FY FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "FY FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities"

Shauna Paul
5 years ago
Views:

FY 2019 - FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities Prepared for Bay County Transportation Planning Organization; and The Florida Department of Transportation,

1 FY FY 2023 Bay County TPO Project Priorities Prepared for Bay County Transportation Planning Organization; and The Florida Department of Transportation, District Three Prepared by West Florida Regional Planning Council Staff to the Bay County Transportation Planning Organization Adopted: July 26, 2017 Amended: This report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the Florida Department of Transportation, and local participating governments, in partial fulfillment of UPWP Work Task C.1. This document does not necessarily reflect the official reviews or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

2 Bay County Transportation Planning Organization FY Project Priorities Document Prepared by West Florida Regional Planning Council Staff to the Bay County Transportation Planning Organization The Bay County Transportation Planning Organization can be reached at: Post Office Box E. Olive Road, Suite A Pensacola, Florida Pensacola, Florida Phone: Fax: (800) (850) (850) Staff contact for this report: Gary Kramer, Transportation Planner IV gary.kramer@wfrpc.org

3 Section Table of Contents Page Numbers NTRODUCTION... 1 METHODOLOGY... 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT... 3 Table 1: FY Committed Non-Strategic Intermodal System (Non-SIS) Project Priorities... 5 Table 2: FY Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities... 6 Table 3: FY Committed Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Table 4: FY Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Table 5: FY Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities Table 6: FY Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Table 7: FY Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Table 8: FY Committed Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities Table 9: FY Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities Table 10: FY Committed Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities Table 11: FY Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities Table 12: FY Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant Table 13: FY Aviation Project Priorities Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport Table 14: FY Seaport Project Priorities Port Panama City Bay County TPO FY 2019-FY 2023 Project Priorities i

4 List of Appendices Appendix A Multimodal Studies Appendix B Evaluation Criteria Appendix C Public Comments Appendix D Resolution BAY Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities ii

NTRODUCTION The Bay County Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), staffed by the West Florida Regional Planning Council, is tasked with developing Project Priorities.

to the State Department of Transportation by October 1 st.

The adopted Project Priorities are used by the State Department of Transportation to develop a five-year Work Program.

5 NTRODUCTION The Bay County Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), staffed by the West Florida Regional Planning Council, is tasked with developing Project Priorities. Project Priorities, which are essentially the Cost Feasible Plan element of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), are usually approved in September each year and are due to the State Department of Transportation by October 1 st. However, this year the Florida Department of Transportation requested the Project Priorities by August 1, 2017 which required adoption by the TPO at their July 2017 meeting. The adopted Project Priorities are used by the State Department of Transportation to develop a five-year Work Program. This five-year Work Program is then used by the TPO to develop its fiveyear Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is adopted by the TPO at its June meeting each year. The chart below explains the process identified above. LRTP Implement Projects Priorities TIP FDOT 5 Year Work Program Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities 1

6 The projects listed in this Project Priorities document are identified by the following tables: Capacity Projects (Tables 1-4). Community Redevelopment Agency Projects (Table 5). Transportation System Management Projects (Tables 6-7). Bicycle/Pedestrian Related Projects (Tables 8-9). Transportation Alternatives Program Projects (Tables 10-11). Public Transportation Related Projects (Tables 12). Aviation Projects (Table 13). Port Projects (Table 14). METHODOLOGY Capacity projects are based on the 2040 LRTP. Completed projects are removed from the list. Projects scheduled for construction in first three years are moved to the committed list. Non - SIS projects are ranked on three categories: existing priorities; new box funds end of the box fund list by dollar amount and program lists; and new projects end of the list by Needs Plan Evaluation Criteria rankings. SIS projects are ranked on two categories-existing priorities and new projects at the end of the list by existing Non-SIS priorities and then by Needs Plan Evaluation Criteria rankings. Community Redevelopment Agency Projects are furnished by the City of Panama City Beach. Transportation System Management Projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria. Projects were provided by the Florida Department of Transportation. Bicycle/Pedestrian projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria as recommended by a committee of the TCC and CAC. Transportation Alternatives Program Projects are ranked based on TPO approved criteria. Public Transportation Related Projects are listed by potential grants and were furnished by the TPO s Public Transportation Staff in consultation with Bay Town Trolley Staff. Aviation Project Priorities are furnished by the Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport. Port Project Priorities are provided by Port Panama City. The Capacity, Transportation System Management, Bicycle/Pedestrian, and Transportation Alternatives Program Projects have listed Committed Projects in addition to the Project Priorities. Committed Projects are projects that are scheduled for construction in the first three years of the Work Program or are currently under construction. These projects are considered Committed so the projects get completed and are not assigned a Project Priority. However, it is understood that these projects are to continue to be funded by the Department of Transportation until the projects are completed. Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -2

