STRATEGY 4 INC Mainway, City of Burlington. [ Month Year ] Project No.: TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING STUDY APRIL 2018

Transcription

1 STRATEGY 4 INC. TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING STUDY 3257 Mainway, City of Burlington Project No.: APRIL 28 [ Month Year ]

2 April 7, 28 Reference No Mr. Jeff Kenny Strategy 4 Inc. 262 Bristol Circle, Suite Oakville, ON L6H 6Z7 Attention: Mr. Kenny Traffic Impact and Parking Study 3257 Mainway City of Burlington Cole Engineering Group Ltd. ( COLE ) is pleased to submit the revised Traffic Impact and Parking Study (TIPS) for the above noted subject property, in support of a new U-Haul facility with three full moves accesses on Mainway. The site located at 3257 Mainway on the north side of Mainway directly across from Pioneer Road in the City of Burlington (the City ). This study concludes that during the peak periods, all key intersections and site accesses can operate at satisfactory levels of service and below capacity with no road improvements required. In addition, the proposed parking supply is sufficient to serve the site. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Best Regards, COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD. Mustafa Ersin Sarier, E.I.T., M. Eng. Traffic Analyst Traffic Urban Development (ICI) Rao Marthi, C.E.T. Project Manager Traffic Urban Development (ICI) MS/RM

3 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study PREPARED BY: COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD. Mustafa Ersin Sarier, E.I.T., M. Eng. Traffic Analyst Traffic Urban Development (ICI) CHECKED BY: COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD. Rao Marthi, C.E.T., MITE Project Manager Traffic Urban Development (ICI) Issues and Revisions Registry Identification Date Description of issued and/or revision Draft Report April 28 For Client review Final Report April 28 For submission April 28 i

4 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Statement of Conditions This Report / Study (the Work ) has been prepared at the request of, and for the exclusive use of, the Owner / Client, City of Burlington and its affiliates (the Intended User ). No one other than the Intended User has the right to use and rely on the Work without first obtaining the written authorization of Cole Engineering Group Ltd. and its Owner. Cole Engineering Group Ltd. expressly excludes liability to any party except the Intended User for any use of, and/or reliance upon, the work. Neither possession of the Work, nor a copy of it, carries the right of publication. All copyright in the Work is reserved to Cole Engineering Group Ltd. The Work shall not be disclosed, produced or reproduced, quoted from, or referred to, in whole or in part, or published in any manner, without the express written consent of Cole Engineering Group Ltd., City of Burlington, or the Owner April 28 ii

5 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Study Approach... 3 Existing Traffic Conditions Existing Road Network Existing Traffic Analysis Future Background Traffic Background Traffic Growth Background Developments Future (223) Background Traffic Analysis Site Traffic Trip Generation Site Traffic Volumes Future Total Traffic Future (223) Total Traffic Analysis Parking City of Burlington By-law Parking Requirements ITE Parking Generation Parking Rationalization Office Parking Review Proxy Parking Survey Oakville Proxy Parking Utilization Survey Burlington Proxy Parking Utilization Survey Parking Comparison... 8 Conclusions and Recommendations April 28 iii

6 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study LIST OF TABLES Table 3. Level of Service Existing Traffic Assessment... 3 Table 4. Level of Service-Future (223) Background Traffic Assessment... 4 Table 5. Trip Generation Subject Site... 5 Table 5.2 Trip Distribution... 5 Table 6. Level of Service Future (223) Total Traffic Assessment... 6 Table 7. Parking Requirement as per City of Burlington Zoning By-law Table 7.2 ITE Parking Generation 4 th Edition Future Parking Demand... 7 Table 7.3 Total Observed Parking Survey Results (Oakville)... 8 Table 7.4 Warehouse Parking Survey Estimation (Oakville)... 9 Table 7.5 Total Observed Parking Survey Results (Burlington)... Table 7.6 Warehouse Parking Survey Estimation (Burlington)... Table 7.7 Parking Comparison Table... LIST OF FIGURES Figure - Site Location... Following Report Figure -2 Site Plan... Following Report Figure 3- Existing Lane Configuration... Following Report Figure 3-2 Existing Traffic Volumes... Following Report Figure 4- Future (223) Background Traffic Volumes... Following Report Figure 5- Site Traffic Volumes... Following Report Figure 6- Future (223) Total Traffic Volumes... Following Report APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Existing Traffic Data Existing Traffic Level of Service Calculations Future (223) Background Traffic Level of Service Calculations Future (223) Total Traffic Level of Service Calculations Parking Demand Surveys April 28 iv

