Figure shows these key intersections and local roads discussed in the next section.
|
|
- Darlene May
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 .6.6. Regional Network The subject site is ideally situated at the confluence of a number of major arterials and highways as indicated on Figure - (See Project escription). U.S. forms the southern boundary of the project site (Gateway Summit portion). U.S. parallels I-84 to the east of the project site, where it also intersects with NYS Route. NYS Route provides the closest interstate highway access. West of the site, U.S. turns southwest towards Peekskill in Westchester ounty. U.S. intersects NYS Route 5 at its northernmost point. NYS Route 5 continues toward the northwest, paralleling I-84 into utchess ounty, and also intersecting with Fair Street. U.S., NYS Route 5, and NYS Route are two lane roadways. The intersections of these roads noted below are all controlled by traffic signals: NYS Route 5/Fair Street (R 6) U.S. /NYS Route 5 U.S. /Stoneleigh venue (R 5) U.S. /John Simpson Road (R 57) U.S. /NYS Route Figure.6- shows these key intersections and local roads discussed in the next section..6. Local Roads and ccess Points Figure.6- depicts the local road network in the vicinity of the subject site. The Fairways development abuts the northern boundary of the Gateway Summit development. The Fairways has access through entennial Golf ourse to Fair Street (ounty Road 6) near Hill and ale Road (ounty Road 44). From Fair Street, traffic can go west toward NYS Route 5 or east toward John Simpson Road (ounty Road 57). John Simpson Road connects Fair Street to U.S.. Fair Street, John Simpson Road, and Hill and ale Road are two lane roads. Posted speeds and recommended speeds are shown in Figure.6-. Traffic controls, and road widths are shown on Figure.6-. Fair Street is a central point for school bus routes converging on armel High School east of the NYS Route 5 intersection and an elementary school in the Town of Southeast east of John Simpson Road. The state roads handle school buses as through traffic. The existing land use on NYS Route 5 and U.S. is primarily non-residential, making school bus stops less frequent than on some local streets. For the purpose of this report, references to the U.S. /hurch Street intersection refer to the eastern (unsignalized) intersection and not the western (signalized) intersection of these two roads, except as specifically noted. On-street parking is permitted along NYS Route 5, but not along U.S. or NYS Route. NYS Route 5 has one hour parking from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. from U.S. past Fair Street. The east side of NYS Route 5 between NYS Route and Fair Street.6-
2 Route Fair St. Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 rea of Existing ccess Easement John Simpson Road (R 57) 85 8 The Fairways ale Road (R 44) 49 R 6 Gateway Summit hurch St. R Plaza Route R Site Entrance File 6 Fig.6- //4 KEY Intersections Studied Gateway Summit The Fairways File 6 // Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845) Figure.6-: Transportation Network Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: =
3 MPH SPEE LIMIT SPEE LIMIT SPEE LIMIT 4 XX MPH Legend Intersections Studied Warning Signs/Recommended Speed Plate Speed Limit Signs Signal Warning Signs Your Speed Is Variable Message File 6 Fig.6- //4 The Fairways Gateway Summit Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845) Figure.6-: Speed ontrols Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = SPEE LIMIT SPEE LIMIT 4 STOP HE SPEE LIMIT MPH SPEE LIMIT RIVEWY rea of Existing ccess Easement 5 MPH RIVEWY MPH MPH MPH 45 MPH HURH 4 SPEE LIMIT 45 MPH 45 MPH HURH SPEE LIMIT 45 EN SPEE LIMIT 4 SLOW Protect Our hildren SPEE LIMIT XX
4 STOP STOP Route 5 Fair St. R6 4 ft. (4 ft) 7 ft. ( ft) Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 ft. STOP rea of Existing ccess Easement 49 STOP John Simpson Road (R 57) ft. 4 ft. ft. 9 ft. (4 ft.) 4 ft. (6 ft.) The Fairways Gateway Summit 4 ft. (9 ft.) STOP 5 ft. 4 ft. ( ft.) ale Road (R 44) STOP 49 R 6 hurch St. 4 4 ft. 6 ft. 4 ft. (9 ft.) Route R 5 STOP 9 8 STOP Putnam Plaza 4 R 57 Site Entrance 55 8 KEY XX (XX) Intersections Studied Gateway Summit The Fairways Road Widths Shoulder Widths STOP Stop Signs Traffic Signal No Left Turn No Trucks Over 5 Tons Except Local eliveries Figure.6-: Traffic ontrols and Pavement Widths Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = File 6 Fig.6- //4 Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
5 has no standing regulations to provide for a northbound right turn lane. The ounty has a wintertime (November 5th to pril 5th) restriction on parking on county roads. Functionally, there are few places where vehicles can park on John Simpson Road or Fair Street without blocking traffic. Except for local deliveries, trucks over 5 tons are prohibited from using Fair Street between the High School and John Simpson Road. The recently signalized intersection of US /Old /Maple venue was not included as a study intersection..6. ollision ata ollision data was reviewed at key intersections. Table.6- shows the frequency of collisions at key intersections. For all intersections, additional background information is provided in Table.6-. The frequency of collisions relates to a combination of factors, but mostly to driver error. The largest factor at any one location is failure to yield right-of-way at Fair Street/John Simpson Road. Failure to yield right-of-way is the main problem at the Hill and ale Road/ Fair Street and NYS Route 5/ Fair Street intersections. Table.6- ollision Frequency and Severity Location * Number of ollisions in a Three Year Period Injury Property amage Only Not Reportable NYS Route 5/ Fair Street U.S. /NYS Route 5 6 U.S. /hurch *** U.S. / Stoneleigh (R 5)/ Putnam Plaza U.S. / John Simpson 5 4 U.S. /NYS Route 9 8 ale Road (R/44)/Fair Street (R 6) 7 John Simpson Road (R/57)/ Fair Street (R 6) 8 5 * See Table.6- for details. ** cover period to 4-- *** Estimated based on pro rating not reportable accidents between two hurch Street intersections with U.S.. No fatalities reported at any of the above intersections Source: New York State epartment of Transportation, ugust..6-
6 Summary Total Fixed Object Single Vehicle ccident Multi-Vehicle accident Pedestrian/bicyclist Wet Road ry Road Rear end Left turn Right angle Parked Sideswipe Overtaking Fell asleep/lcohol river inattention Unsafe speed Failure to yield ROW or disregard traffic control Slippery pavement View obstruction rakes efective Glare Improper turn Improper lane use Following too close acking unsafe Unsafe lane change Other Source: New York State epartment of Transportation, ugust. Reportable ollisions. Table.6- ollision Summary for Locations with More Than Five ollisions Rt. 5/ Fair St. (R 6) Rt. 6/ Rt. 5 Reportable ollisions with only one or more apparent factors. 5 Rt. 6/ hurch Street Frequency of Occurrence U.S. Route 6/ Stoneleigh venue (R 5) other 5 pparent Factors U.S. / John Simpson (R 57) U.S. NYS Route Hill and ale (R 44) /Fair St. (R 6) John Simpson (R 57)/ Fair St. (R 6)
