2016 Demand Response Operations Markets Activity Report: June 2016

Transcription

1 2016 Demand Response Operations Markets Activity Report: June 2016 James McAnany PJM Demand Side Response Operations June 15, 2016

2 This page intentionally left blank PJM P age

3 Figure 1: DY 16/17 Active Participants in Economic, Load Management DR, and Capacity Performance Programs Capacity Economic Load Management Performance Unique State Zone EDC Locations MW Locations MW Locations MW Locations MW DC PEPCO PEPCO DE DPL DEMEC DE DPL DOVDE DE DPL DPL DE DPL ODEC IL COMED BATAV IL COMED COMED ,173 1, ,246 1,162.4 IL COMED IMEAA IN AEP AEPIMP IN AEP HEREC IN AEP WVPA IN AEP WVSDI KY AEP AEPKPT KY DEOK DEK KY EKPC EKPC MD APS AETSAP MD APS AETSHG MD APS AETSTH MD BGE BC MD DPL DPL MD DPL EASTON MD DPL ODEC MD PEPCO PEPCO MD PEPCO SMECO MI AEP COSEDC NJ AECO AE NJ AECO VMEU NJ JCPL AECI NJ JCPL BSHNJ NJ JCPL JCBGS NJ PSEG PSEG , , NJ RECO RECO NY PENELEC PaElec OH AEP AEPOPT OH AEP AMPO OH AEP BUCK OH ATSI AMPO OH ATSI BUCK OH ATSI CPP OH ATSI OEEDC OH DAY AMPO OH DAY BUCK OH DAY DAYEDC OH DEOK AMPO OH DEOK BUCK OH DEOK DEOEDC PJM Page

4 Economic Load Management Capacity Performance Unique State Zone EDC Locations MW Locations MW Locations MW Locations MW PA APS AECI PA APS AETSAP PA APS CHBDTE PA ATSI PAPWR PA DUQ DLCO PA METED AECI PA METED MetEd PA PECO PE , , PA PENELEC AECI PA PENELEC PaElec PA PENELEC WELLSB PA PPL AMPO PA PPL CTZECL PA PPL PPL , , PA PPL UGI-UI TN AEP AEPAPT VA AEP AEPAPT VA AEP AMPO VA AEP RADFRD VA AEP SALEM VA AEP VATECH VA APS ODEC VA DOM CVEC VA DOM DOMEDC VA DOM DOMVME VA DOM NVEC VA DOM ODEC VA DPL ODEC WV AEP AEPAPT WV AEP APWVP WV APS AETSAP Total 1,048 2,401 15,753 8, ,974 9,654 Note: 1) Data as of 6/7/ ) Load Management and Capacity Performance MW are in ICAP. 3) Economic MW are CSP reported Load Reduction values. 4) Residential Locations reported as one location not a total number of end use customers in that program. 5) Unique MW: represents total estimated demand reduction assuming full capacity and economic reductions. 6) As of Jun 7, 2016, DY16/17 RPM Committed Values are MW for Load Management, and MW for Capacity Performance. 7) No Emergency Energy Only registrations to report. PJM P age

5 Figure 2: DY 16/17 MWs in Load Management DR by Resource, Product, and Lead Times DR Product Lead Times (Minutes) Total DR Committed Zone Limited Extended Annual MWs MWs AECO Pre-Emergency Emergency Total AEP Pre-Emergency 1, ,337.9 Emergency Total 1, , ,325.3 APS Pre-Emergency Emergency Total ATSI Pre-Emergency Emergency Total BGE Pre-Emergency Emergency Total COMED Pre-Emergency ,050.2 Emergency Total 1, , ,053.8 DAY Pre-Emergency Emergency Total DEOK Pre-Emergency Emergency Total DOM Pre-Emergency Emergency Total DPL Pre-Emergency Emergency Total DUQ Pre-Emergency Emergency Total EKPC Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PJM P age

6 DR Product Lead Times (Minutes) Total DR Committed Zone Limited Extended Annual MWs MWs JCPL Pre-Emergency Emergency Total METED Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PECO Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PENELEC Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PEPCO Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PPL Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PSEG Pre-Emergency Emergency Total RECO Pre-Emergency Emergency Total TOTAL Pre-Emergency 7, , , ,486.8 Emergency Total 7, , , , ,870.4 Note: MWs are Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM P age

7 Figure 3: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Business Segments Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) Figure 4: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Owner/Company Type Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM P age