7 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Introduction Cole Engineering Group Ltd. (COLE) was retained by Strategy 4 Inc. to undertake a Traffic Impact and Parking Study (TIPS) in support of a new U-Haul facility (the subject site ). The subject lands are located on the north side of Mainway across from Pioneer Road, municipally known as 3257 Mainway, in the City of Burlington (the City ). The site location is illustrated in Figure -. The property is currently occupied by a vacant industrial development. The current proposal is to convert the existing 24,32ft 2 building plus 3,74ft 2 addition into a U-Haul rental facility that will include an automotive repair shop, dispatch and receiving area ( DnR ), showroom, office; and a self-storage warehouse. The site will use the three existing full moves accesses onto Mainway Road. The Site Plan is illustrated in Figure -2. The purpose of this TIS includes: Assessment of the existing traffic volumes and background growth within the study area; Estimation of the future background traffic volumes based on a 5-year traffic horizon (223); Forecasting of traffic associated with the proposed development; Documentation of the traffic impacts associated with the subject lands; Identification of any traffic operational concerns; Identification of any mitigation measures for the adjacent road network (if necessary); and, Comment on the adequacy of the parking spaces supplied for the proposed development and review of on-site circulation. 2 Study Approach Weekday morning and afternoon peak period traffic counts were obtained from the City for the following study area intersections: Mainway Road / Dillon Road (Signalized); Mainway Road / Pioneer Road (Unsignalized); and, Mainway Road / Northside Road (Signalized). The traffic data and signal timing plans are provided in Appendix A. An annual growth factor of % a year has been applied to forecast the existing (28) traffic conditions with the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods analyzed as a result of the traffic peaks on Mainway, as discussed with City staff. In order to forecast the future background (223) traffic conditions, an annual background growth rate of % was used. No background developments in this area were identified by City staff for inclusion in this study. Site traffic was derived using information contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). To be conservative, a non-auto modal split was not applied to trip generation and trips were distributed based on the existing traffic patterns April 28

8 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Future total traffic conditions are determined by the summation of the estimated traffic volumes generated by the site and the background traffic volumes for the 223 horizon. The study area intersections were analyzed using Synchro 9. software which utilizes the U.S. Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2 methodology. 3 Existing Traffic Conditions The existing lane configuration for the study area road network is illustrated in Figure Existing Road Network The road network within the study area is outlined below: Mainway Road is an east-west arterial road consisting of a four (4) lane cross section under the jurisdiction of the City. Mainway Road maintains a speed limit of 6 km/h from Guelph Line to Burloak Drive. The road has urban cross section and sidewalks on the both side of the road in the vicinity of the subject site; Pioneer Road is a local municipal road consisting of two (2) lane cross section under the jurisdiction of the City and maintains 5 km/h in the vicinity of the subject site. The road has urban cross section with no sidewalks. It is under un-signalized control at Mainway intersection; Northside Road is a collector road consisting of two (2) lane cross section under the jurisdiction of the City and maintains 4 km/h in the vicinity of the subject site. The road has urban cross section with a sidewalk on the west side. It is under signalized control at Mainway intersection; and, Dillon Road is a collector road consisting of two (2) lane cross section under the jurisdiction of the City and maintains 5 km/h in the vicinity of the subject site. The road has urban cross section with sidewalks on the both side of the road. It is under signalized control at Mainway intersection. 3.2 Existing Traffic Analysis The existing traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 3-2 and were analyzed using Synchro 9. software. Existing signal timings were incorporated in the analysis. The results of the existing intersection operations are summarized in Table 3., with the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for overall and individual movements. Volume / Capacity (v/c) ratios for overall intersection operations, through movements, or shared through / turning movements equal to.85 or above; and v/c ratios for exclusive movements equal to.95 or above have been shown in bold. For unsignalized intersections, level of service (LOS), based on average delay per vehicle, on individual movements exceeding LOS D have also been shown in bold. The detailed calculations are shown in Appendix B April 28 2

9 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Table 3. Level of Service Existing Traffic Assessment Intersection Key Movement AM Peak LOS (v/c) PM Peak LOS (v/c) Mainway Road / Dillon Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Northside Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Pioneer Road (Un-Signalized) Overall EB through-left WB through-right SB left SB right Overall EB through-left WB through-right SB left SB right EB through EB right WB left WB through NB left B (.62) C (.79) B (.39) B (.43) B (.5) B (.4) B (.49) A (.25) C (.2) C (.6) A (.34) A (.2) A (.9) A (.8) D (.3) B (.47) B (.53) B (.78) B (.3) B (.) B (.37) A (.4) A (.47) C (.) C (.6) A (.22) A (.3) A (.2) A (.37) D (.42) The analysis shows that in the existing condition, the study area intersections all operate at good levels of service (LOS) and below capacity. 4 Future Background Traffic 4. Background Traffic Growth Estimates of growth in background traffic volumes from existing conditions to future horizon year (223) conditions were developed by applying a rate of growth of % per year, as provided by City staff. 4.2 Background Developments Based on correspondence with City staff, there are no proposed developments in the vicinity of the subject site that need to be taken into account in this study. 4.3 Future (223) Background Traffic Analysis Future (223) background traffic volumes are provided in Figure 4-, following the report. The results of the future (223) background traffic operations are summarized in Table 4., with the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for overall and individual movements. Volume / Capacity (v/c) ratios for overall intersection operations, through movements, or shared through / turning movements equal to.85 or above; and v/c ratios for exclusive movements equal to.95 or above have been shown in bold. For unsignalized intersections, level of service (LOS), based on average delay per vehicle, on individual movements exceeding LOS D have also been shown in bold. The detailed calculations are shown in Appendix C April 28 3

