7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept"

Transcription

1 .0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept This section evaluates the traffic operations for all of the study years for the Build conditions as related to the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept. This alternative is a variation of the Preferred Alternative discussed in Section.0 and reflects the condition in which the entire SR 29-Wekiva Parkway would be a tolled expressway. Due to limited transportation funds from other sources, the SR 29- Wekiva Parkway project may need to utilize toll revenues to be considered cost feasible. This alternative represents a tolled expressway along the Preferred Alternative alignment discussed in Section.0. As part of addressing community impacts related to the conversion of an existing non-tolled state roadway into a tolled expressway, a service road is included in this alternative to provide a free option for traffic movement between Lake and Seminole Counties. The Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept includes the same recommended alignment and lane configuration as the Preferred Alternative, including a connection to I- in at SR 1. The main differences between the Preferred Alternative and the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept are the toll structure, the service road and interchange access in east. The roadway network and lane configuration associated with the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept inside the project area of influence are shown in Figures -1A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -1B (). The final alignments and characteristics of the Wekiva Parkway and SR Bypass projects are included in the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept as described below. This section also contains the study area traffic volumes (AADTs and DDHVs) and the corresponding operational analysis associated with the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept. The volumes projected for the SR 29/1 (John Land Apopka Expressway) for the Year 2032 are comparable to projected volumes in previous studies. Operational analyses were conducted for roadway segments, freeway elements, ramps and intersections..1 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept Description As the proposed expressway extension of SR 29, Wekiva Parkway begins at the planned terminus of SR 1/SR 29 (John Land Apopka Expressway) at an interchange with US 1 in in the vicinity of CR 3 (Plymouth Sorrento Road). From this interchange, Wekiva Parkway extends to the north with an alignment just to the west of CR 3. In the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept, the local access interchange in is located at Kelly Park Road just to the west of Plymouth Sorrento Road. The portion of Wekiva Parkway is a four-lane limited access, tolled expressway. However, this section of Wekiva Parkway will be designed to be expandable to six lanes in the future, if necessary. Auxiliary lanes will be provided north of the Kelly Park Road local access interchange to a systems interchange with the SR Bypass near the Orange/Lake County Line. The mainline toll, located between Ponkan Road and Kelly Park Road, and the ramp toll on the Kelly Park Road interchange ramps to and from the north were assumed to be $1.00 and $0., respectively. These toll rates may be modified in future stages of this project. From the systems interchange with the SR Bypass near the Orange/ Line, Wekiva Parkway extends east and northeast into to the existing SR corridor. In east, Wekiva Parkway is proposed as a replacement to the existing SR between Mount Plymouth and the Wekiva River. Local access to Page 12

2 ( BRITT RD. ( ± 1 Miles k La nt m Se B y e ol in u Co nt y 92 1 SEE FIGURE -1B FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY ( GE ORAN E. LIMIT AVE 1 Sorrento ( WEKIVA RIVER RD WOLF BRANCH RD U.S. 1 and S.R. Interchange Inset 33 Mount Plymouth 3 RD PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO 3 n ty WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. THOMPSON ROAD 3A MARKHAM WOODS RD E E WILLIAMSON RD HIGHLAND AVE GE AV E 3 NU E ( MONTGOMERY RD 3 ( LINE DR 2 PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD FLYOVER RAMP SHEELER AVE BRADSHAW ROAD 3 CENTRAL AVENUE 2 BEAR LAKE RD N. PARK AVENUE VICK RD VOTAW RD RD Apopka S 8 Lanes OR AN NG RI SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Lanes EH WY 239 SP Lanes DIX I 23 A IV NU E GEOMETRY LEGEND 2 Lanes OL D GE AV E 23 EK W BUILD (2032) CONDITIONS OR AN LAKE MARY BLVD Co u Co u WELC H RD HIGHLAND AVE le ge ino Or an JUNCTION RD. YOTHERS RD See Interchange Inset 2 1 Se m PONKAN RD 31B n ty N. ROCK SPRINGS RD PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD GOLDEN GEM RD JONES RD 3 ( PEARL LAKE CSWY MAITLAND AV FOLIAGE WY EFFIE RD ROUND LAKE RD U.S. 1 and S.R. 29 Interchange Inset KELLY PARK RD Figure -1A A HAAS RD ONDICH RD SADLER AVE IN T 1 ER NA TIO A NA L 31 See Interchange Inset BLVD PK WY Mount Dora A DOUGLAS AVE e u Co ( Page 13

3 RINEHART RD RINEHART RD Miles ± ORANGE BLVD Wekiva River WEKIVA PARK DR HENDERSON LN LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. LAKE MARKHAM RD OREGON ST 31 LAKE FOREST BLVD INTERNATIONAL PKWY TOWNE CENTER BLVD ( St Johns Pkwy. 1 A 31 Sanford Figure -1B BUILD (2032) CONDITIONS GEOMETRY 1 Lane One Way LEGEND 2 Lanes One Way 2 Lanes Lanes Lanes 8 Lanes A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page 1

4 properties and neighborhoods along the existing corridor will be provided with one local access interchange in the Neighborhood Lakes area. In, Wekiva Parkway is proposed to be a four-lane limited access tolled expressway from the Line to the Neighborhood Lakes interchange. From the Neighborhood Lakes interchange to the Line it is a six-lane limited access tolled expressway. Local access to properties along the existing SR and CR A corridors in east will be provided via a two lane service road that will be constructed on the north side of the tolled expressway. As part of the Wekiva Parkway project, CR A is expected to be realigned to connect to SR approximately four miles west of its current terminus. The mainline toll, located east of the Neighborhood Lakes interchange, and the ramp toll on the Neighborhood Lakes interchange ramps to and from the south were assumed to be $3.00 and $1.0, respectively. These toll rates are preliminary and were developed for use in support of the PD&E Study. These toll rates may be modified in later phases of the project. The SR Bypass provides a connection from SR to the east of Mount Dora with the Wekiva Parkway. This bypass begins at the US 1/SR interchange in Lake County and extends to the east along the existing SR corridor. As part of the SR Bypass, the US 1/SR interchange will be rebuilt as a signalized intersection with direct ramps between US 1 to the north of the interchange to SR east of the interchange to accommodate the shift in traffic patterns due to Wekiva Parkway. Near Round Lake Road, the bypass turns southeast into and terminates at a systems interchange with Wekiva Parkway. This bypass consists of a six-lane divided, controlled access roadway along the existing alignment of SR from US 1 to the vicinity of Round Lake Road. From east of Round Lake Road to Wekiva Parkway, the bypass is expected to be a four-lane limited access facility. Upon crossing the Wekiva River into, the expressway continues east to a connection with I- at the existing I-/SR 1 interchange. Local access to and from Wekiva Parkway within the SR corridor is provided via one-way one-lane and two-lane frontage roads. The frontage road system in this alternative is generally between the Wekiva River and Orange Boulevard, where Wekiva Parkway leaves the SR corridor to connect to I- at SR 1. Two-lane frontage roads are proposed from the slip ramps west of Longwood Markham Road to the east, while one-lane frontage roads are proposed for the section of the frontage road system to the west of these slip ramps. Wekiva Parkway has a local access interchange with International Parkway in addition to its systems interchange with I- at SR 1. Under the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept, traffic from International Parkway would not be able to access I- via Wekiva Parkway. In, Wekiva Parkway is a six-lane limited access tolled expressway. A toll of $1.00 is assumed on the frontage road slip ramps on Wekiva Parkway to and from the east. There are no toll collection facilities on the ramps at the International Parkway interchange..2 Operational Analysis The projected operating levels of service for the mainline roadway, ramps and intersections were analyzed for opening (2012), interim (2022) and design (2032) years under the Build Condition. The roadway segments were analyzed using FDOT LOS standards, the freeway elements and intersections were analyzed using HCS+ Version.2 and the intersections in were analyzed using the Synchro.0 analysis software. Intersection signal timing and phasing provided by Orange, Lake and Seminole Counties were optimized to analyze the Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept. Operation and geometric parameters used in the LOS analysis discussed below can be found in the Appendix E. Page 1

5 .2.1 Build 2012 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept The LOS analyses for Year 2012 are presented in this section. The results of the 2012 roadway segment LOS analyses are summarized in Tables.1,.2 and.3 for Orange, Lake and Seminole Counties, respectively. The two sections below highlight the roadway segments that are expected to operate below the LOS D standard, specifically at LOS E and LOS F. All other roadway segments in the project area are expected to operate at LOS D or better for peak hour, peak direction traffic conditions Roadway Segments Operating at LOS E While most of the roadways shown in the following tables are projected to operate at LOS D or better during the peak hour, several segments are expected to operate at capacity with LOS E for peak hour, peak direction traffic primarily due to heavy congestion: CR 3 from US 1 to Votaw Road SR from CR 3 to CR 3 Wolf Branch Road from US 1 to Round Lake Road I- from SR 3 to Lake Mary Blvd. I- from US 1/92 to North of US 1/92 SR from I- to Town Center Blvd Roadway Segments Operating at LOS F The following roadway segments are expected to operate at LOS F for peak hour, peak direction traffic due to overcapacity conditions: US 1 from SR 3 to CR 3 US 1 from SR 1/SR 29 to Ponkan Road SR 3 from Piedmont-Wekiva Road to line SR from CR 3 to CR A Re-Alignment US 1/92 from I- WB On-Ramp to CR 1 SR 3 from Orange/ Line to SR 3 SR 3 from I- to Palm Springs Road Page 1