8 Figure 5: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Customer Load Reduction Methods Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) Figure 6: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Fuel Mix with Behind the Meter Generation Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM Page

9 Figure 7: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Generator and Permit Type Figure 8: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management DR Registrations Fuel Mix with Behind the Meter Generation PJM P age

10 Figure 9: DY 16/17 Confirmed Load Management Full DR Registrations Energy Supply Curve: This area intentionally left blank PJM P age

11 Figure 10: DY 16/17 MWs in PJM Capacity Performance by Resource and Lead Times Lead Times (Minutes) Total Committed Zone MWs MWs AECO AEP APS ATSI BGE COMED DAY DEOK DOM DUQ Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total PJM Page

12 Lead Times (Minutes) Total Committed Zone MWs MWs EKPC PECO PENELEC PPL Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Pre-Emergency Emergency Total TOTAL Pre-Emergency Emergency Total Note: MWs are Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM P age

13 Figure 11: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Business Segments Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) Figure 12: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Owner/Company Type Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM P age

14 Figure 13: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Load Reduction Methods Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) Figure 14: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Fuel Mix with Behind the Meter Generation Note: Percent of Nominated Capacity (MWs) PJM P age

15 Figure 15: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Generator and Permit Type Figure 16: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Fuel Mix with Behind the Meter Generation PJM P age

16 Figure 17: DY 16/17 Confirmed Capacity Performance Registrations Energy Supply Curve Figure 18: 2016 Economic Demand Response Capability in the Ancillary Service Markets Capability represents total amount that may be offered. Actual offered and cleared volume may be significantly lower and is represented in subsequent figures/tables in report PJM P age

17 Figure 19: 2016 PJM Demand Response Confirmed Regulation Registrations Load Reduction Methods Note: Percent of CSP Reported Load Reduction MWs Figure 20: 2016 PJM Demand Response Confirmed Synch Reserve Registrations Load Reduction Methods: Note: Percent of CSP Reported Load Reduction MWs PJM P age

18 Figure 21: PJM Economic Demand Response Capability in Energy Market (3/1/2006-6/5/2016) Capability represents total amount that may be offered. Actual offered and cleared volume may be significantly lower and is represented in subsequent figures/tables in report. Figure 22: PJM Estimated Revenue for Economic and Load Management DR Markets *Capacity Net Revenue inclusive of Capacity Credits and Charges. PJM P age

19 Figure 23: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Registration Participation Figure 24: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Registration Participation Day-Ahead Activity Figure 25: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Registration Participation Real-Time Activity PJM P age

20 Figure 26: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly MWh Reductions Figure 27: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly MWh Reductions Day-Ahead Activity Figure 28: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly MWh Reductions Real-Time Activity PJM P age

21 Figure 29: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Energy Market Revenue Figure 30: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Energy Market Revenue Day-Ahead Activity Figure 31: 2016 Economic Demand Response Monthly Energy Market Revenue Real-Time Activity PJM P age

22 Figure 32: 2016 Economic Demand Response Energy Market Cost Allocation by Zone Figure 33: 2016 Economic Demand Response Day-Ahead Energy Market Cost Allocation by Zone PJM P age

23 Figure 34: 2016 Economic Demand Response Real-Time Energy Market Cost Allocation by Zone Figure 35: 2016 Load Managment Demand Response Monthly Capacity Revenue from RPM PJM P age

24 Figure 36: 2016 Economic Demand Response Dispatched vs Settled Real-Time Energy Market Summary Figure 37: 2016 Economic Demand Response Cleared vs Settled Day-Ahead Energy Market Summary Note: For Figures 36 and 37 above, Settlement information submitted up to 60 days after the event. Therefore, YTD performance reflected in these reports for the current 2 months is artificially low due to incomplete information at the time of report preparation. PJM Page

25 Figure 38: 2016 Economic Demand Response Regulation Market Participation Figure 39: 2016 Economic Demand Response Synchronous Reserve Market Participation Note: For Figures 38 and 39 above, MWh=sum of the settled MW. Example: 1 MW load available for 12 hours = 12 MWh. PJM P age

26 Figure 40: Economic DR Synchronous Reserve Penetration Distribution (Box-plot) for 2016 Notes: 1) Economic Demand Response are Tier2 resources. 2) Percents shown on upper whisker are maximum hourly DR percentage of Total SR Requirement. 3) The Box-plot depicts the distribution of DR hourly assigned (as a percentage of the Total requirement) for a month: PJM P age