10 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Table 4. Level of Service-Future (223) Background Traffic Assessment Intersection Key Movement AM Peak LOS (v/c) PM Peak LOS (v/c) Mainway Road / Dillon Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Northside Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Pioneer Road (Un-Signalized) Overall EB through-left WB through-right SB left SB right Overall EB through-left WB through-right SB left SB right EB through EB right WB left WB through NB left B (.64) C (.79) B (.39) B (.44) B (.5) B (.43) B (.5) A (.26) C (.2) C (.6) A (.36) A (.22) A (.) A (.9) D (.3) B (.48) B (.54) B (.79) B (.3) B (.) B (.39) A (.43) B (.49) C (.) C (.6) A (.23) A (.4) A (.2) A (.39) D (.45) The results of the future background (223) traffic analysis indicate that all intersections will function with acceptable LOS and below capacity in both the Weekday AM and PM peak periods. 5 Site Traffic 5. Trip Generation Trip generation is estimated using information contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The total site is to have a gross floor area (GFA) of 4,493.4 m 2 (56,6 ft 2 ) which includes 68.7 m 2 of Dispatch and Receiving space (DnR), m 2 of office and showroom space,,6.48 m 2 of storage space, and 29 m 2 of automotive repair shop space. Since the automotive repair shop will be used for repairing the existing U-Haul vehicles, it will not be generating any additional trips to / from the site. Therefore, the GFA of the automotive repair shop does not need to be considered for the trip generation and site traffic analysis. The office component is assessed using land use 7 (General Office) and the self-storage warehouse with associated motor vehicle modifications is assessed using land use 5 (Mini-Warehouse). According to the Trip Generation Manual, 5% of the trips generated by the mini-warehouse are to be truck traffic. The weekday trip generation is summarized in Table April 28 4

11 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Land Use Office (8,62 ft 2 ) Self-Storage Warehouse (24,877 ft 2 ) Table 5. Parameter Trip Generation Subject Site AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Gross Trips Gross Trips Rate (trips/ ft 2 ) Gross Trips Gross Trips Rate (trips/ ft 2 ) Total The proposed development is expected to generate a total of 48 two (2)-way trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 49 two (2)-way trips during the weekday PM peak hour. 5.2 Site Traffic Volumes The trip distribution for the proposed development is based on existing traffic patterns and is summarized in Table 5.2 below. Direction North Via Table 5.2 Trip Distribution AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Dillon Road 5% 5% 5% % Northside Road % 5% 5% 5% South Pioneer Road 5% 5% 5% 5% East Mainway Road 3% 6% 55% 3% West Mainway Road 4% 25% 3% 5% Total % % % % The assigned site traffic volumes are shown in Figure Future Total Traffic The future total traffic operations for the study area intersections were assessed using Synchro 9. software. 6. Future (223) Total Traffic Analysis The future (223) total traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 6-. The results of the future (223) total traffic intersection operations are summarized in Table 6., with the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for overall and individual movements. Volume / Capacity (v/c) ratios for overall intersection operations, through movements, or shared through / turning movements equal to.85 or above; and v/c ratios for exclusive movements equal to.95 or above have been shown in bold. For unsignalized intersections, level of service (LOS), based on average delay per vehicle, on individual movements exceeding LOS D have also been shown in bold. The detailed calculations are shown in Appendix D April 28 5

12 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Table 6. Level of Service Future (223) Total Traffic Assessment Intersection Key Movement AM Peak LOS (v/c) PM Peak LOS (v/c) Mainway Road / Dillon Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Northside Road (Signalized) Mainway Road / Pioneer Road (Un-Signalized) Mainway Road / Middle Site Access (Un-Signalized) Mainway Road / Easterly Site Access (Un-Signalized) Mainway Road / Westerly Site Access (Un-Signalized) Overall EB left- through WB through-right SB left SB right Overall EB through-left WB through-right SB left SB right EB through EB-right WB-left WB through NB left-right EB-left EB through WB through WB- right SB left-right EB-left EB through WB through WB- right SB left-right EB left EB through WB through WB-right SB left-right B (.64) C (.79) B (.4) C (.45) B (.5) B (.43) B (.52) A (.26) C (.2) C (.6) - (.36) - (.22) A (.) - (.2) D (.32) A (.) - (.38) - (.22) - (.) C (.) A (.) - (.38) - (.23) - (.) C (.) A (.) - (.4) - (.22) - (.2) C (.6) B (.49) B (.57) B (.79) B (.3) B (.) B (.42) B (.5) B (.53) C (.2) C (.6) - (.24) - (.4) A (.2) - (.39) D (.46) A (.) - (.26) - (.4) - (.2) C (.2) A (.) - (.26) - (.4) - (.2) C (.2) A (.) - (.26) - (.45) - (.23) E (.8) Under future (223) total traffic conditions, the intersections at the study area operate under capacity and no other improvements are needed April 28 6