7 The statuses of the phases for the Capacity Projects have been color coded to indicate funding. Phases in GREEN are considered Cost Feasible with State and/or Federal funds. This is based on the current 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. If the phase is currently scheduled for completion in the FDOT Five Year Work Program, the fiscal year of funding and the project number are noted. Phases in RED are not considered cost feasible with State and/or Federal funds based on the currently adopted 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. In addition, projects shaded in yellow are the next phases to be funded. The Capacity, Transportation System Management, Transportation Alternatives Program, and Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects have separate Evaluation Criteria to rank projects. The Evaluation Criteria for these four categories are listed in Appendix B. However, the TPO has the final decision on how the Project Priorities are ranked. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Two Public Workshops were held on May 1, The locations of the workshops were the Lynn Haven City Hall and the Gulf Coast State College in Panama City. In addition, two TPO and Advisory Committee Workshops were held. The first workshop was on May 22, 2017 at the Panama City Beach Library whereas the June 29, 2017 workshop was at the Bay County Administration Building in Panama City. Each of the workshops were advertised in the Panama City News Herald. An notice was also sent to the TPO and Advisory Committee Members. News releases were distributed to media outlets and meeting information was promoted through social media sites. Flyers were created and ed to members of the TPO and advisory committees. Comments from the public workshops were identified in the TPO and Advisory Committee Members June and July agenda enclosures and are included in Appendix C. A Public Hearing was also held at the TPO meeting in July. However, no individuals spoke at the Public Hearing. However, the Project Priorities Tables from drafts through adoption were posted on the web site for review and comment. The Project Priorities were a review item at the June TPO Meeting and were approved at the July TPO Meeting (See Resolution BAY in Appendix D) with the following changes: Table 2, Non-SIS o Switch Priorities 3 (Public Transportation) and 4 (Transportation System Management). o Move Priorities 6 (Park and Ride Lot at SR 77 and SR 20) and 7 (Park and Ride Lot at US 231 and Vicinity of Industrial Park) to Priorities 22 and 23. o Switch Priorities 18 (West Bay Parkway Extension from SR 77 to SR 75 (US 231) and 22 (Loop Road Phase 2 from Bay Parkway to Nautilus Street). o Move Priorities 16 (SR 388 from E of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport to East of Burnt Mill Creek) and 17 (SR 388 from East of Burnt Mill Creek to SR 77) Priorities 24 and 25. Table 4, SIS o Move Priority 5 East Avenue from Sherman Avenue to SR 2312 (Baldwin Avenue) to Priority 2 and corresponding priorities moved down on the list. Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -3

8 Table 7, TSM o Include new project Signalized intersection switching upgrades to Priority 3 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list. Table 13, AVIATION PROJECT PRIORITIES o Replace existing priorities with update priorities provided by the Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport. Table 15, CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) PROJECT PRIORITIES o Remove Table from Project Priorities because current intersection projects that are funded with these funds improve air quality in the urbanized area. If these funds are diverted to the TPO s Air Quality Fuel Initiative, it would take funds away from these intersection projects. Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -4

9 FDOT Item- Segment Table 1: FY Committed Non-Strategic Intermodal System (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway Project Name From To Project Phase Status Improvement US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road Segment 2 Richard Jackson Boulevard South Thomas Drive Local Project Jenks Avenue 23 rd Street Baldwin Road US 98/Tyndall Air Force Base US 98 Tyndall Air Force Base PD&E Complete Design Complete ROW Complete Underway PD&E -- Complete Design Complete ROW Complete Underway PD&E Complete Design Funded FY 17/18 ROW Not Required Funded FY 17/18 Transit Lanes Widen to 5 lanes Construct grade separated interchange Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -5

10 FDOT Item- Segment Table 2: FY Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds Improvement FY Priority Ranking Operations and Maintenance of the current ITS System $500,000 1 N/A CR 30 (Front Beach Road) Kelly Street Panama City Beach Parkway (US 98) Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects 1 $450,000 of Sidewalks Transportation System Management (TSM) Improvements $350, Public Transportation Capital Improvements 2 $350, City of Lynn Haven Rails to Trails US th Street Dead End at Old Fuel Depot Regional Trail Program $100,000 5 PD&E -- Complete Gulf Coast Parkway CR 2315 (Star Avenue) SR 30A (US 98) Design Underway ROW -- Funded FY 18/19 Construct 4 lanes SR 22 (Wewa Highway) Business 98 Star Avenue Funded FY 20/21 PD&E Complete Design Underway Right-of-Way See Table 9 for a listing of the Bicycle/Pedestrian projects. 2 See Table 12 for a listing of the Public Transportation projects. 3 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. Widen to 4 lanes 7 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -6

11 FDOT Item- Segment Table 2: FY Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To US 98 / SR 30A / Panama City Beach Parkway) US 98 / SR 30A / Panama City Beach Parkway US 98 / SR 30A / Panama City Beach Parkway Mandy Lane East of Nautilus Street East of Richard Jackson Blvd. East of Nautilus Street East of Richard Jackson Blvd. Thomas Drive/CR SR 390 SR 77 US 231 NA CR 389 (East Avenue) US 98/Thomas Drive Interchange Phases II &III CR 2312 (Baldwin Road) US 98 SR 390 Thomas Drive Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds PD&E Underway # Design Funded FY 18/19 Right-of-Way 1 1 PD&E Underway # Design Funded FY 19/20 Right-of-Way 1 1 PD&E Underway # Design Underway Right-of-Way 1 1 PD&E Funded FY 17/18 Design 1 Right-of-Way 1 1 PD&E 1 Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E Complete Design Complete ROW 1 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. Improvement FY Priority Ranking Widen to 6 lanes 8 Widen to 6 lanes 9 Widen to 6 lanes 10 Widen to 6 lanes 11 Widen to 4 lanes 12 New Interchange 13 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -7

12 FDOT Item- Segment Table 2: FY Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds PD&E 1 Improvement FY Priority Ranking NA Loop Road Phase 2 Bay Parkway NA Transmitter Road US 231 (SR 75) NA Star Avenue Gulf to Bay Parkway SR 22 (Wewa Highway) US 98 (SR 30) west of Mexico Beach Nautilus Street SR 22 (Wewa Highway) US 231 (SR75) The Bay/Gulf County Line Gulf Coast Parkway US 98 (SR 30) US 231 (SR75) Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E 1 Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E 1 Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E Underway # Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E Underway Design 1 Right-of-Way 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. Widen to 4 lanes 14 Widen to 4 lanes 15 Widen to 4 lanes 16 Construct New Roadway Construct New Roadway Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -8

