Congestion Mitigation at IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 in Plainview, TX
|
|
- Loraine Hodge
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2010 Congestion Mitigation at IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 in Plainview, TX Hongchao Liu, Hao Xu, and Rhett Dollins Multidisciplinary Research in Transportation Texas Tech University Mulidisciplinary Research Center in Transportation April, 2010
2 Table of Contents List of Tables...3 List of Figures...5 Introduction...6 Project Objectives...8 Methodological Approach...13 Summary of Research Results and Recommendations...15 Alternative # Alternative # Alternative # Alternative # Summary and Recommendation
3 List of Tables Table 1: Existing s...15 Table 2: Existing Levels of Service West Side...15 Table 3: Existing Levels of Service East Side...15 Table 4: Alternative #1 Proposed s...16 Table 5: Alternative #1 Levels of Service West Side...16 Table 6: Alternative #1 Levels of Service East Side...17 Table 7: Alternative #1 Delay Values vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...18 Table 8: Alternative #1 Delay Values vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...19 Table 9: Alternative #2-1 Proposed s...20 Table 10: Alternative #2-1 Levels of Service West Side...20 Table 11: Alternative #2-1 Levels of Service East Side...20 Table 12: Alternative #2-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...21 Table 13: Alternative #2-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...22 Table 14: Alternative #2-2 Proposed s...23 Table 15: Alternative #2-2 Levels of Service West Side...23 Table 16: Alternative #2-2 Levels of Service East Side...23 Table 17: Alternative #2-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...24 Table 18: Alternative #2-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...25 Table 19: Alternative #3-1 Proposed s...27 Table 20: Alternative #3-1 Levels of Service West Side...27 Table 21: Alternative #3-1 Levels of Service East Side...28 Table 22: Alternative #3-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...28 Table 23: Alternative #3-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...29 Table 24: Alternative #3-2 Proposed s...30 Table 25: Alternative #3-2 Levels of Service West Side...30 Table 26: Alternative #3-2 Levels of Service East Side...30 Table 27: Alternative #3-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...31 Table 28: Alternative #3-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...32 Table 29: Alternative #3-3 Proposed s
4 Table 30: Alternative #3-3 Levels of Service West Side...33 Table 31: Alternative #3-3 Levels of Service East Side...33 Table 32: Alternative #3-3 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...33 Table 33: Alternative #3-3 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)...34 Table 34: Alternative #4 Proposed s...36 Table 35: Alternative #4 Levels of Service West Side...37 Table 36: Alternative #4 Levels of Service West Side...37 Table 37: Alternative #4 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side)...37 Table 38: Alternative #4 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side)
5 List of Figures Figure 1: Site Overview...7 Figure 2: Existing Layout...9 Figure 3: Design Alternatives #2-1 and # Figure 4: Design Alternatives #3-1 and #3-2 (No Through/ Left Turn Option Lane)...11 Figure 5: Design Alternative #3-3 (Through/Left Turn Option Lane Allowed)...12 Figure 6: Design Alternative #
6 Introduction Interstate Highway 27/US Highway 87 (hereafter, IH 27) is a divided freeway that has its southern endpoint in Lubbock, Texas, and its northern endpoint in Amarillo, Texas. The city of Plainview is situated approximately 40 miles north of Lubbock; IH 27 runs through a heavily commercial section on the western side of the city. Within the city limits, US Highway 70 (US 70,) known locally as Olton Road, intersects IH 27 in a diamond interchange with two-way frontage roads in each quadrant. Figure 1 below illustrates the site layout of the area near the intersection. 6
7 Figure 1: Site Overview The northwest quadrant is particularly developed for commercial properties. Several restaurants and small shops are situated on the west frontage road, and a large retail shopping establishment is located about 600 feet west of the freeway. The primary entrances to all of these facilities are in the form of driveways along the IH 27 west frontage road. As a result, there is considerable traffic demand on this segment of frontage road. Owing to the fact that the commercial destinations on the west frontage road are all accessible from origin nodes on all four sides of the interchange, the existing two-lane, two-way frontage road on the northwest quadrant is 7
8 over capacity and experiences severe delays and queue lengths at peak periods. With the congestion, the intersection has experienced increased crash incidence and severity. Additionally, the other approaches to the intersection have suffered reduced levels of service due to the high demand on the southbound movement on the west side of the interchange. The existing traffic signal timing creates a condition where the southbound movement on the west side of the interchange and the westbound movement on the east side compete for green time. Thus, any improvement to one comes at the detriment to the other. Project Objectives The Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) has expressed interest in designing solutions to the problem. It has proposed four alternatives to be considered as solutions. The goal of the project described in this report was to analyze each design alternative from a traffic engineering perspective and evaluate the relative merits of each. From this analysis, a recommendation was formulated as to the most appropriate countermeasures for congestion mitigation along the IH 27 frontage roads. The four alternatives that were evaluated were progressively more costly to implement, but yielded increasing benefits with respect to signal capacity. They are described below: 1. No changes to pavement or markings signal timing changes only. The existing pavement marking configuration would remain as is, with one 20 feet wide lane for all southbound movements and one 12 feet wide lane for all northbound traffic on the west frontage road, with an 8 feet paved shoulder on the east side of the frontage road. There would be no disruption to normal traffic flow as a result of this modification. See Figure 2 below. 8
9 Figure 2: Existing Layout 2. No changes to pavement; restriping the northwestern quadrant from the existing configuration described above to add an additional lane for southbound traffic. The new outside lane would be 11 feet wide and would serve through and right turn traffic while the inside lane would be 10 feet wide and would serve left turn traffic. The existing northbound lane would be narrowed from 12 feet to 11 feet. Disruption to normal traffic would be light; the only traffic control measures required would be during the time the pavement marking removal and replacement occurred. Two variant designs were investigated the first variant did not provide a protected left turn movement for southbound traffic on the west frontage road, while the second variant did provide a protected turn phase. See Figure 3 below. 9