6 CR A from International Parkway to Rinehart Road Rinehart Road from Anderson Lane to CRA TABLE.1 BUILD (2012) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY ORANGE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS U.S. 1 Ponkan Rd. B Wekiva Parkway Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. B Kelly Park Rd. S.R. Bypass A U.S. 1 Hiawassee Rd. B S.R. 1 Hiawassee Rd. Keene Rd. A Keene Rd. S.R. 1 A S.R. 1/S.R. 29 S.R. 1 U.S. 1 B S.R. 1 S.R. 1 U.S. 1 A S.R. 3 C.R. 3 F C.R. 3 S.R. 1 F S.R. 1 C.R. 3 F U.S. 1 C.R. 3 S.R. 1/S.R. 29 C S.R. 1/S.R. 29 Ponkan Rd. F Ponkan Rd. Sadler Ave. C Sadler Ave. S.R. C S.R. 3 U.S. 1 Piedmont-Wekiva Rd. C Piedmont-Wekiva Rd. Line F U.S. 1 Votaw Rd. E Votaw Rd. Welch Rd. D C.R. 3 Welch Rd. Ponkan Rd. D Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. C Kelly Park Rd. Line C U.S. 1 Ponkan Rd. C C.R. 3 Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. D Kelly Park Rd. Line D Ponkan Rd. Sadler Ave. C Round Lake Rd. Sadler Ave. Kelly Park Rd. C Kelly Park Rd. Ondich Rd. C Ondich Rd. Line C U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. D Ponkan Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D C.R. 3 C.R. 3 C Kelly Park Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 C C.R. 3 C.R. 3 D Sadler Ave. Line U.S. 1 D U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. C Ondich Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 C Haas Rd. C.R. 3 C.R. 3 C Page 1

7 Table.1 Build (2012) Roadway Segment LOS Summary (Continued) Roadway From To LOS Ponkan Rd. Lester Rd. C Vick Rd. Lester Rd. Welch Rd. C Welch Rd. Martin St. D Martin St. Old Dixie Hwy. D Old Dixie Highway C.R. 3 Errol Pkwy. C Errol Pkwy. C.R. 3 C Yothers Rd. U.S. 1 C.R. 3 C TABLE.2 BUILD (2012) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY - LAKE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS S.R. Bypass - Limited U.S. 1 S.R. West/S.R. Bypass B Access S.R. West/S.R. Bypass S.R. 29 B Wekiva Parkway S.R. Bypass Old S.R. B Old S.R. Lake/Seminole Co. Line B Wekiva Parkway Service Rd. S.R. C.R. 33 C C.R. 33 Wekiva River Rd. C Wekiva River Rd. Lake/Seminole Co. Line C U.S. 1 S.R. C.R. B B C.R. 00A U.S. 1 C U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. B S.R. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 C C.R. 3 C.R. 3 E C.R. 3 C.R. A Re-Alignment F C.R. A Re-Alignment Wekiva Parkway IC B S.R S.R. 19 C.R. A C C.R. 3 Line S.R. D S.R. S.R. D C.R. 3 Line S.R. D C.R. A S.R. S.R. C C.R. 33 S.R. South of S.R. C Round Lake Rd. Line S.R. C S.R. Wolf Branch Rd. C Wolf Branch Rd. U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. E Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D Wekiva River Rd. S.R. South of S.R. C Page 18

8 TABLE.3 BUILD (2012) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY SEMINOLE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS Lake/Seminole Co. Line Longwood-Markham Rd. B Wekiva Parkway Longwood-Markham Rd. Lake Markham Rd. B Lake Markham Rd. Orange Blvd./S.R. B Orange Blvd./S.R. I- South S.R. 1 B Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp Longwood Markham Rd. C Longwood Markham Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB On/WB Off Ramp B Wekiva Parkway EB and WB C-D Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB On/WB Off Ramp Lake Markham Rd. A Lake Markham Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp B Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp Orange Blvd./S.R. B S.R. 3 S.R. 3 E S.R. 3 Lake Mary Blvd. E Interstate Lake Mary Blvd. C.R. A / S.R. 1 C C.R. A / S.R. 1 S.R. C(EB) B(WB) S.R. U.S. 1/92 C U.S. 1/92 North of U.S. 1/92 E S.R. 1 Interstate Rinehart Rd. B Rinehart Rd. C.R. A C North of I- WB on ramp I- WB on Ramp C U.S. 1/92 I- WB on Ramp CR 1 F CR 1 South of CR 1 D C.R. 31 Lake Forest Blvd. C Lake Forest Blvd. International Pkwy. C International Pkwy. Oregon St/Wayside Dr C S.R. Oregon St/Wayside Dr Interstate C Interstate Town Center Blvd E Town Center Blvd C.R. 31B C C.R. 31B CR 1 C Line S.R. 3 F S.R. 3 S.R. 3 Interstate D Interstate Palm Springs Rd. F Orange Blvd. International Pkwy. C International Pkwy. Colonial Center Pkwy. F C.R. A Colonial Center Pkwy. I- F I- Rinehart Rd F Rinehart Rd East of Rinehart Rd D C.R. A Markham Rd. D C.R. 31 Markham Rd. S.R. C S.R. I- C I- CR 1 C South of CR 31 CR 31 C C.R. 1 CR 31 I- EB on Ramp D I- EB on Ramp U.S. 1/92 D Page 19

9 Table.3 Build (2012) Roadway Segment LOS Summary (Continued) Roadway From To LOS Anderson Lane CR A F CR A Town Center Blvd. D Rinehart Rd Town Center Blvd. SR 1 D SR 1 St Johns Pkwy. C St Johns Pkwy. SR C Lake Mary Blvd. C.R. A D International Parkway C.R. A SR 1 Ramps D SR 1 Ramps S.R. C Markham Road Longwood-Markham Rd. Markham Woods Rd. C Markham Woods Rd. Orange Blvd. C Longwood-Markham Rd. S.R. C.R. A C Wekiva Park Dr SR North of SR C Lake Markham Rd. S.R. C.R. A C N Oregon Street North of S.R. S.R. D Wayside Drive South of S.R. S.R. C Figures -2A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -2B () show the 2012 Build AADTs that were used to determine the 2012 Build DDHVs. The 2012 DDHVs and corresponding LOS for the roadway elements are illustrated in Figures -3A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -3B (). Page 10

10 A JUNCTION RD. GOLDEN GEM RD AITLAND AV 8A ( B Mount Dora,200 E. LIMIT AVE 2,00,00 29,00 JONES RD 1 32,00,00 BRITT RD. 21,100 3,200 3,00 2,300 3,300,00 SADLER AVE 2,00,800 Figure -2A BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS,900 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) LEGEND xx,xxx 2012 AADT 11,000 ROUND LAKE RD 39,200 WOLF BRANCH RD 0 ONDICH RD 3,300,900 3,800 Sorrento 12,00,200 28,000 2,100 3,000 1, EFFIE RD 2,00 1,900 ( 9,900 2,000 YOTHERS RD 8,200 3 PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD 0,000 3,800 HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE 8,200 10,300 9,900 2,100,800,200 1,800 8,900 3 FOLIAGE WY 19,900 1,800 ( PONKAN RD 11,000 1,900 8,200 3, ,00 HAAS RD OLD DIXIE HWY,900,900 3,00 20, ,0 KELLY PARK RD VICK RD,800 BRADSHAW ROAD 3 3A 2,800 10,00 2,300,00 2 CENTRAL AVENUE 10,00 N. ROCK SPRINGS RD N. PARK AVENUE,00 Mount Plymouth 1,0 2,200 2,00 2,00,000 Apopka WELCH RD 3,000 2 HEELER AVE A,00 1,00 THOMPSON ROAD 1,000 2,300 VOTAW RD 3,800 33, ( 3 1 1,800 PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. 8,00 Miles ±,000 LINE DR 33, BEAR LAKE RD 23 1,900 1,200 2 WEKIVA RIVER RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD ( 3 PEARL LAKE CSWY 0, MONTGOMERY RD A DOUGLAS AVE SEE FIGURE -2B FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY 28 MARKHAM WOODS RD 131,900 E E WILLIAMSON RD 1, ,200 INTERNATIONAL PKWY 23 ( ,300 2 ORANGE BLVD 31B A ( 3 22 ( LAKE MARY BLVD Page 11 OLD Æ 1