13 FDOT Item- Segment Table 2: FY Non-Strategic Intermodal Systems (Non-SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To West Bay Parkway US 98 (SR 30) in Walton County West Bay Parkway Extension SR77 Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds Improvement FY Priority Ranking Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -9 SR 79 SR 75 (US 231) PD&E Underway Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E 1 Design 1 Right-of-Way Construct New Roadway 19 Widen to 4 lanes 20 NA Multimodal Studies 3 $150, NA Park and Ride Lot SR 77 SR 20 NA Park and Ride Lot US SR SR 388 E of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport East of Burnt Mill Creek Vicinity of Industrial Park East of Burnt Mill Creek SR 77 Design $50,000 $250,000 Design $50,000 $250,000 PD&E Complete Design Underway Right-of-Way PD&E Complete Design Underway Right-of-Way 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. 2 Feasibility Study is currently underway. 3 See Appendix A for Multimodal Studies Widen to 4 lanes 24 Widen to 4 lanes 25

14 Table 3: FY Committed Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway FDOT Item- Segment Project Name From To Project Phases Status Improvement US98 at 23 rd Street US rd Street SR 390 (St Andrews Boulevard/Beck Avenue) SR 390 (St Andrews Boulevard) SR 390 (St. Andrews Boulevard) SR 388 (West Bay Parkway) SR 368 (23 rd Street) CR 2312 (Baldwin Road) CR 2312 (Baldwin Road) Jenks Avenue Jenks Avenue SR 77 SR 79 East of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport PD&E Complete Design Complete Right-of-Way Complete Underway PD&E Complete Design Complete Right of Way Underway Funded FY 18/19 PD&E Complete Design Complete Right of Way Underway Funded FY 16/17 PD&E Complete Design Complete Right-of-Way Underway Funded FY 17/18 PD&E Complete Design Underway Right-of-Way Funded FY 16/17 Funded FY 17/18 of Overpass Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen/Construct to 4 Lanes Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -10

15 FDOT Item- Segment NA Table 4: FY Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To Improvement SR 75 (US 231) 2 SR 389 (East Avenue) SR 75 (US 231) NA SR 75 (US 231) NA SR 75 (US 231) S. of SR 30A (US 98) Sherman Avenue South of Pipe Line Road North of Penny Road South of Scotts Ferry Road South of Pipe Line Road CR 2312 (Baldwin Road) North of Penny Road South of Scotts Ferry Road SR 20 6-lanes 4-lanes 6-lanes 6-lanes 6-lanes 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program. 2 Includes intersection/interchange improvements at US98/Harrison Avenue Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds PD&E Underway # Design Underway Right-of-Way Funded FY 19/20 through FY 21/22 PD&E Underway # Design 1 Right-of-Way PD&E Underway # Design Underway Right-of-Way 1 PD&E Underway # Design 1 Right-of-Way 1 PD&E Underway # Design 1 Right-of-Way 1 FY Priority Ranking Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -11

16 FDOT Item- Segment Table 4: FY Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Project Priorities Project Name From To Improvement NA 23 rd Street US98 (SR30) SR390 6-lanes 1 Phase NOT currently funded in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or FDOT Five Year Work Program Phases in Green are Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds in the 2040 LRTP - Red phases are NOT Cost Feasible with State/Federal Funds PD&E 1 Design 1 Right-of-Way FY Priority Ranking 6 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -12

17 Table 5: FY Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking FDOT Item- Segment Project Name From To Phases Locally Funded in 2040 LRTP Improvement US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road Segment 3 West of SR 79 West of Lullwater Drive Design Complete Right-of-Way Funded FY 18/19 Transit Lanes US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road Segment 4.1 West of Lullwater Drive Hill Road Design Funded FY 17/18 & FY 18/19 Right-of-Way Funded in FY 20/21 Transit Lanes US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road Segment 4.2 Hill Road SR 392A (Hutchison Boulevard) Design Funded in FY 20/21 Right-of-Way Transit Lanes US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road Segment 4.3 SR 392A (Hutchison Boulevard) Richard Jackson Boulevard Design Partially Funded FY 20/21 Right-of-Way Transit Lanes SR 79 (South Arnold Drive) US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road US 98/SR 30A/Panama City Beach Parkway Design Complete Right-of-Way Funded FY 17/18 Widen to 4 Lanes Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -13

18 Table 5: FY Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking FDOT Item- Segment Project Name From To Phases Locally Funded in 2040 LRTP Improvement NA Alf Coleman Road US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road US 98/SR 30A/Panama City Beach Parkway Design Right-of-Way Widen to 4 Lanes NA Hill Road US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road US 98/SR 30A/Panama City Beach Parkway Design Right-of-Way Widen to 4 Lanes NA Powell Adams Road US 98A/SR 30/Front Beach Road L.C. Hilton Jr. Drive Design Right-of-Way Widen to 4 Lanes Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -14