10 Figure 3: Design Alternatives #2-1 and # Widening the existing pavement from 40 feet to 46 feet, then modifying the pavement marking to allow three 11 feet wide lanes for southbound traffic (one each for right turn, through, and left turn, with the possibility to leave the through lane as a left turn/through option lane.) Northbound traffic would have one 11 feet wide lane and the shoulder would be narrowed to 2 feet. This alternative would require the relocation of the existing traffic signal pole for northbound traffic on the west side of the interchange, plus the demolition and construction of curb and gutter. Disruption to normal traffic would be light to moderate as this design requires the installation of new pavement, the removal and installation of curb and gutter, pavement marking, new traffic signal poles, and possibly the installation of new conduit and ground boxes. Three variants were investigated; the first variant allowed only permissive left turns from only the inner lane of the 10
11 southbound approach on the west frontage road, while the second variant provided a protected left turn phase. The third variant included a through/left turn option lane as well as a left turn only lane. See Figures 4 and 5 below. Figure 4: Design Alternatives #3-1 and #3-2 (No Through/ Left Turn Option Lane) 11
12 Figure 5: Design Alternative #3-3 (Through/Left Turn Option Lane Allowed) 4. Redesign the interchange to one-way frontage road operation on all quadrants. This alternative requires the construction of new pavement to widen the northwest approach to 46 feet, plus the addition of free U-turn lanes on the north and south sides of the interchange. An adequate design would also require the relocation of several signal poles, ground boxes, conduit, curb and gutter, and pavement marking, and would likely require the design of a full PS&E package. Existing traffic in the area would be substantially disrupted due to construction. See Figure 6 below. 12
13 Figure 6: Design Alternative #4 Methodological Approach The data to be used in the analysis was provided by TxDOT and supplemented by data collected during site visits to the interchange. Turn bay lengths, lane widths, and clearance distances were established by field measurement. Video of existing traffic was recorded at three peak periods (AM, Noon, and PM peaks) and was used for calibration of the existing traffic simulation model. Several software packages were considered for use during this project, including VISSIM (PTV, 2006,) Synchro 7 (Trafficware, 2007,) PASSER III (TTI, 1998,) and CORSIM (FHWA, 2006). After evaluation, it was decided to utilize Synchro 7 to model the intersection and establish level of service and other operational characteristics for both the existing and proposed configurations. 13
14 The methodological process used to construct the model and simulation was performed in the following steps: 1. The first step was the creation of the existing model. The geometric information about the intersection was obtained from TxDOT plans and site visits, and supplemented by images obtained from Google Earth. 2. After the existing geometry was created for the roadway network near the intersection, traffic data was input to the model. Traffic data was provided by TxDOT. 3. Existing signal timing information was coded into the model. The interchange was modeled as a 4-phase diamond, modified to allow two-way frontage road traffic. Signal timing data was provided by TxDOT. 4. Calibration of the model to fit calculated delay and queue length results with observed conditions. This step was especially important, because the driveway density on the west side of the northwest quadrant is such that the simulation initially calculated delay values incorrectly. The problem was solved by summing the delays expected for each driveway and adding it to the calculated delay for the signalized intersection. 5. Modification of the existing conditions model to reflect the proposed design alternatives and evaluating each for network performance measures. 6. Evaluation of all alternatives and selection of the design with the highest cost-to-benefit ratio. Formulation of recommendation based on the minimum level of reconstruction effort required to achieve the desired level of service. 14
15 Summary of Research Results and Recommendations After calibration of the existing model to reflect field conditions, intersection performance benchmarks were established. The existing signal timing consists of fully actuated, uncoordinated operation. If all movements reach their maximum green times, the signal would make a complete service cycle every 156 seconds. This mode of operation is continuous throughout the day; there are no time of day timing changes currently in place. The existing intersection timing is summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Existing s Phase # Direction of E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) Table 2: Existing Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR AM E E C A A A C E A Noon E E B A A E E F C PM F E B A A F E F C Table 3: Existing Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A E E B D C Noon A B A E E B E C PM A A A F E B F E As shown in these three tables, the most critical movements at the intersection are the southbound left and through movements on the west side (which share a single lane) and the northbound movement 15
16 on the east side, where left and right turn traffic shares a single lane with through traffic. Additionally, the eastbound movement on the west side and the westbound movement on the east side experience levels of service in the E/F range throughout the day. Alternative #1 The intent of this project was to determine to what extent the level of service could be improved by a series of increasingly complex modifications. The first alternative, timing changes with no pavement or marking changes, yielded significant improvements in capacity. The proposed changes, and the expected levels of service which result, are shown in Tables 4-6 below. Table 4: Alternative #1 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) Table 5: Alternative #1 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR AM D D B A A A B C A Noon D E B A A B C F A PM D D B A A B C F A 16
17 Table 6: Alternative #1 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D D B C C Noon A A A D E A D C PM A A A D E B E C As shown in Table 4-6, the split times for most phases have been reduced. The cycle length for the signal would be 110 seconds if all phases were to extend to their maximum allowable green times. This proves effective because of a situation which arises as a result of origin/destination pairings near the intersection. The southbound movement on the west side is actually striped as a single lane. However, the lane is 20 feet wide and its effective configuration is that of a left/straight option and a right turn only lane. Drivers note that the pavement is wide enough for them to use the extra space for a right turn only lane, and so they proceed to bypass the through/left queue whenever possible to make the right turn. Observation in the field indicates that there is approximately 100 feet of right turn bay length available for this maneuver; driveways nearby inhibit the ability of drivers to utilize all available pavement width. Therefore, it may be concluded that the southbound lane configuration is equivalent to one left/straight/right option lane and a right turn only lane with 100 feet of storage. A similar situation arises on the east side of the intersection with westbound traffic. There is a heavy movement of westbound right turns onto the west frontage road for drivers who wish to visit the commercial establishments in the northwest quadrant of the intersection. Therefore, the northernmost westbound lane experiences much heavier traffic than the other through lanes. Although there are three lanes available for westbound through movements, the northernmost lane carries a disproportionate amount of this traffic because drivers know that they must be in that lane if they wish to easily make a right turn onto the west frontage road on the west side of the intersection. The queue from this single lane extends to a location several hundred feet from the intersection and prevents westbound traffic from 17