11 RINEHART RD 2,800 3,00 12,00,300, Miles ±,900 1,900 ORANGE BLVD,300 19,100 13,800,00 13,00 33,100 Wekiva River WEKIVA PARK DR ,000 2,000 32,00,300 1,00 3,00,900 OREGON ST 11,900 8,00 13, ,000 LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. A,300 3,00,0 1,00 2,800 LAKE MARKHAM RD 2,800 2,200 1,00 3,0 3,0 3,00 3,00,10 28,00,20 1,00,20 31,200 HENDERSON LN 2,0 32,100 WILSON RD LAKE FOREST BLVD WAYSIDE DR 8,800 2,0,300,100 1,100 10,900,200 38,100 33,200 3,00 INTERNATIONAL PKWY,100,00,000 12,00 20,200 32,800,200 12,300 1,00 10,800 TOWNE CENTER BLVD 11,900 11,200,100 1,300 1,00 10,300 11,200 9,300 1,100 0,00 3,100 ( St Johns Pkwy. 32,800 1,300 1,800,800 8,800,300 1,800 18,00 Figure -2B BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) LEGEND 9,90 19,000 1,00 22,800 29,800 1,200 3,900 1,800 A,00 1,200 3,00,800 20,00 22,00 29,900 xx,xxx 2012 AADT 131,900 Page 12

12 JUNCTION RD. GOLDEN GEM RD WEKIVA RIVER RD ITLAND AV 8A 380 ( B Mount Dora E. LIMIT AVE 2, ,10 1,0 JONES RD BRITT RD. 1, Figure -3A BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS 20 SADLER AVE 2,020 0 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES (DDHV) LEGEND xx,xxx 2012 (DDHV) LOS A, B, & C LOS D LOS E LOS F ROUND LAKE RD WOLF BRANCH RD 0 ONDICH RD 1, Sorrento EFFIE RD 1,10 1,00 ( YOTHERS RD ,00 3 PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD 2, HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE ,00 3 FOLIAGE WY 1, ( 20 PONKAN RD 1, HAAS RD OLD DIXIE HWY 1,310 0 KELLY PARK RD 290 VICK RD 10 BRADSHAW ROAD 3 3A A SEE FIGURE -3B 1, N. PARK AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE 2, N. ROCK SPRINGS RD 80 1,10 WELCH RD VOTAW RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD ( ,10 ( 3,10 3, ,020 2, Mount Plymouth 10 1,00 80 HEELER AVE 1,10 Apopka 1,00 1,00 THOMPSON ROAD ,030 1,90 Miles ± 120 PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. LINE DR 3,010 2,030 BEAR LAKE RD PEARL LAKE CSWY 13 MONTGOMERY RD A DOUGLAS AVE 28 MARKHAM WOODS RD,30 E E WILLIAMSON RD 31, INTERNATIONAL PKWY 23 ( ORANGE BLVD FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY 31B A ( 3 22 ( LAKE MARY BLVD Page 13 O Æ

13 RINEHART RD 1,330 1,890, Miles ± ORANGE BLVD 0 1, , Wekiva River 2,030 WEKIVA PARK DR 20 2,010 OREGON ST, , , Figure -3B BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. A DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOURLY VOLUME (DDHV) LEGEND xx,xxx 2012 (DDHV) LOS A, B, & C LOS D LAKE MARKHAM RD , ,20 1,000 1,10 HENDERSON LN 320 1,980 1,190 1,0 WILSON RD LAKE FOREST BLVD ,20 2, A WAYSIDE DR INTERNATIONAL PKWY ,190 1,90 1,10 1,90 2, ,00 1,00 1,380 2,0 1,00 1, ,30 1,00 1, ,220 TOWNE CENTER BLVD 1,000 2,10 1, ,090 2,30 ( 1,90 90 St Johns Pkwy , ,20 Sanford LOS E LOS F,30 Page 1

14 Ramp Analyses The results of the ramp merge/diverge junctions analyses are summarized in Table. for the interchanges within the study area. Table. shows that all of the freeway elements along I- and SR 1 in the project area are expected to operate at LOS D or better during peak hour traffic conditions. The weaving analysis completed for the I- westbound C-D road shows that this segment will operate at LOS B in the Year The weaving analysis for the SR 1 westbound ramps between Rinehart Road and I- interchange will operate at LOS B. The weaving analysis for the Wekiva Parkway ramps between the SR Bypass and Kelly Park Road interchange will operate at LOS A. TABLE. BUILD (2012) FREEWAY AND RAMP LOS SUMMARY Merge Analysis Diverge Analysis Interchange Ramps Ramp Description Volume (vph) Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS I- at U.S. 1/92 I- at SR I- at SR 1 I- at CR A I- EB CD Rd. I- WB CD Rd. SR 1 at Rinehart Rd. I- EB Off Ramp to U.S. 1/ A I- WB On Ramp from U.S. 1/ C - - I- EB On Ramp from U.S. 1/ D - - I- WB Off Ramp to U.S. 1/ D I- EB Off Ramp to SR (through I- EB CD) A I- WB On Ramp from SR WB (through I- WB CD) B - - I- WB On Ramp from SR EB (through I- WB CD) B - - I- EB On Ramp from SR 1, C - - I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1, C I- EB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB A 1.8 B I- EB Off Ramp to Wekiva Parkway WB 90.0 A 1. B I- WB On Ramp from SR 1 NB 30.1 A. A I- WB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB 90.1 A 1.0 B I- EB On Ramp from SR 1 NB A. A I- EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB 30.8 A 1.0 B I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB A 3.2 A I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB 30.0 A 19.0 B I- EB Off Ramp to CR A 1, B I- WB On Ramp from CR A (through I- WB CD) 1, C - - I- EB On Ramp from CR A C - - I- WB Off Ramp to CR A (through I- WB CD) B I- EB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB, Wekiva Pkwy. WB and SR 1, A I- EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB C 1.9 A I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB, SR 1 SB and CR A 1,00 1. B.8 A I- WB On Ramp from CR A and SR 2,10 U/C C - - SR 1 WB off Ramp to Rinehart Rd B SR 1 EB on Ramp from Rinehart Rd B - - SR 1 WB on Ramp from Rinehart Rd B - - SR 1 EB off Ramp to Rinehart Rd B U/C = ramp operates under capacity Page 1

15 Table. Build (2012) Freeway and Ramp LOS Summary (Continued) Merge Analysis Diverge Analysis Interchange Ramps Ramp Description Volume (vph) Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS SR 1 at International Pkwy Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD Rd. SR 1 NB Off Ramp to International Pkwy B SR 1 SB On Ramp from International Pkwy. 0.8 A - - Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from International Pkwy A - - Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to International Pkwy B Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD 20.0 A 13.8 B Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD B.1 A Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR A 3.0 A Wekiva Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR A.1 A Pkwy. WB Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB CD 10.2 A. A CD Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. WB CD A 3.8 A Wekiva Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to SR (existing) A Parkway at Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR (existing) B - - SR Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR (existing) A (existing) Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp from SR (existing) A - - Wekiva Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to SR Bypass U/C A Parkway at Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR Bypass A SR Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR Bypass A - - Bypass Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp from SR Bypass B - - Wekiva Wekiva Pkwy. NB Off Ramp to Kelly Park Rd B Parkway at Wekiva Pkwy. NB On Ramp from Kelly Park Rd A - - Kelly Park Wekiva Pkwy. SB Off Ramp to Kelly Park Rd B Rd Wekiva Pkwy. SB On Ramp from Kelly Park Rd B - - Wekiva Wekiva Pkwy. NB Off Ramp to US 1 1, A Parkway Wekiva Pkwy. NB On Ramp from US B - - Connector Wekiva Pkwy. SB Off Ramp to US B at US 1 Wekiva Pkwy. SB On Ramp from US 1 1, B - - U/C = ramp operates under capacity Weaving Segment I- WB C-D Rd. SR 1 Westbound Wekiva Parkway at SR Bypass Weaving Analysis Ramp Description Volume Density (vph) (pc/mi/ln) LOS I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB and CR A 1,20 I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB 30 SR EB and WB Ramps to SR 1 SB, CR A and I- WB 1, B SR EB and WB Ramps to Wekiva Pkwy. WB 0 On Ramp from Rinehart Rd. to I- EB and WB 8 On Ramp from Rinehart Rd. to Intl. Pkwy. and Wekiva Pkwy. 12 SR 1 WB to I- EB and WB 1, B SR 1 WB to Intl. Pkwy. and Wekiva Pkwy. 1,38 Wekiva Parkway NB off Ramp to WB SR Bypass B Wekiva Parkway SB on Ramp from EB SR Bypass B Page 1

16 .2.1. Intersection Analyses The PM peak hour intersection analyses are summarized in Table.. All of the intersections analyzed in are projected to operate at LOS B or better. In, all of the signalized intersections along SR are expected to operate at LOS C or better for the PM peak traffic conditions. All of the intersections analyzed along the Service Road are projected to operate at LOS B or better. In, nineteen out of the twenty-one signalized intersections in the project area operate at LOS D or better whereas two signalized intersections are projected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak period. The intersections along CR A at International Parkway and Rinehart Road are expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak period. TABLE. BUILD (2012) INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY PM Peak Intersection Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS US 1 and CR 3 Signal 12.8 B CR 3 and Ponkan Rd Signal 9.0 A CR 3 and Kelly Park Rd Signal 12. B Wekiva Parkway Connector and Wekiva Pkwy Signal 1. B US 1 and Wekiva Pkwy Connector Signal 8.0 A CR 3 and Wekiva Pkwy Connector Signal 8.9 A Kelly Park Rd and Wekiva Pkwy SB Ramps Signal 1. B Kelly Park Rd and Wekiva Pkwy NB Ramps Signal. A SR and US 1 Signal 2. C SR and Round Lake Rd Signal 18.1 B SR and SR Bypass Signal 33.8 C SR and CR 3 Signal 2. C SR and CR 3/Niles St Signal 21.3 C SR and Realigned CR A Signal 1.1 B SR and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 1.8 B SR (Existing) and Wekiva Pkwy WB Ramps Signal 1. A SR (Existing) and Wekiva Pkwy EB Ramps Signal 10.9 B CR A West (Old) and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 9. A CR A (Old) and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 13. B Wekiva Pines Blvd and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 9.9 A Wekiva River Rd and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 13.3 B Page 1