19 FDOT Item- Segment Table 6: FY Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway Scheduled Major Street Minor Street Improvement FY 15/16 US 98 (Back Beach Road) SR FY 15/16 US 98 (Panama City Beach Parkway/Back Beach Road) Walton County Line to Thomas Drive Construct additional left turn lane east bound on US 98 (Back Beach Road) Signal Cabinet Modification 23 rd Street US 98 to US FY 16/17 CR 389 E 26 th Street Modify Intersection Upgrade ATMS system software from Actra to Tactics, institute performance monitoring FY 16/17 Traffic Management Center Upgrades features, upgrade video wall, upgrade TMC & EOC video switch, and integrate network management software FY 16/17 SR 77 (Ohio Avenue) SR75 (US231) to Upgrade signal systems to run East 9th Street adaptive phasing. North bound left turn lane, add an exclusive right turn lane and combined left turn lane/thru lane on north bound Cauley FY 18/19 SR 30A (US 98) Panama Avenue. A raised median will be Cauley Avenue City Beach Parkway constructed on US 98 at Cauley Avenue. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will be added from Annabellas Drive to about 500 feet east of the intersection Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -15

20 Table 6: FY Committed Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway FDOT Item- Segment Scheduled Major Street Minor Street Improvement FY 18/ FY 18/ FY 19/20 SR 30 (US 98A/Front Beach Road) SR 392A (Hutchison Boulevard) SR 75 (US 231/Harrison Avenue) Moylan Road Clara Avenue East 19th Street South Bound right turn from Moylan onto Front Beach Road in addition to a West Bound right turn lane from Front Beach Road onto Moylan. Bay County requests a left turn lane on Moylan from Back Beach Road be included in this project. Signalize intersection, Fiber Optic Connect signal to system, remove School Zone, move crosswalk to the signalized intersection Add signal backplates (completed by City) Add South Bound right turn lane Add West Bound right turn lane Upgrade signal hardware Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -16

21 FDOT Item- Segment Table 7: FY Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Project Priorities Major Street Minor Street Description Estimated Cost Operations and Maintenance of the current ITS System (Fund with TSM Funds if this project cannot be funded with Capacity Funds and fund the maintenance of the system first; LRTP Capacity Priority #1) 1 - Construct West Bound right turn lane (Bay County requests to Construct SR 75 (US 231) Transmitter Road East Bound right turn lane instead) 2 - Extend North Bound left turn lane to accommodate queue NA System Wide Signalized Intersection Switching Upgrades NA SR 30 (Business 98) CR 2337 (Sherman Avenue) Upgrade signal switch systems to provide improved data feed to FDOT Regional TMC and driver info systems Improve Radii, Construct East Bound Left Turn Lane With 100 Feet of Storage FY Priority $500,000 1 $719,317 for, $204,800 for ROW 2 $520,882 3 $697,279 for, $1,019,800 for ROW NA SR 390 (Beck Avenue) 19 th Street Upgrade to Mast Arm Signalization Estimate in Progress 5 4 NA SR 391 (Airport Road) 19 th Street NA SR 30A (US 98/Tyndall Parkway) Ivy Road to Tyndall Air Force Base Main Entrance 1 Add left turn lanes 2 Upgrade to Mast Arms Install fiber cable from Ivy Road to main entrance of Tyndall Air Force Base Connect Sabre Drive and Tyndall Drive to ATMS. Estimate in Progress 6 $468,935 for, $ 0 for ROW 7 Note: The TPO is actively seeking additional projects for the TSM project priority list. These projects may come from existing and future corridor studies as well as requests from the TPO or the general public. Additional corridor studies may be funded under this TSM Table. Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -17

22 Table 8: FY Committed Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway FDOT Item- Segment Road Name From To Mode Recommended Facility Type/Improvement Minnesota Avenue 1 CR 2321 (Baldwin Road) Mosley Drive Pedestrian SR 30 (Alt. US 98) SR 79 Portside Drive Pedestrian SR 30 (Front Beach Road) Portside Drive East Lakeshore Drive Pedestrian of Sidewalks in FY 2016/17 of Sidewalks in FY 2017/18 of Sidewalks in FY 2018/19 1 This project is funded with safety funds as recommended by the Community Traffic Safety Team. 2 Project partially transferred to Bay County. Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -18

23 Table 9: FY Bicycle & Pedestrian Project Priorities FDOT Item- Segment Road Name From To Mode Recommended Facility Type/Improvement FY Priority CR 30 (Front Beach Road) East Lakeshore Drive Twin Lakes Drive Pedestrian of Sidewalks 1A CR 30 (Front Beach Road) Twin Lakes Drive Kelly Street Pedestrian of Sidewalks 1B NA CR30 (Front Beach Road) Kelly Street Panama City Beach Parkway (US 98) Pedestrian of Sidewalks 1C NA NA NA NA Harvard Boulevard CR 3026 (Cherry Street) CR 22/2337 (Sherman Avenue) CR 2323 (Boat Race Road) SR 390 Issac Byrd Park Pedestrian of Sidewalks 2 US98 (Tyndall Parkway (SR 30A) 11 th Street (CR 28) US98 (Tyndall Parkway (SR 30A) SR 30 (Business 98) Pedestrian of Sidewalks 3 15 th Street/US 98 (SR 30A) NA 15 th Street SR 30 (US 98) CR 386 Pedestrian Pedestrian of Sidewalks 4 Berthe Avenue (CR 2323) Pedestrian of Sidewalks 5 of Sidewalks/Multi- Use Paths 6 NA Star Avenue (CR 2315) US231 (SR 75) SR 22 (Wewa Highway) Bicycle of Bicycle Lanes 7 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -19