7 .6.4 lternative Modes of Travel Pedestrian ctivity Pedestrian activity varies within the project area. Pedestrian counts were taken at Fair Street/Hill and ale Road and the U.S. /site access intersections to ascertain pedestrian activity in the vicinity of the future site access. Weekday p.m. peak hour pedestrian counts were collected on Thursday pril, between the hours of : p.m. and 6: p.m.; and Saturday pril 5, between : a.m. and : p.m.. No pedestrian activity was observed. Most pedestrian activity in the study area would be expected around key pedestrian attractions such as the public library (southeast corner of U.S. /NYS Route 5), armel High School (western Fair Street), armel Post Office (western Fair Street), Lake Gleneida, commercial and government buildings (NYS Route 5 area between Fair Street and U.S. ). In particular, the public library with no designated off-street parking attracts trips from on-street parking in the area. Figure.6-4 shows pedestrian facilities. Sidewalks are located along the east side of NYS Route 5 from U.S. extending beyond Fair Street. The westernmost portion of Fair Street at the Post Office and school has sidewalks. small portion of U.S. has sidewalks east of the intersection with NYS Route 5. There are pedestrian crossing signs on U.S. east of the Stoneleigh venue intersection and on Fair Street near the armel High School. The intersection of U.S. /NYS Route 5 has crosswalks and pedestrian signals. Public Transportation armel is served by both Westchester ounty ee-line buses and Putnam ounty PRT buses. PRT schedules can be found in ppendix G, at or by calling Putnam ounty Transportation (845) 878-RIE. Putnam Plaza is the central location for all PRT bus route start and end points. Figure.6-5 shows key points in the study area for PRT routes. The Westchester ounty ee Line runs the 77 Taconic Express out of the armel owl on Old. These four buses run down to White Plains via aldwin Place, Shrub Oaks, and Yorktown Heights in the morning and return with the afternoon commuter rush..6.5 Existing Traffic Volumes This traffic study reviews Existing onditions, based on recent traffic counts and historic data. The existing data forms the basis of the year 8 No uild ondition (the scenario without the proposed action) and the year 8 uild ondition (with the proposed action). The following intersections were evaluated in this traffic capacity review:. U.S. and NYS Route, Town of Southeast,. U.S. and John Simpson Road, Town of Southeast,. U.S. and NYS Route 5, Town of armel.6-4
8 85 Route 5 Fair St. R 6 Route 5 PE rea of Existing ccess Easement PE PE SHOOL The Fairways Gateway Summit Legend PE Study rea Sign Warning Signs rosswalk Pedestrian Signal Sidewalk Figure.6-4: Pedestrian Infrastructure Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = File 6 Fig.6-4 //4 Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
9 Rt. 5 To/From Town of Kent Rt. From Route rea of Existing ccess Easement The Fairways Rt. To Route Rt. To/From Mahopac, aldwin, Mahopac Falls, JV Mall Rt. 4 To/From Putnam Valley, Philipstown, utchess Putnam Plaza Gateway Summit Rt. To/From rewster Railroad Station File 6 Fig.6-5 //4 Putnam rea Rapid Transit (PRT) Routes Intersections Studied Route (Two-way) Route (One-way Loop) Route &4(Two-way) Route 5 (Two-way) Rt. To/From Putnam Hospital Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845) Figure.6-5: Existing PRT us Routes Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: =
10 4. U.S. and hurch Street (east), Town of armel 5. U.S. and Stoneleigh venue (R 5) and Putnam Plaza, Town of armel 6. NYS Route 5/Fair Street (R 6), Town of armel 7. Fair Street (R 6)/ Hill and ale Road (R 44), Town of armel 8. Fair Street (R 6)/ John Simpson Road (R 57), Town of armel 9. U.S. /Site access, Town of armel Figures.6-6, and.6-7 provide existing p.m. weekday and existing Saturday peak hour traffic volumes in the vicinity of the subject property. These turning movements were collected in pril of except as noted in ppendix O. Weekday P.M. peak hour traffic counts were collected on Thursday pril, between the hours of : p.m. and 6: p.m.; and Saturday pril 5, between : a.m. and : p.m.. The counts at NYS Route 5 and Fair Street were taken on Thursday, May, between the hours : p.m. and 6: p.m. and Saturday, May 7, between : a.m. and : p.m.. US / Stoneleigh venue counts are from Frederick P. lark, Inc., in May of 4. No counts were taken during a holiday period. The directional flow shifts in the PM peak hours along U.S.. The counts identify the peak afternoon weekday commutation travel and peak Saturday midday shopping periods. fternoon traffic typically peaks between :45 p.m. and 5:45 p.m. Fair Street at John Simpson and Fair Street at Hill and ale Road peaks were later at 5: to 6: p.m.. Saturday traffic peaks mostly occurred between : a.m. and : p.m.. U.S. intersections from Stoneleigh venue (R 5) to the Route intersection peak beginning after p.m.. The Fair Street/John Simpson Road intersection peak started at noon while other study intersections on Route 5 and Hill and ale Road/Fair Street peak after noon. US /Stoneleigh venue counts are from June 5, 4. Saturday volumes at study intersections east of Maple venue were balanced to reflect 4 counts taken for Putnam Plaza. This was not done for the p.m. peak hour as there is a shift in directional volumes during the p.m. peak hours..6.6 riteria The Highway apacity Manual and the Highway apacity Software procedures document the methodology used for modeling levels of service, delay, and volume to capacity ratios at both signalized and unsignalized intersections. service is a measure of the operational quality of an intersection; level of service is the highest, most efficient level, and level of service F is the lowest level. The operational quality of an intersection is based on the average amount of time that a vehicle is delayed. Levels of service are examined by lane group, or the set of lanes allowing the same movements on an approach. The definitions of delays consider all delays including startup, deceleration and acceleration delays. The New York State epartment of Transportation (NYS OT) prefers the use of the Highway apacity Manual methodologies over other traffic capacity methodologies. Table.6- presents the levels of service criteria for unsignalized intersections..6-5
11 Route Fair St. (R6) Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) 55 6 rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways Fair St. (R 6) hurch St. R Site Entrance Putnam Plaza 6 Gateway Summit Route R File 6 Fig.6-6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-6: Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
12 Route 5 94 Fair St. (R6) Fair Street (R 6) 76 Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways 65 4 Fair St. (R 6) hurch St. R Site Entrance 9 5 Putnam Plaza 69 Gateway Summit Route R File 6 Fig.6-7 7//4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-7: Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
13 Table.6- Unsignalized Intersections riteria Stopped elay (Seconds Per Vehicle) < > and < 5 E >5 and < 5 >5 and < 5 >5 and < 5 F > 5 SOURE: Highway apacity Manual, National cademy of Sciences, Transportation Research oard, National Research ouncil, Washington,..,. Table.6-4 presents the levels of service criteria for signalized intersections. The New York State epartment of Transportation (NYS OT) generally seeks a minimum level of service (delay of 55 seconds or less for a signalized intersection) for all lane groups. The NYS OT Highway esign Manual notes, In some cases, it may be necessary to accept service E or F on individual lane groups due to unreasonable costs or impacts associated with improving the level of service. For all intersections, the volume to capacity ratio is an indication of the unused capacity or the ability of the intersection to process more traffic. It is possible to have a movement with an adequate level of service (level of service,, or ) and be at capacity for the movement. It is also possible to have a movement with an unacceptable level of service (level of service E or F) with additional capacity available on the movement. The NYS OT goal for volume to capacity (V/) ratios at signalized intersections for lane groups is generally below.95. The ability of an entire intersection to handle more traffic is a complex issue as traffic can be added to under-capacity movements without impacting over-capacity movements..6-6