17 Table. Build (2012) Intersection LOS Summary (Continued) PM Peak Intersection Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Wekiva Park Dr Stop 1.8 A/B 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Wekiva Park Dr Stop 10. A/B 1 Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Longwood Markham Rd Stop 1. A/C 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Longwood Markham Rd Stop 12.3 A/B 1 Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Lake Markham Rd Stop 12. A/B 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Lake Markham Rd Stop 11. A/B 1 U.S. 1/92 and I- WB Ramps Signal 9.2 A U.S. 1/92 and I- EB Ramps/CR 1 Signal 31.1 C SR and CR 31 (Orange Blvd) Signal 18.3 B SR and Lake Forest Blvd Signal 8.3 A SR and International Pkwy Signal 1.1 B SR and N Oregon Ave/Wayside Dr Signal 1.8 B SR and I- WB Ramps Signal 1.9 B SR and I- EB Ramps Signal 18. B SR and Town Center Blvd Signal 28. C SR and Rinehart Rd Signal 20. C CR A and International Pkwy Signal.3 E CR A and I- WB Ramps Signal 3. D CR A and I- EB Ramps Signal 23.2 C CR A and Rinehart Rd Signal. E CR 1 and CR 31 Signal 1.8 B Rinehart Rd and St Johns Pkwy Signal 21.8 C Rinehart Rd and SR 1 NB Ramps Signal 1.3 B Rinehart Rd and SR 1 SB Ramps Signal 18.3 B Rinehart Rd and Town Center Blvd Signal 19. B International Pkwy and Wekiva Parkway SB Ramps Signal 18.0 B International Pkwy and Wekiva Parkway NB Ramps Signal 1.0 B 1. Mainline/Side Street The LOS for the freeway elements, the projected turning movement volumes and intersections are illustrated in Figures -A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -B (). Page 18

18 JUNCTION RD. AITLAND AV GOLDEN GEM RD C B ( C 3 3 A 31B 8A 3 ( A Mount Dora E. LIMIT AVE ( C BRITT RD ,0 ROUND LAKE RD 1 ( B WOLF BRANCH RD ONDICH RD ( ( HAAS RD A A 31 INTERNATIONAL PKWY ORANGE BLVD ( 1 EFFIE RD 1 OLD JONES RD SADLER AVE YOTHERS RD PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD FOLIAGE WY ,2 23 Sorrento ( C ( C ( B ( B ( A ( B ( A ( B ( ( A B Mount Plymouth ± Miles SEE FIGURE -B FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY %, A %, A U.S. 1 and S.R. 29 Interchange Inset ( B ( A ( B ( A PONKAN RD KELLY PARK RD See Interchange Inset VICK RD 3 N. ROCK SPRINGS RD WELCH RD ( A MARKHAM WOODS RD PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD ( B ( A E E WILLIAMSON RD ,2 LAKE MARY BLVD , Æ 1 Figure -A BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TMV) LEGEND ( X Signalized Intersection Level of Service ") X/X Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (Major/Minor Streets) $+ X &- X Ramp Level Of Service Weave Level Of Service HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE 3 OLD DIXIE HWY 3A BRADSHAW ROAD 2 N. PARK AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE Apopka 3 2 HEELER AVE THOMPSON ROAD VOTAW RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. 13 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD ( ( PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD LINE DR BEAR LAKE RD PEARL LAKE CSWY MONTGOMERY RD DOUGLAS AVE 28 ( B ORANGE AVENUE ( 3 HIGHLAND AVE ( Page 19

19 RINEHART RD ± , $+ D ( A ( C Wekiva River WEKIVA PARK DR ")A/B ")A/B $+A ")A/C ")A/B LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. A $+A $+ B ")A/B LAKE MARKHAM RD ") A/B $+A , WAYSIDE DR ,308 LAKE FOREST BLVD HENDERSON LN 291 1,9 WILSON RD , $+ ( B B ( B ORANGE BLVD 23 1, INTERNATIONAL PKWY ,12 30 $+ $+ C A $+ B &- B $+ $+ B C 20 1, ( B TOWNE CENTER BLVD $+ C $+ C ( B ( B ( B ( B ( B ( C ( A , , , , OREGON ST $+ C 2 1,01 ( C ( C ( B &- B ( B 0 1,8 St Johns Pkwy , , , , ( B $+ D ") X/X Figure -B BUILD (2012) CONDITIONS TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TMV) LEGEND ( X Signalized Intersection Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (Major/Minor Streets) $+ X &- X Ramp Level Of Service Weave Level Of Service , ( E $+ C $+ C ( D A ( C ( E , , Sanford 300 1, 2 1, Page 180

20 .2.2 Build 2022 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept The LOS analyses for Year 2022 are presented in this section. The results of the roadway segment level of service analyses are summarized in Tables.,. and.8 for Orange, Lake and Seminole Counties, respectively. The two sections below highlight the roadway segments that are expected to operate below the LOS D standard, specifically at LOS E and LOS F. All other roadway segments in the project area are expected to operate at LOS D or better for peak hour, peak direction traffic conditions Roadway Segments Operating at LOS E The tables show that the following roadway segments that were operating at LOS D or better in the 2012 Build conditions are expected to operate at capacity with LOS E for peak hour peak direction for the 2022 Build conditions traffic primarily due to heavy congestion: Sadler Avenue from Line to US 1 Vick Road from Welch Road to Martin Street US 1/92 from CR 1 to South of CR 1 SR 3 from SR 3 to I- CR A from Rinehart Road to East of Rinehart Road Roadway Segments Operating at LOS F The following roadway segments were operating at LOS D or better in the Year 2012 Build condition. In addition to the failing roadway segments listed in the 2012 Build conditions, these roadway segments are expected to begin to fail at LOS F for peak hour, peak direction traffic due to overcapacity conditions in the Year 2022: US 1 from Ponkan Road to SR CR 3 from Votaw Road to Ponkan Road CR 3 from Kelly Park Road to Line Vick Road from Martin Street to Old Dixie Highway CR 3 from Line to SR International Parkway from Lake Mary Blvd. to SR 1 Ramps Page 181

21 The following roadway segments were operating at LOS E in the 2012 Build conditions, but are expected to fail at LOS F for peak hour, peak direction traffic due to overcapacity conditions in the Year 2022: CR 3 from US 1 to Votaw Road I- from SR 3 to Lake Mary Blvd. SR from I- to Town Center Blvd. TABLE. BUILD (2022) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY ORANGE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS U.S. 1 Ponkan Rd. C Wekiva Parkway Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. C Kelly Park Rd. S.R. Bypass B U.S. 1 Hiawassee Rd. C S.R. 1 Hiawassee Rd. Keene Rd. B Keene Rd. S.R. 1 B S.R. 1/S.R. 29 S.R. 1 U.S. 1 C S.R. 1 S.R. 1 U.S. 1 A S.R. 3 C.R. 3 F C.R. 3 S.R. 1 F S.R. 1 C.R. 3 F U.S. 1 C.R. 3 S.R. 1/S.R. 29 D S.R. 1/S.R. 29 Ponkan Rd. F Ponkan Rd. Sadler Ave. F Sadler Ave. S.R. F S.R. 3 U.S. 1 Piedmont-Wekiva Rd. C Piedmont-Wekiva Rd. Line F U.S. 1 Votaw Rd. F Votaw Rd. Welch Rd. F C.R. 3 Welch Rd. Ponkan Rd. F Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. D Kelly Park Rd. Line C U.S. 1 Ponkan Rd. C C.R. 3 Ponkan Rd. Kelly Park Rd. D Kelly Park Rd. Line F Ponkan Rd. Sadler Ave. C Round Lake Rd. Sadler Ave. Kelly Park Rd. D Kelly Park Rd. Ondich Rd. D Ondich Rd. Line D U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. D Ponkan Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D C.R. 3 C.R. 3 D Page 182