24 FDOT Item- Segment Table 10: FY Committed Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities Not Subject to Priority Ranking funded in the first three years of the Transportation Improvement Program or Underway Project Name From To Description Thomas Drive (CR3031) Sidewalks & Bike Lanes Bob Little Road Sidewalk/Bicycle Path Laird Street Thomas Drive Cherry Street Thomas Drive Laird Street US98 (SR30) Joan Avenue 7th St of sidewalks on the west side of Thomas Drive from Laird St to US98 for a distance of.669 miles and on Laird Street from Thomas Drive to Joan Ave for distance of 1.75 miles in FY 16/17 of a 5 foot concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike lane parallel to the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be paved along the shoulder of the road. The project may require bike/ped guardrail, construction of driveway connections, and concrete drainage inlets in FY 16/ Merritt Brown Middle School Safe Routes to School Merritt Brown Road Merritt Brown Middle School Construct 5 foot sidewalk along the north side of road for approximately 3,400 feet. Project would also include construction of 700 feet of sidewalk along Merritt Brown Way and Tommy Smith Drive in FY 18/19 and FY 19/20 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -20

25 FDOT Item- Segment Table 11: FY Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project Priorities Project Sponsor Project Name From To Description FY Priority Parker N/A Callaway Business Highway 98 Sidewalks Boat Race Road Sidewalk and Bike Lane Callaway Cherry Street Sidewalks N/A N/A N/A Callaway Callaway Mexico Beach Wallace Road Sidewalk and Bike Lane Yellow Bluff Road and S. Star Avenue Sidewalks 15 th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements CR 22A (Bob Little Road) US 98/Tyndall Pkwy US 98/Tyndall Parkway US 98/Tyndall Parkway Betty Louise Dr 780 feet from US 98 SR 30A (US 98B) Tyndall Parkway Berthe Ave S. Star Avenue Berthe Ave S. Star Avenue CR 386 Construct sidewalks along Business Highway 98. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant in FY 20/21. Construct a concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike lane parallel to the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be paved along the shoulder of the road. Construct sidewalks along both sides of the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant Construct a 5 foot concrete sidewalk and paved asphalt bike lane parallel to the roadway. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. The bike lane will be paved along the shoulder of the road Construct a 5 foot concrete sidewalk. The sidewalk will be FDOT typical and ADA compliant. Construct 7,120 Linear feet of sidewalk and 330 Linear feet of pedestrian bridge Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -21

26 FDOT Item Segment# NA Table 12: FY Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant Funding Source % Project Description TD Bay Trip & Equip Local Funds 90% 10% NA TD Bay Planning 100% FTA 5305 State Local Funds FTA 5307 Toll Revenue Credit FTA 5307 FLEX Toll Revenue Credit 80% 10% 10% 80% 20% 80% 20% Provide non sponsored trips and/or capital equipment to the trans disadv Planning agency duties for trans disadv planning related services Bay County TPO Planning grant funds Capital prev. maint., replacement vehicles, expansion, vehicles, signage, shelters, transit centers, misc. equip, security and training Capital prev. maint., replacement vehicles, expansion, vehicles, signage, shelters, transit centers, misc. equip, security and training Operating Assistance FTA % (Operating costs for Local Funds 50% equipment and facilities & JARC Projects) 1 Federal funds of $350,000 correspond to the Non-SIS Priority 4 in Table 2. Proposed FY ,087 49,787 Proposed FY ,087 49,787 Proposed FY ,087 49,787 Proposed FY ,087 49,787 Proposed FY ,087 49,787 22,505 22,505 22,505 22,505 22,505 72,008 9,001 9,001 1,625, , ,000 87, , ,000 72,008 9,001 9,001 1,625, , ,000 87, , ,000 72,008 9,001 9,001 1,625, , ,000 87, , ,000 72,008 9,001 9,001 1,625, , ,000 87, , ,000 72,008 9,001 9,001 1,625, , ,000 87, , ,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -22

27 FDOT Item Segment# Table 12: FY Bay County Public Transportation Project Priorities by Grant Funding Source % Project Description Proposed FY Proposed FY Proposed FY Proposed FY Proposed FY FTA 5339 Toll Revenue Credit 80% 20% Capital bus and bus related facilities 425, , , , , , , , , , FTA 5310 State Local Funds 80% 10% 10% Capital Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 166,815 20,852 20, ,815 20,852 20, ,815 20,852 20, ,815 20,852 20, ,815 20,852 20, FTA 5310 Local Funds 50% 50% Operating Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 100, , , , , , , , , , FDOT Block Grant Local Funds 50% 50% Operating Assistance Block Grant 482, , , , , , , , , , FDOT 5311 Local Funds 50% 50% Operating - Rural Assistance 127, , , , , , , , , , FDOT 100% Urban Corridor 189, , , , ,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -23

28 Table 13: FY Aviation Project Priorities Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport 2019 Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description FAA Funding State Funding Local Funding Estimated Funding Total Cost 1 N/A Perform Master Plan 450,000 25,000 25, ,000 2 N/A Runway/Taxiway Improvements 900,000 25,000 75,000 1,000,000 3 N/A Runway Extension/Overlay 2,700, , ,000 3,000,000 4 N/A Screening Checkpoint - DESIGN 310,262 17, , ,760 5 N/A CBP International Facility 926, , ,610 2,058,700 6 N/A Crosswind Runway Phase I 4,214,700 9,042,650 9,042,650 22,300,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -24

