INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018

Transcription

1 INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018

2 ICE OVERVIEW AGENDA Why ICE? When ICE is Required? Applicability and Process 2

3 AVAILABLE RESOURCES 3

4 INTERSECTION TYPES Roundabout ICE will replace the 3 step roundabout evaluation process in

5 INTERSECTION TYPES Median U Turn (MUT) No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 5

6 INTERSECTION TYPES Median U Turn (MUT) No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 6

7 INTERSECTION TYPES Restricted Crossing U Turn (RCUT) Unsignalized Signalized 7

8 INTERSECTION TYPES Jughandle 8

9 INTERSECTION TYPES Displaced Left Turn Left turns and through movements operate concurrently Also called continuous flow intersection Could have displaced lefts on 2 legs instead of all 4 9

10 INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 10

11 INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 11

12 INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 12

13 STAGES OF ICE 13 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 1; Page 7

14 ICE STAGE 1 PROCESS 14 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 2; Page 10

15 1.1 A PROJECT APPLICABILITY CHECK ICE is REQUIRED when New signalization is proposed Major reconstruction of existing signalized intersection is proposed Adding exclusive left turns, adding intersection legs Conversion of a directional or bi directional median opening to a full median opening is proposed Driveway/Connection permit applications for Category E, F, G District Design Engineer (DDE) and District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) consider an ICE a good fit for the project 15 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Section 2.3; Page 5

16 1.1 A PROJECT APPLICABILITY CHECK ICE NOT REQUIRED Work does not include substantive proposed changes to intersection Mill and resurface pavement; changing full median opening to directional median opening Minor intersection operational improvements Adding right turn lane or signal phasing changes or equipment upgrades Encouraged for local roadways, not required Recommended for ramp terminal intersections (stop control, signalized, or yield), not required 16 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Section 2.3; Page 5

17 ICE STAGE 2 PROCESS 17 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 3; Page 14

18 ICE STAGE 3 PROCESS 18 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 4. Page 18

19 FDOT ICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2018: Training and Acclimation Implementation Focus: District Training Two intersections per district 2019: Districts Identify & Conduct ICE Analysis for Additional Locations Implementation Focus: Refine ICE Process Evaluate minimum of three projects in these offices/focus areas PD&E Traffic Operations Access Management/Permitting 2020: Full ICE Procedure Implementation by Districts Implementation Focus: Mainstream ICE Process ICE Manual Procedures fully effective January 1, 2020 Quality Assistance Reviews (QAR) starting in Year 4 19

20 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 20

21 S.R. 535 EXISTING 21

22 S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized Restricted Crossing U Turn N S Construction $1,300,000 Design Cost $430,000 ROW Cost $500,000 22

23 Median U Turn N S Construction $1,220,000 Design Cost $320,000 ROW Cost $510,000 S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 23

24 Partial DLT N S Construction $1,170,000 Design Cost $320,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 24

25 US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD EXISTING Signal Existing Construction and Design Cost $0 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 25

26 US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT Construction and Design Cost $1,480,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 26

27 US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,160,000 ROW Cost $9,000,000 D1 Training 27

28 US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Construction and Design Cost $3,080,000 ROW Cost $2,250,000 D1 Training 28

29 US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Continued D1 Training 29

30 US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD EXISTING D1 Training 30

31 US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT Construction and Design Cost $1,130,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 31

32 US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,160,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 32

33 33 US 1 / RATLIFF RD. EXISTING

34 US 1 / RATLIFF RD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,440,000 ROW Cost $0 34

35 US 1 / RATLIFF RD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,350,000 ROW Cost $300,000 35

36 SR 392A / CLARA AVE EXISTING D3 Training 36

37 SR 392A / CLARA AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signal Construction and Design Cost $430,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 37

38 SR 392A / CLARA AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $1,520,000 ROW Cost $300,000 D3 Training 38

39 US 27 / TALPECO RD EXISTING D3 Training 39

40 US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized Construction and Design Cost $510,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 40