22 Table. Build (2022) Roadway Segment LOS Summary (Continued) Roadway From To LOS Kelly Park Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D C.R. 3 C.R. 3 D Sadler Ave. Line U.S. 1 E U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. C Ondich Rd. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 C Haas Rd. C.R. 3 C.R. 3 C Ponkan Rd. Lester Rd. C Vick Rd. Lester Rd. Welch Rd. D Welch Rd. Martin St. E Martin St. Old Dixie Hwy. F Old Dixie Highway C.R. 3 Errol Pkwy. C Errol Pkwy. C.R. 3 D Yothers Rd. U.S. 1 C.R. 3 C TABLE. BUILD (2022) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY LAKE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS S.R. Bypass - Limited U.S. 1 S.R. West/S.R. Bypass B Access S.R. West/S.R. Bypass S.R. 29 C Wekiva Parkway S.R. Bypass Old S.R. C Old S.R. Lake/Seminole Co. Line B Wekiva Parkway Service Rd. S.R. C.R. 33 C C.R. 33 Wekiva River Rd. C Wekiva River Rd. Lake/Seminole Co. Line C U.S. 1 S.R. C.R. B D C.R. 00A U.S. 1 C U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. B S.R. Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D C.R. 3 C.R. 3 D C.R. 3 C.R. A Re-Alignment F C.R. A Re-Alignment C.R. A IC C S.R S.R. 19 C.R. A C C.R. 3 Line S.R. D S.R. S.R. D C.R. 3 Line S.R. F C.R. A S.R. S.R. D C.R. 33 S.R. South of S.R. C Round Lake Rd. Line S.R. C S.R. Wolf Branch Rd. D Wolf Branch Rd. U.S. 1 Round Lake Rd. E Round Lake Rd. C.R. 3 D Wekiva River Rd. S.R. South of S.R. C Page 183

23 TABLE.8 BUILD (2022) ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARY SEMINOLE COUNTY Roadway From To LOS Lake/Seminole Co. Line Longwood-Markham Rd. B Wekiva Parkway Longwood-Markham Rd. Lake Markham Rd. B Lake Markham Rd. Orange Blvd./S.R. C Orange Blvd./S.R. I- South S.R. 1 C Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp Longwood Markham Rd. C Longwood Markham Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB On/WB Off Ramp B Wekiva Parkway EB and WB C-D Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB On/WB Off Ramp Lake Markham Rd. B Lake Markham Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp B Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off/WB On Ramp Orange Blvd./S.R. B S.R. 3 S.R. 3 F S.R. 3 Lake Mary Blvd. F Interstate Lake Mary Blvd. C.R. A / S.R. 1 C C.R. A / S.R. 1 S.R. C(EB) B(WB) S.R. U.S. 1/92 D U.S. 1/92 North of U.S. 1/92 E S.R. 1 Interstate Rinehart Rd. C Rinehart Rd. C.R. A D North of I- WB on ramp I- WB on Ramp D U.S. 1/92 I- WB on Ramp CR 1 F CR 1 South of CR 1 E C.R. 31 Lake Forest Blvd. C Lake Forest Blvd. International Pkwy. D International Pkwy. Oregon St/Wayside Dr C S.R. Oregon St/Wayside Dr Interstate C Interstate Town Center Blvd F Town Center Blvd C.R. 31B D C.R. 31B CR 1 D Line S.R. 3 F S.R. 3 S.R. 3 Interstate E Interstate Palm Springs Rd. F Orange Blvd. International Pkwy. C International Pkwy. Colonial Center Pkwy. F C.R. A Colonial Center Pkwy. I- F I- Rinehart Rd F Rinehart Rd East of Rinehart Rd E C.R. A Markham Rd. D C.R. 31 Markham Rd. S.R. D S.R. I- C I- CR 1 C South of CR 31 CR 31 D C.R. 1 CR 31 I- EB on Ramp D I- EB on Ramp U.S. 1/92 D Page 18

24 Table.8 Build (2022) Roadway Segment LOS Summary (Continued) Roadway From To LOS Anderson Lane CR A F CR A Town Center Blvd. D Rinehart Rd Town Center Blvd. SR 1 D SR 1 St Johns Pkwy. D St Johns Pkwy. SR D Lake Mary Blvd. C.R. A F International Parkway C.R. A SR 1 Ramps F SR 1 Ramps S.R. C Markham Road Longwood-Markham Rd. Markham Woods Rd. D Markham Woods Rd. Orange Blvd. C Longwood-Markham Rd. S.R. C.R. A C Wekiva Park Dr SR North of SR C Lake Markham Rd. S.R. C.R. A C N Oregon Street North of S.R. S.R. D Wayside Drive South of S.R. S.R. C Figures -A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -B () show the 2022 Build AADTs that were used to determine the 2022 Build DDHVs. The LOS for the roadway elements along with the DDHVs that were used to determine the LOS is illustrated in Figures -A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -B (). Page 18

25 JUNCTION RD. ITLAND AV GOLDEN GEM RD WEKIVA RIVER RD 8A ( B Mount Dora 9,300 E. LIMIT AVE 3,900 3,00 13,000 JONES RD 1 38,800 13,000 BRITT RD. 3,100,100 2,800,200 13,00 3,00,000 SADLER AVE 3,00 Figure -A BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS 9,200 3,00 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) LEGEND xx,xxx 2022 AADT 12,00 ROUND LAKE RD WOLF BRANCH RD 900 ONDICH RD 3,00,300,800 3,00 Sorrento 13,00 3,900,300 9,800 1,300 2,900 EFFIE RD 2,900 38,200 ( YOTHERS RD 3,000 13,100 10,100 3,100 3 PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD 3 9,300 KELLY PARK RD HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE 8,00 12,00 12,800 9,800 3,00 2,900 9,300 10,200 3 FOLIAGE WY 2,00 1,800 ( PONKAN RD 1,900 3,000 13,100 38,100,800 23,300 1,800 HAAS RD OLD DIXIE HWY,800 10,00 13,100 0,100 VICK RD 2,0 BRADSHAW ROAD 3 3A 3,800,00 2 N. PARK AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE 1,00 30,00 Mount Plymouth 13,00 0,000 SEE FIGURE -B A 11,000 11,100 11,00 1 N. ROCK SPRINGS RD WELCH RD 0,00 VOTAW RD 3, ,900,00 2,0 28,00 Apopka 31,900 EELER AVE 2,00 23,00 29,00 THOMPSON ROAD ( 3 1,800 Miles ± PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. 1,900 LINE DR 2, BEAR LAKE RD 23 2,100 8,00 2 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD ( 3 PEARL LAKE CSWY 13 MONTGOMERY RD A DOUGLAS AVE,00 28 MARKHAM WOODS RD E E WILLIAMSON RD 10,800 13,100 89, INTERNATIONAL PKWY 23 1,00 ( ORANGE BLVD FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY 31B A ( 3 22 ( LAKE MARY BLVD Page 18

26 RINEHART RD 30,00,000 1,000 11,200 12,100 11, Miles ± ORANGE BLVD,00 19,900,000 21,300 1,200 1,200 2,00 Wekiva River WEKIVA PARK DR 330 1,00 OREGON ST 12, ,200 3,100,900 2,00 00,200 LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. A Figure -B BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) LEGEND,900 2,00,300 8,00,00 LAKE MARKHAM RD,00 3,00 2,00,00,000,000,00,00,900,000 11,00 23,000 11,00,00 10,900 31,00 32,100 1,00 33,900 HENDERSON LN,100 3,00 32,00 18,100 WILSON RD LAKE FOREST BLVD A 1,100 9,00 0,00 3,00 1,00 WAYSIDE DR 12,30,100,800 8,200 1,900 1,00,100 21,800 1,300 INTERNATIONAL PKWY 8,200,000 8,200 18,100 39,800,000 1,00 29,300,00,100 1,00 20,00,300 23,300 2,300 33,900 11,100 TOWNE CENTER BLVD 1,100 13,00 8,200 21,800 20,00 13,800 13,00 9,00 1,900,900,100 ( St Johns Pkwy. 1,100 18,100 3,00 9,300 80,800 8,00 3,00 21,100 Sanford xx,xxx 2022 AADT 13,100 Page 12

27 A JUNCTION RD. GOLDEN GEM RD WEKIVA RIVER RD AITLAND AV C 8A 0 ( B Mount Dora E. LIMIT AVE 1,80 2,0 1,30 2,000 JONES RD 1 1,30 BRITT RD. 1, Figure -A BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS SADLER AVE 2,0 10 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES (DDHV) LEGEND xx,xxx 2022 (DDHV) LOS A, B, & C LOS D LOS E LOS F ROUND LAKE RD WOLF BRANCH RD ONDICH RD Sorrento 00 2, , EFFIE RD 2,0 2,00 ( YOTHERS RD ,0 3 PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD 3, HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE FOLIAGE WY 1, ( Mount Plymouth 1, , , ,0 1,90 PONKAN RD 1,0 OLD DIXIE HWY HAAS RD 380 VICK RD 3 KELLY PARK RD 20 BRADSHAW ROAD 3A 1, N. PARK AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE 90 A 0 SEE FIGURE -B ,220 1 N. ROCK SPRINGS RD 2,0 1,0 WELCH RD 2,080 VOTAW RD ,30 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD 3,20 13 ( 2 3 ( 2 3,0 92 3, , , ,90 HEELER AVE 1,0 1,810 Apopka THOMPSON ROAD ,220 Miles ± 130 PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. 3,30 LINE DR BEAR LAKE RD PEARL LAKE CSWY MONTGOMERY RD A DOUGLAS AVE 28 MARKHAM WOODS RD E E WILLIAMSON RD 31,0 239 INTERNATIONAL PKWY 23 ( ORANGE BLVD FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY 31B,000 A ( 3 22 ( LAKE MARY BLVD Page 188 OLD Æ 1