14 Table.6-4 Signalized Intersections riteria * E Stopped elay (Seconds Per Vehicle) < > and < > and < 5 >5 and < 55 >55 and < 8 F > 8. SOURE: Highway apacity Manual, National cademy of Sciences, Transportation Research oard, National Research ouncil, Washington,..,. * For urban areas, the minimum level of service for design of lane-groups (one or more movements) assuming reasonable costs and impacts..6.7 Existing Levels of The results of the level of service analyses for the study intersections are summarized in Tables.6-5,.6-6 and.6-7. apacity analysis calculations are provided in ppendix F. Table.6-5 shows the level of service at unsignalized intersections. The left turn from John Simpson Road to Fair Street is operating at level of service F in the p.m. peak hour and the Saturday peak hour. nominal use of the site access has been assumed for this analysis, although no traffic was observed entering or exiting during the p.m. or Saturday peak hours. Left turns are currently prohibited from eastbound hurch Street onto U.S.. For the purposes of this analysis, this illegal traffic has been added to the legal right turn movement to establish level of service. Tables.6-6 and.6-7 show the level of service at the existing signalized intersections. Signalized intersections operated at level of service or better during peak hours at the study locations. The Highway apacity Software model results apply to peak hour periods only and do not represent every minute of traffic operations. uring off peak periods, which is the majority of the time, drivers typically will find operations adequate and much better than the modeled peak hour results. uring peak periods the experience of individual drivers can vary, because the model calculates average delay only. Since peak 5 minute flows typically do not all occur in the same 5 minute period in the peak hour, the traffic model does not always account for the ability of a traffic signal to compensate for shifting traffic volumes and thus may overestimate delay. For unsignalized intersections the model conservatively assumes that the peak volumes occur simultaneously..6-7
15 Intersections are typically treated by the model as isolated intersections when in fact traffic is influenced by other intersections. No adjustment has been made for signal coordination. ctual operation of the NYS Route 5 traffic signals may appear better than modeled because of signal coordination. Intersection Road Fair Street/Hill and ale Road Fair Street Hill and ale Road hurch Street/U.S. U.S. hurch Street (E) U.S. /Site ccess U.S. Site ccess Lane Group pproach irection- Movement E-L, T S-L S-R N-L, T E-R E-L, T S-L, R apacity (v/c) Table.6-5 Existing ondition Summary Unsignalized Intersections P.M. Weekday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) 8..8 Fair Street/John Simpson Road Fair Street W-L, T.9 9. John Simpson Road N-L. 56. F N-R.6 9. Level-of- (see Table.6- for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). Volumes set at minimum one vehicle per movement. Unsignalized intersections are in italics apacity (v/c) Saturday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) F.6-8
16 Table.6-6 Existing ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Town of armel Lane Group P.M. Weekday Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection pproach elay elay Road irection- Movement apacity (seconds/ vehicle) apacity (seconds /vehicle) Fair Street/NYS Route 5 Fair Street W-L W-R NYS Route 5 N-T N-R NYS Route 5 S-L, T Overall 4.6. U.S. / NYS Route 5 U.S. W-L W-R U.S. N-T N-R NYS Route 5 S-L S-T Overall Stoneleigh venue/u.s. Stoneleigh venue Putnam Plaza U.S. U.S. E-L, T W-L, T N-L N-T, R S-L S-T S-R Overall Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left)
17 Table.6-7 Existing ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Town of Southeast Lane Group P.M. Weekday Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection pproach elay elay Road irection- Movement apacity (seconds /vehicle) apacity (seconds /vehicle) U.S. / John Simpson U.S. E-L E-T, R U.S. W-L W-T W-R John Simpson N-L,T, R John Simpson S-L S-T, R Overall U.S. /NYS Route U.S. U.S. NYS Route NYS Route E-L E-T, R W-L W-T W-R N-L, T, R S-L, T S-R Overall Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left) Future No-uild Traffic: Network and Volumes Typically, a project's traffic impact is determined by comparing future traffic conditions without the project's traffic (8 No-uild conditions) to traffic conditions with project-generated traffic (8 uild conditions). The No-uild traffic condition is an interim scenario that establishes a future baseline condition. No-uild traffic conditions are ascertained based on a number of factors: () improvements in the local road network that are planned or underway; () traffic from general population growth in the local area; and () traffic from identified development projects in the project site vicinity..6-
18 traffic signal has been installed at the intersection of Old and U.S. since the traffic counts were taken in the network. lthough this intersection was not studied, changes in traffic that occur should be localized and should not alter the overall traffic through nearby intersections. The New York State epartment of Transportation (NYS OT) has projects listed in the draft Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (October, to September, 6). The Route 5/Route rehabilitation is anticipated for 6 (PIN 86). The Stoneleigh venue (R 5) rewville Road (R 6) improvements (PIN ) and Stoneleigh venue reconstruction project from Putnam Hospital to U.S. are slated for 5. The first portion of the Fair Street improvements (PIN 87569, extending from NYS Route 5 to John Simpson Road) will be completed in 4 and will improve the Fair Street/John Simpson Road intersection. The Fair Street/John Simpson Road intersection improvements include signalization, adding a eastbound right turn lane and a westbound left turn lane. These improvements are included in the No uild and uild onditions. The armel Revitalization project on Route 5 should improve upon the streetscape from U.S. to Fair Street and further north. Storage for the left turn from Southbound NYS Route 5 onto U.S. is to be extended. Rehabilitation of the U.S. bridge between John Simpson Road and NYS Route (NYS OT esign Project number 5955) should be completed in ecember 4. The right turn lane from U.S. to John Simpson Road will be extended to allow for longer queues. The bridge width would be capable of supporting four lanes of traffic on U.S. Route 6 in the long term. Peak hour traffic volumes for the weekday p.m. and Saturday No-uild scenarios are provided in Figures.6-8 and.6-9. These figures reflect the existing traffic plus the background traffic growth of two percent annually over five years, plus other area projects. The two percent growth rate has been used and accepted for estimating growth in other area traffic studies. short-term traffic growth rate of two percent per year was used to establish background growth to the build year of 8. For the U.S. /Stoneleigh venue intersections background traffic was expanded for four years (4 to 8) reflecting more recent counts. Traffic from area development projects were added to the transportation network. ppendix H tables show trip rates and total vehicular trips from other area developments. Senior unit trip rates were based on maximum trip rates with the entering and exiting traffic evenly split on Saturday. There are no published Saturday trip rates for gas station and convenience stores, so the Saturday rates were based on fueling positions for a gas station and convenience store with car wash. Likewise, no published rates for Saturday peak hour automobile care centers are available so the rate was assumed to be ten percent of the daily rate, with evenly split entering and exiting traffic, as in the p.m. condition..6.9 lternative Transportation Improvements Pedestrian/icyclist Improvements Work is proceeding on pedestrian improvements in the Route 5 area, from U.S. slightly past Fair Street. These improvements would alter parking in the area and improve.6-
