation Committees responsible for this
More informationASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING) VOL. 9, NO. 5 (2008) PAGES
ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING) VOL. 9, NO. 5 (2008) PAGES 505-512 THE INFLUENCE OF RANDOMLY ORIENTED HAIR FIBRE AND LIME ON THE CBR VALUE OF DADRI FLY ASH J.N. Akhtar *, J. Alam
More informationDESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm
STEPPED FOOTING The construction of sloped footing is sometimes difficult and when the slope of the top face of footing is more, say more than 1 vertically to 3 horizontally, it may be difficult to finish
More informationRECYCLED AGGREGATES FOR MINOR SCHEMES (RAMS)
RECYCLED AGGREGATES FOR MINOR SCHEMES (RAMS) Project Report May 2011 By Prof N Ghazireh Head of R & D, Tarmac Ltd Tarmac Ltd Millfields Road Ettingshall Wolverhampton WV4 6JP 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...4
More informationAPPENDIX G SCA BASIN CALCULATIONS
ONONDAGA LAKE SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT FINAL DESIGN APPENDIX G SCA BASIN CALCULATIONS p:\honeywell -syr\444853 - lake detail design\09 reports\9.22 sediment management final design\110930 submittal\110906 onon
More informationSOFRASAR TUNNEL PRODUCTS CONNECTING ALL COMPONENTS
www.optimas.com SOFRASAR TUNNEL PRODUCTS CONNECTING ALL COMPONENTS CONTENTS DOWEL SYSTEM SOF-FIX AXIS 110 PG. 06 DOWEL SYSTEMS 04 BOLTING SYSTEMS 08 GROUT LIFT SOCKETS 11 CENTERING DOWELS AND SHEAR DOWELS
More informationIrrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FLUID MECHANICS Faculty of Engineering nd Year CIVIL ENG. Irrigation &Hydraulics Department 010-011 1. FLUID PROPERTIES 1. Identify the dimensions and units for the following engineering
More informationHomework of chapter (3)
The Islamic University of Gaza, Civil Engineering Department, Fluid mechanics-discussion, Instructor: Dr. Khalil M. Al Astal T.A: Eng. Hasan Almassri T.A: Eng. Mahmoud AlQazzaz First semester, 2013. Homework
More informationl DESCRIPTION l FEATURES l LIMITATIONS l TYPICAL APPLICATIONS l MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS TECHNICAL MANUAL SECTION 2.3 PAGE 1 / 6
www.ucanfast.com TECHNICAL MANUAL SECTION 2.3 PAGE 1 / 6 l DESCRIPTION The UCAN WAG anchor is a fully threaded torque controlled expansion anchor assembled with a three segment expansion clip. All parts
More informationMethod of Test for Sieve Analysis
Method of Test for Sieve Analysis 1. Scope: This test is for determining sieve analysis of subbase, base course, mineral aggregate (Surface course materials), concrete aggregates, fillers, and similar
More information