41 US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,520,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 41

42 US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $2,150,000 ROW Cost $300,000 D3 Training 42

43 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. EXISTING D4 Training 43

44 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Construction and Design Cost $1,350,000 ROW Cost $0 D4 Training 44

45 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 1 D4 Training 45

46 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 2 D4 Training 46

47 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 3 D4 Training 47

48 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT MUT Construction and Design Cost $1,060,000 ROW Cost $0 D4 Training 48

49 SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial DLT Construction and Design Cost $2,500,000 ROW Cost $100,000 D4 Training 49

50 SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE EXISTING D4 Training 50

51 SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,710,000 ROW Cost $1,000,000 D4 Training 51

52 SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT MUT/PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,090,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 D4 Training 52

53 SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT/PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,060,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 D4 Training 53

54 US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD EXISTING D4 Training 54

55 US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,490,000 ROW Cost $0 DEVELOPMENTS D4 Training 55

56 US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial MUT Construction and Design Cost $1,480,000 ROW Cost $0 DEVELOPMENTANALYSIS D4 Training 56

57 US 27 / NW 138 ST EXISTING D6 Training 57

58 US 27 / NW 138 ST - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Median U Turn Alternative Construction and Design Cost $2,710,000 ROW Cost $3,400,000 D6 Training 58

59 US 27 / NW 138 ST PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Alternative Construction and Design Cost $9,230,000 ROW Cost $3,200,000 D6 Training 59

60 US 27 / NW 138 ST PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial Displaced Left Turn Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,410,000 ROW Cost $3,000,000 D6 Training 60

61 U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 EXISTING D7 Training 61

62 U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Construction and Design Cost $1,190,000 ROW Cost $2,000,000 D7 Training 62

63 U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $2,120,000 ROW Cost $725,000 D7 Training 63

64 FDOT Road and Bridge Staff Hour Guidelines for ICE Analysis 64

65 FDOT ROAD/BRIDGE STAFF HOUR GUIDELINES - DRAFT 65

66 US 98 at TRILBY ROAD ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS 66

67 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Roundabout Analysis Intersection identified for potential signalization Existing intersection is TWSC Conducted ICE analysis instead of 3 Step Roundabout Analysis Data Collection Obtained existing AM and PM TMCs Obtained opening year and design year AADTs for both roads Safety Data 2 fatalities in 2009 Over 3 crashes per year ( ) ½ angle crashes ½ injury crashes Conducted field review 67

68 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Existing Conditions U.S. 98 is two lanes; 55 mph posted speed U.S. 98 has 16% to 19% daily trucks; WB 67 design vehicle Trilby Road is two lanes; 30 mph posted speed Trilby Road has 10% trucks westbound 68

69 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road CAP-X Analysis Existing AM Peak Hour Existing PM Peak Hour 69

70 Roundabout is: 80% lower in Fatal & Injury crashes than traffic signal 65% lower in Total crashes than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 SPICE Analysis 70

71 Stage 1 ICE Form Evaluation Summary U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 Analysis 71

72 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Concept Development 72

73 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Concept Development 73

74 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Operations Analysis TWSC Synchro Analysis Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows Trilby Road Approach Delay and U.S. 98 Left Turn delay Traffic Signal Synchro Analysis Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows average vehicle delay for all movements 74

75 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Operations Analysis Roundabout Analysis in Sidra Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows average vehicle delay for all movements 75

76 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 76

77 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 77

78 U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 78

79 Roundabout is: 80% lower in Fatal & Injury crashes than traffic signal 65% lower in Total crashes than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 79

80 FDOT ICE TOOL OVERVIEW 80

81 Roundabout results: Overall B/C is 1.78 and NPV is $1.5M TWSC better than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 B/C and NPV Analysis 81

82 Stage 2 ICE Form Evaluation Summary Roundabout recommended U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 Analysis 82

83 DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS 83