18 accessing the other through lanes. Therefore, this approach may be considered as having storage limitations as well. Since these movements experience storage failures, it is reasonable to expect that a shorter cycle length would improve delay and level of service values. With a shorter cycle, queues have a shorter time to build between each green cycle and therefore can empty more times per hour than with a longer cycle. As a result, the queue failures become less important to the overall performance of the intersection. Tables 7 and 8 below summarize the improvements to delay that are expected as a result of implementing Alternative #1, timing changes only. Table 7: Alternative #1 Delay Values vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Time of Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -34% -34% -23% 100% 0% -43% -48% -18% -21% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -22% -13% 0% 100% 100% -37% -67% -53% -59% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -13% -23% -7% 50% 100% -24% -61% -45% -54% 18
19 Table 8: Alternative #1 Delay Values vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -33% -32% -24% -28% -30% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% -88% 0% -29% -15% 0% -32% -43% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% -67% 0% -38% 3% 0% -31% -33% Alternative #2 Alternative #2 involves the striping of a right-turn only lane for the southbound approach on the west frontage road. There are two options available for this design alternative: Alternative #2-1 involves the conversion of the existing left/through/right lane into a left turn only lane and striping an extra lane to be used for through and right turn traffic. Signal timing will be optimized for the intersection, but no phasing changes will be installed. Alternative #2-2 involves the conversion of the existing left/through/right lane into a left turn only lane and striping an extra lane to be used for through and right turn traffic. Signal timing will be optimized and a protected left-turn phase will be installed for southbound traffic on the west frontage road. During the protected turn phase, southbound through and left turn traffic will move simultaneously. 19
20 Table 9 below shows the proposed split times for each alternative design. Tables 10 and 11 illustrate the expected levels of service for design alternative #2-1. Tables 12 and 13 show delay improvements over the existing condition with the implementation of design alternative #2-1. Table 9: Alternative #2-1 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) Table 10: Alternative #2-1 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR AM D D B A A A B C B Noon D E B A A D C F B PM E D B A A F C F C Table 11: Alternative #2-1 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D D B C C Noon A A A D D A D B PM A A A D D A E D 20
21 Table 12: Alternative #2-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Time of Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -34% -35% -27% 0% 0% -43% -42% -18% 7% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -22% -14% 0% 0% 0% -37% -67% -39% -29% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -21% -27% -7% 50% 100% -23% -57% -40% -43% 21
22 Table 13: Alternative #2-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -33% -32% -24% -33% -36% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -88% 0% -33% -29% -10% -34% -43% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -67% 0% -40% -29% -10% -33% -33% When compared to the results that are achieved under Alternative #1, the improvements expected from Alternative #2-1 are at best marginal, and in some cases less desirable. An example of this is the southbound right turn movement the improvement in the expected delay value is 10% - 20% less than under Alternative #1. Alternative #2-2 involves the installation of a right/through option lane and conversion of the existing southbound lane into a left turn only lane. Additionally, the intersection timing will be modified to allow a protected southbound left turn on the west frontage road approach. The proposed split times, levels of service, and expected improvements in delay over the existing condition are shown in tables below. 22
23 Table 14: Alternative #2-2 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) SBLT Table 15: Alternative #2-2 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBTR AM E E B A A A C D B Noon E F B A A E C F C PM F E B A A F C F C Table 16: Alternative #2-2 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D E B C C Noon A A A D F B D B PM A A A E F B E D 23
24 Time of Table 17: Alternative #2-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBTR* Existing N/A Proposed Change N/A Change % -21% -23% -14% 500% 500% -14% -15% -34% N/A Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBTR* Existing N/A Proposed Change N/A Change % -3% 38% 15% 400% 400% 13% -55% -77% N/A PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBTR* Existing N/A Proposed Change N/A Change % 16% 3% 7% 300% 500% -6% -45% -80% N/A *Since this configuration limits right turns on red, it is not possible to directly compare the existing delay for right turn and through traffic to the delay for this proposed design alternative. 24
25 Table 18: Alternative #2-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -22% -22% -12% -31% -33% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % -50% -69% 0% -10% 53% 20% 100% 10% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% -50% 0% -20% 95% 20% 77% -5% Comparing the values in Tables 17 and 18 to the values in Tables 7 and 8 illustrate that adding a left turn only lane does not provide a great deal of additional capacity to the intersection. Even providing a protected left turn movement does not provide a significant amount of additional capacity. The extra southbound left turn capacity on the west side of the intersection that the protected movement provides is counteracted by the reduction in capacity for the northbound movement. Therefore, it is not recommended to install the improvements associated with this alternative. Alternative #3 Alternative #3 involves the installation of new pavement and the addition of two additional lanes for southbound traffic on the west frontage road. This alternative would provide one right turn only lane, one through lane, and one left turn only lane instead of the existing configuration of one lane for all traffic. Lane widths would be narrowed for the northbound and southbound approaches. This alternative would 25