19 Route Fair St. R 6 Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways 67 Fair St. (R 6) 55 hurch St. 64 Gateway Summit Route R Putnam Plaza Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-8: No uild PM Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: =, Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
20 Route Fair St. R 6 Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) 68 8 rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways 46 5 Fair St. (R 6) 8 47 hurch St. Gateway Summit Route R Plaza Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-9: No uild Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
21 pedestrian amenities and flow. No changes are included for the intersection operation. ppendix I contains a further description of these improvements. Other areas of proposed bicycle and pedestrian improvements include a trail along an old railroad grade that runs adjacent to the site and under a U.S. bridge to the west of the Gateway Summit site access. The trail would connect to rewster and improvements along NYS Route 5 north to the ounty Line. These projects are outlined in the Mid-Hudson South Region icycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, dated June, as show in ppendix I. Public Transportation With the completion of the new traffic signal at the intersection of Old and U.S., the PRT Route bus route may be rerouted between U.S. /John Simpson Road and the Office of ging on Old. The PRT Route historically has used Hughson Road between these points to provide a signalized intersection for accessing U.S...6. No-uild Tables.6-8,.6-9 and.6- contain the level of service summaries for the 8 No-uild scenario for the unsignalized and signalized intersections. hanges in level of service from the Existing conditions for the study intersections are shown on these tables. Putnam ounty signalization and improvements anticipated in 4 for the Fair Street/John Simpson Road intersection should improve that intersection from a level of service F, as an existing unsignalized intersection, to level of service or better as a no-build condition signalized intersection. The renovation of Putnam Plaza with a supermarket is anticipated to include a northbound right turn lane on U.S. at Putnam Plaza opposite Stoneleigh venue. The northbound right turn lane improvement is included in the No uild and uild analysis..6-
22 Intersection Road Fair Street/Hill and ale Road Fair Street Hill and ale Road hurch Street/U.S. U.S. hurch Street (E) U.S. /Site ccess U.S. Site ccess Lane Group pproach irection- Movement E-L, T S-L S-R N-L, T E-R E-L, T S-L, R apacity Table.6-8 No uild ondition Summary Unsignalized Intersections P.M. Weekday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) Level-of- (see Table.6- for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound. L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). Volumes set at one vehicle per movement. * Reduction in level of service from the Existing ondition. 9.7 * * apacity Saturday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) * *.6-
23 Table.6-9 No uild ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Town of armel Intersection Road Fair Street Lane Group pproach irection- Movement Fair Street/John Simpson Rd. E-T E-R P.M. Weekday Peak Hour apacity.58.9 elay (seconds/ vehicle).4.5 Saturday Peak Hour apacity..6 elay (seconds /vehicle) 6..9 Fair Street W-L W-T John Simpson Rd. N-L N-R Overall 7..5 Fair Street/NYS Route 5 Fair Street W-L * W-R NYS Route 5 N-T.8 5. *.68. * N-R NYS Route 5 S-L, T *.9.7 * Overall.9 * 9.4 U.S. / NYS Route 5 U.S. U.S. NYS Route 5 W-L W-R N-T N-R S-L S-T Overall Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound. L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). * ecline in level of service from the Existing ondition. * * * *.6-4
24 Table.6- No uild ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Towns of armel and Southeast Intersection Road Stoneleigh/U.S. Lane Group pproach irection- Movement P.M. Weekday Peak Hour apacity elay (seconds /vehicle) Saturday Peak Hour apacity elay (seconds /vehicle) Stoneleigh venue E-L, T Putnam Plaza W-L, T U.S. N-L.5 9. *. 8.6 N-T.8 4. * ** N-R ** U.S. S-L ** S-T S-R.9.4 *.9.9 * Overall John Simpson/U.S. U.S. E-L * E-T, R U.S. W-L * W-T W-R John Simpson N-L, T, R John Simpson S-L S-T, R Overall * U.S. /NYS Route U.S. U.S. NYS Route NYS Route E-L E-T, R W-L W-T W-R N-L, T, R S-L, T S-R Overall Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). * Reduction in level of service from the Existing ondition. ** Improvement in level of service from the Existing ondition. * * * *.6-5
25 .6. Future Site Improvements The applicant proposes to create three access points: one from Fair Street to The Fairways, and two from US to Gateway Summit. Two emergency access drives are also proposed, including one to Kelly Road and one between The Fairways and Gateway Summit. No on-street parking is proposed on the new roads. The northern access point is proposed as a three-lane (two lanes in and one lane out) stop sign controlled access drive to Fair Street. The northern access point would serve The Fairways senior housing. The northern access drive to Fair Street would include the crossing of a golf cart path on the entennial golf course. stop sign will be added in both directions on the golf cart path, with warning signs posted in each direction on the access drive to the senior housing. The golf cart path crossing will also be delineated with contrasting materials to further highlight this crossing for motorists and reduce the potential for collisions between golfers and future site residents. lear sight lines would be established for golf cart users. The need for traffic management, traffic control and traffic calming measures for both the golf cart path and the access drive will be reviewed during the final design phase of the project. The two southern access points are from U.S.. One is designed to serve the restaurant and auto dealership. The primary access is designed to serve all of the remaining non-residential uses as well as residents of Gateway Summit. The primary access point would have three lanes and would be signalized, with left turn lanes provided for entering and exiting vehicles (one lane in and two lanes out). The primary access point is on the eastern edge of the US frontage, providing feet of spacing between it and the secondary access. This also maximizes the distance to the Old /Maple venue/us traffic signal. To the extent possible, the Gateway Summit traffic light would be centered between the Maple venue/old /US and John Simpson Road/US traffic signals It should be noted that the instant action of subdividing this property and installing the internal roadway will not result in traffic impacts. The purpose of this traffic review is to take a broader look at existing and future traffic conditions to assist the lead agency and other agency officials (Putnam ounty and NYS OT) in evaluating potential future infrastructure requirements. Emergency ccess There are two means of emergency access proposed -- one through Kelly Road and the other between the Gateway Summit and The Fairways project sites. Emergency access between Gateway Summit and The Fairways would benefit both sites..6. Trip Generation and istribution Table.6- shows the potential mix of uses for Gateway Summit and The Fairways with associated trip generation rates based on ITE Trip Generation data. Table.6- shows the trips generated by each of the proposed project elements. Table.6- summarizes the trips generated by each of the proposed land use types..6-6