28 RINEHART RD 1,0 2,110, Wekiva River Miles ± ORANGE BLVD ,10 1,010 1, WEKIVA PARK DR 20 3,180 OREGON ST, , ,0 0 1, LONGWOOD-MARKHAM RD. A Figure -B BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES (DDHV) LEGEND xx,xxx 2022 (DDHV) LOS A, B, & C LOS D LAKE MARKHAM RD , ,180 1, ,130 1,100 2,20 HENDERSON LN 90 2,10 1,20 1,830 WAYSIDE DR WILSON RD LAKE FOREST BLVD , ,830 2,0 A INTERNATIONAL PKWY ,20 2,080 1,820 2,10 2,0 00 1,290 2,0 TOWNE CENTER BLVD 1,180 2,980 2,330 1, ,0 1,30 1,300 1, ,0 1,80 2,20 1,10 1, ,830,20,030 ( 2,120 1,200 St Johns Pkwy. 30 1,10,0 1, ,00 Sanford LOS E LOS F,000 Page 189

29 Ramp Analyses The results of the ramp merge/diverge junctions analyses are summarized in Table.9 for the interchanges within the study area. Table.9 shows that all of the freeway elements along I- and SR 1 in the project area would still operate at LOS D or better during peak hour traffic conditions. All of the weaving analysis done is expected to operate at LOS C or better in the Year TABLE.9 BUILD (2022) FREEWAY AND RAMP LOS SUMMARY Interchange Ramps I- at U.S. 1/92 I- at SR I- at SR 1 I- at CR A I- EB CD Rd. I- WB CD Rd. SR 1 at Rinehart Rd SR 1 at International Pkwy. Ramp Description Merge Analysis Diverge Analysis Volume (vph) Density Density LOS LOS (pc/mi/ln) (pc/mi/ln) I- EB Off Ramp to U.S. 1/ A I- WB On Ramp from U.S. 1/ D - - I- EB On Ramp from U.S. 1/ D - - I- WB Off Ramp to U.S. 1/ D I- EB Off Ramp to SR (through I- EB CD) 1, A I- WB On Ramp from SR WB (through I- WB CD) B - - I- WB On Ramp from SR EB (through I- WB CD) B - - I- EB On Ramp from SR 1, D - - I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1, C I- EB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB B 21.2 C I- EB Off Ramp to Wekiva Parkway WB B 1.0 B I- WB On Ramp from SR 1 NB 30. A 12. B I- WB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB 10. A 22. C I- EB On Ramp from SR 1 NB 1, B 12. B I- EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB A 22. C I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB 1, B.2 A I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB B 2. C I- EB Off Ramp to CR A 1, B I- WB On Ramp from CR A (through I- WB CD) 1,20 2. C - - I- EB On Ramp from CR A C - - I- WB Off Ramp to CR A (through I- WB CD) C I- EB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB, Wekiva Pkwy. WB and SR 1, A I- EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB D 2.9 A I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB, SR 1 SB and CR A 2, C. A I- WB On Ramp from CR A and SR 2,0 U/C C - - SR 1 WB off Ramp to Rinehart Rd 1, C SR 1 EB on Ramp from Rinehart Rd 1, D - - SR 1 WB on Ramp from Rinehart Rd B - - SR 1 EB off Ramp to Rinehart Rd C SR 1 NB Off Ramp to International Pkwy C SR 1 SB On Ramp from International Pkwy B - - Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from International Pkwy B - - Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to International Pkwy C U/C = ramp operates under capacity Page 190

30 Table.9 Build (2022) Freeway and Ramp LOS Summary (Continued) Merge Analysis Diverge Analysis Interchange Ramps Ramp Description Volume (vph) Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD Rd. Wekiva Pkwy. WB CD Rd. Wekiva Parkway at SR (existing) Wekiva Parkway at SR Bypass Wekiva Parkway at Kelly Park Rd Wekiva Parkway Connector at US 1 Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD 30.9 A 21.0 C Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. EB CD C. A Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR 0. A 10.1 B Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR B 11.3 B Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB CD A 1.1 B Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from Wekiva Pkwy. WB CD B.0 A Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to SR (existing) B Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR (existing) B - - Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR (existing) B Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp from SR (existing) B - - Wekiva Pkwy. WB Off Ramp to SR Bypass 1, B Wekiva Pkwy. WB On Ramp from SR Bypass 1, B Wekiva Pkwy. EB Off Ramp to SR Bypass 1, B - - Wekiva Pkwy. EB On Ramp to SR Bypass 1, B - - Wekiva Pkwy. NB Off Ramp to Kelly Park Rd C Wekiva Pkwy. NB On Ramp from Kelly Park Rd B - - Wekiva Pkwy. SB Off Ramp to Kelly Park Rd B Wekiva Pkwy. SB On Ramp from Kelly Park Rd C - - Wekiva Pkwy. NB Off Ramp to US 1 1, B Wekiva Pkwy. NB On Ramp from US C - - Wekiva Pkwy. SB Off Ramp to US C Wekiva Pkwy. SB On Ramp from US 1 1, C - - Weaving Segment I- WB C-D Rd. SR 1 Westbound Weaving Analysis Ramp Description Volume (vph) I- WB Off Ramp to SR 1 SB and CR A 1,0 I- WB Off Ramp to Wekiva Pkwy. WB 90 SR EB and WB Ramps to SR 1 SB, CR A and I- WB 1,290 SR EB and WB Ramps to Wekiva Pkwy. WB 0 On Ramp from Rinehart Rd. to I- EB and WB 18 On Ramp from Rinehart Rd. to Intl. Pkwy. and Wekiva Pkwy. 2 SR 1 WB to I- EB and WB 1,0 Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 30. C 21.0 B SR 1 WB to Intl. Pkwy. and Wekiva Pkwy. 2,19 Wekiva Parkway at Wekiva Parkway NB off Ramp to WB SR Bypass 1, B SR Bypass Wekiva Parkway SB on Ramp from EB SR Bypass 1, B Page 191

31 .2.2. Intersection Analyses The PM peak hour intersection analyses are summarized in Table.10. All of the intersections analyzed in are projected to continue to operate at LOS B or better. In, all of the signalized intersections along SR are expected to operate at LOS C or better for the PM peak traffic conditions. All of the intersections analyzed along the Service Road are projected to operate at LOS B. In, eighteen out of the twenty-one signalized intersections in the project area operate at LOS D or better, whereas the rest are projected to operate at LOS E or F during the PM peak period. In addition to the two failing intersections along CR A at International Parkway and Rinehart Road, the intersection of CR A at the I- westbound ramps will operate worse than LOS D in the Year 2022 compared to Year TABLE.10 BUILD (2022) INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY PM Peak Control Delay Intersection Type (sec/veh) LOS US 1 and CR 3 Signal 18. B CR 3 and Ponkan Rd Signal 9.3 A CR 3 and Kelly Park Rd Signal 13. B Wekiva Parkway Connector and Wekiva Pkwy Signal 19. B US 1 and Wekiva Pkwy Connector Signal 10.3 B CR 3 and Wekiva Pkwy Connector Signal 9.9 A Kelly Park Rd and Wekiva Pkwy SB Ramps Signal 1.9 B Kelly Park Rd and Wekiva Pkwy NB Ramps Signal 8.1 A SR and US 1 Signal 2.3 C SR and Round Lake Rd Signal 21. C SR and SR Bypass Signal 22.2 C SR and CR 3 Signal 2.9 C SR and CR 3/Niles St Signal 2.9 C SR and Realigned CR A Signal 22. C SR and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 21. C SR (Existing) and Wekiva Pkwy WB Ramps Signal 1.8 A SR (Existing) and Wekiva Pkwy EB Ramps Signal 13.1 B CR A West (Old) and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 10.8 B CR A (Old) and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 1.9 B Wekiva Pines Blvd and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 11.3 B Wekiva River Rd and Wekiva Pkwy Service Rd Signal 1.3 B Page 192