26 also require the relocation of curb and gutter and traffic signal poles. There are three options available with this design alternative: Alternative #3-1 involves the conversion of the existing left/through/right lane into a left turn only lane, a through only lane, and a right turn only lane. Signal timing will be optimized for the intersection, but no phasing changes will be installed. Alternative #3-2 involves the installation of a right turn only lane, through only lane, and a left turn only lane as discussed above. Additionally, the signal timing and phasing will be modified to allow a protected left turn movement for southbound left turn traffic. Alternative #3-3 is the same as alternative #3-1 but with the through lane also allowing a left turn option. This may require adjustment of pavement marking at the intersection. The option lane s presence would necessitate the installation of split phasing in the event that a protected left turn phase were desired; for this reason, Alternative #3-3 examines permissive turns only and disregards the protected option as not viable. Table 19 below shows the proposed split times for each alternative design. Tables 20 and 21 illustrate the expected levels of service for design alternative #3-1. Tables 22 and 23 show delay improvements over the existing condition with the implementation of design alternative #
27 Table 19: Alternative #3-1 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) Table 20: Alternative #3-1 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR AM D D B A A A B C C A Noon D E B A A D C F C A PM E D B A A F C F C A 27
28 Table 21: Alternative #3-1 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D D B C C Noon A A A D D A D B PM A A A D D A E D Time of Table 22: Alternative #3-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -34% -35% -23% 0% 0% -43% -42% -20% -42% -36% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -31% -11% 0% 0% 100% -37% -67% -53% -71% -74% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -13% -23% -7% 50% 100% -25% -59% -57% -75% -80% 28
29 Table 23: Alternative #3-1 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -33% -32% -24% -33% -36% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -88% 0% -47% -29% -10% -34% -43% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -67% 0% -40% -29% -10% -33% -33% As shown in Tables 22 and 23, Alternative #3-1 provides a much improved level of service for southbound traffic on the west frontage road. Delays in the noon and PM peaks show significant reduction, especially for the right turn and through movements. Since through and right turn traffic have their own lanes and no longer share delay times with the other movements, they experience much less delay. Alternative #3-2 provides the same lane configuration as alternative #3-1 but also provides a protected left turn movement in addition to the permissive movement. Table 24 shows the proposed split times for the intersection phases under alternative #3-2. Tables show the expected levels of service and delay times that will result from implementation of alternative #
30 Table 24: Alternative #3-2 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) SBLT Table 25: Alternative #3-2 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR AM E E B A A A C D C A Noon D F B A A D C F C A PM F E B A A F C F C A Table 26: Alternative #3-2 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D E B C C Noon A A A D F B D B PM A A A E F B E D 30
31 Table 27: Alternative #3-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Time of Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -18% -19% -14% 500% 500% -43% -21% -38% -28% -29% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -8% 38% 15% 400% 400% -86% -55% -79% -77% -89% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % 16% 3% 7% 300% 500% -6% -45% -78% -75% -89% 31
32 Table 28: Alternative #3-2 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -19% -18% -12% 6% 0% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % -50% -69% 0% -10% 51% 20% -2% -24% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% -50% 0% -20% 95% 20% 77% -5% Tables 27 and 28 show that the addition of a protected left turn phase for southbound traffic on the west frontage road provides a marginal improvement in delay for all southbound movements, but significantly increases the delay experienced by the opposing northbound movement. Virtually all other movements on both sides of the intersection remain unchanged. Alternative #3-3 is the same scenario as alternative #3-1 except that the middle (through) lane for southbound traffic on the west frontage road is configured as a through/left turn option lane. All left turns operate permissively. Table 29 below shows the proposed split times for all phases. 32
33 Table 29: Alternative #3-3 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east (east E/W WBLT (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east side overlap with phase 1) Table 30: Alternative #3-3 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR AM D D B A A A B C C A Noon D E B A A D C D D A PM E D B A A F C D D A Table 31: Alternative #3-3 Levels of Service East Side Time of EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTLR AM A A A D D B C C Noon A A A D D A D B PM A A A D D A E D Table 32: Alternative #3-3 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) 33
34 Time of Delay AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -34% -34% -23% 0% 0% -43% -42% -24% -24% -29% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -27% -13% 0% 0% 100% -37% -66% -71% -70% -86% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBL SBT SBR Existing Proposed Change Change % -13% -23% -7% 50% 100% -25% -59% -61% -70% -89% Table 33: Alternative #3-3 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay Values AM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBLTR Existing Proposed Change Change % 0% 0% 0% -33% -32% -24% -33% -36% Noon EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 50% -94% 0% -47% -29% -10% -34% -43% PM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBLTR SBTL Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -83% 0% -40% -29% -10% -33% -33% 34
35 Compared to alternative #3-1, the improvement in delay for southbound traffic on the west frontage road is slight. As expected, the through movement suffers a slight degradation of capacity due to the effect of left turning traffic out of the through lane. However, this alternative is expected to cost more than alternative #3-1 due to the extra costs of installing new pavement markings for a dual left turn lane. More importantly, it will reduce the overall safety of the intersection by allowing permissive turns from two lanes. Experience has shown that drivers do not correctly anticipate the extra time required to make the left turn out of the outer lane, and this leads to additional right-angle collisions with northbound through vehicles. The marginal improvement in level of service is deemed insufficient to justify recommending this alternative over #