26 Internal circulation between the various proposed uses is assumed to amount to percent of the total trips generated, excluding trips from Lots, and, which are physically separated from the other lots. No separate internal reduction was taken for Lots, based on the uses. Table.6- shows the breakdown of internal trips and external trips. These internal trips represent trips between The Fairways (with most of the residential units) and Gateway Summit, which contains all the proposed non-residential development. s these two portions of the development are not internally connected, these trips are assigned to the network between The Fairways and Gateway Summit principal access points. Internal use is also shown for the Gateway Summit main access driveway for internal trips between Gateway Summit residential, convenience retail, hotel, office, and recreation uses. The number of internal trips is shown as ten percent of the residential and convenience retail trips. Internal trips between the secondary access point and the primary access drive are not considered in this report. It is assumed that a portion of existing pass-by traffic already on the roadway network would access either the commercial or public use on the project site, changing area travel patterns. Table.6-5 shows the trips already on the network that, upon passing by the site, would be expected to be attracted to uses on the site. Pass-by trips are assumed to be slightly under 5 percent of the total anticipated retail and recreation center traffic. These trips were assigned to the network to and from U.S. based on existing flows. Table.6-6 shows the total new external non-pass-by trips. To calculate trips generated by the proposed senior residential housing, the p.m. peak hour trip generation rate used for senior residential housing is based on the maximum rate and not the average rate. This rate is a more reasonable rate for the expected use. The worst case traffic conditions for a weekday period would be the p.m. peak hour with commuter traffic mixing with retail traffic. Saturday retail traffic is the dominant site generated traffic. Lot 9 is proposed to remain vacant and would therefore not generate any new traffic. No parking has been provided for the use of Lot 9. The senior housing/assisted living units proposed on Lot 6 are each assumed to be two bedroom units with approximately,5 square feet. This size is larger than the assisted living quarters discussed in Trip Generation as either a single room or a small apartment style unit with a kitchenette and living space. These units are treated herein as senior housing for trip generation purposes. The distribution of trips varies for different types of uses. ppendix J shows trip distribution based on residential use, hotel use and all other uses. The hotel use will have a broad attraction with the largest portion of trips from Interstate I-84 and US. The recreation center and convenience store would attract trips primarily from within the Town of armel. The residential trips would be a combination of work, shopping and recreational trips. Figures.6- and.6- summarize the total site generated traffic..6-7
27 Route 5 Fair St. R6 7 5 Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways 7 Fair St. (R 6) 5 6 hurch St. Northern Site Entrance 8 Gateway Summit Route 7 R 5 Plaza Secondary riveway Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-: PM Site Generated Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
28 Route Fair St. R6 5 Fair Street (R 6) 4 Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways 9 4 Fair St. (R 6) hurch St. Northern Site Entrance Gateway Summit Route 5 R 5 Plaza 6 Secondary riveway Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-: Saturday Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
29 Lot # Lot Lot Lot Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 7 Lot 8 Lot 9 Fairways Lot Land Uses and Size {ITE ode} Potential Land Uses Hotel 5 rooms, onference enter, and anquet Facility {} Quality Restaurant 7, square feet {9} uto ealership 45, square feet {84} Office, square feet {7} Elderly Residences, 4 dwelling units {5} *** Elderly Residences, 48 dwelling units {5} *** orporate/professional Offices 7,6 square feet {7} onvenience Store 4 square feet {85} Recreational ommunity enter 68, square feet {495} onservation rea (Vacant) Elderly Residence, Retirement *** ommunity 5 dwelling units {5} * Equations rates not available, based on average rates. ** units are based on: dwelling units for residential rooms for hotel Park for athletic fields, square feet of gross floor area for retail, restaurant, and recreational community center. *** Maximum rate for a.m. and p.m. Table.6- Project Site Trip Generation Rate Summary.M. Peak Hour IN (Trips/ unit **) *.547* * OUT (Trips/ unit **).76.46*.5* * IN (Trips/ unit **).* 5.8*.97.5* * 6.79*.476* *...7* 5.68*.64*.. Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th edition, Washington..,. Trips Rates P.M. Peak Hour OUT (Trips/ unit **).77*.47* Saturday Peak Hour IN (Trips/ unit **) *.9.5*.5* *.67*..5* OUT (Trips/ unit **) *.6.5*.5* *.65*..5*.6-8
30 Lot # Lot Lot Lot Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 7 Lot 8 Lot 9 Fairways Lot Total Land Uses and Size (Potential Uses) Hotel 5 rooms, onference enter, and anquet Facility Quality Restaurant 7, square feet uto ealership 45, square feet Office, square feet Elderly Residences, 4 dwelling units Elderly Residences, 48 dwelling units orporate/professional Offices 7,6 square feet onvenience Store 4 square feet Recreational ommunity enter 68, square feet onservation rea (Vacant) * Elderly Residences, 5 dwelling units 8 sf = gross leasable square feet. Table.6- Project Site Trip Generation Summary IN M. Peak Hour OUT Total Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th edition, Washington.., IN Trips P.M. Peak Hour OUT Total Saturday Peak Hour IN OUT Total
31 Total Land Uses Hotel Office Residential Recreational Retail, and Restaurant IN M. Peak Hour OUT Total Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th edition, Washington.., Table.6- Project Site Trips y Use IN Trips P.M. Peak Hour OUT Total Saturday Peak Hour IN OUT Total Retail and community recreational trips Gateway Summit Residential Total Internal (%) onvenience Retail Total Internal (%) Fairways total * Internal (%) IN 8 Table.6-4 Retail Site Trips Internal and External.M. Peak Hour OUT 8 IN Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th edition, Washington..,. * Internal trips are trips between The Fairways and the main portion of Gateway Summit using the external road network Trips P.M. Peak Hour OUT 8 Saturday Peak Hour IN 8 5 OUT