29 Table 13: FY Aviation Project Priorities Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport 2020 Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description 1 N/A 2 N/A 3 N/A 4 N/A 5 N/A 6 N/A Screening Checkpoint - CONSTRUCTION Cell Phone Lot Expansion Design & OB Baggage Expansion - DESIGN Design North Concourse Expansion Construct Duel West Parallel TXY Crosswind Runway Phase II FAA Funding State Funding Local Funding Estimated Funding Total Cost 3,137, ,283 4,026,859 7,338, , , , , , , ,688 89, ,082 1,795,900 4,437, , ,500 4,930,000 4,214,700 9,042,650 9,042,650 22,300, Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description FAA Funding State Funding Local Funding Estimated Funding Total Cost 1 N/A ARFF Vehicle 720,000 40,000 40, ,000 2 N/A 3 N/A 4 N/A OB Baggage Expansion - Expand AP Maintenance Facility North Concourse Phase I 2,653,560 2,653,560 5,307, , ,000 2,122, ,056 5,228,496 7,862,400 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -25

30 Table 13: FY Aviation Project Priorities Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport 2022 Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description FAA Funding State Local Funding Funding Estimated Funding Total Cost 1 N/A Commercial Apron Expansion 3,154, , ,240 3,504,800 2 N/A 3 N/A Vehicle Parking Expansion Phase I - DESIGN Upgrade Airport Security System 0 89, , , ,000 50,000 50,000 1,000, Priority FDOT Item-Segment Project Description 1 N/A 2 N/A 3 N/A Environmental Assessment Continuing Vehicle Parking Expansion Phase I - CONSTRUCTION Rehabilitate Vehicle Access Road FAA Funding State Local Funding Funding Estimated Funding Total Cost 450,000 25,000 25, , ,575 1,870,425 2,771, ,037,500 1,037,500 2,075,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -26

31 Table 14: FY Seaport Project Priorities Port Panama City 2019 Priority # Program Description Local State Total 1 TBD Replace East Avenue Bridge 1,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 2 TBD East Terminal Improvements 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 3 TBD Expand Bulk Transfer Facility 250, , ,000 4 TBD Dredge West 3 1,350,000 1,350,000 2,700,000 5 TBD Extend Road & Rail at IDC 250, , , Priority # Program Description Local State Total 1 TBD Expand East Terminal Berth 4,000,000 4,000,000 8,000,000 2 TBD East Terminal Improvements 4,500,000 4,500,000 9,000,000 3 TBD Expand Bulk Storage 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000, Priority # Program Description Local State Total 1 TBD Refrigerated Warehouse 3,000,000 3,000,000 6,000,000 2 TBD Racks for Refrigerated Containers 750, ,000 1,500, Priority # Program Description Local State Total 1 TBD Mobile Harbor Crane 2,500,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 2 TBD Container Handling Equipment 600, ,000 1,200,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -27

32 Table 14: FY Seaport Project Priorities Port Panama City 2023 Priority # Program Description Local State Total 1 TBD Container Yard Expansion 750, ,000 1,500,000 2 TBD East Terminal Improvements 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 3 TBD Bulkhead/Berth Capacity Improvements 250, , ,000 Bay County TPO FY FY 2023 Project Priorities -28

33 Appendix A Multi Modal Studies

34 FY Multi Modal Studies Project Description Project Name From To $150,000 Annually for Multi Modal Studies SR 77 Baldwin Road 3 rd Street US 98 (15 th Street) 23 rd Street East Bay Bridge 23 rd Street SR 390 US 231 A-1

35 Appendix B Evaluation Criteria

36 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN EVALUATION CRITERIA Criteria Rating Scale Category and Criteria (Description) (Lesser Benefit <----> Higher Benefit) Economic Vitality - 15% (Goal 6) (Objectives 6.1, 6.4, and 6.5) Economic Reach (Positive Employment Growth from 2010 to 2040 Trafffic Analysis Zones along Corridor) To what extent will the project support planned development or provide economic benefits (e.g. job growth/retention)? No >0 to 2% >2% Base Access (Project on the SIS for Military Access or the Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET)) 0 1 Does the project improve military base access directly or indirectly (e.g., along a connecting route)? No Yes Intermodal Goods Movement (Project on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) or TPO 's Regional Freight Plan Network) 0 1 To what extent will the project enhance, expand, or benefit intermodal facilities or opportunities for goods movement? No Yes Multimodal Transportation Safety - 20% (Goal 2) (Objectives 2.1, 2.3, and 6.5) School Activity (Project within two miles of a public school, private school, or College) 0 1 Will the project help to improve a school zone or school-related activities (e.g., school crossings, school routes, buses, etc.) No Yes Safety Improvement Strategies (Accident rates based on Signal Four Analytics) Projects ranked from highest to lowest and awarded a graduated point value based on ranking past five years Lowest Mid-Range Highest Identified by Community Traffic Safety Team (Project on the Bay County Community Traffic Safety Team List of Projects) Has the project been identified as a Community Traffic Safety Team Project? No < 1 Year 1 Year or > B-1