13 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study 7 Parking 7. City of Burlington By-law Parking Requirements Based on the City Zoning By-law 22, this site would require 3.5 parking spaces per m 2 GFA for the office and one () parking space per m 2 GFA for the self-storage warehouse and shop area. Table 7. summarizes the required parking spaces as per the City s By-law. Table 7. Parking Requirement as per City of Burlington Zoning By-law 22 Use Total GFA Parking Rate Parking Requirement Office: Other 8.92 m Spaces / m 2 28 Spaces Industrial Uses,6.48 m 2 Space / m 2 6 Spaces Total 44 Spaces The City of Burlington By-law parking requirements states 44 parking spaces are required. Since the shop area will not be generating trips to and from the site, as stated in Section 5.; this area does not require additional site parking. 7.2 ITE Parking Generation Future parking demand was also analyzed using ITE s Parking Generation Manual, 4 th Edition. The results are summarized in Table 7.2. Table 7.2 Land Use (LUC) ITE Parking Generation 4 th Edition Future Parking Demand Maximum 85 th Percentile Parking Demand / ft 2 ft 2 GFA Total Office Building Urban (LUC7) 2.98 vehicles per ft 2 GFA Mini-Warehouse (LUC5).7 vehicles per ft 2 GFA Total Future Parking Demand 47 As observed from the ITE s Parking Generation 4 th Edition, the site is anticipated to require a parking demand of 47 parking spaces in total. 7.3 Parking Rationalization 7.3. Office Parking Review In review of the City s By-law, parking for the ancillary office use will be supplied at the rate of 3.5 spaces / m 2. Therefore, with a GFA of m 2 for office space, 22 parking spaces are required for office use. This has been found to better reflect the intended use of the site s office space for warehouse, truck rental, and ancillary retail April 28 7

14 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Proxy Parking Survey To determine the parking requirements for the self-storage warehouse use, parking demand studies were conducted at two (2) U-Haul proxy site locations: U-Haul Moving and Storage of Oakville (478 Woody Road, Oakville); and, U-Haul Moving and Storage of Burlington (3476 Mainway, Burlington). The parking demand surveys were performed by Accu-Traffic on Saturday, September, 26 from 8: AM to 4: PM and can be found in Appendix E. As it is expected that these sites would also be subject to the office parking By-law rate of 3.5 spaces / m 2, the office GFA s were used to calculate the amount of parking spaces required for office use at these sites. The parking required for office use was discounted from the observed parking surveys in order to determine the warehouse parking demand. The majority of business and parking for the proxy sites was found to be generated from truck rental service, therefore transaction data provided by the U-Haul sites were utilized to discount half of the customers who would choose to leave their vehicles on site. In order to better understand the parking requirement of the warehouse use, U-Haul rental data was acquired and taken into account with the surveys. It is important to understand that there are no parking spaces on these proxy sites which are dedicated to a single use. As such, different discounting factors were applied to the proxy data to better approximate exclusive warehouse use. These include the vehicles of employees to the office as well as those that leave their vehicles on site while renting a truck for the day. Based on the rental data received, approximately 8% of rentals are same day rentals for Burlington and 64% of rentals are same day rentals for Oakville Oakville Proxy Parking Utilization Survey The U-Haul site located at 478 Woody Road in the City of Oakville was observed for parking utilization on Saturday, September, 26. The warehouse consists of an approximate GFA of 55 m 2 and an office GFA of 98 m 2. There are eight (8) parking spaces provided in the main parking area and 5 parking spaces in the rear for a total of 58 spaces. Note that the parking usage can be used interchangeably. The total observed results are provided in Table 7.3. Table 7.3 Total Observed Parking Survey Results (Oakville) Time Observed Parked Vehicles Parking Utilization Rate 8: 8:3 9 6% 8:3 9: 2 8% 9: 9:3 4 9% 9:3 : 7% : :3 3 8% :3 : 3 8% : :3 5 9% :3 2: 4 9% April 28 8