36 Alternative #4 Alternative #4 is the most far-reaching of the proposed design alternatives. This option would involve the complete redesign of the intersection, both from a signal timing and geometric perspective. The existing two-way frontage roads would be reconstructed as one-way frontage roads. Dedicated U- turn lanes would be installed for the northbound and southbound approaches. This redesign would necessitate several geometric changes, including the restriping of all approaches, relocation of curb and gutter and signal poles, and new signage. It would also represent a completely different interchange configuration which the traveling public would have to become accustomed to. Design and construction costs would be substantial, as would disruption to traffic flow during construction. The proposed configuration was modeled in Synchro. The proposed split times and levels of service are shown in Tables 34-36, and the expected delay values are shown in Tables 37 and 38. Table 34: Alternative #4 Proposed s Phase # Direction of AM Peak Noon Peak PM Peak E/W (east NB (east E/W SB WBLT NB (east side overlap with phase 3) EBLT (east SB side overlap with phase 1)
37 Table 35: Alternative #4 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBTR AM D B A A C C Noon D A A A D C PM D A A A D C Table 36: Alternative #4 Levels of Service West Side Time of EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBTR AM A A D B C B Noon A A D C C C PM A A D F C C Table 37: Alternative #4 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (West Side) Time of Delay AM EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL* SBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % -41% -55% 300% 0% -68% -72% Noon EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL* SBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % -38% -23% 0% -50% -83% -83% PM EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL* SBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % -37% -29% 33% -67% -82% -82% * Since the lane configurations have changed, direct comparison of delay times between existing and new configurations is not possible. Delays shown for existing southbound movements are for the single existing lane. 37
38 Table 38: Alternative #4 Delay Values Vs. Existing Delay Values (East Side) Time of Delay AM EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL* NBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% 100% -43% -6% -31% -72% Noon EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL* NBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % 300% 200% -46% 240% -43% -63% PM EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL* NBTR* Existing Proposed Change Change % 100% -83% -52% 760% -60% -61% * Since the lane configurations have changed, direct comparison of delay times between existing and new configurations is not possible. Delays shown for existing northbound movements are for the single existing lane. Significant improvements are expected for the frontage road traffic as a result of implementing Alternative #4. Since westbound right turns are no longer allowed onto the west frontage road, the redistribution of the volume which currently make use of this movement will negatively impact the traffic network in other areas. Overall, this is the best option from a traffic operations standpoint, but it comes at a much higher monetary and time cost than the other alternatives. Summary and Recommendation Each alternative presented in this report has benefits and costs. From a simple capacity perspective, conversion of the interchange into a traditional diamond with one-way frontage roads on all four quadrants offers the highest capacity. This improvement in capacity will result in a cost that is orders of magnitude higher than the implementation of any of the less robust design alternatives. 38
39 It is clear from the analysis described above that the intersection will experience an improvement in both capacity and safety with the implementation of any of these design alternatives. However, one plan of action presents itself as an ideal path from immediate improvement of the intersection s capacity to ultimate build-out. The following actions are recommended to TXDOT as a long-range plan for improvement of the intersection of IH 27 and US Hwy 70 in Plainview, Texas: Deploy the signal timing changes associated with Alternative #1 immediately. These changes are straightforward and simple to implement, and will improve intersection capacity immediately as shown in Tables 7 and 8. Design signal, pavement marking, and signage plans to implement Alternative #3-1 (widening of pavement, installation of additional lanes for southbound traffic on the west frontage road, some relocation of signal equipment.) Ensure that to whatever extent possible, the design accounts for a future build-out of the intersection to a standard diamond interchange with one-way frontage roads. Construction and installation of Alternative #3-1 should commence as soon as is practical. Update the long-range plan for this area to include conversion of the frontage roads from twoway to one-way. When funds are made available, implement Alternative #4 (conversion of all frontage roads to one-way traffic, installation of U-turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic, and complete signal redesign.) This path of action has the benefits of being scalable to the Department s funding restraints while at the same time providing a plan for improvement in the short, medium, and long terms. 39
Tight Diamond Interchange versus Single Point Urban Interchange: Pedestrians Prospective
Tight Diamond Interchange versus Single Point Urban Interchange: Pedestrians Prospective Ahmed Amer, M.S. Ph.D. Candidate Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
More informationAppendix G: Future Conditions Traffic Analysis Memorandum
ppendix G: Future Conditions Traffic nalysis Memorandum Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Riverfront Drive Corridor Study ǀ T42.867 ppendix MEMORNDUM Date: pril, 27 To: Paul Vogel From: Ross B. Tillman,
More informationWalmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn
More information9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.
9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. TIA GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Report Context Municipal Address Comment: Section 1.1 Location relative to major
More informationREDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Wendy s Parker, Colorado January 215 Prepared for: Sterling Design Associates, LLC 29 W. Littleton Boulevard #3 Littleton, Colorado 812 Prepared by: 1233 Airport
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT
PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by: In Association with: November 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Patton Township, in partnership
More informationArterial Traffic Analysis Some critical concepts. Prepared by Philip J. Tarnoff
Arterial Traffic Analysis Some critical concepts Prepared by Philip J. Tarnoff Agenda Fundamentals Signal timing concepts Actuated signal controllers Developing timing plans Types of signal control First
More informationMarch 11, Lynnfield Board of Selectmen Town of Lynnfield 55 Summer Street Lynnfield, MA Walnut Street Traffic Assessment
March 11, 2015 Lynnfield Board of Selectmen Town of Lynnfield 55 Summer Street Lynnfield, MA 01940 Re: Walnut Street Traffic Assessment Dear Board of Selectmen Members: As requested, BETA Group, Inc. (BETA)
More informationTechnical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc.
Technical Memo To: Steve Gramm, SDDOT From: Steve Hoff, Engineering, Inc. Project: I-190/Silver Street Study CC: Date: 6//010 Job No: DOT Contract 41044, Order PD-0-09 RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis
More informationAn Evaluation of Signalized Intersection System Analysis Techniques Walter J. Freeman, P.E., Kien Y. Ho, P.E., Elizabeth A. McChesney, E.I.T.