32 Gateway Summit Retail and ommunity Recreational Primary ccess External Total From Tables.6- and.6-4 passby (5%) External non passby Restaurant and Retail Secondary ccess External Total From Tables.6- and.6-4 passby (5%) External non passby Total M. Peak Hour IN Table.6-5 Pass y Trips OUT Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th edition, Washington.., Total 6 4 Trips P.M. Peak Hour IN OUT Saturday Peak Hour Total IN OUT Pass-by trips are expected to be to and from the U.S. accesses. In the analysis provided herein, the potential uses identified would generate 54 p.m. peak hour trips and 546 Saturday peak hour trips. These do not account for internal trips within the project area that never enter the transportation network, or trips that are already on the network passing the site that would be drawn into it. Internal trips are shown in Table.6-4. ppendix J Figures show the anticipated traffic distribution. Site generated traffic associated with the proposed development is broken into three parts: the residential area, the hotel and remainder of the site. uild ondition Figures.6-, and.6- show the site generated trips (Figures.6- and.6-) added to the No-uild volumes (Figures.6-8 to.6-9). Most truck traffic to the site would consist of deliveries to the individual users providing supplies and miscellaneous goods. Generally these trucks will be traveling to and from I-84 using U.S. and NYS Route. However, in many cases the trucks will have other local stops at retail facilities along U.S.. Most trucks would use the primary access drive except those destined to the northern residential lots (Lot 4 and Fairways Lot ) or the secondary access (Lots, and 4). School bus trips are not anticipated on site roads. Neither the hotel nor senior housing is anticipated to have school busing needs. The emergency access from Kelly Road to/from the site would be school bus negotiable in an emergency. However, such use is for the benefit of off-site adjoining residential development..6-
33 Route 5 4 Fair St. R 6 Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways Fair St. (R 6) hurch St. R Putnam Plaza Gateway Summit Northern Site Entrance Route Secondary riveway Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-: uild PM Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
34 Route 5 64 Fair St. R 6 Fair Street (R 6) Route 5 John Simpson Road (R 57) 75 7 rea of Existing ccess Easement ale Road (R 44) The Fairways Fair St. (R 6) hurch St. R Putnam Plaza Gateway Summit Northern Site Entrance Route 48 Secondary riveway Site Entrance R File 6 //4 KEY Gateway Summit The Fairways Intersections Studied Traffic Signal ontrolled Stop or Yield ontrolled hannel Illegal Left Turn Figure.6-: uild Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Gateway Summit / The Fairways Town of armel, Putnam ounty, New York ase Map: NYSOT Planimetric Map (Lake armel Quad) Scale: = Tim Miller ssociates, Inc., North Street, old Spring, New York 56 (845) Fax (845)
35 .6. uild s stated above, the instant action of subdividing the property and installing required infrastructure will not in themselves result in adverse traffic impacts. The discussion below is predicated upon the buildout of the potential uses that are identified in hapter. of this GEIS. Tables.6-6 through.6-8 provide level of service summaries for the 8 proposed uild condition (without any mitigation). If on-site land use and growth occurs as outlined herein, level of service would decline at certain intersections. Intersection Road Fair Street/Hill and ale Road Fair Street Hill and ale Road Fair Street Site ccess hurch Street/U.S. U.S. hurch Street (E) Lane Group pproach irection- Movement E-L, T S-L S-R Fair Street/Northern Site ccess W-L, T N-L, R N-L, T E-R apacity Table.6-6 uild ondition Summary Unsignalized Intersections P.M. Weekday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) U.S. /Secondary Site ccess U.S. E-L, T.9.7 * Site ccess Lot and S-L, R Level-of- (see Table.6- for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). Volumes set at one vehicle per movement. Unsignlaized intersections are in italics. * Reduction in level of service from the No uild ondition. 8.5 F F apacity Saturday Peak Hour elay (seconds /vehicle) F *.6-
36 Table.6-7 uild ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Town of armel Intersection Road Fair Street Lane Group pproach irection- Movement Fair Street/ John Simpson Rd. E-L E-T P.M. Weekday Peak Hour apacity.59. elay (seconds/ vehicle).5.6 Saturday Peak Hour apacity..8 elay (seconds /vehicle) 6.. Fair Street W-T W-R John Simpson Rd. N-L N-R Overall Fair Street/ NYS Route 5 Fair Street W-L E W-R NYS Route 5 N-T N-R NYS Route 5 S-T *.9 7. Overall 5.6. * U.S. / NYS Route 5 U.S. W-L W-R U.S. N-T N-R NYS Route 5 S-L F S-T Overall U.S. Primary Site ccess U.S. E-L E-T U.S. W-TR Primary ccess S-L.4... S-R Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). * Reduction in level of service from the No uild ondition..6-
37 Table.6-8 uild ondition Summary Signalized Intersections in the Towns of armel and Southeast Intersection Road Lane Group pproach irection- Movement Stoneleigh/U.S. P.M. Weekday Peak Hour apacity elay (seconds /vehicle) Saturday Peak Hour apacity elay (seconds /vehicle) Stoneleigh venue E-L, T F. 5. F Putnam Plaza W-L, T.5.9 F.6.5 F U.S. N-L * N-T N- R U.S. S-L E * S-T * S-R Overall E John Simpson/U.S. U.S. E-L.99.8 F.6 5. E-T, R * U.S. W-L W-T. 9. F W-R John Simpson N-L, T, R E E John Simpson S-L F E S-T, R Overall U.S. /NYS Route U.S. U.S. NYS Route NYS Route E-L E-T, R W-L W-T W-R N-L, T, R S-L, T S-R Overall Level-of- (see Table.6-4 for level-of-service criteria). N = Northbound, S = Southbound, E = Eastbound, W = Westbound L = left, R= right, TR = through and right, (e.g. W-L = Westbound left). * Reduction in level of service from the No uild ondition. F E F * E.6-4
Transportation June 24, Traffic and Transportation
.5 Traffic and Transportation Transportation June 4, 011 This traffic study assesses the traffic impacts of the preferred onservation site plan. Previously, a Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted for
More information5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study
5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Kevin Even, P.E. Village Engineer and Public Works Director Village of Waunakee. From: Kevin Wehner, P.E. KL Engineering, Inc.
TEHIL MEMORUM To: Kevin Even, P.E. Village Engineer and Public Works irector Village of Waunakee 400 King James Way, uite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 3719 608-663-1218 www.klengineering.com From: Kevin Wehner,
More informationTHIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC
Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...
More informationDraft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for
oad & Traffic Management Road & Traffic Management R Atlantic Traffic Engineering Specialists Draft Report Traffic Impact Study Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development Yarmouth, Nova Scotia Prepared
More information1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343
More informationWesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units
Wesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units 1 Summary This report presents an analysis of the changes in traffic volumes in the Wesbrook Place neighbourhood associated with a redistribution
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC
Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.
More informationTraffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas
ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA February 13, 2015 Mr. Meran Dadgostar P.E., R.S. Town of Highland Park 4700 Drexel Dr. Highland Park, Texas 75205 Re: Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest
More informationLittleton Transportation Planning and Traffic Study 43D Priority Development Sites
Littleton Transportation Planning and Traffic Study 43 Priority evelopment Sites Prepared for: The Town of Littleton in cooperation with Prepared by: xecutive Summary Study Objectives The Littleton Transportation
More informationTechnical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.
Technical Memorandum TRFFIC IMPCT STUDY RIDLEY ROD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, V Prepared for: Mr. David Williams By: Charles Smith, P.E., PTOE EPR Charlottesville, V July 2014 1 TBLE OF CONTENTS
More informationDIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK MARCH 14, 2017 PREPARED FOR: 1950 Brighton Henrietta Town Line Rd Rochester, NY 14623 PREPARED
More informationSouth Albion-Bolton Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives
Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives Prepared for: The Town of Caledon August 9 Transportation Solutions Ltd. 43 Forest Road Cambridge, ON N1S 3B4
More informationMemorandum Pershing Road Suite 400 Kansas City, MO Tel Fax
Memorandum 2400 Pershing Road Suite 400 Kansas ity, MO 64108 Tel 816 329 8600 Fax 816 329 8601 www.transystems.com To: Mr. avid Gurss Kansas epartment of Transportation wight. Eisenhower State Office ldg.
More informationTRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado
TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado Submitted by: Fehr & Peers 621 17th Street, Ste. 231 Denver, CO 8293 (33) 296-43 December, 21 App. M-2 Traffic Assessment River Edge Colorado December 21 TABLE OF
More informationFINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study
FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study Prepared for City of Albertville, MN July 20, 2017 SRF No. 10060.00 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Existing Conditions... 1 Data Collection...
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY King Soopers #116, a grocery marketplace anchored commercial development, is proposed
More informationDate: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study
To: Ms. Susan C. Ryan Spaulding Youth Center 72 Spaulding Road Northfield, NH 03276 Date: September 7, 2017 Project #: 52455.00 From: Robin Bousa Director of Transportation Systems Re: Spaulding Youth
More informationALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY
ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland
More informationTransportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace
Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Abington Township, Montgomery County, PA Sandy A. Koza, P.E., PTOE PA PE License Number PE059911 Prepared by McMahon Associates, Inc. 425 Commerce Drive,
More informationHENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.
HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2294170 Ontario Inc. February 2, 2017 117-652 Report_1.doc
More informationOFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.
OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
More informationTroutbeck Farm Development
Troutbeck Farm Development Willistown Township, Chester County PA For Submission To: Willistown Township Last Revised: October, 4 TPD# INLM.A. 5 E. High Street Suite 65 Pottstown, PA 9464 6.36.3 TPD@TrafficPD.com
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client
More informationTAKOMA METRO STATION
TKOM METRO STTION Traffic nalysis Technical Memorandum Station Planning in Support of Joint evelopment Job No. 13-FQ165-LN-2 November 213 WSHINGTON METROPOLITN RE TRNSIT UTHORITY (WMT) Takoma Metro Station
More informationMETHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)
Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic
More informationTraffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016
Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
More informationMEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:
MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2434984 Ontario Inc. 13-5510 Canotek Road Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9J5 June 4, 2015 115-613 Report_2.doc D. J.
More informationCOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: First Bay Properties Inc. 311 Richmond Road, Suite 203 Ottawa, ON K1Z 6X3 August 8, 2017 117-663 Brief_1.doc
More informationQUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Quickie Convenience Stores Larny Holdings Ltd. c/o PBC Group April 15, 2015 115-615 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationFocused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project
March 13, 2017 Mr. Phil Boyle Town of Corte Madera 300 Tamalpais Drive Corte Madera, CA 94976-0159 Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project Dear Mr. Boyle; W-Trans has completed a focused
More informationPINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina
PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina Prepared for Longbranch Development Prepared by January 13, 219 ii Table of Contents Subject Page Signature Page... i Table of Contents...
More informationTraffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment Webster Groves, Missouri October 19, 2018 Prepared For: Gershman Commercial Real Estate 150 North Meramec Avenue Suite 500 St. Louis, Missouri 63105
More informationTraffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment. City of Rome Oneida County, New York. March 2, 2018
March 2, 2018 Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment City of Rome Oneida County, New York Prepared for: City of Rome 198 N. Washington Street Rome, NY 13440 Prepared by: C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES 50
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for the GLEN ELLEN COUNTRY CLUB SENIOR RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT 84 Millis, Massachusetts Prepared by: McMahon Associates, Inc. Prepared for: Toll Brothers, Inc. August 216 DRAFT
More informationGateway Transportation Study
Gateway Transportation Study Amherst, Massachusetts SUBMITTED TO University of Massachusetts Amherst Town of Amherst SUBMITTED BY Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Watertown, Massachusetts March 213 Back of
More informationTraffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017
Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI
More informationINDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting
More informationHenderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development
Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic
More informationINTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS
INTRODUCTION The thoroughfare plan will assist public officials in the development of a specialized system for efficient and safe movement of vehicular traffic while minimizing potential conflicts with
More informationMagnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6
More informationA plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown
A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown February 2011 A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
More informationOwnership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park
Traffic Impact Analysis Ownership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park Silver Spring, MD Lot 17: Site Plan No. 821413 Lot 18: Site Plan No. 821414 Filing Number: 13-TS-1198527A Prepared
More informationShockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis
Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis Richmond, Virginia August 14, 2013 Prepared For City of Richmond Department of Public Works Prepared By 1001 Boulders Pkwy Suite 300, Richmond, VA
More informationD.13 Transportation and Traffic
This section addresses transportation and traffic issues and impacts related to the Proposed Project. Section D.13.1 provides a description of the affected environment for the Proposed Project. Applicable
More informationRoute 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection
TRAFFIC FEASIBILITY STUDY Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection Orleans, Massachusetts Prepared for: Town of Orleans Prepared by: Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, LLC
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017
TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC
More informationHarriet Fraser Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning
Appendix 5: Traffic Assessment 71 26 February 2015 Mr James Beban Senior Resource Consents Planner Cuttriss Consultants Ltd PO Box 30429 Lower Hutt PO Box 40170 Upper Hutt 5140 P 04 526 2979 M 027 668
More informationList of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...
List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing
More informationAPPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report
New Jersey Pennsylvania Lackawanna Cut-Off Passenger Rail Service Reston Project Environmental Assessment APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report E.1 Introduction As part of the overall environmental
More informationURBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2
URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 February 27, 2014 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationMEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9
MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates
More informationAppendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station
Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,
More informationINDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Simluc Contractors Limited 2550 Blackwell Street, Ottawa K1B 5R1 October 18, 2013 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J.