15 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Time Observed Parked Vehicles Parking Utilization Rate 2: 2:3 8 % 2:3 : 5 9% : :3 4 9% :3 2: 6 % 2: 2:3 7 % 2:3 3: 6 % 3: 3:3 6 % 3:3 4: 5 9% As shown in Table 7.3, a maximum parking utilization rate of % was found during the peak period of 2: - 2:3 PM. Based on the observed parked vehicles, assumed office parking, and rental data provided, an estimated warehouse parking rate was found and summarized in Table 7.4. Time Table 7.4 Observed Vehicles Warehouse Parking Survey Estimation (Oakville) Parking Utilization Office Parking Rental Out Rental Data Rental Returned Rental Parking Warehouse Parking 8: 8:3 9 6% 3 5 8:3 9: 2 8% : 9:3 4 9% :3 : 7% : :3 3 8% :3 : 3 8% 3 9 : :3 5 9% :3 2: 4 9% : 2:3 8 % :3 : 5 9% : :3 4 9% 3 :3 2: 6 % 3 3 2: 2:3 7 % :3 3: 6 % : 3:3 6 % :3 4: 5 9% As a result, a maximum of six (6) vehicles are estimated to have been parked for warehouse usage. This would result in a peak warehouse parking demand rate of one () space / 97 m 2 GFA April 28 9

16 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Burlington Proxy Parking Utilization Survey The U-Haul site located at 3476 Mainway, Burlington was observed for parking utilization on Saturday, September, 26. The warehouse consists of an approximate GFA of m 2 and an office GFA of 9.9 m 2. There are four (4) parking spaces provided in the main parking area and 45 parking spaces in the rear for a total of 49 spaces. Note that the parking usage can be used interchangeably. The total observed results are provided in Table 7.5. Table 7.5 Total Observed Parking Survey Results (Burlington) Time Observed Vehicles Parking Utilization 8: 8:3 2 43% 8:3 9: 9 39% 9: 9:3 9 39% 9:3 : 2 43% : :3 2 43% :3 : 2 4% : :3 2 4% :3 2: 22 45% 2: 2: % 2:3 : 23 47% : : % :3 2: 2 43% 2: 2: % 2:3 3: 24 49% 3: 3: % 3:3 4: 22 45% Shown in Table 7.5, a maximum parking utilization rate of 53% was found during the peak period of : - :3 PM. Based on the observed parked vehicles, assumed office parking, and rental data provided, an estimated warehouse parking rate was found and summarized in Table 7.6. Time Table 7.6 Observed Vehicles Warehouse Parking Survey Estimation (Burlington) Parking Utilization Office Parking Rental Out Rental Data Rental Returned Rental Parking Warehouse Parking 8: 8:3 2 43% :3 9: 9 39% : 9:3 9 39% 3 5 9:3 : 2 43% : :3 2 43% April 28

17 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Time Observed Vehicles Parking Utilization Office Parking Rental Out Rental Data Rental Returned Rental Parking Warehouse Parking :3 : 2 4% 3 7 : :3 2 4% :3 2: 22 45% : 2: % :3 : 23 47% : : % :3 2: 2 43% 3 8 2: 2: % :3 3: 24 49% : 3: % :3 4: 22 45% Based on the proxy survey results, the Burlington U-Haul site experienced a peak parking demand for the warehouse use at : PM of 6 vehicles, or a peak demand rate of approximately one () space / 3 m 2 of GFA. 7.4 Parking Comparison In summary, the proxy sites located at 478 Woody Road and 3476 Mainway were used to determine a parking rate for the proposed site. The proposed parking rate is 3.5 spaces per m 2 for office GFA, as per the City s Zoning By-law, and one () space per 3 m 2 for self-storage warehouse GFA based on the proxy site data. A comparison of all related parking rates in addition to the proposed parking supply rates are summarized in Table 7.7. Table 7.7 Parking Comparison Table Parking Rates Use Total GFA Parking Rate Parking Requirement City Zoning By-law Parking Rate ITE Parking Rate Maximum Proxy Site Parking Rate Office 8.92 m Spaces / m 2 28 Spaces Warehouse,6.48 m 2 Space / m 2 6 Spaces Total 2,42.48 m 2-44 Spaces Office 8.92 m 2 Space / 32 m 2 26 Spaces Warehouse,6.48 m 2 Space / 547 m 2 2 Spaces Total 2,42.48 m 2-47 Spaces Office 8.92 m Spaces / m 2 28 Spaces Warehouse,6.48 m 2 Space / 3 m 2 39 Spaces Total 2,42.48 m 2-67 Spaces April 28