32 Table.10 Build (2022) Intersection LOS Summary (Continued) PM Peak Control Delay Intersection Type (sec/veh) LOS U.S. 1/92 and I- WB Ramps Signal 12. B U.S. 1/92 and I- EB Ramps/CR 1 Signal 3. C Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Wekiva Park Dr Stop 22. A/C 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Wekiva Park Dr Stop 13.1 A/B 1 Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Longwood Markham Rd Stop 2.9 A/C 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Longwood Markham Rd Stop 1.3 A/C 1 Wekiva Pkwy WB CD and Lake Markham Rd Stop 18. A/C 1 Wekiva Pkwy EB CD and Lake Markham Rd Stop 1.0 A/C 1 SR and CR 31 (Orange Blvd) Signal 21. C SR and Lake Forest Blvd Signal 10.2 B SR and International Pkwy Signal 19. B SR and N Oregon Ave/Wayside Dr Signal 1.1 B SR and I- WB Ramps Signal 1.9 B SR and I- EB Ramps Signal 2.3 C SR and Town Center Blvd Signal 31. C SR and Rinehart Rd Signal 29.1 C CR A and International Pkwy Signal 9.9 E CR A and I- WB Ramps Signal 8.3 E CR A and I- EB Ramps Signal 8. D CR A and Rinehart Rd Signal 8. F CR 1 and CR 31 Signal 23. C Rinehart Rd and St Johns Pkwy Signal 18.2 B Rinehart Rd and SR 1 NB Ramps Signal 23.1 C Rinehart Rd and SR 1 SB Ramps Signal 2.2 C Rinehart Rd and Town Center Blvd Signal 20.1 C International Pkwy and Wekiva Parkway SB Ramps Signal 1. B International Pkwy and Wekiva Parkway NB Ramps Signal 19. B 1. Mainline/Side Street The LOS for the freeway elements, the projected turning movement volumes and the intersections are illustrated in Figures -A (Orange and Lake Counties) and -B (). Page 193

33 JUNCTION RD. AITLAND AV GOLDEN GEM RD WEKIVA RIVER RD B %, B %, B B A 8A ( A Mount Dora , E. LIMIT AVE ( C 1 BRITT RD , ,998 1 ROUND LAKE RD 32 1, ( C ( C , WOLF BRANCH RD Sorrento ONDICH RD ( EFFIE RD ( ( C , HAAS RD FOLIAGE WY ( C A 300 1, ( C , ( C ( A ( B Mount Plymouth ± Miles ( B ( B ( B ( B A SEE FIGURE -B FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY 31 INTERNATIONAL PKWY ORANGE BLVD U.S. 1 and S.R. 29 Interchange Inset ( OLD JONES RD SADLER AVE YOTHERS RD ( B ( A ( B PLYMOUTH-SORRENTO RD $+ C $+ C ( A PONKAN RD KELLY PARK RD See Interchange Inset VICK RD N. ROCK SPRINGS RD WELCH RD ,20 $+ 9$+C C 1, ( B MARKHAM WOODS RD ( B ( A E E WILLIAMSON RD ,22 LAKE MARY BLVD ,1 Æ 1 Figure -A BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TMV) LEGEND ( X Signalized Intersection Level of Service ") X/X Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (Major/Minor Streets) $+ X &- X Ramp Level Of Service Weave Level Of Service HIGHLAND AVE ORANGE AVENUE 3 OLD DIXIE HWY 3A BRADSHAW ROAD 2 N. PARK AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE Apopka VOTAW RD 3 2 HEELER AVE THOMPSON ROAD WEKIVA SPRINGS RD. 13 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD ( ( ,29 1, PIEDMONT/WEKIVA RD LINE DR BEAR LAKE RD 1,098 3 PEARL LAKE CSWY 21 1,12 13 MONTGOMERY RD $+ C DOUGLAS AVE 28 ( B ( 3 ( 3 22 Page 19

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade

More information

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I) Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I) Introduction The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a

More information

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer Study Overview Interchange Locations Study Context Follow-up

More information

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM July 2014 FINAL (SR 43) Project Development and Environment Study From State Road 60 (Adamo Drive) to I-4 (SR 400) Hillsborough County, Florida Work Program Item

More information

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION 7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION 7.1 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY FEASIBILITY REPORT Congestion hot spot problem locations have been assessed using the

More information

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY WASHINGTON COUNTY AND BENTON COUNTY APRIL, 2006 INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY WASHINGTON COUNTY AND BENTON COUNTY April, 2006 Prepared by Parsons Transportation Group

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL October 2010 State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL Prepared

More information

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum I-395 Southbound between Duke Street & Edsall Road: Congestion Relief Feasibility Study Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum Task Order #92 Prepared by: July 17, 2012 Rummel, Klepper

More information

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 3. 23 NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS This section addresses the operations of the transportation system and details how it would be expected to function under year 23 No Build conditions with the projected

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...

More information

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: JANUARY 2007 Donahue Drive Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network Prepared by: The University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research Prepared for: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

More information

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR

More information

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016 Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Over the last several years, the Waterford Lakes area has experienced increased congestion due to a substantial increase in residential and commercial development. The current Existing and Future Conditions

More information

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING 5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING This section is based upon the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (April 2, 2008) and the Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Parking Analysis (May

More information

The current document is revised based on the comments received on:

The current document is revised based on the comments received on: General Overview 1 Introduction Over the last several years, the Waterford Lakes area has experienced increased congestion due to a substantial increase in residential and commercial development. The current

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.

More information

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection

More information

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum To From Gwen Pipkin Bill Howell Date June 18, 2013 Subject Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 29 PD&E Study From Oil Well Road to SR 82 Collier County, FL FPID 417540-1-22-01

More information

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45 th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45 th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No. SR 9/I-95 Interchange at PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: 436519-1-22-01 FAP No.: 0951-682-1 ETDM No.: 14225 Palm Beach County MPO October 19, 2017 SR 9/I-95 Interchange at PD&E Study Presentation

More information

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

FM #: ETDM #: 11241 SR 826/Palmetto Expressway PD&E Study From SR 93/I 75 to the Golden Glades Interchange FM #: 418423 1 22 01 ETDM #: 11241 Agency/ Kick Off Meeting October 27, 2011 2 Location Map From SR 93/I 75 to Golden

More information

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Highway 111 Corridor Study Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,

More information

Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team. Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation

Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team. Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation RTA Welcome Geoff Lang, MetLife, RTA Chair Jim Beley, The Umstead Hotel & Spa, RTA regional travel experience chair NCDOT

More information

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December

More information

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report

More information

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum APPENDIXB Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 MEMORANDUM Transportation Jim Kollbaum, PE

More information

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner

MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner MEMORANDUM Date: September 22, 2014 To: Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority From: Yongliang Zhu, Lochner Re: Attachments: Median Flyer Stop Weave Analysis West Plains Transit Center IJR Project

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2005 TO: Ted Idlof, URS FROM: Jeff Clark, Fehr & Peers RE: U.S. 50 Interchange Planning Study 1042-2011 This memorandum describes conceptual improvements for the

More information

Executive Summary. North Florida Transportation Planning Organization Argyle Traffic Study

Executive Summary. North Florida Transportation Planning Organization Argyle Traffic Study North Florida Transportation Planning Organization i Executive Summary The Argyle Forest area is a highly congested transportation area located in southern Duval County. SR 9A (I-295) and SR 21 (Blanding

More information

FI N A N C I A L RESOURCER S REVIEW AND UPDATE M I A M I-DADE LO N G R A N G E TRANSPORT T ATION PLAN UPDATE TO THE YE

FI N A N C I A L RESOURCER S REVIEW AND UPDATE M I A M I-DADE LO N G R A N G E TRANSPORT T ATION PLAN UPDATE TO THE YE Appendix B: Miami-Dade LRTP Cost Feasible Projects (Fully Funded and Partially Funded Projects) Fully Funded Projects Existing County roads O&M $317.9 $316.7 $811.5 Non Motorized set aside $27.9 $24.7

More information

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,

More information

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad

More information

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis To James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Date January 19, 2017 Copies Reference number 243381/VP From Michael Iswalt and Vanessa Peers File reference 4-05 Subject Lafayette Downtown Congestion

More information

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: City of Thornton And Colorado Department of Transportation Prepared by: 11 Blake Street, Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 822 Contact: Brian Bern, PE, PTOE

More information

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background

More information

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study 5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...

More information

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest

More information

A: PLANNED P ROJECTS PROJECTS

A: PLANNED P ROJECTS PROJECTS Appendix A: PLANNED PROJECTS Programming Study Sound Barrier along south side of for approx. 2100 feet. Construction Complete $850,000 5 8613.00 Y Y Y Sound Barrier along south side of for 500' west of

More information

Grant Avenue Streetscape

Grant Avenue Streetscape REPORT TYPE GOES HERE Grant Avenue Streetscape PREPARED FOR City of Manassas 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110 PREPARED BY 8300 Boone Boulevard Suite 700 Vienna, Virginia 22182 571.389.8121 July 31,

More information

Intersection LOS Intersection level of service (LOS) is defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the following criteria:

Intersection LOS Intersection level of service (LOS) is defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the following criteria: Page 2 of 9 Intersection LOS Intersection level of service (LOS) is defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the following criteria: Table 1 LOS Definitions Level of Signalized Un-Signalized Definition

More information

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland

More information

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 3: Draft List of Facilities.