An Evaluation of Signalized Intersection System Analysis Techniques Walter J. Freeman, P.E., Kien Y. Ho, P.E., Elizabeth A. McChesney, E.I.T. A system of signalized intersections is a critical element
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting: May 12, 2017 # 1 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICT: Response to Board Member Initiative: Safety Concerns for Left Hand Turn
More informationJames M. Moore, Director of Planning & Building Services, Town of Fairfax. Victory Village Senior Housing Development Traffic Study
Traffic Study To: From: James M. Moore, Director of Planning & Building Services, Town of Fairfax David Parisi, PE, TE, Parisi Transportation Consulting Date: October 14, 216 Subject: Victory Village Senior
More informationDUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING
DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC
Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...
More informationIntroduction Roundabouts are an increasingly popular alternative to traffic signals for intersection control in the United States. Roundabouts have a
HIGH-CAPACITY ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS: GOING AROUND IN CIRCLES David Stanek, PE and Ronald T. Milam, AICP Abstract. Roundabouts have become increasingly popular in recent years as an innovative
More informationENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report
Preparedby: ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
More informationShockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis
Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA
More informationFAIRFIELD - RYAN S CORNER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA
FAIRFIELD - RYAN S CORNER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted on behalf of: Fairfield Residential Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 00 McLean, Virginia
More informationTraffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas
ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest
More informationAppendices. Appendix J: Traffic Study
Appendices Appendix J: Traffic Study The Platinum Triangle Subsequent EIR The Planning Center Appendices This page intentionally left blank. The Platinum Triangle Subsequent EIR The Planning Center TRAFFIC
More informationFigure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area
ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA May 5, 2016 Mr. Anthony Beach, P.E. BSP Engineers 4800 Lakewood Drive, Suite 4 Waco, Texas 76710 Re: Intersection and Access Analysis along Business 190 in Copperas Cove
More informationENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Buncombe County Schools ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Asheville, NC Project Number: 13-71 8/1/13 www.davenportworld.com DAVENlORT Transportation Impact Analysis Enka
More informationEvaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation
Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad
More informationDOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY
DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY Since mid-2009, RPM Transportation Consultants (RPM) has worked with the Downtown Tupelo Main Street Association to evaluate traffic conditions and potential
More informationNorthwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)
Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I) Introduction The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a
More informationTraffic Analysis Report I-5 Interchanges 14 and 19 (Green Springs and North Ashland Interchanges) City of Ashland Jackson County
Traffic Analysis Report I-5 Interchanges 14 and 19 (Green Springs and North Ashland Interchanges) City of Ashland Jackson County Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 3 3500 NW Stewart
More informationTHIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,
More informationTraffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017
Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI
More informationUS-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study. December 2017
US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study December 2017 US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study Avenue Consultants December 2017 US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study December 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
More informationHarbord Street and Hoskin Avenue (Queens Park Crescent to Ossington Avenue) Final Report
Consultant Services for Updating Intersections Operations to Accommodate Bi-Directional Cycle Tracks Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue (Queens Park Crescent to Ossington Avenue) January 30, 2014 Consultant
More informationProject Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015
Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative
More informationMETHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)
Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic
More informationCENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF MEMORANDUM
CTPS CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF Staff to the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization MEMORANDUM To: Martha White, Natick Town Administrator February 17, 2011 Eric Nascimento, MassDOT
More informationPlace Vanier 250 Montreal Road Transportation Impact Study Addendum. Prepared for Broccolini Construction September 20 th, 2012
Update for the May 31 st, 2012 Traffic Impact Study Prepared for Broccolini Construction 111-23596-00 September 20 th, 2012 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario CANADA K2B 8K2 Telephone: 613-829-2800
More informationIntersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study
Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study CSAH 9 at CSAH 60 (185th Avenue) Prepared For: Dakota County Transportation Department Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue, 3rd Floor Apple Valley,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations:
MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subject: Najib O. Habesch Nick M. Fomenko, PE, PTOE Bushnell Park North Traffic Assessment BETA Project #: 4461 As part of our contract to undertake the design of the Bushnell
More informationOperational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies
Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,
More informationDiverging Diamond Interchange and Double Crossover Intersection Vehicle and Pedestrian Performance
Diverging Diamond Interchange and Double Crossover Intersection Vehicle and Pedestrian Performance Praveen K. Edara, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
More informationMoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network
MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network Prepared by: The University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research Prepared for: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority
More information133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas
133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS Overland Park, Kansas September 1, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW... 1 3. CONCEPT
More informationCollision Estimation and Cost Calculation
Collision Estimation and Cost Calculation Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Rates Based Method... 4 20-Year Collision Cost Procedure... 4 Safety Performance Function Method... 7 Important notes when
More informationCITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor
More informationDawson, Liu, Xu, Cheu, and Machemehl Page 1
Dawson, Liu, Xu, Cheu, and Machemehl Page 1 Publish information: Eugene, D. H., H. Liu, and R.B. Machemehl (2011). Assessing the Feasibility of Converting Two Way Left Turn Lane into Bus Rapid Transit
More information4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
Transportation Systems 4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS This chapter examines the impacts of the Central Corridor Extension on existing roadways and traffic operations and discusses the transit service, operations,
More informationChapter 4 Traffic Analysis
Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection
More informationBLOSSOM AT PICKENS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY
BLOSSOM AT PICKENS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY Class Project Report for ECIV 542 Traffic Engineering Submitted by Omor Sharif Muchun Song Narges Kaveshgar Quyen Pham Chih-Yao Lin Submission
More informationS. Johnston (IBI Group)
IBI GROUP 100 175 Galaxy Boulevard Toronto ON M9W 0C9 Canada tel 416 679 1930 fax 416 675 4620 ibigroup.com Memorandum To/Attention Project File Date October 15, 2013 From A. Ortlieb Project No 24RX12.0246.00
More informationCAPE COD COMMISSION 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA (508) Fax (508) Transportation Safety Report
CAPE COD COMMISSION 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 (508) 362-3828 Fax (508) 362-3136 2006 Transportation Safety Report Bourne: Otis Rotary Harwich: Route 137/Route 39 Orleans: Route
More informationSubject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis
MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade
More informationMultnomah County Courthouse Relocation. Transportation Alternatives Analysis Technical Memorandum: FINAL
Multnomah County Courthouse Relocation Portland, Oregon Transportation Alternatives Analysis Technical Memorandum: FIL Prepared for Multnomah County Facilities and Property Management Division 41 N Dixon
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis
Traffic Impact Analysis Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. Waterloo, Iowa SEH No. A-CLAAS0501.00 November 16, 2004 Table of Contents (Continued) Table of Contents Certification Page Table of Contents Page 1.0
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.