18 Strategy 4 Inc. 357 Mainway Traffic Impact and Parking Study Parking Rates Use Total GFA Parking Rate Parking Requirement Proposed Parking Rate Office 8.92 m Spaces / m 2 28 Spaces Warehouse,6.48 m 2 Space / 3 m 2 39 Spaces Total 2,42.48 m 2-67 Spaces Based on the above parking comparison the 75 proposed parking spaces exceed the proposed parking by 8 parking spaces when compared to the ITE s Parking Generation, 4 th Edition. 8 Conclusions and Recommendations The assumptions, findings and conclusions of our analysis are presented as follows: Under existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections along Mainway currently operate with acceptable LOS and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios; Based on the future (223) background traffic analysis all intersections within the study area generally operate with acceptable LOS and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios; The subject site is expected to generate 48 new vehicular two-way trips during the weekday morning peak hour (28 trips inbound and 2 trips outbound), and 49 new vehicular two (2)-way trips during the weekday afternoon peak hour (2 trips inbound and 28 trips outbound); The future (223) total traffic is expected to exhibit similar results as the future (223) background traffic; The three existing accesses are expected to operate with acceptable LOS and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios; and, The proposed parking supply of 75 parking spaces is supported by the ITE s Parking Generation 4 th Edition and two (2) proxy parking utilization surveys and is therefore sufficient to service the site April 28 2

19 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study SITE LOCATION Figure - - Site Location Ref.# (April 28)

20 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Figure -2 - Proposed Site Plan Ref.# (April 28)

21 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Northside Road Westerly Access Middle Access Easterly Access Dillon Road Mainway Road Mainway Road Pioneer Road Legend Existing Traffic Control Signal Existing Stop Control Existing Lane Configuration Figure 3- - Existing Lane Configurations Ref.# (April 28)

22 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Northside Road Westerly Access Middle Access Easterly Access Dillon Road Mainway Road Mainway Road (69) 39 (59) 792 () (549) 864 (58) 83 (3) 6 () (566) 84 () (566) 84 (29) 5 (537) 79 Pioneer Road Legend xx AM Peak Hour Volume (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume Figure Existing (28) Traffic Volumes Ref.# (April 28)

23 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Northside Road Westerly Access Middle Access Easterly Access Dillon Road Mainway Road Mainway Road (69) 39 (535) 832 () (577) 98 (544) 844 (3) 6 () (595) 884 () (595) 884 (29) 5 (564) 83 Pioneer Road Legend xx AM Peak Hour Volume (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume Figure 4- Future (223) Background Traffic Volumes Ref.# (April 28)

24 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Northside Road Westerly Access Middle Access Easterly Access Dillon Road Mainway Road Mainway Road () (7) 4 (6) 8 (4) 3 (7) 2 (2) (2) 2 (5) (2) (5) (2) (5) Pioneer Road Legend xx AM Peak Hour Volume (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume Figure 5- Site Traffic Volumes Ref.# (April 28)

25 Strategy 4 Inc. City of Burlington 3257 Mainway - A New U-Haul Facility Traffic Impact and Parking Study Northside Road Westerly Access Middle Access Easterly Access Dillon Road Mainway Road Mainway Road (69) 39 (542) 846 (6) 8 (58) 9 (56) 856 (33) 62 (2) 2 (6) 894 (2) (6) 894 (3) 52 (579) 84 Pioneer Road Legend xx AM Peak Hour Volume (xx) PM Peak Hour Volume Figure 6- Future (223) Total Traffic Volumes Ref.# (April 28)

26 APPENDIX A Existing Traffic Data

27 Dillon Rd Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:3: To: 8:3: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2634 Mainway & Dillon Rd 29-Mar-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Adriana ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 379 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 228 North Entering: 29 Trucks Trucks 9 East Entering: 46 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Dillon Rd Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: West Entering: West Leg Total: Comments

28 Dillon Rd Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: 2:: To: 3:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2634 Mainway & Dillon Rd 29-Mar-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Adriana ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 86 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 558 North Entering: 58 Trucks Trucks 2 East Entering: 25 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Dillon Rd Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks 3 3 S Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: West Entering: West Leg Total: Comments

29 Dillon Rd Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:3: To: 7:3: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2634 Mainway & Dillon Rd 29-Mar-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Adriana ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 226 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 382 North Entering: 27 Trucks Trucks 7 East Entering: 883 North Peds: East Peds: 6 99 Cyclists Trucks Dillon Rd Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: West Entering: West Leg Total: Comments

30 Total Count Diagram Dillon Rd Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2634 Mainway & Dillon Rd 29-Mar-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Adriana ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 428 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 6799 North Entering: 699 Trucks Trucks 56 East Entering: 3428 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Dillon Rd Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: West Entering: West Leg Total: Comments

31 Dillon Rd Annual Average Daily Traffic Diagram Total Factor = Monthly Factor(.4) x Daily Factor(.93) x 24 Hour Factor(.85) = Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2634 Mainway & Dillon Rd 29-Mar-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Adriana ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 2555 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 266 North Entering: 25 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 634 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Dillon Rd Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: West Entering: West Leg Total: Comments

32 Pioneer Rd Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:3: To: 8:3: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2255 Mainway & Pioneer Rd 3 3-Nov-25 Weather conditions: Sunny/Dry Person(s) who counted: Dominik ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists Pioneer Rd West Peds: 4 Trucks 22 Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 848 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 67 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 65 Comments