More information4.11 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Existing Conditions
4.11 TRFFI N IRULTION 4.11 TRFFI N IRULTION This section describes the existing traffic/circulation setting of the project site, identifies associated regulatory requirements, evaluates potential impacts,
More informationDecember 4, Merrimac Zoning Board of Appeals 2-8 School Street Merrimac, MA Attn: Kathy Marshall. Dear Board Members:
December 4, 28 Merrimac Zoning Board of Appeals 2-8 School Street Merrimac, MA 86 Attn: Kathy Marshall RE: RAMSHEAD MERRIMAC, MA Dear Board Members: Bayside Engineering, Inc. has received the MDM Transportation
More informationChapter 4 Traffic Analysis
Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection
More informationEvaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation
Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad
More information4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study
More informationWhite Chapel Village Traffic Impact Analysis
White Chapel Village Traffic Impact nalysis Southlake, Texas 2435 N. Central Expressway Suite 750 Richardson, Texas 75080 214.468.8200 www.stantec.com Prepared for: RREF Real Estate & Note cquisitions
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Prepared by Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc. December 14, 2009 Updated November 9, 2010 230 South Broad Street Philadelphia
More informationMichael A. Werthmann, PE, PTOE Principal
9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Brian Lorenc GHB-630, LLC Michael A. Werthmann, E, TOE rincipal Luay R. Aboona, E rincipal
More informationOTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:
OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012
More informationChapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 6: Traffic and Parking A. ITRODUCTIO This chapter examines the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Fresh Kills Park roads. The analysis of transit and pedestrians is presented
More informationRoute 7 Corridor Study
Route 7 Corridor Study Executive Summary Study Area The following report analyzes a segment of the Virginia State Route 7 corridor. The corridor study area, spanning over 5 miles in length, is a multi
More informationTraffic Impact Statement
Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee
Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1 November 19, 2014 Presentation Team Matt Fulda, Greater Bridgeport Regional Council Chris Granatini, P.E., Tighe & Bond Craig Yannes, P.E., PE PTOE, Tighe & Bond
More informationMarina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)
Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12) traffic study prepared for: Cymbal Development OCtober 2012 Traf Tech October 1, 2012 Mr. Asi Cymbal - President Cymbal Development 3470 North Miami Avenue Upper Suite Miami,
More information4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES
SECTION 4 4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES 4.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS The City has established Traffic Impact Study (TIS) requirements for the purpose of ensuring that both the quantitative and qualitative
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning
F i s c h b a c h Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning Traffic Impact Study Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN Prepared March 2016 Ms. Gillian L. Fischbach, P.E.,
More informationAPPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA
APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax: 212 213-3191 www.akrf.com Draft Memorandum To: Michael
More informationSECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING
SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING 1.1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1.1.1 Roadway Functional Classification The Multnomah County Comprehensive Framework Plan s Policy 34: Trafficways and the Functional Classification
More informationCongestion Management Report
Congestion Management Report NH 101A (Amherst St and Canal/Bridge St), NASHUA Segment Length: 2.7 miles Daily Traffic Volumes: 9,000-40,000 Analysis Period: August 2015 Number of Traffic Signals: 9 Number
More informationNEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:
NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Solidex Holdings Limited & Investissement Maurice Lemieux Investments Attn: Mr. Anthony
More informationFRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: City of Thornton And Colorado Department of Transportation Prepared by: 11 Blake Street, Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 822 Contact: Brian Bern, PE, PTOE
More informationPrepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas. Project Number: /07/2017. Trinity Landing. New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas Project Number: 16273 4/7/217 Trinity Landing New Hanover County, NC Trinity Landing Transportation Impact nalysis Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas New
More informationMEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner
MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering
More informationTraffic Study North Shore School District 112
Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Proposed Expansion of Northwood Junior High School Prepared By: May 1, 2015 1. Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) has been retained
More informationWalmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn
More informationDraft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan
Summary of North Industrial and Hudson Bay Industrial Recommended Improvements Table 1. Summary of s Item Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Millar Ave north of 51st St Super 8 Motel back lane 400 Block
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA
Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat
More informationWaterford Lakes Small Area Study
Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS
More informationHidden Oaks Elementary School
Hidden Oaks Elementary School SCHOOL ROUTE PLAN For HIDDEN OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATION 13 ORANGE COUNTY Prepared for: ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Traffic Engineering
More informationSpeed Control & Limits
Speed Control & Limits Exceeding the speed limit is a common contributing factor of fatal and other types of accidents. *25 mph* School zones, business or residential districts *55 mph* Certain state highways
More information3.9 - Transportation and Traffic
Transportation and Traffic 3.9 - Transportation and Traffic This section describes the potential transportation and traffic effects of project implementation on the project site and its surrounding area.
More informationTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)
Attachment 2 DATE: August 6, 2012 TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council James C. Hardy, City Manager Ramon Towne, Director of Public Works Leah Edwards, Assistant Engineer TRAFFIC
More information6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas April 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #063238300 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic
More informationAPPENDIX D. Traffic Impact Study Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP
APPENDIX D Traffic Impact Study Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP Traffic Impact Study Catskill Access Evaluation NYS Thruway Exit 21 Town of Catskill, New York CM Project No. 114-232 Prepared For: Greene
More informationTransportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations
Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations Route 4 Corridor Study: Route 10 Corridor Study: Route 44 Corridor Study: Route 175 Corridor Study: Route 5/15 Corridor Study: Rentschler Field
More informationFlatbush Avenue
7.2.1.7 Flatbush venue Flatbush venue is one of the major traffic arteries in the study area and its efficient operation is an important ingredient in owntown rooklyn s management plan. While it currently
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More informationDate: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment
To: Peter Cavanaugh General Electric From: David Bohn, PE Ryan White, PE Date: April 4, 217 Project #: 13421. Re: / Traffic/Intersection Assessment Consistent with the Cooperation Agreement between the
More informationAbrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677
Transportation Impact Analysis Sierra College Boulevard Commercial Project City of Rocklin Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 Prepared by: 1875 Olympic Boulevard,
More informationHILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October
More informationHOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Momentum Planning & Communications 1165 Greenlawn Crescent Ottawa, ON K1L 6C2 June 29, 2015 115-618 Brief_1.doc
More informationPublic Involvement Meeting Tuesday, June 13, Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study
Public Involvement Meeting Tuesday, June 13, 2017 Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Agenda / Meeting Outline 1. Introduce the project 2. Complete Streets 3. Share/confirm our findings 4. Your Opinion 5.
More informationVIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2012 READ, VOORHEES & ASSOCIATES TORONTO, ONTARIO Read, Voorhees & Associates
More information