Traffic Impact Study Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama Prepared for: Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama September 214 Revision 1 October 214 Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain
More information5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study
5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...
More informationMichigan Avenue Traffic Study
City of Sarnia Michigan Avenue Traffic Study Final Report November 29, 218 B17 SUBMITTED BY CIMA CANADA INC. 4 327 Harvester Road Burlington, ON L7N 3G7 T 289 288-287 F 289 288-285 cima.ca CONTACT Stephen
More informationCity of Los Banos Traffic Model and Transportation Master Plan
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S P a g e 1 City of Los Banos Traffic Model and Transportation Master Plan Prepared for the City of Los Banos by PRISM Engineering Grant P. Johnson, PTOE, PE Professional Traffic
More informationPrepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas. Project Number: /07/2017. Trinity Landing. New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas Project Number: 16273 4/7/217 Trinity Landing New Hanover County, NC Trinity Landing Transportation Impact nalysis Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas New
More informationAdvisor: Peter G Furth
2016 Adewale Ogunleke Northeastern University, MA 4/26/2016 Advisor: Peter G Furth ABSTRACT During peak periods, Everett s Upper Broadway Corridor from Ferry St. and Gladstone Street faces crippling traffic
More informationSyracuse University University Place Road Closure
Transportation Impact Study for the proposed Syracuse University University Place Road Closure City of Syracuse, Onondaga County, NY March 216 Project No. 3613 Prepared For: Syracuse University Office
More informationBistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748
City of Barrie Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1748 Date Submitted: June 12 th, 2017 06/12/17 John Northcote, P.Eng. Professional License
More informationUniversity Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007
Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-
More informationCHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW
HPTER 3 STUY RE OPERTIONL OVERVIEW This chapter describes the overall traffic operations within the study area under existing and future conditions and focuses on individual intersections not directly
More informationMEMORANDUM. Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger
To: From: Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger 1110 Bonifant Street Suite 210, Silver Spring, MD 20910 301-448-1333 WellsandAssociates.com
More information192 & 196 Bronson Avenue / 31 Cambridge Street
Bronson Inc. July 213 192 & 196 Bronson Avenue / 31 Cambridge Street TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared by: Study 192 Bronson Type Avenue July 213 Study Transportation Name Brief February 211 TB Check List
More informationI-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report
I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report July 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 Study Area Limits... 1 Purpose and Need of the Study... 1 Safety
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to identify conformance with the original traffic impact study for the proposed retail development on Lot 5 of Riverdale Retail Filing No. 1 located on the
More informationM-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016
M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for CITY OF BELTON By May 2016 Introduction Missouri State Highway 58 (M-58 Highway) is a major commercial corridor in the City of Belton. As development has
More informationCorridor Studies. LA 415 and LA 73
Corridor Studies LA 415 and LA 73 Project Approach for Both Corridors 1. Data Collection 2. Data Summary 3. Traffic Analysis 4. Micro-Simulation modeling 5. Generation of alternatives 6. Modeling alternatives
More informationMEMO DRAFT VIA . Mr. Terry Bailey Foremost Development Company. To: Michael J. Labadie, PE Steven J. Russo, E.I.T. Fleis & VandenBrink.