33 Pioneer Rd Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: 2:5: To: 3:5: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2255 Mainway & Pioneer Rd 3 3-Nov-25 Weather conditions: Sunny/Dry Person(s) who counted: Dominik ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists Pioneer Rd West Peds: Trucks 3 Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 44 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 68 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 66 Comments

34 Pioneer Rd Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:45: To: 7:45: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2255 Mainway & Pioneer Rd 3 3-Nov-25 Weather conditions: Sunny/Dry Person(s) who counted: Dominik ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists Pioneer Rd West Peds: Trucks 2 Trucks South Peds: 2 West Entering: 539 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 9 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 57 Comments

35 Total Count Diagram Pioneer Rd Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2255 Mainway & Pioneer Rd 3 3-Nov-25 Weather conditions: Sunny/Dry Person(s) who counted: Dominik ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists Pioneer Rd West Peds: 7 Trucks 69 Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 3934 Cyclists Cyclists 2 2 South Entering: 586 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 48 Comments

36 Pioneer Rd Annual Average Daily Traffic Diagram Total Factor = Monthly Factor(.99) x Daily Factor(.93) x 24 Hour Factor(.85) = Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington 2255 Mainway & Pioneer Rd 3 3-Nov-25 Weather conditions: Sunny/Dry Person(s) who counted: Dominik ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Trucks Cyclists N Mainway W E Cyclists Trucks S Mainway Trucks Cyclists Pioneer Rd West Peds: 29 Trucks 288 Trucks South Peds: 7 West Entering: 67 Cyclists Cyclists 3 3 South Entering: 998 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 955 Comments

37 Northside Rd Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 8:: To: 9:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington Mainway & Northside Rd 3 8-May-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Rick W ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 96 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 929 North Entering: 4 Trucks 6 4 Trucks 4 East Entering: 236 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Mainway Cyclists Trucks Northside Rd N W E S Driveway Trucks Cyclists Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 675 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 978 South Leg Total: Comments

38 Northside Rd Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: 2:: To: 3:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington Mainway & Northside Rd 3 8-May-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Rick W ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 94 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 953 North Entering: 2 Trucks 2 2 Trucks East Entering: 486 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Mainway Cyclists Trucks Northside Rd N W E S Driveway Trucks Cyclists Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: 2 Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 495 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 8 South Leg Total: Comments

39 Northside Rd Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:5: To: 7:5: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington Mainway & Northside Rd 3 8-May-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Rick W ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 245 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 268 North Entering: 3 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 82 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Mainway Cyclists Trucks Northside Rd N W E S Driveway Trucks Cyclists Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: 3 Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 5 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 37 South Leg Total: Comments

40 Total Count Diagram Northside Rd Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington Mainway & Northside Rd 3 8-May-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Rick W ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 46 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 77 North Entering: 77 Trucks Trucks 33 East Entering: 3529 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Mainway Cyclists Trucks Northside Rd N W E S Driveway Trucks Cyclists Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: 42 Trucks Trucks South Peds: 9 West Entering: 3657 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 2 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 5 Comments

41 Northside Rd Annual Average Daily Traffic Diagram Total Factor = Monthly Factor(.93) x Daily Factor(.94) x 24 Hour Factor(.85) =.6727 Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Burlington Mainway & Northside Rd 3 8-May-26 Weather conditions: Clear/Dry Person(s) who counted: Rick W ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Mainway runs W/E North Leg Total: 229 Cyclists Cyclists 2 East Leg Total: 436 North Entering: 247 Trucks Trucks 53 East Entering: 577 North Peds: East Peds: Cyclists Trucks Mainway Cyclists Trucks Northside Rd N W E S Driveway Trucks Cyclists Mainway Trucks Cyclists West Peds: 68 Trucks Trucks South Peds: 5 West Entering: 594 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 3 West Leg Total: South Leg Total: 8 Comments

42 Intersection Name: Dillion Rd TS ID: Line No: Model: IP address: Controller Make: 92 8 ACS/ Econolite Type of Operation: 8 Phase Semi-Actuated * Start from Main Menu Date Description Prepared by No Y M D MA Ph Ph2 Ph3 Ph4 EB - Mainway PHASE DESCRIPTION Ph5 Ph6 WB - Mainway Ph7 Ph8 SB - Dillion Road PHASE IN USE/EXCLUSIVE PED (MM) *- - 2 Phase: Phase in Use X X X Exclusive PED CONTROLLER TIMING DATA - VEHICLE TIMING Phase: Timing Plan: Minimum Green * Walk Ped. Clearance 5 5 Pedestrian Carry Over Vehicle Extension MAX MAX Yellow Change Red Clearance Phase Minimum: Phase: Lock Detector Vehicle Recall PHASE DATA - VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN RECALLS * Pedestrian Recall X X MAX Recall X X Min Recall COORDINATION: COORDINATOR PATTERN, SPLIT PATTERN * - 3-2, - 3-3