37 Multimodal Transportation Security - 10% (Goal 7) (Objectives 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) Emergency Response (Project on a hurricane evacuation route in the Northwest Florida Hurricane Evacuation Restudy) 0 1 Will the project directly enhance emergency response or improve emergency access for police, fire, ambulance, major utility center, etc? No Yes Identified Security Issues (Project is within 2 miles of military installation, airport, port, and local government center) 0 1 Will the project help to address a previously-identified security issue or concern? None Yes Service Disruption (Project is within 5 miles of a hurricane evacuation route from the Hurricane Restudy above) 0 1 Does the proposed project provide alternative routes for natural disaster evacuation? No Yes Congestion Management - 20% (Goal 8) (Objective 8.1) Correct Deficiency (Project is deficient in the Existing Plus Committed Network) Will the project appropriately address congestion as identified by studies or other observations? < to 1.3 >1.3 Congestion Management Strategies (Volume to Capacity Ratio from the 2040 Needs Plan Network) To what extent will the project incorporate congestion management strategies? > to 1.3 <1.0 Facility Level of Service (LOS) (Regional Transportation Model and TPO's LOS Tables for 2010) What is the LOS of the proposed project area? A-B C-D Failing Multimodal Choices and Connections - 15% (Goal 1)(Objectives 1.1 and 1.2) Pedestrian (Project included as a Pedestrian project in the TPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan as amended on Sept. 25, 2013) To what extent will the project enhance pedestrian and related connections or opportunities? >2 miles within 2 miles Bicycle (Project included as a bicycle project in the TPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan as amended on Sept. 25, 2013) within 2 To what extent will the project enhance bicycle and related connections or opportunities? >2miles miles Public Transportation (Project is located on a Bay Towne Trolley Route or a FDOT Park and Ride Lot) To what extent will the project enhance public transportation and related connections or opportunities (e.g., park&ride, bus shelters)? >2miles within 2 miles Same facility same facility Same facility B-2

38 System Efficiency and Preservation - 10% (Goal 3 ) (Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5) AADT (2010 FDOT or 2010 Local Government Traffic Counts) ,000 to What is the estimated daily traffic volume at the project location? 0 to <10,000 20,000 >20,000 Route Significance (Project is on the Strategic Intermodal System or National Highway System) 0 1 Is the project located on the National Highway System or FIHS? No Yes Existing Deficiency (Regional Transportation Model and TPO's LOS Tables for 2010 or other LOS Analysis) Will the project address one or more deficiencies (e.g., failing LOS, ADA, signal delay, resurfacing, etc.)? < to 1.3 >1.3 System Sustainability and Livability - 10% (Goals 4&5) (Objectives 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 5.1,5.5, and 5.7) Environmental (PD&E Study and/or FDOT Consultant ETDM Review) Does the project have impacts or no impacts? No impacts Moderate Low Recreational Opportunity (Project is linked to water, campgrounds, parks, and trails) 0 1 To what extent might the project add, enhance, or otherwise benefit recreational opportunities for residents or visitors? >2miles 0 to 2 miles Local Planning (Project is located in a Local Government Comprehensive Plan or Master Plan) 0 1 Is the project identified or supported by an existing municipal comprehensive plan or other locally-adopted plan or study? No Yes Economic Vitality 3*15 45 Multimodal Transportation Safety 3*20 60 Multimodal Transportation Security 3*10 30 Congestion Management 3*20 60 Multimodal Choices and Connections 3*15 45 System Efficiency and Preservation 3*10 30 System Sustainability and Livability 3*10 30 Maximum points one project can have 300 Bay County TPO has final authority to select the projects for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan and to rank them in the Project Priorities. B-3

39 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) CRITERIA A. Level of Service (LOS) Issue Addressed Current Deficiency Five Year Deficiency Ten Year Deficiency Not deficient 5 Points 3 Points 1 Point 0 Points B. Regional Significant Roadway (defined as a roadway that is included in the model for the metropolitan area s transportation network) Yes 2 Points No 1 Point C. Crash Rate Safety Ratio Greater than 2.00 Safety Ratio from 1.00 to 2.00 Safety Ratio less than 1.00 D. Has an existing TPO priority Yes No E. Significant Freight Corridor Designated NHS Intermodal Connector or Truck Traffic more than 10% Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Truck Traffic 8-10% AADT Truck Traffic % AADT 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point 2 Points 1 Point 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point F. Local Project Support Wide Support = Resolutions of support from 2 local governments + 2 letters of support from community organizations 5 Points Moderate Support = Resolutions of support from 2 local government or 1 local government resolution + 1 letter of support from community organization 4 Points No demonstrated support beyond 1 local government sponsor resolution 3 Points B-4

40 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) PROJECT CRITERIA Evaluation Category Scoring (Maximum Points Possible) Project Score Criterion 1 Safety 25 Criterion 2 Connectivity 15 Criterion 3 Location Efficiency 10 Criterion 4 Public Support 15 Criterion 5 Proximity to School 15 Criterion 6 Design Quality 10 Criterion 7 Bonus Points Environmental/Archaeological Projects/ Historic Preservation Age of Project 1 point per year, capped at 5 years 10 Total Total Points Possible 105 B-5

41 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROJECT PRIORITY CRITERIA A Benefit-Cost Index was calculated for all segments except those identified either as having an existing facility or as meeting the target level of service; these segments were filtered out of the prioritization process to help focus improvements where they are most needed. TPO staff, with input from the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the consulting team, established a benefit weighting system of 40% for existing conditions, 40% for potential demand, and 20% for public input/prior plans. Accordingly, the Benefit-Cost Index equation is (0.4*LOS + 0.4*Demand + 0.2*Input/Plans) / Cost per Mile. These results were then multiplied by 1,000 to convert them to a more reasonable scale. Please note: The TPO did not agree with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Criteria rankings and worked with the TPO staff to develop a new ranking of projects based upon the rankings by a Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee comprised of members of the TPO's Technical Coordinating Committee and the Citizens' Advisory Committee. These rankings are identified in Table 9 of this report. B-6