MEMO DRAFT VIA EMAIL To: From: Mr. Terry Bailey Foremost Development Company Michael J. Labadie, PE Steven J. Russo, E.I.T. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: August 29, 214 Re: Proposed Apartments City of Walled
More informationTaming Traffic: Bethlehem Pike Phase II - Road Diet Evaluation
Taming Traffic: Bethlehem Pike Phase II - Road Diet Evaluation March 2012 i Taming Traffic: Bethlehem Pike Phase II - Road Diet Evaluation March 2012 i The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
More informationStudent Housing Development
Traffic Impact Study for the proposed Student Housing Development City of Oneonta Otsego County, New York Project No. 3259 December 212 Revised February 13, 212 Prepared For: Newman Development Group,
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT CASTLE PINES APARTMENTS CASTLE PINES, COLORADO
TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT CASTLE PINES APARTMENTS CASTLE PINES, COLORADO APRIL 12, 218 REV. JULY 16, 218 Prepared for: Davis Development 43 Corporate Center Dr Suite 21 Stockbridge, GA 3281 Prepared by: 112
More informationErickson Living at Limestone Valley
Erickson Living at Limestone Valley Howard County, Maryland July 28, 27 Adequate Road Facilities Test Evaluation and Traffic Study Prepared for: Erickson Living Steven Montgomery Vice President of Development
More informationIMPACTS OF TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ON DOWNTOWN PEAK HOUR CONGESTION: A SYNCHRO ANALYSIS FOR BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON
Final Technical Report TNW2009-06 IMPACTS OF TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ON DOWNTOWN PEAK HOUR CONGESTION: A SYNCHRO ANALYSIS FOR BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON Chris Masek, P.E. Nancy Nihan,
More informationVT15 / Allen Martin Drive Intersection Scoping Study
VT15 / Allen Martin Drive Intersection Scoping Study ALTERNATIVES PRESENTATION MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2016 Agenda Study Area Project Background Existing Conditions Identified Issues Proposed Alternatives
More informationCapital Region Council of Governments
March 23, 2018 Capital Region Council of Governments PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Realignment of Swamp and Northfield Road s approaches to Route 44 (Boston Turnpike) Town of Coventry SUMMARY: The Town of Coventry
More informationRoad Conversion Study Plumas Street
Plumas Street Phase I Submitted to The Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Submitted by Zong Tian, Ph.D., P.E. Saeedeh Farivar Haiyuan Li, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Transportation Education
More informationInterstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project. Prepared September 6, 2017
EODOT Project: ODOT Project: STA-IR 77-.50; PID 00290 Interstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project Summary of Public Comments Received and Responses
More informationAppendix D: Concept Screening
Concept Description Concept #1 Route 288 Roadway Widening This concept consists of constructing a third lane on northbound and southbound Route 288 between Powhite Parkway and US 360. This improvement
More informationSimulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer
Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer Abstract The Exposition Corridor transit project is a light rail project
More informationStreet / Bob Billings Parkway Lawrence, Kansas CFS Project No
Drive Improvements 6 th Street to 15 th Street / Bob Billings Parkway Lawrence, Kansas 6644 CFS Project No. 15-56 Traffic Impact Study July 15, 15 Prepared for: City of Lawrence Public Works Department
More informationDRAFT MEMORANDUM. 1. Introduction
Dowling Associates, Inc. 180 Grand Ave., Suite 250, Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 839-1742 FAX: (510) 839-0871 428 J Street, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 266-2190 FAX: (916) 266-2195 MEMORANDUM To:
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2005 TO: Ted Idlof, URS FROM: Jeff Clark, Fehr & Peers RE: U.S. 50 Interchange Planning Study 1042-2011 This memorandum describes conceptual improvements for the
More information6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic
More informationExisting Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer
Date: April 16 th, 2015 To: From: Re: Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer Darian Nagle-Gamm, Traffic Engineering Planner Highway 6 (2 nd Street) /
More information3. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS
3. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS Eglinton Avenue spans 35 kilometres across the centre of Toronto, from Kingston Road near Lake Ontario in the east to the Pearson Airport in the west. The corridor
More informationPlease find below the Town staff s responses to NCDOT s recommended roadway stipulations listed in a letter dated May 25, 2015.
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL Public Works Department 6850 Millhouse Road Chapel Hill, NC 27516-8173 phone (919) 969-5100 fax (919) 969-2003 www.townofchapelhill.org TO: FROM: Chuck Edwards, NCDOT Division 7 District
More informationDelaware Avenue Corridor Study
Delaware Avenue Corridor Study City of Marysville, Ohio February 19, 2009 ms consultants, inc. engineers, architects, planners 2221 Schrock Road Columbus, Ohio 43229-1547 ms ms consultants, inc. engineers
More informationI-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer
I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer Study Overview Interchange Locations Study Context Follow-up
More informationSt. Stefan Serbian Orthodox Church 1989 and 1993 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa REVISED TRANSPORTATION BRIEF
St. Stefan Serbian Orthodox Church 1989 and 1993 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa REVISED TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa,
More informationApplication of Diamond Interchange Control Strategies at Closely Spaced Intersections
Application of Diamond Interchange Control Strategies at Closely Spaced Intersections Zong Tian, Thomas Urbanik II, and Reed Gibby Signalized diamond interchanges are one of the most common interchange
More informationCRYSTAL HOUSE III TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARLINGTON COUNTY, VA
CRYSTAL HOUSE III TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARLINGTON COUNTY, VA Prepared for: Roseland, A Mack-Cali Company Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. Michael R. Pinkoske, PTP Henry C. Clarke, EIT 70.97.660
More informationLos Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation
Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, 2015 AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation Previous Presentations Los Altos Hills Town Council in May 2014 and February 2015 Palo Alto
More informationI-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design
I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY Public Meeting for Schematic Design The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being,
More informationFebruary 24, 2017 Project #: 20076
February 24, 217 Project #: 276 Jinde Zhu Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation 14 SW Walnut Street MS 17 Hillsboro, Oregon 97213 RE: Sunset Ridge Phase 2 Access Report and Zone Change
More informationGlenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation
Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background
More informationLIBERTY TREE ACADEMY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
LIBERTY TREE ACADEMY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Liberty Tree Academy Prepared by: 161 Blake Street, Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 822 Contact: David Kline, PE, PTOE (33)-572-2 On Behalf of: Liberty
More informationLow Level Road Improvements Traffic Analysis. Report
Low Level Road Improvements Traffic Analysis Report June, 22 Table of Contents. INTRODUCTION.... LOW LEVEL ROAD PROJECT....2 STUDY AREA....2. West-End Corridor Improvements... 2.2.2 East-End Corridor Improvements...
More informationDonahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation
Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background
More informationVolume-to-Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning
Volume-to-Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning Hao Xu (Corresponding Author) Research Associate Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Texas
More informationSummary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009
Summary: Several recent studies have assessed potential development and redevelopment opportunities in the Mercer Crossing area of Trenton, Ewing, and Lawrence. This Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street
More information