43 Coordinator Pattern (CP) 2 3 Cycle Length Offset (sec) Timing Plan Split Pattern 2 3 Phases (sec) TIME BASE: ACTION PLAN, DAY PLAN * - 5-2, - 5-3, -5-4 Day Plan Sched. # Action Plan 2 3 Time Period 6: 9: 5:3 9: Pattern Timing Plan Schedule = Day Plan Schedule 2 = Day Plan 2 Schedule 3 = Day Plan : : Day Plan (Weekday) Day Plan 2 (Saturday) Day Plan 3 (Sunday, Holidays) Action Plan = free (254) Special Programming: TIME BASE DATA TIME OF YEAR EVENTS * Events Exception Day MON/ DOW/ WOM/ MON DOW Year Day Plan New Year's Day Fixed 3 Family Day 2 Float Good Friday 3 Float Victoria Day 4 Float Canada Day 5 Fixed 7 3 Civic Day 6 Float Labour Day 7 Float Thanksgiving 8 Float Christmas Day 9 Fixed

44 Intersection Name: Northside TS ID: Line No: Model: IP address: Controller Make: 94 5 ACS/ Econolite Type of Operation: 4 Phase Semi-Actuated * Start from Main Menu Date Description Prepared by No Y M D MA Ph Ph2 Ph3 Ph4 EB/WB - Mainway SB - Northside PHASE DESCRIPTION Ph5 Ph6 Ph7 Ph8 PHASE IN USE/EXCLUSIVE PED (MM) *- - 2 Phase: Phase in Use X X Exclusive PED CONTROLLER TIMING DATA - VEHICLE TIMING Phase: Timing Plan: Minimum Green 8 8 * Walk 25 Ped. Clearance 4 8 Pedestrian Carry Over Vehicle Extension 3 3 MAX MAX Yellow Change 4 4 Red Clearance 3 2 Phase Minimum: Phase: Lock Detector Vehicle Recall PHASE DATA - VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN RECALLS * Pedestrian Recall X X MAX Recall X X Min Recall COORDINATION: COORDINATOR PATTERN, SPLIT PATTERN * - 3-2, - 3-3

45 Coordinator Pattern (CP) 2 3 Cycle Length Offset (sec) Timing Plan Split Pattern 2 3 Phases (sec) TIME BASE: ACTION PLAN, DAY PLAN * - 5-2, - 5-3, -5-4 Day Plan Sched. # Action Plan Time Period Pattern 6: 9: 2 5:3 3 9: 254 9: 2 8: 254 9: 2 8: 254 Timing Plan Schedule = Day Plan Schedule 2 = Day Plan 2 Schedule 3 = Day Plan 3 Day Plan (Weekday) Day Plan 2 (Saturday) Day Plan 3 (Sunday, Holidays) Action Plan = free (254) Special Programming: TIME BASE DATA TIME OF YEAR EVENTS * Events Exception Day MON/ DOW/ WOM/ MON DOW Year Day Plan New Year's Day Fixed 3 Family Day 2 Float Good Friday 3 Float Victoria Day 4 Float Canada Day 5 Fixed 7 3 Civic Day 6 Float Labour Day 7 Float Thanksgiving 8 Float Christmas Day 9 Fixed

46 APPENDIX B Intersection Capacity Analysis Reports Existing (28) Traffic Conditions

47 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3257 Mainway TIPS : Mainway & Northside Road EX AM Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes.... Flpb, ped/bikes.... Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 73 Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 5% 6% % 6% 7% Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot.5 c.5 v/s Ratio Perm c.3. v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor.... Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service B A C C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM 2 Control Delay.3 HCM 2 Level of Service B HCM 2 Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 9. Sum of lost time (s) 3. Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 4/8/28 Synchro 9 Report Ex AM.syn Page

48 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3257 Mainway TIPS 2: Mainway & Site Access 3 EX AM Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) 332 px, platoon unblocked.88 vc, conflicting volume vc, stage conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB EB 2 WB WB 2 SB Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m)..... Control Delay (s)..... Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s)... Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 4/8/28 Synchro 9 Report Ex AM.syn Page 2

49 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3257 Mainway TIPS 3: Pioneer Road & Mainway EX AM Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians 4 2 Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) 394 px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc, stage conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB EB 2 WB WB 2 NB Volume Total Volume Left 65 3 Volume Right 66 4 csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 4/8/28 Synchro 9 Report Ex AM.syn Page 3

50 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3257 Mainway TIPS 4: Mainway & Site Access 2 EX AM Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (Veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc, stage conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB EB 2 WB WB 2 SB Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m)..... Control Delay (s)..... Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s)... Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 4/8/28 Synchro 9 Report Ex AM.syn Page 4