42 Appendix C Public Comments

43 COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKSHOPS May 1, 2017 May 1, 2017 Lynn Have City Hall 1. Non-SIS Priority #12 Panama City Beach Parkway from East of Richard Jackson Boulevard to Thomas Drive. FDOT is funding the Design in house and it did not appear in the Work Program. The Project ID Number should be changed to from The Project ID Number has been changed to The status of the Design Phase has been updated to reflect it is underway. 2. Non SIS Priority#14 CR 389 (East Avenue) from Baldwin Road to SR 390. What is the reason this project does not extend to SR 77? The 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan did not show a need to extend this project from SR 390 to SR 77. Therefore, it was not considered for the 2040 Long Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan. The project priorities are based on the TPO s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan. 3. TSM Priority #4, Beck Avenue 19 th Street Mast Arm Signalization. Will this project interfere with the multi-use path along this corridor? There is no multi-use path that is planned along this corridor. However, there are two multi-use paths projects that were completed in early 2017 but are not along this corridor. These two projects are Airport Road from US 231 to Harrison Avenue and Harrison Avenue from Airport Road to 19 th Street. In addition, a segment north of this segment (SR 390 six laning from 23 rd Street to Baldwin Road) is planned to have bicycle lanes and sidewalks. 4. TAP Project Priority #6 from last year the Lynn Haven Sidewalk Project is not shown on the FY Project Priorities. What is the reason for this emission? The TPO Staff did not receive a TAP resubmittal package in 2017 for the Lynn Haven Sidewalk Project. Therefore, it was not subjected to the 2017 TAP ranking criteria. Only the TAP projects that were ranked with the 2017 TAP Criteria were considered for the FY Project Priorities. May 1, 2017 Gulf Coast State College 1. Who staff s the Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST)? The Florida Department of Transportation District III staff s the CTST. Members from Law Enforcement, local government, and the TPO staff usually attend the CTST meetings in Bay County. Projects are funded with safety funds and are usually bicycle/pedestrian related projects. 2. What is the status of the Transit Committee? A separate Transit Committee has not been approved by the TPO. C-1

44 3. How are the Panama City Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Projects funded and how are the CRA projects different from the TPO s roadway capacity projects? The Panama City Beach CRA projects are funded by the City of Panama City Beach and are capacity and multimodal projects. The TPO capacity projects are normally funded by state and federal funds. However, Bay County has funded capacity improvements on county facilities such as Baldwin Road and the City of Panama City has funded capacity improvements on city facilities such as Jenks Avenue. C-2

45 COMMENTS FROM TPO AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES WORKSHOP MAY 22, Table 1 Non-SIS Committed. Remove the Loop Road project. The project is complete. Change has been made. 2. Table 2 Non-SIS. Priority 3, Public Transportation Capital Improvements. When was the dollar amount raised to $350,000? The $350,000 for Public Transportation Capital Improvements occurred during the public involvement portion of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan and was included in the adoption of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan. 3. Table 2 Non-SIS. Priorities. Bay County Representatives indicated they will be ing a recommended priority list for these projects. The recommended Non-SIS Priorities were received by from the Bay County Staff on June 2, Table 4 SIS. Priority 5. East Avenue. It was recommended to move this project to Priority 2 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list. The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. The recommendation will be presented at the June TPO meeting for information with approval of the Project Priorities at the July TPO meeting. 5. Table 7 TSM. Priority 6. SR 30A (US 98 Tyndall Parkway). It was recommended to move this project to Priority 3 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list. The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. The recommendation will be presented at the June TPO meeting for information with approval of the Project Priorities at the July TPO meeting. 6. Tables 9 and 11 Boat Race Road. It was mentioned that this project is Priority 6 on the Bicycle/Pedestrian Project Priorities and Priority 1 on the TAP Project Priorities. A project can occur on both lists. Once a project is funded and the funding source identified, it will be removed from the priority list that is not associated with the funding source. C-3

46 COMMENTS FROM TPO AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES WORKSHOP JUNE 29, Table 2 Non-SIS. a. Switch Priorities 3 (Public Transportation) and 4 (Transportation System Management). b. Move Priorities 6 (Park Ride Lot at SR 77 and SR 20) and 7 (Park and Ride Lot at US 231 and Vicinity of Industrial Park) to Priorities 22 and 23. c. Switch Priorities 18 (West Bay Parkway Extension from SR 77 to SR 75 (US 231) and 22 (Loop Road Phase 2 from Loop Road Phase 1 to Nautilus Street). d. Move Priorities 16 (SR 388 from E of Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport to East of Burnt Mill Creek) and 17 (SR 388 from East of Burnt Mill Creek to SR 77) to Priorities 24 and 25. The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. 2. Table 2 Non-SIS and Table 4 SIS. It was recommended the phase that is requested to be funded be highlighted in yellow. Change has been made. 3. Table 4 SIS. Priority 5. East Avenue from Sherman Avenue to SR 2312 (Baldwin Road). It was recommended to move this project to Priority 2 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list. The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. 4. Table 7 TSM. It was recommended to include the new project Signalized Intersection Switching Upgrades to Priority 3 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list. The movement of priorities needs to be approved by the TPO. 5. Table 10 Committed TAP. It was requested to remove the Jenks Avenue from Baldwin Road to SR 390 since it will be included in the TRIP widening project from Baldwin Road to SR 390. This project has been removed from the Project Priorities List. 6. Table 11 TAP. Add SR 30 (US 98B) from CR 22A Bob Little Road to SR 30A (US 98) Tyndall Parkway as Priority 1 and the corresponding projects moved down on the list since is funded in FY 2020/21. Change has been made. C-4

Cost Feasible Plan Report BAY COUNTY 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Cost Feasible Plan Report BAY COUNTY 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Prepared for Bay County Transportation Planning Organization and The Florida Department of Transportation, District Three Prepared