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 3: Draft List of Facilities. Table of Contents 3.1. Interim vs. Ultimate Configuration for the Remaining Segments of NTE... 1 3.2. Characteristics of Project Segments... 3 3.2.1. All Segments... 5 3.2.2. Segment 2E... 8 3.2.3. Segment

More information

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION... 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 1 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS... 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS... 2 ROADWAY

More information

3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands

3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands 3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands Figure 3.1 also shows the proposed road network within the Premier Gateway Phase 1B Employment Area lands, which features two collector roads providing

More information

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212

More information

Appendix D: Concept Screening

Appendix D: Concept Screening Concept Description Concept #1 Route 288 Roadway Widening This concept consists of constructing a third lane on northbound and southbound Route 288 between Powhite Parkway and US 360. This improvement

More information

Master Plan. Planning. Environmental. Linton Blvd. to Northlake Blvd. I-95 (SR 9) Interchange Master Plan Palm Beach County

Master Plan. Planning. Environmental. Linton Blvd. to Northlake Blvd. I-95 (SR 9) Interchange Master Plan Palm Beach County I-95 (SR 9) Interchange Master Plan Palm Beach County DISTRICT FOUR OFFICE OF Planning AND Environmental MANAGEMENT 95 Master Plan 9 Linton Blvd. to Northlake Blvd. PREPARED FOR: Florida Department of

More information

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) traffic study prepared for: Cymbal Development OCtober 2012 Traf Tech October 1, 2012 Mr. Asi Cymbal - President Cymbal Development 3470 North Miami Avenue Upper Suite Miami,

More information

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No.

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No. June 4, 2015 Dear Resident: Thank you for attending this public information meeting for the proposed SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 Interchange. The purpose of this meeting is two-fold: to provide

More information

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report July 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 Study Area Limits... 1 Purpose and Need of the Study... 1 Safety

More information

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW HPTER 3 STUY RE OPERTIONL OVERVIEW This chapter describes the overall traffic operations within the study area under existing and future conditions and focuses on individual intersections not directly

More information

Average Delay/Vehicle (sec/veh) Signalized. Unsignalized Intersection

Average Delay/Vehicle (sec/veh) Signalized. Unsignalized Intersection Attachment: Traffic Analysis Results Traffic simulation modeling analysis was completed for Santa Cruz Ave from Alameda De Las Pulgas to Junipero Serra Blvd. Analysis was performed for existing conditions

More information

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS 4.11 TRANSPORTATION The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated in the Buena Park Beach/Orangethorpe Mixed Use Project Traffic Analysis (Traffic Analysis) by Austin-Foust Associates

More information

US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study. December 2017

US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study. December 2017 US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study December 2017 US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study Avenue Consultants December 2017 US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study December 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...

More information

Final Project Prioritization Plan

Final Project Prioritization Plan Final Project Prioritization Plan For the NM 599 Corridor Executive Summary I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NM 599 serves as a North/South by-pass for vehicles traveling through Santa Fe and a WIPP route for low

More information

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181 Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Presentation I-95 at Boynton Beach Boulevard Interchange and I-95 at Gateway Boulevard Interchange Project Development and Environment Study Palm Beach

More information

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

PRESENTATION OUTLINE November 8, 2017 PRESENTATION OUTLINE Regional Express Lanes Network Purpose/Benefits of Express Lanes 95 Express Phase 3C Project Video and Overview 95 Express Phase 3C Schedule 2 SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017 TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC

More information

EXHIBIT B. Bass Lake Rd US 50 to Hollow Oak Rd 2 Lanes with unimproved median and 4 foot paved shoulders. $ %

EXHIBIT B. Bass Lake Rd US 50 to Hollow Oak Rd 2 Lanes with unimproved median and 4 foot paved shoulders. $ % Fee Program Project List - 2004 General Plan Cost Estimate 2004 Alternative Route Study West Valley Condition 27 Alternative connection between, Feasibility study. Included in /White Rock Connector. south

More information

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners DRAFT Corridor study Honeysuckle Road October 2017 Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I... 1 STUDY SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 CONCLUSIONS... 5 SECTION II... 7

More information

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax: 212 213-3191 www.akrf.com Draft Memorandum To: Michael

More information

INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018

INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018 INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018 ICE OVERVIEW AGENDA Why ICE? When ICE is Required? Applicability and Process 2 AVAILABLE RESOURCES http://www.fdot.gov/traffic/trafficservices/intersection_operations.shtm

More information

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study CSAH 9 at CSAH 60 (185th Avenue) Prepared For: Dakota County Transportation Department Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue, 3rd Floor Apple Valley,

More information

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report ROUTE 7 (HARRY BYRD HIGHWAY) WESTBOUND FROM WEST MARKET STREET TO ROUTE 9 (CHARLES TOWN PIKE) Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report Project No. 6007-053-133, P 101 Ι UPC No. 58599 Prepared by:

More information

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn

More information

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study January 2015 Prepared for: City of Richland Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 Kennewick, Washington 99336 Table of Contents Introduction and Background... 1 Existing

More information

Technical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc.

Technical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc. Technical Memo To: Steve Gramm, SDDOT From: Steve Hoff, Engineering, Inc. Project: I-190/Silver Street Study CC: Date: 6//010 Job No: DOT Contract 41044, Order PD-0-09 RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis

More information

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017 Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI

More information

Turnpike Projects in Palm Beach County. Palm Beach TPA Update September 20, 2018

Turnpike Projects in Palm Beach County. Palm Beach TPA Update September 20, 2018 Turnpike Projects in Palm Beach County Palm Beach TPA Update September 20, 2018 Agenda Background Funded Projects Future Project Status Widenings Interchanges Express Lanes Phasing 2 Background 45 Miles

More information

4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 4.10 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION The following section is based on a traffic and circulation study prepared by Fehr & Peers, Inc. (November 2003; refer to Appendix F for technical calculations). The effects

More information

Mid Rivers Mall Drive/I-70 & Route 79/I-70 Interchange Study

Mid Rivers Mall Drive/I-70 & Route 79/I-70 Interchange Study Mid Rivers Mall Drive/I-70 & Route 79/I-70 Interchange Study Prepared for: City of St. Peters One St. Peters Center Boulevard St. Peters, Missouri 63376 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 5 Study Area...

More information

GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of 5

GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of 5 38. SH 114/SH 121 Corridor The DFW Connector : FT1345, FT 1347, FT1424, FR1424, FT1425, FR1425, FT1440, FT1500, FR1500, FT1505, FR1505, FT1507, FR1507, FT1510, FR1510, FT1715, FR1715, FT2720, FR2720, HM8190

More information

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 Prepared by Planning and Research Division Arkansas State

More information

List of Exhibits...ii

List of Exhibits...ii One Brickell Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits...ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 1. INTRODUCTION...2 1.1 Study Area...2 1.2 Study Objective...5 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...6 2.1 Data Collection...6

More information

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY OF OAKLAND 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design Final Report (v3) March 23, 2007 PREPARED BY: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. 27 th Street/Bay Place Corridor

More information

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative

More information

Interstate 66 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT. From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County FEBRUARY 2013

Interstate 66 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT. From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County FEBRUARY 2013 FEBRUARY 2013 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT Interstate 66 From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Transportation

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 Introduction... 6 2.1 BACKGROUND... 6 2.2 PURPOSE OF STUDY... 7 2.3 STUDY AREA... 8 2.4 STUDY PROCESS / STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT... 8 3.0 Summary of Freeways

More information

2. Existing Conditions

2. Existing Conditions 2. Existing Conditions The existing traffic and parking conditions on the site and the surrounding area were reviewed based on the study methodology in Section 1.2. 2.1 Existing Land Use The portion of

More information

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon Traffic Analysis and Design Report NW Bethany Boulevard NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road Washington County, Oregon May 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary... 2 Section

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018 Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas May 23, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064529800 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis Texas Odyssey

More information

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary March 2015 Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to identify conformance with the original traffic impact study for the proposed retail development on Lot 5 of Riverdale Retail Filing No. 1 located on the

More information

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007 Technical Memorandum May 2007 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design CONTENTS SECTION ONE- INTRODUCTION...1 SECTION TWO-

More information

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum MoPac (State Loop 1) Intersections, Austin District From North of Slaughter Lane to South of La Crosse Avenue CSJ: 3136-01-015 Travis County, Texas

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by: In Association with: November 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Patton Township, in partnership

More information

Short and Long Term Needs

Short and Long Term Needs Short and Long Term Needs The short- and long-term programs of proposed projects listed below have been designed to address the mobility issues in South Montgomery County. These improvements to the transportation

More information

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study

More information

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic

More information

APPENDIX C TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL APPENDIX FOR TEMPLO LA HERMOSA CHURCH: MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

APPENDIX C TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL APPENDIX FOR TEMPLO LA HERMOSA CHURCH: MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX C TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL APPENDIX FOR TEMPLO LA HERMOSA CHURCH: MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR TEMPLO LA HERMOSA CHURCH Merced County, California Prepared

More information

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations Bluffdale/ UDOT 14600 South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations 14600 South and Redwood Road $ 600,000 $ 550,000 This project is to install a new High-T intersection at Redwood Road and 14600 South

More information

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY CDOT Project No. STA 2254 85 (19187) Prepared for: Colorado Department of Transportation Region

More information

Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge

Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge TAM Board Meeting January 28, 2016 RSRB Project Elements Eastbound Third Lane: Sir Francis Drake Blvd. to Marine Street 10 ft Barrier Separated

More information

Traffic Impact Statement

Traffic Impact Statement Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared

More information

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK IN NORFOLK, VA INTERMODAL ENGINEERING, P.C. OCTOBER, 200 The Landmark at Talbot Park is a proposed redevelopment of the existing apartments along the

More information